rejetto forum

Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Bug reports => Topic started by: guessst on October 09, 2006, 04:09:01 PM

Title: Access violation at address 004AF080 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 026950
Post by: guessst on October 09, 2006, 04:09:01 PM
Access violation at address 004AF080 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 0269508C
HFS 2.1 beta16
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2006/10/9 下午 11:47:06
 + $6[004AF080]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.WndProc (Line 3193, "WSocket.pas" + 23) + $6
 + $33[0040414F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
 + $25[0047E13D]{hfs.exe     } JclDebug.TJclStackBaseList.Create + $25
 + $4[004B0357]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.ASyncReceive (Line 4096, "WSocket.pas" + 36) + $4
 + $6[004AEFA6]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.WndProc (Line 3174, "WSocket.pas" + 4) + $6
 + $6[004B61B1]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomLineWSocket.WndProc (Line 6533, "WSocket.pas" + 12) + $6
 + $8[004AF124]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.XSocketWindowProc (Line 3225, "WSocket.pas" + 14) + $8
 + $A[00433662]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
 + $83[00456F2B]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
 + $A[00456F62]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
 + $96[00457182]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
 + $2[0053C8ED]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 69, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 15) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+, 1920 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2006/9/17 下午 08:21:44
Title: Re: Access violation at address 004AF080 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 026950
Post by: rejetto on October 09, 2006, 04:33:23 PM
hmm, this log tell me little about the problem.
are you able to reproduce the error?