rejetto forum
Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Topic started by: Garphy on January 11, 2007, 05:59:37 AM
-
this is a new bug...
under UTF-8 template, all file uploaded with chinese names will be like:艰璇句欢澧炲己鐗?rar
suggestion about "log to files...":
while the same name file existed, hfs will replace the old one.This will make the log lost.
so i advice to write to the end instead or replace...
-
ummm.... i dont think utf-8 is for chinese characters... dont u need to use big something to show chinese characters...
-
unicode is for all language...
-
ummm.... i dont think utf-8 is for chinese characters... dont u need to use big something to show chinese characters...
build 80 support chinese under UTF-8 very well
the only problem is what i said above,
under gbk mode ,the filename uploaded is all right,but error in UTF-8 template,
so i think it's needed to encode or decode the filename ,while uploading...
-
any opinion?
-
i think i fixed this problem in build 081, please try it.
www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=3791.msg1021003#msg1021003
-
i'm sorry to bother you that: bug still...
-
I've tried it also, same for me.
-
can you post a screenshot of the problem?
-
UTF-8
before:
(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j110/dayletter/before.jpg)
after:
(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j110/dayletter/after.jpg)
It works fine with charset=BIG5 of course...
-
can you confirm which build number are you using?
-
can you confirm which build number are you using?
081
-
me too,I guess encoding the name into UTF-8 would be ok~
wait for your good news next build
-
fixed in build 082
www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=3791.msg1021139#msg1021139
-
God.......
still...
淇℃伅缁勭粐鎬濊€冮鍚堥泦.docx: OK --- 43.15 KB (Speed 2850 KB/s)
suppose to be:
信息组织思考题合集.docx: OK --- 43.15 KB (Speed 2850 KB/s)
-
crap...
can you eventually contact me on ICQ/MSN ?
my addresses www.rejetto.com/me/
-
my network speed is too low to log on even msn...
what's the trouble in the filename?
-
finally fixed.... ?
www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=3791.msg1021342#msg1021342
-
OMG...finally fixed! Great job!
However...
found another bug:
(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j110/dayletter/Clip.jpg)
which should originally look like this:
(http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j110/dayletter/Clip_2-1.jpg)
This bug appears only on uploading...
-
argh!
fixed
www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=3791.msg1021348#msg1021348
-
Great!
It's perfect now :D
-
done!
:D
if no other bug this could be a stable version~
-
new test progress:
besides uploaded filename and name in the log,
there are 3
ignored places:
1.progress bar
2.~files.lst?recursive
3.Download manager tpl
-
1. fixed in next build
2. can't reproduce, seems to be working good here. can you furnish a screenshot?
3. how did you test?
-
1. that's ok~
2. we know,~files.lst?recursive will list a txt,view the source is all right,
but error in IE,because the default charset of IE isn't UTF-8,I think add a tpl for the funtion will be ok.
3. Flashget,just display error
declare UTF-8 in default DMBROWNSERTPL doesn't work...
086 version is quite well now~
just take it easy to fix the bugs~
looking forward to the new features in the plan
-
2. ~file.lst is a simple ASCII txt made of URLs. if you see things like %E3%A4%F8 it is all ok, it is not a bug. if your problem is different please furnish a screenshot.
aside from this, a tpl for this function is already available, search for "filelist.tpl" in the documentation/wiki
3. i don't have flashget. can you furnish a screenshot?
-
2.ohhh,i just forgot that tpl...
now i see,here's an available "filelist.tpl":
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
</head>
<body><div>%files%</div></body>
</html>
[files]
%list%
[file]
http://%host%%encoded-folder%%item-url%<br>
3.the last one,just look at this:
as the same,gbk is ok,error under UTF-8
[attachment deleted by admin]
-
2. no %symbol% in the TPL you reported should make use of the UTF8 specified, AFAIK
3. is there any problem in the screenshot you posted? can you specify where?
-
3.nearly all the chinese charaters
i think it's the soft that doesn't support utF-8 well...
it's not a key bug,so,i don't mind it much...
-
3.nearly all the chinese charaters
i think it's the soft that doesn't support utF-8 well...
it's not a key bug,so,i don't mind it much...
However,if the soft is full Unicode support (UTF-16 for the soft,UTF-8 for the web),that is perfect...
Will the full Unicode support be in future plan?
-
Will the full Unicode support be in future plan?
yes