1.6 comin...

[Anonymous]

the string that appears in the user/pass dialog box

I still do not understand what realm is.  i don't see where this is at in the user/pass dialog box

[rejetto]

sorry for being vague.
i was talking about the user/pass dialog of the browser, no the one of HFS.

[Anonymous]

I understood that.  But I entered in a custom realm and it doesn't show up in the user/pass dialog window.  I was able to get it to show up if the root is protected.  Does the root have to be protected to get the realm to work?

[Rafi]

@Rejetto  -
remember you had a small bug you had to fix in the tooltip above the tray icon ? it had junk instead of <space><cr>  between the displayed values (under Win98SE Hebrew enabled)

Same thing is in the tooltip above the "download" tray Icon. Can you do the same fix there ?

Thanks

[rejetto]

rafi, does this problem apply also to tips in filebox, etc ?

[Rafi]

rafi, does this problem apply also to tips in filebox, etc ?

If "filebox" means the tooltip above the VFS tree area - no. seems to be only when you put more the one text field in a raw (w/o <cr> ) ...

[Mr. Anon]

There's a problem in HFS 1.6 rc8 where HFS would ignore the resume request and sends from the beginning of the file.
Here's an example:
I set up a text file called "Testing.txt" in HFS (8 bytes) with the contents:
00001111
and with this bug:

*** GET REQUEST ***
GET /Testing.txt HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1
Accept: */*
Range: bytes=4-
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Connection: close
*******************

*** RESPONSE ***
HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
Content-type: text/plain
Content-range: bytes 4-7/8
Content-length: 4
Server: HFS 1.6 rc8
Content-Disposition: attachment;  filename="Testing.txt"

0000
****************

As you see from the example above, HFS doesn't send the 1's but instead send from the beginning of the file, resulting a corrupted file on resume.
If the download isn't interrupted in between, the download would work just fine.

[Mr. Anon]

HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-type: text/html

403 - You are not allowed to access this file

I am correct that the ban HTML couldn't be changed right? (1.6rc8)
Idea: I was thinking about a feature which will let people see why they are banned in the HTTP headers. For example:

HTTP/1.1 403 Banned (Leeching)
Content-type: text/html

You have been banned from the server because of the reason: (Leeching)

It would be nice if this feature is togglable and that the HTML in the ban is customizable as well as the HTML headers! Also if this option were to be added into newer version of HFS, the variable %banreason% or etc should be added too.
Thanks!

[rejetto]

resume problem fixed
there was also a problem in the "Connection: close" header. now fixed. (in rc9)

[Mr. Anon]

Thanks sooooooooo much, rejetto!
I am surprised how much time you put into your softwares...
Would you consider the customizable BAN message I mentioned above too?
Now checking every second for rc9 on the server.

[rejetto]

had you a look at template in RC8 ?
it has already been implemented.

[Anonymous]

Was the realm issue I described resolved or is this the way is should be?

[rejetto]

i just tested the problem you reported, and i was not able to reproduce it.
it works fine to me. the customized realm is shown. i tested with IE and Opera.

[Mr. Anon]

Customized realm works here too...
Where is rc9?  :cry:
Waiting for resume to be fixed...

[Mr. Anon]

HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-type: text/html

403 - You are not allowed to access this file

I am correct that the ban HTML couldn't be changed right? (1.6rc8)
Idea: I was thinking about a feature which will let people see why they are banned in the HTTP headers. For example:

HTTP/1.1 403 Banned (Leeching)
Content-type: text/html

You have been banned from the server because of the reason: (Leeching)

It would be nice if this feature is togglable and that the HTML in the ban is customizable as well as the HTML headers! Also if this option were to be added into newer version of HFS, the variable %banreason% or etc should be added too.
Thanks!

What do you think about this, rejetto?