rejetto forum
Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Topic started by: tj on December 21, 2005, 09:46:05 PM
-
on the 2.0 beta 29,none of the limits work for me. i can put max connections 50 or anything and it still allows more then that. same with max per ip. please fix this :D limits work for me with 1.6a though..
p.s. ive tried the 2.0 31 too,still dont work. eh thanks in advance.
-
right now i tested speed limit on beta31 and works nicely.
check if your settings are right, or find how to reproduce the problem on another PC.
to solve, try "clear options and quit"
-
thanks man,but im not worried about the speed limit...i mean like the max connections and max connections per i.p. because sometimes people use their proggys to try to flood the connections...
-
p.s. i noticed it does attempt to close connects for max already exceeded or whatever it says.but it stops.
also,heres a pic of the idea im trying to give you.http://tinypic.com/j8mkp4.jpg
-
oh sorry i misread
i tested max connections using 2
then opened 2 connections to HFS (telnet localhot 80)
then used the browser, and HFS returned "server busy"
this is the expected behaviour
-
oh sorry i misread
i tested max connections using 2
then opened 2 connections to HFS (telnet localhot 80)
then used the browser, and HFS returned "server busy"
this is the expected behaviour
ive done the same thing you did,yes your correct it does limit it to two connections total..but when people use programs such as "server attack" or something to flood with multiple it exceeds the limit somehow...have you changed the way it limits since 1.6 ? maybe thats it..if you have no more answers then thats fine ill leave you alone LOL. :?
p.s. ive tried the beta34. had a friend test it for me and still no luck.
once again sorry for bothering you.
i also havent tried this on another comp so ill do that soon B)
-
this because the feature is not meant to be an anti-DoS
i may put an option for it, to disconnect suddenly but... options, options, options, we have to add only what is really neeed.
who needs such thing? if you have someone who is attacking you, then ban him. :)
-
this because the feature is not meant to be an anti-DoS
i may put an option for it, to disconnect suddenly but... options, options, options, we have to add only what is really neeed.
who needs such thing? if you have someone who is attacking you, then ban him. :)
alright that would be nice.thanks
also some programs to attack ips use proxy support so its not just them..
lmao ill leave you alone now,not another post from me i promise. do what you please:D