rejetto forum

Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Topic started by: rejetto on July 27, 2007, 08:32:29 AM

Title: Review for HFS 2.2
Post by: rejetto on July 27, 2007, 08:32:29 AM

Guess what?
A new review for HFS (http://www.softpedia.com/reviews/windows/HFS-HTTP-File-Server-Review-61161.shtml).
The ratings? Couldn't be better! ;D

Title: Re: Review for HFS 2.2
Post by: radd on July 27, 2007, 08:51:28 AM

what so confusing about the restrict access? can we discuss about it? i would love to see if the article writes "the bad : NONE"

Title: Re: Review for HFS 2.2
Post by: rejetto on July 27, 2007, 08:55:49 AM

it's a matter of being equivocal, not wrong or right.
can anyone phrase it better?
i can think of "Access only for".

i'm very glad for that review.

Title: Re: Review for HFS 2.2
Post by: radd on July 27, 2007, 08:59:44 AM

allow access from..
allow access..

Title: Re: Review for HFS 2.2
Post by: maverick on July 27, 2007, 09:58:10 AM

Good job rejetto and good review.

I don't know why they found the restrict access menu misleading.  To me it is straight forward.  I think if they would have created a few user accounts for their test review, the restrict access menu would have made more sense to them.

Maybe call it "restrict user access to" or "limit user access to".