rejetto forum

When &RQ v1.0?

Guest · 210 · 206631
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Electron

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 81
    • View Profile
Reply #60 on: February 18, 2004, 09:58:20 AM
So! Now souces are open... And... What? Where are all coll developers that will at once give us all the features??? I knew at once it would  be so...

Èòàê! Âîò è âûëîæèëè âàì, ãîñïîäà, èñõîäíèêè! È ÷òî? Ãäå âû âñå? Êîòîðûå êðè÷àëè, ÷òî îíè íà ðàç âñ¸ óëó÷øàò è âñ¸ èñïðàâÿò!!!
Òîëüêî áîëòàòü è óìååòå... ß ýòîãî è îæèäàë... À òåïåðü Ðåæåòòî âîçüì¸ò çàáü¸ò íà ÐÊÞ è áóäåò âîîáùå âåñåëî...
My world is how I creat it.

Offline alkimiya

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 315
    • View Profile
Reply #61 on: February 18, 2004, 03:55:58 PM
Quote from: "Don_Miguel"
I see.. you don't want to open the sources to the public.. or.. something 8)
...

Are there any obstacles on your way? Why don't you just release the sources or make another decidion?

http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1302&highlight=sources

Anonymous

  • Guest
Reply #62 on: March 09, 2004, 04:28:22 PM
off topic. Now &Rq has no furure becouse no badody whons  update it( I'm about new version relise)
sorry for my english =))))

Offline Electron

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 81
    • View Profile
Reply #63 on: March 09, 2004, 09:16:41 PM
So we're still waiting for Rejetto to say JUST SOMETHING...
We all know that to know nothing and to wait for any news is worse than to know even a bad news... (!)
Or may be Rejetto's keeping silence because he's developing smth fantastic :)) 4 example he'll implement all so-wanted-features at once?
Ha? Sounds good... But a bit ironically...

Well... Thx 4 attentoin :)
My world is how I creat it.

Offline alkimiya

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 315
    • View Profile
Reply #64 on: March 09, 2004, 10:01:56 PM
My guess is rejetto is busy studying and working at the moment and any development for &RQ would be from people like kirys (see cvs repository).

Offline Kirys

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
    • http://www.kt2k.com
Reply #65 on: March 10, 2004, 09:41:24 AM
I will take time before I would be able to fix bugs in &RQ.
I don't know the code structure yet.
Actualli I'm studing the code and helping Rejetto with SF (i am an expert of SF :D ).

But actually the Source is open so anyone could post suggestion of code modification patches ecc in the developers forum :)
I will be happy to add them to cvs.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13523
    • View Profile
Reply #66 on: March 10, 2004, 04:49:58 PM
these are not good times for me
i just want to say i'm sorry for the delaying

Anonymous

  • Guest
Reply #67 on: May 30, 2004, 06:10:16 PM
Áëèí, ïðîùå ïîâåñèòüñÿ ÷åì äîæäàòüñÿ íîâîé âåðñèè!

So, we are wwwwaaaaaaaiiiiitttttttttttttiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnngggggggg to lloooooonnnnnnnggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13523
    • View Profile
Reply #68 on: May 30, 2004, 08:45:40 PM
read about &RQ.NET project
english forum

Offline NN

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Reply #69 on: May 31, 2004, 09:15:54 AM
I do not think &RQ.NET is a good idea.

&RQ takes about 1Mb.
For &RQ.NET we must download .NET about 23Mb.

And the speed will not be as in &RQ.
Also &RQ.NET will not run on Windows 95, which is mentioned in &RQ ;)

1.0.0.0

  • Guest
Reply #70 on: June 03, 2004, 05:28:05 PM
Ðûæèé, åáàòü òåáÿ â ñðàêó, äåëàé ñêîðåé êðûñó âåðñèè 1.0, çàåáàëèñü óæå æäàòü, õâàòèò òåáå õóéíåé ñòðàäàòü è áàá åáàòü, ìû âîí ðóññêèå âñå óñïåâàåì è åáàòü è äåëàòü, à òû òóò õóéíåé ñòðàäàåøü, êîðî÷å æäåì íîâóþ âåðñèþ, áîòàíèê õðåíîâ


_____________________
Èç Ðîññèè ñ ëþáîâüþ...

2.0.0.0

  • Guest
Reply #71 on: June 06, 2004, 10:56:14 PM
1.0.0.0
ñëûøü, ðóññêèé! òû ñàì-òî äîõóÿ ïðîãðàìì íàïèñàë? åñëè òàê, òî ïðèìè ó÷àñòèå â ðàçðàáîòêå. à åñëè íåò, òî ìîë÷è, óìíèê, áëèí, õðåíîâ!

all
sorry for flame in russian!

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13523
    • View Profile
Reply #72 on: June 08, 2004, 03:28:35 PM
warning: win9x is not meant to be supported by me.
it may be, but i'm not really interested in such platform and i don't have win9x systems where to make tests.

Offline Zeon

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Reply #73 on: June 13, 2004, 05:38:04 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
no guys, don't think that if you make donations 1.0 will come faster.
the donations are for those who wants to send me a buck because they are happy for my software.

you are not forced to pay, and i'm not forced to program. that's our agreement.

my advice is: send a gift to me if you are happy for what you got, not for what you think you will get, because i make no promises and &RQ development is now very slow for a number of reasons.
for the same reasons 1.0 may never see the light.
However, if i will ever drop &RQ development, i would release sources under GPL for other people to continue the work.
as you can see all the software i released is under GPL. &RQ is not (yet) only because it was not developed with this intent at start.

i can't stop my real job because i get 30€ for &RQ development. not even for 300. i should get at least 1500€/month to drop my job and work on my freeware all the time. And this is impossible, you see, so let's go as we always did.
ôèãîâî..

Offline Zeon

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Reply #74 on: June 13, 2004, 05:54:06 AM
Quote from: "2.0.0.0"
1.0.0.0
ñëûøü, ðóññêèé! òû ñàì-òî äîõóÿ ... ìîë÷è, óìíèê, áëèí, õðåíîâ!
8O  :eek:

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14