rejetto forum

any chances to autokick users that are idling for some time

Guest · 18 · 12882

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Anonymous

  • Guest
well i have a problem that there is no autokick after some time user idles
am i wrong ?  :eek:
can it be in next version ?
i was using lates official 1.5g



Anonymous

  • Guest
Quote from: "Suicide"
well i have a problem that there is no autokick after some time user idles
am i wrong ?  :eek:
can it be in next version ?
i was using lates official 1.5g

Try 1.6 http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs.exe.
If I'm not mistaken, I see users being  kicked out after sometime...


Anonymous

  • Guest

Anonymous

  • Guest
nothing new there
users still can idle till the end of days taking max connections
they idle after "requesting" and there is no info about their browers and no actions after requesting status. i think thats scanning for ftp/http servers at my local network. but they are taking my connections ... so when they reach max numbers of connections noone else will be able to connect.
how it looks like: http://zone.ee/suicide_01/hfs.png

i hope rejetto must understand that he must add autokick users after some time idle



Anonymous

  • Guest
Quote from: "Suicide"
nothing new there
how it looks like: http://zone.ee/suicide_01/hfs.png

i hope rejetto must understand that he must add autokick users after some time idle


I tried and tried, and I *never* got a "requesting" status. The status is always returned to "idle" and then, after a while - was cleared/kickedout

So, the question is - how did you get the "requesting" status ?


Anonymous

  • Guest
well i think its port scan for shared resources like http/ftp
i ve written about it above  :roll:


Offline anomaly2k_VIP

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Just uncheck "Persistent connections" under other options. Also, rejetto's betas are usually 99% stable, I wouldn't worry if I were you, especially considering that the betas have more features.


Anonymous

  • Guest
:eek:  8O  :eek:  8O
thx mate ... i just know english not so much ... so i havent translated "persistent connections" ... but i should ;]
everything will be ok now i think ... )
thanks


Anonymous

  • Guest
well i want to ask rejetto then after what time server kicks them ?
and maybe its possibe to make user defined max idle time untill kick ?


Offline Rafi

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 452
    • View Profile
Quote from: "Suicide"
well i want to ask rejetto then after what time server kicks them ?
and maybe its possibe to make user defined max idle time untill kick ?

60 seconds  ;)


Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13523
    • View Profile
hello :)

i understand "we" need a connection timeout feature.
because, yes, your problem can be solved unchecking persistent connections, but that slows the browsing a lot.
the best is to keep a fast browsing but no zombie connected.
it will come.

there is no timeout ATM (sorry rafi).
HFS does not disconnect.
if it gets disconnected it is because of the client.

another point. do you want to see a "requesting" status?
just telnet the server and type a single char. (but CTRL+C ;) )


Anonymous

  • Guest
yes . HFS is not kicking them ... i ve tryed persistent connections ... users are still requesting ....
rejetto, can you fix this please ?)
i really need this cause i got about 20 users with 'requesting' status after 12 hours of using server in my local net (there are 1300 computers in this net)
i really need this connections to be autokicked :(


Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13523
    • View Profile
persistent connections has a bug: it is applied only after a restart

the bug is already fixed in next 1.6


Anonymous

  • Guest
rejetto, i am using 1.6 rc 12 and restarted server many times but users are still showing and counting as active after 'request' status :(
 :cry:  :cry:  :cry: