2.0 coming...

MarkV · **Reply #1005 on:** January 28, 2006, 10:54:28 PM

No I don't use Opera, but I'm in a testing mood B)
I think I'll give it a try...
edit: Opera test completed, original post updated.

MarkV

maverick · **Reply #1006 on:** January 29, 2006, 04:54:38 AM

Thanks MarkV.

I thought the download limit for IE and Opera would be around 2 GB. Your testing confirms that. Firefox test results is a little troubling to me as I also thought it should have the same/similar download capacity as the other two browsers. Your test results show firefox has about twice the download capacity compared to the other 2 browsers *but* with a download error which isn't good. I don't imagine such huge files are transfered that often to be really concerned about it.

Martok · **Reply #1007 on:** January 29, 2006, 10:15:35 AM

Hello Maverick,

Firefox having twice as much bytes downloaded is clear concerning the data types and their ranges in windows:

Code: [Select]

integer   32 bit  -2147483647 -  2147483648
DWORD     32 bit            0 -  4294971734
Int64     64 bit        -2^64 - 2^64

DWORD is sometimes called Unsigned Integer or something like this. I used the Delphi/Pascal names of the data types, in C(++) they are named slightly different.

HFS uses Int64 all the time. This means files can be nearly unlimited in size. If you type 2^64 in your calculator, you know what I mean

16 Million Terabyte, if I didn't make a mistake in dividing it down from number of bytes...

So you see, the only problem can be the downloader. HFS is great!

maverick · **Reply #1008 on:** January 29, 2006, 12:32:22 PM

Hello Martok.

Thanks for the information. Very interesting. An "YES" HFS is GREAT!

Anonymous · **Reply #1009 on:** February 04, 2006, 10:52:07 AM

Access violation at address 004D364F in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 0000003E
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 04.02.2006 12:04:18
[004D364F]{hfs.exe } HSlib.ThttpConn.disconnect (Line 1175, "HSlib.pas" + 1) + $0
[0040417B]{hfs.exe } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004FF3CC]{hfs.exe } main.TmainFrm.Kickconnection1Click (Line 3376, "main.pas" + 2) + $0
[0045C6CA]{hfs.exe } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D8A3]{hfs.exe } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E582]{hfs.exe } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045E4D1]{hfs.exe } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" +

+ $0
[00455947]{hfs.exe } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System : Windows XP Home Edition, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Sempron(tm) 2200+, 1566 MHz MMX
Display : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
hfs.exe: Build: 0 02.01.2006 21:29:14

Anonymous · **Reply #1010 on:** February 06, 2006, 03:14:51 AM

does any one know when the final version is coming out?

------------

Love the program, keep it up

Anonymous · **Reply #1011 on:** February 06, 2006, 03:44:59 AM

maybe in 5 or 6 years

MarkV · **Reply #1012 on:** February 07, 2006, 03:10:09 AM

I think final version will be out as soon as this ProcessQ bug is swatted... :roll:

MarkV

Torp · **Reply #1013 on:** February 10, 2006, 02:06:46 PM

Wow! HFS is a real good program.. I really like it!
Especially the 2.0 version. Keep up the good work!
I found no bugs yet.

BowflexMaster · **Reply #1014 on:** February 12, 2006, 12:28:06 AM

It seems to like using 100%CPU when people are downloading big files, and I'm not quite sure why.

EDIT: Nevermind... I found that was only because stupid Symantec Auto-Protect was scanning the server logs, for every byte that changed...

rejetto · **Reply #1015 on:** February 15, 2006, 03:31:53 AM

Quote from: "Anonymous"

why are the older betas removed? would be nice if they were available still... didn't have this problem with beta 31 i think it was...

previous beta is always available just forging the URL for download
since i have little webspace, i can't keep all versions online

rejetto · **Reply #1016 on:** February 17, 2006, 09:36:36 AM

Quote from: "maverick"

rejetto,

oui, c'est moi

Quote

1.) Is the template section [upload-failed] still valid? If so, how is it triggered and when? I have tried different things (cancelling upload etc.) and this section of the template doesn't get activated.

i fear the only way to get that section ATM is this one: Minimum disk space reached

Quote

2.) I also think "simultaneous" is a better word to use instead of "contemporaneous".

accepted

rejetto · **Reply #1017 on:** February 17, 2006, 09:54:46 AM

Quote from: "~GeeS~"

Rejettto,
could you please open a topic called "Router&Port Problems" and make it sticky.

since there is no possibility to move a post to an existant topic, i created a forum

rejetto · **Reply #1018 on:** February 17, 2006, 10:01:42 AM

Quote from: "~GeeS~"

Failed to create key *\shell\Add to HFS\command
HFS 2.0 beta34

you got this because, i guess, you were using a limited user instead of an administrator.
anyway, that kind of error is unwanted, i thought it was managed in another way

rejetto · **Reply #1019 on:** February 17, 2006, 10:42:08 AM

beta35 has many news, but i want to work on some bugs before releasing it
be patient

2.0 coming...

Anonymous

Anonymous

Anonymous

Torp

BowflexMaster