rejetto forum

Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Beta => Topic started by: rejetto on March 13, 2010, 01:56:14 PM

Title: Testing build #259
Post by: rejetto on March 13, 2010, 01:56:14 PM

download @ www.dovedove.it/hfs/hfs259.exe

what's new
- problems with folder sorting [link] (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php/topic,8324.msg1049380.html#msg1049380)

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: crazyboris on March 14, 2010, 10:07:36 AM

still having problem with that i have to load the template every time i restart/update the hfs.exe or resart the server.

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: Sinorrah on March 15, 2010, 11:11:18 AM

first i want to let you know that HFS is a awesome software

are you planning adding a "logout" feature in a future build?

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: rejetto on March 15, 2010, 02:39:19 PM

welcome sinorrah.
i will, but not for version 2.3
this is off topic here, so please click "search" and then type "logout". it's a FAQ.

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: yiguang on March 17, 2010, 10:06:06 AM

Quote from: Sinorrah on March 15, 2010, 11:11:18 AM

first i want to let you know that HFS is a awesome software

are you planning adding a "logout" feature in a future build?

Same feeling. Plus, the vfs file isn't automatically loaded after retart, and when log in Windows with a different account, I have to repeat the setting (Thout all auto save/load options are already selected.)

Out of the above, it's an absolutely ideal software! Thanks a lot!

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: rejetto on March 17, 2010, 10:22:09 AM

Quote

the vfs file isn't automatically loaded after retart,

it is by default.
menu > start/exit > reload on startup vfs file previously open
maybe you disabled it, or HFS cannot read the file, or cannot read the configuration.

Quote

and when log in Windows with a different account, I have to repeat the setting (Thout all auto save/load options are already selected.)

menu > save options > to registry (all users)

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: maxgearcc on March 30, 2010, 09:48:38 PM

file masks>don't consider as download             not working...
flags>don't consider as download           unable to tick the check box...

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: rejetto on March 31, 2010, 12:51:39 PM

Quote

file masks>don't consider as download             not working...

just tested here, and working as expected.
please describe exactly what you see that's supposed to be wrong (in details). You may just have misunderstood this feature.

Quote

flags>don't consider as download           unable to tick the check box...

i guess you are trying with folders. That option is for files only, not folder.

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: Mars on March 31, 2010, 07:59:49 PM

Quote

Quote
flags>don't consider as download           unable to tick the check box...

i guess you are trying with folders. That option is for files only, not folder.

It would maybe be necessary for the future to mask the unusable options instead of deactivating them?  ???

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: rejetto on April 01, 2010, 02:01:05 PM

not sure.
the disabled effect is aesthetically better because the hidden leaves a senseless hole.
it also hints the user about the existence of something, even if it's not available at this right point for some reason.

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: f2065 on April 06, 2010, 03:49:04 PM

Problems with adjustment MIME:

1. I can not remove a line "video/mpeg", "text/plain" and others. After Apply and OK they are restored!

2. Continuation of processing of the coincided masks!
For example, at me it is written:
*.htm | test/html
*.css | test/css
*.* | application/x-force-download

And in this case in browsers FireFox and Opera CSS comes with MIME-type x-force-download, and they do not process it. Before such problem was not!!! At me always such adjustment MIME was, and CSS was given earlier with correct MIME-type. Has noticed this problem in last versions. If to clean "*.* | application/x-force-download" or to change a mask - that CSS it is given correctly. But earlier that this problem was not!!!

Title: Re: Testing build #259
Post by: rejetto on April 22, 2010, 02:47:31 PM

"user" post moved to
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php/topic,8502.0.html