2.0 coming...

rejetto · **Reply #1050 on:** February 24, 2006, 03:32:57 AM

those reports are useless, i fear

dead connections in HFS should not be related to unreleased system resources (sockets)

Azag · **Reply #1051 on:** February 24, 2006, 06:40:50 AM

Quote from: "rejetto"

those reports are useless, i fear
dead connections in HFS should not be related to unreleased system resources (sockets)

Well thanks for taking a look. I wish I had more useful info to show but maybe in time. :#) I suspect it is the way my older Linksys routerdeals with to many data requests to quick or a misconfiguration in it or somewhere else on my part. There appears to be no real harm, nor memory leak, nor any resource eating problem any more so I am very thankful for that. Perhaps in time with newer versions bug will disappear since as I said thsi problem is very minor compared to how it use to be (no 100% CPU and no large RAM resource is being lost anymore which is a very good thing.) So if I discover something more insiteful to help clear this up or if the bug just stops or there is a major change I will let you know. I there are any third party tools I could use to do a real time debug dump that would give you better info to look at like some decompiler or debugger (IDA pro or other) or even Borland Delphi itself. You would of course have to tell me the needed options or parameters to use.

But either way I realize even to look if a bug was found (not necessarily since it may not be HFS fault at all) that it would take some considerable time to fix if possible. Point is I am in no rush and if there si anything I can do to help I am more than willing to do whatever I can. Just ask. Thanks and keep up the good work as always.

One question relating to maverick's last one.
Does the "Specific HTML for download managers" option have to be checked in order to allow downloaders to resume their unfinished downloads or will they resume without it. Also what does this option actually do? Just wondering how that works. Okay cyaz... :bye: :^^:

rejetto · **Reply #1052 on:** February 24, 2006, 08:03:04 AM

the Specific HTML for download managers option uses a special template when Getright is browsing (or others)

maverick · **Reply #1053 on:** February 24, 2006, 01:06:46 PM

Quote from: "rejetto"

the Specific HTML for download managers option uses a special template when Getright is browsing (or others)

Did a test. Maybe it is just me, but I didn't see a special template and it is enabled. Does a download manager browse? All that was really required for the one's that I have used is to just supply the dowload link to the program and let it do its work.

But, I did notice something that might need fixing.

I don't use Getright but I do use Download Accelerator Plus (DAP).
In Menu -> Limits -> max simultaneous downloads from a single address:
1. Setting - "no limits" -> DAP starts 10 downloads for the same file. Resume IS supported.
2. Setting - "anything but no limits" -> DAP starts only 1 download no matter what the limit is set at. Resume is NOT supported when limits are active.

Downloading with my Opera browser:
1. Setting - "no limits" - works correctly - resume IS supported.
2. Setting - "anything but no limits" - works correctly - resume IS supported.

beta 37

rejetto · **Reply #1054 on:** February 25, 2006, 09:53:38 AM

Quote from: "ataxy"

i have a problem with beta37 everytime i load my vfs it hangs about a third of the way in its loading of it, task manager says not responding even if i let it go for 30 min

you can send your VFS file privately to my email.
i will have a look at it and try to understand the problem.

Quote from: "Azag"

I suspect it is the way my older Linksys routerdeals with to many data requests to quick or a misconfiguration in it or somewhere else on my part.

i think it is just a bug in HFS
the first problem is to reproduce it

Quote from: "maverick"

Does a download manager browse?

getright, fdm and flashget do

Quote

I don't use Getright but I do use Download Accelerator Plus (DAP).
...Resume is NOT supported when limits are active.

i tested with DAP7
it refuses to download at all
then tested DAP8
sometimes it tells SUPPORTED, sometimes not
it seems to me it is just bugged

...sad because i intended using DAP as download manager
btw, if i kick connections DAP doesn't automatically retry downloading the file. is there a way to do it?

Anonymous · **Reply #1055 on:** March 01, 2006, 09:46:19 AM

how can i edit the html file ?? ... sice beta 36 i couldnt find the option in "other options"

Anonymous · **Reply #1056 on:** March 01, 2006, 12:44:53 PM

Switch to Expert Mode.

rejetto · **Reply #1057 on:** March 06, 2006, 04:30:26 PM

beta38 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta38.zip

what's new
+ Menu -> Switch ON/OFF
+ warning on many items
* %diskfree% now considers the minimum disk space set
- errors in progress bars
- setting a drive in "edit resource" led to problems

rejetto · **Reply #1058 on:** March 06, 2006, 04:35:46 PM

ok boys... with beta38, what are the lasting problems?
i know the update feature doesn't work for somebody.
i have no idea how much time it will take to fix it, i think i'd better publish the stable with this problem since it is not very important.

it will take some time before documentation is updated. it would be cool if someone will help with it.

see now how segmented downloads are nice to watch, now that a graphical bug has been fixed.

Martok · **Reply #1059 on:** March 06, 2006, 05:38:32 PM

Quote from: "rejetto"

i know the update feature doesn't work for somebody.

Yep, I still got errors. Maybe Windows is not ready to start the exe?
I would try it myself, but I have only Delphi 4 here, so I sadly can't compile HFS. Anyway, would you please consider trying this as the batch file:

Code: [Select]

start /wait hfs.new.exe -q
move "%s" "%shfs.old.exe"
move /y hfs.new.exe "%2:shfs.exe"
start "%2:shfs.exe"
del %0

Instead of 'DEL '+BATCH_FILE+CRLF, you may use 'DEL %0', just for a better look.

And before the execNew, some small delaying like sleep(100) would be good to give Windows some time to close all files.
Why do you close HFS with a -q call instead of closing itself?

rejetto · **Reply #1060 on:** March 07, 2006, 01:17:22 AM

Quote from: "Martok"

start /wait hfs.new.exe -q

i think this may fix the problem

Quote

Why do you close HFS with a -q call instead of closing itself?

so that i'm sure that batch is running when HFS is closing

maverick · **Reply #1061 on:** March 07, 2006, 01:46:16 AM

I have noticed a couple of problems with v2.0 beta 38.

1. Menu -> IP Address -- shows an INVALID IP Address (it isn't my address). I have never seen this problem before this beta 38.

2. Menu -> IP Address -> Dynamic DNS Updater for No-IP -- HFS is not contacting dynupdate.no-ip.com This feature worked ok in beta 37. Not working at all for me in beta 38.

maverick

rejetto · **Reply #1062 on:** March 07, 2006, 02:21:16 AM

1. it is an IP detected with the "find external", right? probably one of the servers i have in list is inaccurate. using your http analyzer you may find which one, so i can remove it from the list.

2. HFS does the update ONLY IF the external IP has changed since the last update. the value of the last update is kept in the cfg-line last-external-address. you may check if it differs from yours.

...and it works only with the address HFS finds itself, it doesn't matter if you type a custom address or switch to another one.

maverick · **Reply #1063 on:** March 07, 2006, 03:52:08 AM

Quote from: "rejetto"

1. it is an IP detected with the "find external", right? probably one of the servers i have in list is inaccurate. using your http analyzer you may find which one, so i can remove it from the list.

Yes, just checked and it is the IP detected with the "find external address". But what it finds isn't correct. I have only noticed this problem with beta 38. It looks like you are using myip.se and myip.dk to check ip address. Both of these "might" be causing the problem.

Quote

2. HFS does the update ONLY IF the external IP has changed since the last update. the value of the last update is kept in the cfg-line last-external-address. you may check if it differs from yours.

The last external address shown in hfs.ini is not my address as I mentioned before. Just checked and this time I am able to connect to my no-ip account. I'm not sure why it worked this time. My HTTP analyzer does not show HFS trying to login to my no-ip account (like beta 37 did) but there is a HFS connection to dynupdate.no-ip.com/ip.php to check IP address which was correct. I think the problem I mentioned with the DNS Updater might have something to do with the wrong external IP address HFS was finding.

Quote

...and it works only with the address HFS finds itself, it doesn't matter if you type a custom address or switch to another one.

Yes I know.

rejetto · **Reply #1064 on:** March 07, 2006, 11:57:31 AM

Quote from: "maverick"

Yes, just checked and it is the IP detected with the "find external address". But what it finds isn't correct. I have only noticed this problem with beta 38. It looks like you are using myip.se and myip.dk to check ip address. Both of these "might" be causing the problem.

to know which of them, just go to the websites www.myip.se and www.myip.dk and see who is replying wrong.

Quote

I think the problem I mentioned with the DNS Updater might have something to do with the wrong external IP address HFS was finding.

yes, it may be

2.0 coming...

Azag

Anonymous

Anonymous