rejetto forum

Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Topic started by: rejetto on April 16, 2004, 11:07:31 PM

Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 16, 2004, 11:07:31 PM
this is a beta version, for those of you who want help testing...
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta46.zip

if you want sources as well
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta46.src.zip

what's new ?
VER: 2.0
+ File Menu -> Upload (only for real-folders)
+ File Menu -> Default file mask
+ Easy/Expert mode
+ multiselect files
+ load comments from external files
+ support for IP-ranges (syntax FROM_ADDRESS-TO_ADDRESS)
+ you can abort loading VFS and downloading update
+ new VFS format with compression
+ warn you loading incompatible VFS formats
+ Menu -> Start/Exit -> "Only 1 instance"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Compressed browsing"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Delete partial uploads"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Rename partial uploads"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Modal dialog for options"
+ Menu -> "Self Test"
+ Menu -> "Uninstall"
+ Menu -> Virtual File System -> "Flag files added recently"
+ Menu -> Virtual File System -> "Auto-save every..."
+ Menu -> Tray icons -> The tray icon shows -> "Number of logged uploads"
+ Menu -> Start/Exit -> "Confirm exit"
+ Menu -> IP address -> "Don't include port in URL"
+ Menu -> IP address -> "Find external address"
+ Menu -> "Dynamic DNS updater"
+ Menu -> Start/Exit -> "Find external address at startup"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Save in/out totals"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Keep old version updating"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Minimum disk space"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary downloads"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary downloads from single address"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary addresses"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary addresses downloading"
+ Menu -> Flash taskbutton -> "Also beep"
+ Menu -> Save options -> "Auto-save every..."
+ File Menu -> "Bind/unbind root to real-folder"
+ File Menu -> "Switch to real-folder"
+ File Menu -> "Don't count as download"
+ File Menu -> "Flag as new"
+ File Menu -> "Reset <new> flag"
+ File Menu -> "Edit resource"
+ File Menu -> "Visible only to anonymous users"
+ File Menu -> "Let download"
+ File Menu -> "Auto-hide empty folders"
+ Log Menu -> "Do not log address"
+ Log Menu -> "Ban this address" (an address must be at caret position)
+ Log Menu -> Log what -> "Banned"
+ Log Menu -> "Apache log file format..."
+ shell context menu: checkbox instead of add/delete (moved to Other options)
+ Template editor -> Find
+ warning on many items
+ better "open folder" dialog
+ "Ignore limits" for accounts
+ Bans -> "Add/delete row" (easier to understand)
+ new HTML template symbols: you can find a full list in the included help
+ file-masks and address-masks now support inverted logic: just put "\" ahead
+ pipelined requests now supported
+ autoupdate (automatic download & replace)
+ /~progress
+ multiple custom addresses
+ new symbol in tray message: %uploads% (global uploads counter)
+ "File list" link generating a list to feed download managers
+ new symbols in the log filename for log rotation
+ username displayed (when logged in)
+ Download counter now works also for real folders
+ command line: -d X (waits at start for X tenth of second)
+ command line: -q (quit, useful with "only 1 instance")
+ command line: -i X (load/save hfs.ini in folder X)
+ average speed are logged
+ ~files.lst template can be loaded from external file "filelist.tpl"
+ first start: a dialog suggest to enable shell integration
* hfs.ini by default saved in the same folder with hfs.exe
* "copy URL" as submenu
* save options -> "delete" replaced by "Clear options and quit"
* "No tray icon for file extentions" has been removed because obsolete
* symbol %login% renamed in %login-link%
* new behaviour for Options dialog
* "Abort file addition" more visible
* "Access for users" renamed to "Restrict access"
* "Run it" renamed to "Open it"
* by default config is now saved in user registry
* filetime sorts from newer to older
- sometimes the VFS was not flagged as modified (and then not auto-saved)
- newline problem in tray message
- comments were limited to 255 chars
- "Flash task button: on download" was flashing on every GET request
- clearing the file system, no new file name was asked
- problem downloading empty files
- "leave disconnected connections" prevented tray icons from being removed
- tray icons now display total percentage, to be consistent with the main window
- fixed problems with unicode
- logging bytes sent/received could stuck
- ban list was unproperly saved in configuration
- loading a new VFS didn't discard completely old settings
- sometimes IE hangs after reaching 100%
- ~files.lst showing filenames it shouldn't
- "let browse" was not inherited by subfolders of real folders
- set user/pass: inputing a password with empty username did not raise error
- other minor fixes
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: catgirl on April 16, 2004, 11:47:03 PM
one bug:

"upload" and "login" button no support chinese encode. :(

(http://bbs.mdjinfo.net/images/nickpage/2271082159931.gif)


"UP" button already fix .thank
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 16, 2004, 11:55:06 PM
I still don't get how you could upload files onto HFS 2.
Unlike the screenshot above, I only have the LOGIN button and going to /~upload brings me to the folder page.

EDIT: Figured out that there are Unicode Enters at the HTML Template:
(http://swg.fg.bz/HFS/Bug1.png)
Replaced some Unicode Enters with a real line break and now the upload button appears but the upload still doesn't work. Replaced all Unicode Enters with a real line break and the upload button is gone again. The upload option is grayed at the file menu.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 12:16:54 AM
BUG #1: Double Object Bug
1. Right click HFS, click New Link
2. Click OK
3. RIght click HFS again, click New Link
4. "Format '%i' invalid or incompatible with argument
HFS 2.0 alpha1"
P.S. Same for folders, files.

BUG #2: Customized Template Bug
(http://swg.fg.bz/HFS/Bug2.png)
The whole word aren't shown.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 17, 2004, 05:14:56 AM
all problems here posted should have been solved in alpha2
uploaded
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Divine on April 17, 2004, 05:35:01 AM
How do you get the Upload button to show. I only get the login button to show.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: catgirl on April 17, 2004, 06:11:16 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
all problems here posted should have been solved in alpha2
uploaded

OK.thank
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 07:08:54 AM
Quote from: "Divine"
How do you get the Upload button to show. I only get the login button to show.
Alpha2: Confirmed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: catgirl on April 17, 2004, 07:20:43 AM
"upload" not work. :(

(http://zhuluren.com/non/usr/10/10_2983_3.gif)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 17, 2004, 07:25:54 AM
Quote from: "catgirl"
"upload" not work. :(

1. confirmed. If returns with "404 not found" on
   http://xx.xx.xx.xxx/My%20Upload/%encoded-folder% :(
2. the menu upload->upload for users->list "NONE" is missing. Actually - this list is better then "access for users". I suggest to make both the same logic/view - as upload ("ALL" saves checks of previous settings)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 07:27:18 AM
(http://swg.fg.bz/HFS/Bug3.png)

1. Upload function is grayed. Could not select anything.
2. No upload button on HFS page.

How do you go to that page, catgirl? I can't go to that page :)
P.S. Just saw your reply Rafi, HELLLPPP! :P
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 17, 2004, 07:34:28 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
P.S. Just saw your reply Rafi, HELLLPPP! :P
Simple (??? 8O ) - the trick is - just creat a new folder (real!!!) and grant upload access to all ON it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 07:43:19 AM
Ah... got it! Thanks!
Feature Request: Set default upload path for root and enable upload access.

Bug Confirmed: %encoded-folder%
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 17, 2004, 07:47:27 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Ah... got it! Thanks!
Feature Request: Set default upload path for root and enable upload access.

I think not. what about a little security & privacy... :cry: better a bit difficult then sorry... ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: catgirl on April 17, 2004, 07:53:01 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Ah... got it! Thanks!
Feature Request: Set default upload path for root and enable upload access.

Bug Confirmed: %encoded-folder%


Bug Confirmed: %encoded-folder%!!!! :(  :(  :(  :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 07:55:04 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Ah... got it! Thanks!
Feature Request: Set default upload path for root and enable upload access.

I think not. what about a little security & privacy... :cry: better a bit difficult then sorry... ;)
Oops... I mean to set a default path (root) to upload to so that the HFS admin could Enable upload access on root... :lol: Sorry for the confusion.

Anyways, I worked on the HTML Template and fixed the 404 Not Found error, but then I don't know where the browser should post the data to, I tried /~upload and it doesn't work. HFS keeps on saying Requested POST "..." and no files actually appear on the screen.

Quote from: "rejetto"
VER: 2.0
+ new HTML template symbols: %build-time%
+ filemasks now support inverted logic: just put "\" ahead
+ pipelined requests now supported
+ File Menu -> "Don't count as download"
* "No tray icon for file extentions" has been removed because obsolete
* symbol %login% renamed in %login-link%
- file hints: also inherited user access were shown (while the rest shown is just local)
- having folders URLs with no trailing slash, caused problems with some folder/browser pairs
Could you explain these to me, I don't get what they are used for.  :?

BUG #3: Multiple Users Bug
Users could be created with the same name in Alpha2. Where it is not possible to have different passwords all at once for the same user.

COMMENT #1: Second Instance Port
Is HFS designed to open port 33xx when a second instance of the program is run?

COMMENT #2: HFS Shell Extension
Would it be better if HFS does not open different instances of HFS for every files added by shell extension? (For example: "1.exe and 2.exe is selected, right click, HFS, then HFS stores 1.exe at port 33x8 and 2.exe at port 33x9. Could HFS just store it all at one instance of the program? Two files at port 33x8 for example.)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 17, 2004, 01:09:06 PM
1. the root is actually a special virtual folder. it is already in to-do to make it possible to turn it in a real-folder.
2. i don't get your %encoded-folder% problem. maybe you customized your template. if not, please tell me how to reproduce the bug.
3. i understand it was not obvious how to get the upload feature, thus i will change the what's new:
+ File Menu -> Upload (only for real-folders)

Quote
Could you explain these to me, I don't get what they are used for.
i'll do my best
Quote
+ new HTML template symbols: %build-time%
it is the time spent by HFS to build the output page
Quote
+ filemasks now support inverted logic: just put "\" ahead
anywhere you got a filemask, like files filter where you specify what files to show, you can now specify what files to DONT show.
Quote
+ pipelined requests now supported
pipelined requests are a way of working speeding up the download of complex pages. new requests are made before the previous reply are fulfilled. IE doesn't use it AFAIK. in Mozilla it is an option. Opera does it, no option.
Quote
+ File Menu -> "Don't count as download"
this is an FR made by neoj on this forum. another explanation is present in the dialog.
Quote
* "No tray icon for file extentions" has been removed because obsolete
obsolete cause of the above feature
Quote
* symbol %login% renamed in %login-link%
just rename symbols in your customized template

the rest is bugfixing

Quote
BUG #3: Multiple Users Bug
fixed

Quote
COMMENT #1: Second Instance Port
nope, the port selection is delegated to the system

Quote
COMMENT #2: HFS Shell Extension
this was discussed in multiple threads and is already in to-do list.
i would like to have it for v2.0, but i have to submit to the OS-contest a final version for the end of this month.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 17, 2004, 02:48:05 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
2. i don't get your %encoded-folder% problem. maybe you customized your template. if not, please tell me how to reproduce the bug.
Here is the log . actually nothing special was done to make it happen... it happens also with clean install and only one real folder.


-------------------log---------------

7/04/04 17:40:17  80.178.36.68:1223 Connected
17/04/04 17:40:17  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Requested GET /My Upload/~upload
17/04/04 17:40:17  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Request dump
> GET /My%20Upload/~upload HTTP/1.1
> Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/msword, application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
> Referer: http://80.178.36.68/My%20Upload/
> Accept-Language: he,ru;q=0.5
> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; H010818; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Host: 80.178.36.68
> Connection: Keep-Alive
> Authorization: Basic cmFmaTpyYWZpZGFy
17/04/04 17:40:17  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Served 1937 bytes
17/04/04 17:40:17  80.178.36.68:1223 Requested GET /~img27
17/04/04 17:40:17  80.178.36.68:1223 Request dump
> GET /~img27 HTTP/1.1
> Accept: */*
> Referer: http://80.178.36.68/My%20Upload/~upload
> Accept-Language: he,ru;q=0.5
> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; H010818; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Host: 80.178.36.68
> Connection: Keep-Alive
17/04/04 17:40:17  80.178.36.68:1224 Connected
17/04/04 17:40:18  80.178.36.68:1224 Requested GET /~img14
17/04/04 17:40:18  80.178.36.68:1224 Request dump
> GET /~img14 HTTP/1.1
> Accept: */*
> Referer: http://80.178.36.68/My%20Upload/~upload
> Accept-Language: he,ru;q=0.5
> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; H010818; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Host: 80.178.36.68
> Connection: Keep-Alive
17/04/04 17:40:18  80.178.36.68:1223 Served 583 bytes
17/04/04 17:40:18  80.178.36.68:1224 Served 578 bytes
17/04/04 17:40:24  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Requested POST /My Upload/%encoded-folder%
17/04/04 17:40:24  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Request dump
> POST /My%20Upload/%encoded-folder% HTTP/1.1
> Accept: image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/msword, application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
> Referer: http://80.178.36.68/My%20Upload/~upload
> Accept-Language: he,ru;q=0.5
> Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------7d410418c24
> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; H010818; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Host: 80.178.36.68
> Content-Length: 46
> Connection: Keep-Alive
> Cache-Control: no-cache
> Authorization: Basic cmFmaTpyYWZpZGFy
17/04/04 17:40:24  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Served not - 404
17/04/04 17:40:24  rafi@80.178.36.68:1223 Disconnected by server - 3865 bytes sent
17/04/04 17:41:19  80.178.36.68:1224 Disconnected - 578 bytes sent
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 04:44:37 PM
Quote
2. i don't get your %encoded-folder% problem. maybe you customized your template. if not, please tell me how to reproduce the bug.
OK...
Here are the HTML code from the browser:
Quote
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><a href="%encoded-folder%~login" class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img27"> LOGIN</a></div>
Quote
<a class=folder href="%encoded-folder%"><img src="/~img14"> Back to file list</a>
Quote
<form action="%encoded-folder%" method=post enctype="multipart/form-data">
As you could see above, form action is set to %encoded-folder%, so the browser sent its POST command to /%encoded-folder% and resulted in a 404 Not Found error.
Title: huh?
Post by: nanackle on April 17, 2004, 10:27:13 PM
Quote from: "catgirl"
"upload" not work. :(

(http://zhuluren.com/non/usr/10/10_2983_3.gif)


I have turned on uploading for anyone on a real folder, but how do I get the upload page when I am browsing in my web browser? I'm sorry if I am missing the obvious.... but I read the entire thread and am trying my best to find the answer on my own... and any help would be greatly appreciated!


Thanks again.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 10:31:16 PM
Does the UPLOAD button not work for you?  8O
And yes, the upload function does not work! :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 17, 2004, 10:32:52 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Does the UPLOAD button not work for you?  8O
And yes, the upload function does not work! :)

An Upload button never appears in the folder.

Also, when adding a link in the HFS program, links never ever appear, no matter how I have entered the address (even with all of the http:// mumbo jumbo)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 10:36:21 PM
What version are you currently using?
The current latest version is Alpha 2.
I have no problems with the Upload button or Links.
Did you start HFS 2.0 with a fresh configuration?
Title: reply
Post by: Nanackleman on April 17, 2004, 10:38:15 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
What version are you currently using?
The current latest version is Alpha 2.
I have no problems with the Upload button or Links.
Did you start HFS 2.0 with a fresh configuration?

It is alpha 2... just grabbed it.
It is probably not a fresh config... what is the best way to start with a new config?

Thanks again... you are a ton of help!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Nanackleman on April 17, 2004, 10:39:54 PM
I figured it out... and I did see the upload button. Thanks again... love the program and wish there was more I could do to help!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 17, 2004, 10:41:46 PM
1. So how did you figure out?
2. Do the upload function work for you? (Does the %encoded-folder% bug exists on your HFS?)

LOL... Did I really help? :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Divine on April 18, 2004, 04:09:52 AM
Ok! your suggestion to create a real folder to upload worked.
Thats not easy to figure out.

Idea:
Why not have the Upload option not greyed out.
Have it give you a list where you can make a New Real Folder to Upload or specify the folder you want people to upload too.

 
I see the upload page and I can select  a file to upload but I get a when I press the Submit Query.

404 - Not found
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 18, 2004, 05:16:11 AM
Quote
I see the upload page and I can select  a file to upload but I get a when I press the Submit Query.

404 - Not found
Don't warry..., we get it too  :D  ;)  only rejetto knows how to avoid it... ;)  8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 18, 2004, 05:43:50 AM
It's now 7:43AM in rejetto's time...
Awaits HFS 2.0 Alpha 3.
Hopes the upload bug gets fixed...
Coming soon...
FTP - in HFS v4. :lol:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Pavel Rus on April 18, 2004, 08:43:53 AM
Hello!
If souce code for version 2 available,
please give me link.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 18, 2004, 01:43:41 PM
alpha3 uploaded
i will soon publish sources, sorry people but i upload at 1k/s :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: BaNsheE on April 18, 2004, 04:15:39 PM
Great Man! :D

Now the upload thing works! :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 18, 2004, 06:24:33 PM
BUG #3: Multiple Users Bug
* Access for users now grayed?
* 1. Menu -> Other Options -> Users
   2. Add -> test -> Ok "CAP the K :lol:"
   3. Menu -> Other Options -> Users
   4. HFS Crashes

BUG #4: Upload Overwrite Problems
Upload could overwrite currently existing files.

BUG#5: Upload User Permissions Bug
Upload permissions could only be set to ANYONE. Cannot select any users.

COMMENT #3: HFS Freezes During Upload Process
HFS freezes on upload until upload is finished, cannot see process.

COMMENT #4: Refresh Rate For Real Folders
If user were to delete a file in a folder shared by HFS, sometimes HFS will not refresh and the file stays in the view of HFS. Then HFS reports a 200 OK response and also with a huge content size. Although HFS responses, the transfer will not start as the file isn't on the drive.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 18, 2004, 06:46:01 PM
Bug #4 - is it a bug ? I don't think so. It should overwrite. Want  a confirm dialog ? maybe ...

Bug #5 - Yes it seems that somehing is wrong there, It used to work in alfa 2

Bug #6 - try upload 50 MB file. Windows 98 crashed the second time I uploaded it , with "insuficiant system resources "

Bug #7 - the progress bar (bottom of the browser) is not correct. I suggest to implement a real progress bar. Also - missing - the upload rate on both the server and client sides.

Bug #8 - trying F5 (refresh) after upload finished - restarts the upload again... I suggest to open a new browser window for the upload files dialog. so people can use the other window to see progress (by F5) until u implement one.

edit:
comment #5 - make the file-names edit boxes longer. it is hard to see long path names...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 18, 2004, 07:32:17 PM
Quote
Bug #4 - is it a bug ? I don't think so. It should overwrite. Want  a confirm dialog ? maybe ...
Is it possible on the browser side to do a confirmation popup? Might be possible on JavaScript... But browser will have to complete it's POST command first... Maybe HFS could name it like HFS(1).exe, HFS (2) or something.

Quote
Bug #5 - Yes it seems that something is wrong there, It used to work in alpha 2
Maybe because the "Users" feature is currently buggy.

Quote
Bug #6 - try upload 50 MB file. Windows 98 crashed the second time I uploaded it , with "insufficient system resources "
Yea, maybe it's just for local only since local-local connections have very high data rates and HFS have to process a lot in a short time. (Similar to Comment #3.)

Quote
Bug #7 - the progress bar (bottom of the browser) is not correct. I suggest to implement a real progress bar. Also - missing - the upload rate on both the server and client sides.
For my knowledge, it's not possible to implement a real progress bar onto a HTTP webpage while the POST command is going. Although it might be possible for HFS to create an additional page where users could view their upload progress. Otherwise, something like a Java applet will be needed to view progress in real-time.

Quote
Bug #8 - trying F5 (refresh) after upload finished - restarts the upload again... I suggest to open a new browser window for the upload files dialog. so people can use the other window to see progress (by F5) until u implement one.
Don't know really what you want there. But then if you are trying to see progress on the upload pending page, then no. This is because the browser have to completes it POST command before HFS could send anything back. (Pressing F5 on the browser window will cause the upload to restart.) But as I said before, it is possible for HFS to create a new page (ex. uploadprogress.htm) so that users could go to that page and view their upload progress.


edit:
Quote
comment #5 - make the file-names edit boxes longer. it is hard to see long path names...
Where is the file name edit boxes? The upload fields?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FEATURE REQUEST
F1: Password Protected Uploads
F2: Move uploads to folder "x"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P.S. Corrected Spelling Errors :)
Title: Re: reply
Post by: rejetto on April 18, 2004, 09:58:39 PM
Quote from: "Nanackleman"
It is probably not a fresh config... what is the best way to start with a new config?
hold SHIFT key while starting


sources at www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs.src.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 18, 2004, 10:41:27 PM
bug#3a  what?

bug#3b  fixed

bug#4   it is the meant behaviour

bug#5   i can't reproduce it

bug#6   i uploaded 50MB monitoring USER and GDI resources, and memory too. no increment was observed.

bug#7   bottom of the browser? IE bug, you should stop using that IE thing :) i can't do a progress because i can only reply to the POST command when the upload has finished. we can have a /~progress page, with auto-refresh and a link to it in the upload page (with target=_blank).

bug#8   this is not a bug, but we can avoid it by sending a page with a reload command in it. so the POST command switch to a GET. i don't think it is good to force people to open a new page. most browser has it as an option, and that's enough.

comment#3  i guess you tested it locally. try lowering the upload speed.

comment#4  i can't reproduce it

comment#5  done

fr#1    why?

fr#2    why?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 19, 2004, 03:14:36 AM
B3A: Cannot select "Access for users" for any files when accessing the file menu.

B4: Could you make HFS to upload like HFS(1).exe when HFS.exe already exists? (For better security)

B5: When a user is added in the Users tab, the username doesn't show in the Upload-> menu.

B7: /~progress would be great!

C4: I only got it once... I will let you know when it happens again.

F1/F2: I could say passive uploads, in case someone don't want their uploads public. Since users cannot control the file once it's uploaded on HFS.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: catgirl on April 19, 2004, 06:25:22 AM
save file display error dialog box! (at time)

(http://zhuluren.com/non/usr/10/10_2994_1.gif)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 19, 2004, 07:03:26 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
bug#6   i uploaded 50MB monitoring USER and GDI resources, and memory too. no increment was observed.
Try to download it twice
Quote from: "rejetto"
bug#7   bottom of the browser? IE bug, you should stop using that IE thing :) i can't do a progress because i can only reply to the POST command when the upload has finished. we can have a /~progress page, with auto-refresh and a link to it in the upload page (with target=_blank).
A good idea. I think I pointed before to a free sample of one.
I think the user should have an option to choose if to have the upload button pop up a new web page/window. Then the upload directory can have a autorefresh thing and can serve for progress  monitoring.

Quote from: "rejetto"
bug#8   this is not a bug, but we can avoid it by sending a page with a reload command in it. so the POST command switch to a GET. i don't think it is good to force people to open a new page. most browser has it as an option, and that's enough.
See #7 . give it as an option.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on April 27, 2004, 03:43:42 AM
What happened to the forum?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 27, 2004, 04:51:11 AM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
What happened to the forum?

and to the V 2.0 development ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 27, 2004, 03:07:13 PM
It seems that the server has crashed and all data is lost.
I think rejetto has restored the forum from his backups.  :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 27, 2004, 03:17:30 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
It seems that the server has crashed and all data is lost.
I think rejetto has restored the forum from his backups.  :?
Was it running on HFS software ?  ;)  :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 27, 2004, 09:34:51 PM
the db server give up
i don't know what exactly happened
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: carpediem on April 29, 2004, 06:22:08 AM
I don't know if i experienced a bug or if it was just bad luck. I put a 4.5 gigabyte file in alpha 5, but when my friend started to download it it only reported as 800 megabyte or something like that. Are there any limitations on the filesize maybe?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 29, 2004, 12:35:08 PM
hfs has pratically no file size limit
the limit is in the client (browser) you used
please search the forum, you can find a post where this thing has been discussed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 29, 2004, 08:24:50 PM
mr.anon:
1. yes, HFS will prevent uploading files from being downloaded/listed
Quote
2. What I meant is that a delete function when using a trigger. For ex:
---HFS Trigger #1---
C:\Unzip.exe -extract %files%
del %files%
---End Trigger #1 ---
why should HFS do it? just create a batch file


there will be a list of pairs: filemask,command
  commands will be called upon uploaded files for files matching the filemask
  form data will be saved in a temporary area, and made available to external programs.
  the temporary area will likely be a global atom. [ see globalGetAtomName() ]
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 30, 2004, 02:44:35 AM
alpha6 uploaded
all bugs should have been fixed
no news about the win9x resources problem
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on April 30, 2004, 06:10:20 AM
BA6-1: Multiple "new user" user Bug
HFS does not check whether if multiple users called "new user" are created. Can you fix that? I know other names will make an error but usernames called "new user" doesn't make a error. (Username: "new user" are without the quotes.)

When are you going to see the upload trigger function? Anytime soon?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 30, 2004, 07:21:49 AM
BA6-2
upload progress & right click menu:
       - UL Speed - not shown (Yet  ?)
       - UL pause - not working (Yet  ?)
       - ULs # in task-bar icon tool tip - not shown (Yet ? )

BA6-3 IP-Ban->cancel - not working


UP speed - is much better!
Win98 resources - still - killing the PC ...
Title: Web serve
Post by: Nanackleman on May 03, 2004, 06:54:06 AM
HFS works great as a HTTP web server... I can serve pages very easily. Is there a way that HFS will auto open a particular HTML file when someone logs onto my server... or opens a particular directory?

Could there be an option for this... or a special file name that you could name an html file so that it will automatically open when someone opens the directory that contains it?

If I am already missing this feature then I am sorry... but please let me know!
Title: Save User list
Post by: Dutchman on May 03, 2004, 12:33:04 PM
Can you add an option to save User accounts?
Also an import option as well

Evvry time that you upgrade too a new version you have to add it manualy.
Title: Re: Web serve
Post by: rejetto on May 03, 2004, 02:43:35 PM
Quote from: "Nanackleman"
HFS works great as a HTTP web server... I can serve pages very easily. Is there a way that HFS will auto open a particular HTML file when someone logs onto my server...
this was introduced in ver 2
"default file mask"
Title: Re: Save User list
Post by: rejetto on May 03, 2004, 02:45:16 PM
Quote from: "Dutchman"
Can you add an option to save User accounts?
Also an import option as well
when you save options, users are saved as well.
to import/export, just save options to file.
it is a simple text file you can edit/copy/paste...
Title: Re: Web serve
Post by: nanackleman on May 03, 2004, 02:58:54 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Nanackleman"
HFS works great as a HTTP web server... I can serve pages very easily. Is there a way that HFS will auto open a particular HTML file when someone logs onto my server...
this was introduced in ver 2
"default file mask"


I have looked all over.... where is this option?
Title: Re: Web serve
Post by: nanackleman on May 04, 2004, 12:43:02 AM
Quote from: "nanackleman"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Nanackleman"
HFS works great as a HTTP web server... I can serve pages very easily. Is there a way that HFS will auto open a particular HTML file when someone logs onto my server...
this was introduced in ver 2
"default file mask"


I have looked all over.... where is this option?


Ok figured it out... took a while though, but thanks for your help!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Gobble on May 04, 2004, 03:49:13 AM
Any luck on numbnails yet?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: carpediem on May 04, 2004, 03:22:39 PM
The icons often fail to load when browsing. Tried in both IE and opera and they  failed to load on both. If I right click on the image and chose "load image" in opera it will load, and the same goes for IE. It's the file icons and the "up" icon when in a sub folder that fails for me.

I don't get a red x, it's just not loading properly. Didn't see this in Alpha 5 though.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 05, 2004, 11:51:50 PM
Quote from: "carpediem"
The icons often fail to load when browsing.

iv had the same  bug
it appers to happen only when you load hfs (autoload's the file system) or when you manualy load the file system from a saved  database ,

e.g  when you go to the root dir for your  hfs, you will get a box within a box ( with out the red x (indicating file couldent be loaded)  ) this appers to sujest that the  html page is either skipping loading the icon or  loading to fast for th eicons to be displayed properly.

observations:

1. if you  go in to a folder  then back tot he room  the icons will apper.
2. if you right click on a missing icon select show image , the icons will apper.
3. if you  manually re add all hfs virtual and real folders with out  restoring from a back up file system the problem dosent exist

hwoever if yu go back and manually re add all of the folders e.t.c  ( with out using a saved database) the icons work properly

on a side note iv had another error  whislt  trying to add  a resorce to share    it happens when switching from 1 drive to another e.g  from c:\  to d:\ (just  give you a bug report ( next time it happens ill post) but as far as i can see dosent affect the  program running )
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: merig00 on May 06, 2004, 02:17:05 AM
just small notice...when checking for updated version it sais that last untested version is 2.0 beta 4 and not beta 6
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on May 06, 2004, 08:44:09 PM
" you will get a box within a box ( with out the red x (indicating file couldent be loaded) )"

R u sure? Because i think if the picture is too small
the red x wouldn't appear but the error is the same.รป
I mean that this error can be the "redx" error but because
the picture is too small there is no redx.

Hope u understand my bad english.

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 07, 2004, 05:41:18 PM
TGeRi : yes i know what you where tryig to sAY , however the problems isnt that , what the problem is, is that when you load the file systems for a saved backup  (and not manually install) the graphical icons , wont load  or will load but are not viewable untill you riught click and select show icons , or go in to a filder then back to root .
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Gobble on May 09, 2004, 09:06:41 PM
I know that thumbnails are already listed in the to do list.  Any ETA?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 09, 2004, 10:24:23 PM
Quote from: "Gobble"
Any luck on numbnails yet?
i'm not going to work on it very soon. not me at least.
Title: why?
Post by: CYS on May 10, 2004, 12:16:49 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Gobble"
Any luck on numbnails yet?
i'm not going to work on it very soon. not me at least.

why? you do a good job!
oh, there is no monolib.pas in the source code, please add it. thanks
Title: Re: why?
Post by: rejetto on May 11, 2004, 10:59:53 AM
Quote from: "CYS"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Gobble"
Any luck on numbnails yet?
i'm not going to work on it very soon. not me at least.
why? you do a good job!
why? because i want to work on other features for now.
i have a long to-do list.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 18, 2004, 05:13:20 AM
BA6-4: Browse It! Ports Bug
Browse It! (F9) will not phrase the correct address if the server is not running on port 80.
Heh... and this behavior only happens if the server is turned off... ;)

BA6-5: ON/OFF Button Bug
1. Open Some Connections (w/ Keep-Alive on)
2. Click the ON/OFF button when idle connections are seen.
3. Click No on the following popup.
4. The button is in a incorrect state. :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 19, 2004, 01:33:11 AM
BA6-4: fixed in alpha7
BA6-5: i can you say that? only because the browser still browse? you should check the listening port instead.
  anyway, this suggested me a change: i linked the widget update to the server status changing. before it was linked to user actions.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 19, 2004, 02:37:53 AM
TA: could you send me a VFS file that causes the bug? i'm unable to reproduce it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 19, 2004, 04:37:20 AM
CFA6-1: Refresh of Invalid Files
I have a saved VFS and when I moved files around, HFS does not automatically scans those location to see if the correct files exists and will shows thousands of minutes remaining if a user requests the file. HFS will not transfer anything although the users sees the file on the webpage. (Because the actually file is not on the actual location.)

FA6+-1: Multi-select
How's your decision on multi-selection of files? I really need it :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 19, 2004, 04:51:49 AM
alpha7 uploaded
bugfix reported here + compression support (see related compression thread)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 19, 2004, 05:12:03 AM
CA7-1: Addition of Accept-Ranges header
Since HFS supports HTTP 1.1 file resuming, it is appropriate to add the following header into HFS replies:

Accept-Ranges: bytes

This indicates that HFS supports resuming by bytes.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 19, 2004, 01:36:53 PM
CA7-1: done
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 19, 2004, 02:47:37 PM
just upgraded to  alpha 7

now i dont know if iv missed a seting or what but every time i try n browse the  HFS part of my site i get a blank white page.
no html code , no errors nothing :?

Additional

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"></HEAD>
<BODY></BODY></HTML>

is all the html page code im getting.
 how ever on the server its showing

15:48:08  82.34.81.114:4496 Requested GET /

but im still getting no html what so ever , ( using the default VFS html templaite that comes  when you first install HFS)

also

http://127.0.0.1:4599

im not using IIS so i dont have local loop back lol  but the server still shows the request. or if i do have local lop back its displaying the  " cannot find page" error

15:52:55  127.0.0.1:4599 Requested GET /
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 19, 2004, 07:34:16 PM
just disable compression

that is not what the server sent, but IE like to change things

btw, what IE are you using?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 20, 2004, 08:39:23 PM
Alfa - 7 :
I cannot browse+login (F9) my local IP. I use user/pass protected tree-top + User/pass protected subfolder. I get a blank web page, with "IE cannot link to the web page..." . Alfa6 works fine.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 21, 2004, 01:15:11 AM
that bug is fixed in alpha8 (to be uploaded)

(http://www.rejetto.com/forumattach/hfsstatus.png)
who thinks HFS is not going to be cool? :)
Title: :))
Post by: TGeRi on May 21, 2004, 04:07:08 AM
Erm. Hi! So. I mean. I think. Erm. Argh.

Cant find the words.. :)

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 21, 2004, 04:08:25 AM
WOW!!! Nice one rejetto!
Now for some questions:
1.) What about download/upload speeds?
2.) Multiple Connections?
3.) Ability to disable progress page?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 21, 2004, 04:13:55 AM
2.0alpha8 uploaded (sources as well)

+ /~progress (template changed)
+ global uploads counter
+ username displayed (when logged in)
+ support for "new file" flag
+ Menu -> Virtual File System -> "Flag files added recently"
- compression fixed
- comments were limited to 255 chars
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 21, 2004, 04:46:50 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
that bug is fixed in alpha8 (to be uploaded)

(http://www.rejetto.com/forumattach/hfsstatus.png)
who thinks HFS is not going to be cool? :)
Black="not transffered" & White="already transffered"  :?:  8O
==> It should be reversed ... ;)

Nice  :!:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 21, 2004, 04:51:01 AM
BA8-1: LOGIN button on Uploads pages
The login button is shown even if the user is logged in. (Upload pages)

CA8-1: Inversed File Progress Bars
I agree with Rafi! :)

CA8-2: Active Transfer button on every page
Instead of a link on the upload pages only, I think it's a good idea to add a progress button on all HFS pages... just an idea. ;)

CA8-3: Duplicate function for hiding folders? (Does Hide and Hide Tree does the same thing on folders?)
Desc above.

FA8+-1: Files Tag Feature
To re-tag files so that they becomes new again. (Right click -> Retag Files/Folders)

@Rafi, in your HTML Template, switch the in and the out bars ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 21, 2004, 12:50:20 PM
BA8-1: should be fixed
CA8-1: it is reversed to get a border (while the background is bright)
  if you don't like it, customize it ;)
CA8-2: i don't want unnecessary items on the page, and the progress is interesting for uploads only since most clients have a progress bar for downloads.
CA8-3: explained in the guide
FA8+-1: done
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 21, 2004, 12:57:26 PM
alpha 9 uploaded
+ File Menu -> Flag as new
- login link problem in upload page

URLs are changed, please refer the first post of this thread
(ok rafi?)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 21, 2004, 01:14:44 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
just disable compression

that is not what the server sent, but IE like to change things

btw, what IE are you using?


im using IE 6 sp1

latest version from  ms update with all security fixes
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 21, 2004, 01:26:15 PM
got back a while when we where getting that bug with the icons being displayed , i think i may have found out why

iv just edited the html templait and it happening agane , however ifi  close the app down and reload using  the origional setings it works fine , just though id let you all know :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on May 21, 2004, 01:53:41 PM
adding a new folder
changed from drive C:\ to drie d:\

i get this  error report

I/O error 21
HFS 2.0 alpha9
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 21/05/1999 14:51:52
[004A8674]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[0040288A]{hfs.exe     } System.ErrorAt + $16
[004A8674]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004A9247]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDirectory + $9F
[004A9171]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDrive + $59
[004AA796]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TSelectDirDlg.DriveListChange + $12
[0043BE04]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.Change + $1C
[004A8121]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.SetDrive + $115
[004A835D]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.Click + $4D
[0043BD77]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.CNCommand + $FB
[00465920]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004689A7]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[004688C3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043BC6E]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043CD61]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[004656F0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[004689FB]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[00469057]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $B
[0045129C]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMCommand + $2C
[00465920]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004688C3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041D654]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList + $4
[0042D1F4]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00468555]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004688C3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F3C1]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[00468555]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004689A7]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00469066]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $1A
[00465920]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004688C3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043BC6E]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043CD61]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004689A7]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00469C79]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMKeyDown + $19
[00465920]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00464EFF]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.DoMouseWheel + $87
[0046616B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.CMMouseWheel + $27
[00465920]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004688C3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043BC6E]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043CD61]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004689A7]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00465FB7]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WMMouseWheel + $4F
[00465920]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004687F5]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $89
[0041D654]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList + $4
[0042D1F4]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00468555]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00468727]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.IsControlMouseMsg + $4F
[004688C3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043BC6E]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043CD61]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004555C7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004555FE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045247B]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.ShowModal + $147
[004AAB7B]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.SelectDirectory + $16F
[004EF311]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Addfolder1Click (Line 4656, "main.pas" + 2) + $B
[0045C34A]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D523]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E202]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0041D654]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList + $4
[0042D1F4]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[00468540]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[0045E151]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004555C7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004555FE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045581E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F2A80]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP, 1100 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
List of loaded modules:

[00400000] C:\Http File Server\hfs.exe
             Build: 0
[00D10000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\msctfime.ime
<00400000>  5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[00D50000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\ctagent.dll
<10000000>  1.0.0 Build: 8
[01440000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\ODBC32.dll
<00400000>  3.520.9042 Build: 0
[10000000] C:\Program Files\Messenger Plus! 2\MsgPlusH.dll
            2.54.0 Build: 75
[1F850000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\odbcint.dll
            3.520.7713 Build: 0
[5A500000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\wiashext.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[5AD70000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\uxtheme.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1106
[629C0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\LPK.DLL
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[63000000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\WININET.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1405
[70A70000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\SHLWAPI.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1400
[70D00000] C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.GdiPlus_6595b64144ccf1df_1.0.10.0_x-ww_712befd8\gdiplus.dll
            5.1.3101 Build: 0
[71500000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\browseui.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1400
[71700000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\shdocvw.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1400
[71950000] C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.2600.1331_x-ww_7abf6d02\comctl32.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1342
[71A50000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\mswsock.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71A90000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\wshtcpip.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71AA0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\WS2HELP.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71AB0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\WS2_32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1240
[71AD0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\wsock32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71B20000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\mpr.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71BF0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\SAMLIB.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[71C10000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntlanman.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[71C20000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\NETAPI32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1343
[71C80000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\NETRAP.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71C90000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\NETUI1.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[71CD0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\NETUI0.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[72FA0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\USP10.dll
            1.409.2600 Build: 1106
[73000000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\winspool.drv
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[732E0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\RICHED32.DLL
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[73BA0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\sti.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[73D70000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\shgina.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1106
[746F0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\Msimtf.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[74720000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\Msctf.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[74AE0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\CFGMGR32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[74E30000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\RICHED20.dll
            5.30.23 Build: 1211
[75970000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\MSGINA.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1343
[75A70000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\USERENV.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[75F40000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\appHelp.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[75F60000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\drprov.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[75F70000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\davclnt.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[762A0000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSASN1.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1362
[762C0000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\CRYPT32.dll
            5.131.2600 Build: 1123
[76360000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\WINSTA.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76390000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\IMM32.DLL
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[763B0000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\comdlg32.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1106
[76600000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\CSCDLL.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[76620000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\cscui.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76670000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\SETUPAPI.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76990000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntshrui.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76B20000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\ATL.DLL
            3.0.9435 Build: 0
[76B40000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\winmm.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76BF0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\PSAPI.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76C90000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\IMAGEHLP.DLL
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76F20000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\DNSAPI.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76F60000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\WLDAP32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76F90000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\Secur32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[76FB0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\winrnr.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[76FC0000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\rasadhlp.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[77050000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\COMRes.dll
            2001.12.4414 Build: 42
[77120000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\oleaut32.dll
            3.50.5016 Build: 0
[771B0000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\OLE32.DLL
            5.1.2600 Build: 1362
[773D0000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\shell32.dll
            6.0.2800 Build: 1348
[77C00000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\version.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 0
[77C10000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSVCRT.DLL
            7.0.2600 Build: 1106
[77D40000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\user32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1255
[77DD0000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\ADVAPI32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[77E60000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1106
[77F50000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1217
[78000000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\RPCRT4.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1361
[7C890000] C:\WINDOWS\System32\CLBCATQ.DLL
            2001.12.4414 Build: 53
[7E090000] C:\WINDOWS\system32\GDI32.dll
            5.1.2600 Build: 1346
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 21/05/2004 14:53:56
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 21, 2004, 01:56:02 PM
that was me  lol

sorry its big  dunno who mutch in fo u need for  bug reports and seing as with  from  the alpha 9 version i though id post it in here also
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 21, 2004, 05:28:14 PM
A few things (Alfa 9):

BA9-1 :
I accidentally put twice the same file for upload (I know, silly...) what happend was - it was not overwritten in the output but appended to itself...

BA9-2 : Tray-icon->shows-># uploads - does not work

CA9-1:
Since you show accumulated % progress of all files - I suggest that in the progress bar try to show also:  "downloading File #X of Y files "

CA9-2:
Is it possible at all to auto-resume an upload ?

FA9-1:  
Think of a way for the uploading user to be able to change his refresh rate, and limit the minimun & default possible rate in the HFS server.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 21, 2004, 11:45:19 PM
@BA9-1: Cannot Reproduce Problem
@BA9-2: Confirmed
@CA9-2: I doubt it.
@FA9-1: It is possible to change it via the HTML Template.


FA9+-2: Detailed Progress
Size Completed + Speed should also be included in the progress page.

CA9-3: Grayed "Tag as new" function
Instead of hiding the Tag as new function for new files, it would be better to gray it instead.

BA9-3: Hide / Hide Tree Function
They don't seem to make a difference in this alpha.

BA9-4: %user% Variable does not work in upload pages
When %loggedin% is placed in the upload section of the HTML Template, HFS will not phrase the username. (Shows %user% on webpages.)

BA9-5: Upload Bugs
a. HFS posts to /folder//~upload instead of /folder/~upload. (Although upload still works.)
b. HFS does not return to the file list when the upload is completed. Is this designed behavior?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 22, 2004, 12:28:49 AM
rejetto  just to let you know  im running  alpha 9  wth compresson enabled
and its working fine now  , still geting that bug with the icons i narrowed it down to  it happening as soon as you

1. edit the htlm templait
2. reload HFS ( the the option to save and reopen the file systme on start up) - ( it appers as if its not scanning and  uploading new items in the NON-Virtual folder's also could just be me doning some ting wonr though)

couldent send you the HFS file system backup  as its to big via email

if you can isntall msn messenger i cans end it though there
other than that i can upload it t my apache server n send you the link
or  upload the whole directory to  my  Hfs site so you can brows n upload / download at your leashure

Apache File Server URL = http://fileserver.pws.emedia-ltd.com (HFS + Apache)

yes i know  its working from a url insted if ipadress , this is because  i did a simple redirection cript and masked th eipadress  if you want ill show u the coding for a  page Like that

also rejetto if you need any online file storgae space let me know  as iv got a  24/7 1mb connection and id be happy to  set ya up a storage space on the server.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on May 22, 2004, 02:19:45 PM
u mean rejetto :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 22, 2004, 07:15:06 PM
BA9-1: interesting feature, isn't it? :)
 it was because the test for file-change was based on the filename.
 i didn't think about such situation. now it is fixed.

BA9-2: the icon was not refreshed. now it will.

CA9-1: i don't have that information

CA9-2: no, there's no client able to do it

FA9-1: the refresh is fully demanded to the template. if anyone has a better [update] template to submit...

FA9-2: i have to create the part measuring the uploading speeding

CA9-3: ok

BA9-3: i just tested. it is working correctly. hide tree is the recursive version of hide.

BA9-4: fixed

BA9-5a: fixed
BA9-5b: weird, it does for me!


@Terminal: i will check that ASAP
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on May 23, 2004, 01:37:48 AM
ok heres the simple url redirect that im using to get HFS to work via a Url insted of the ip adress

Code: [Select]
<HTML>
<head>
<TITLE>page name here</TITLE>
<META NAME="description" CONTENT=" ">
<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT=" ">
<meta name="Robots" content="INDEX,FOLLOW">
</head>
<frameset rows="100%,*" border=0 frameborder=0 framespacing=0>
<frame src="http://ip-address here:port here/" name="url discription here">
</frameset>
</html>

basically that just forwards the url to the specified ip address and port  but keeps the url adress in the address bar

feel free to use it :)

rejetto if you could implament some way of setting hfs up to automatically  url redirect insted of just using the ipadress would be a nice feature for a future releace

also  how about implamenting some sort of login system for the acctual server its self  e.g if you minamize it to your systray  you can opt to have it ask for a password when you want  to return to the password ( only sujesting this as  for the past coupple of nights my brother had been sneekin in to my room n closing off connections of ppl that are donwloading form me  and that can get anoyign at times lol would imajin the same for every one  in the same kinda situation)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 23, 2004, 01:40:26 AM
that was me agane , been haivng problems login in to the forum  where it  either wont log me in with my user name n pass or tells me it does then when i post it comes up as guest

also noticed that  when i opt  for the forum to remember my login  it never does :S
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 23, 2004, 04:10:04 AM
Quote from: "Terminal-Access"
rejetto if you could implament some way of setting hfs up to automatically url redirect insted of just using the ipadress would be a nice feature for a future releace

Not automatically, but try:
        Menu->IP-address->custom-> your-URL
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 23, 2004, 05:03:40 AM
Quote from: "Terminal-Access"
rejetto if you could implament some way of setting hfs up to automatically url redirect insted of just using the ipadress would be a nice feature for a future releace
I am not sure what you meant by that.
Since HFS is not the one in control of your webserver, it cannot be used for redirecting users from a hostname. You could however use services like no-ip.com if you want a domain to reach to.

You <-> Redirection Web Server (HTML Based) <-> HFS.
As the diagram shown above, HFS is not the one in control of the redirection server. (HFS is the final destination.) You could use HFS to redirect your browser to somewhere else however.

This feature is possible if rejetto adds a FTP engine into HFS that modifies the HTML on the remote redirection server. But since there are a lot of features pending on the "To-Do" list, I don't think this will be in HFS anytime soon.

Quote from: "Terminal-Access"
also how about implamenting some sort of login system for the acctual server its self e.g if you minamize it to your systray you can opt to have it ask for a password when you want to return to the password ( only sujesting this as for the past coupple of nights my brother had been sneekin in to my room n closing off connections of ppl that are donwloading form me and that can get anoyign at times lol would imajin the same for every one in the same kinda situation)
Task Manager -> End Task (hfs.exe)  :o
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 23, 2004, 05:13:53 AM
BA9-6: Compressed Browsing Does Not Work
HFS sends the HTML as plain text even if Compressed Browsing is checked? Any explanations?

FA9+-3: Framed Upload Page
After looking at your "to-do" list, you gave me an idea.
What about making a frame on upload pages so the left frame shows the progress and the right frame shows the main upload page?
That way, a user does not have to open a separate window to look at their upload process.

Check pm, rejetto :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 23, 2004, 02:16:29 PM
@Mr. Anon

lol i know that it dosent direct ur  dns server e.t.c  as i run my own lol :P lol

thats whay i posted about  my  url redirect   abouve the post  

the one posted by Guest with
Code: [Select]
<HTML>
<head>
<TITLE>page name here</TITLE>
<META NAME="description" CONTENT=" ">
<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT=" ">
<meta name="Robots" content="INDEX,FOLLOW">
</head>
<frameset rows="100%,*" border=0 frameborder=0 framespacing=0>
<frame src="http://ip-address here:port here/" name="url discription here">
</frameset>
</html>

was posted by me  lol

Quote
You could use HFS to redirect your browser to somewhere else however.

This feature is possible if rejetto adds a FTP engine into HFS that modifies the HTML on the remote redirection server. But since there are a lot of features pending on the "To-Do" list, I don't think this will be in HFS anytime soon.

^ i was acctually   talking aboutt hat should have explaned my self a bit better lol

and as to end tasking  HFS
 not n option as i need it runnin 24/7
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 23, 2004, 04:11:20 PM
What I meant is can't your brother just end task hfs.exe in the middle of the night and close all of your connections anyways?
You should lock your computer instead. ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 23, 2004, 06:47:00 PM
lol , no he wont as he has  an area on that also he closes it off so that his frineds can dwonlaod  or he can downlaod  him self    but neway i though it would make a nice  feature to implamnet never the less
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 23, 2004, 10:42:27 PM
BA9-6: you forgot the Accept-Encoding: gzip ;)
FA9+-3: interesting

@Terminal: did you read the answer Rafi gave you?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 23, 2004, 10:50:09 PM
Quote
id be happy to set ya up a storage space on the server.
thank you. luckily i don't need it ATM.

Quote
if you minamize it to your systray you can opt to have it ask for a password when you want to return to the password
hmm...this would work only until someone does not kill hfs process. the clean way to protect your HFS is to use the multi-user features of your OS. do you use WinXP ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 23, 2004, 11:05:37 PM
yes i do use windows xp how ever my computer is logged in to my workspace area (only one on my computer) 24/7 as im running a home network and a part time buisness via this workstation/server (my brother has his own computer conected to the net via my lan, and when im sleeping at night he sneaks in n disabled or terminates ne one  donwloading from hfs , yes i could  lock the workstation out but tis alotta hastle just to lock some one out of 1 program , plus i have serveral other programs runnig simultaniously with hfs that need monitoring  so i cant really lock the workstation plus ppl contacting me on  msn messenger also e.t.c just though it spunde  like a nice ide thats all :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 24, 2004, 03:01:42 AM
and won't your brother just terminate HFS process ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 24, 2004, 03:06:34 AM
Yup, just like what I am mentioning.
End Task ends it all! ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 24, 2004, 03:23:17 AM
alpha10 available
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha10.zip
what's new?
- bug adding folder
- transient messages on status bar were not shown anymore
- standard icons were not reloaded from VFS files
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Terminal-Access on May 24, 2004, 12:31:55 PM
nope my brother wont  end task it as he had an area set up on it also he will just close ne connections on the server that are downloading from my area or the oter areas so he can have ppl download from his area lol
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 24, 2004, 03:15:00 PM
i meant: you bro restarts HFS, so he get to close connections anyway
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 24, 2004, 06:14:49 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
alpha10 available
- standard icons were not reloaded from VFS files

Nice. I though you'll never get to it...


Edit:
BTW - when you get to the speed measurement - dont forget the top bandwidth graph (2 colors, Up & down...) it will impress the judges...
Title: Real Folders
Post by: Rafi on May 25, 2004, 11:13:37 AM
Don't real folders suppose to show/expand  the files in them (in the VFS view) ?  I get this only for  virtual folders.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 25, 2004, 12:10:24 PM
it would consume too much resources for large folders or always changing folders
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on May 25, 2004, 06:24:05 PM
Couldn't you limit the consuming somehow? I'd like an option for it anyway.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on May 25, 2004, 08:46:12 PM
when will be this competition.

i think if any other wins the judges got money from the author
of that program.

hfs is the best

TGeRi

ps: i will wirte an article (a test really) in a hungarian computer
magazine that i work for and i will compare easyi2use and free
webservers and hfs will be one of the competitors... I will let u
know who won :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: mdg-webmaster on May 25, 2004, 09:44:29 PM
Hi peoples,

How can I creat a Real folder for Upload files? an how do I upload over the Webinterface?

mdg-webmaster
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 25, 2004, 09:57:28 PM
Quote from: "mdg-webmaster"
Hi peoples,

How can I creat a Real folder for Upload files? an how do I upload over the Webinterface?

mdg-webmaster
* add a folder (answer NO to the Q about virtual...)
* select it; Menu->upload->anyone
* the user then sees an upload button & progress screen http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1480&start=77
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 26, 2004, 02:44:04 AM
(http://swg.fg.bz/HFS/HFSUploadTemplate.png)
:D :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 26, 2004, 06:09:46 AM
Nice! this will win the competition  for rejetto...

I would add ON/OFF capability to the view of the progress frame and control over the refresh rate.
Maybe also show finished files (color the finished files edit boxes, or even put the progress over the edit box and "move" is from file to file...)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 26, 2004, 06:51:17 AM
BA10-1 :  Progress page doesn't work no more. (worked on alfa 9)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 26, 2004, 07:21:18 AM
Progress page works here.
Title: Complete download
Post by: pero28 on May 26, 2004, 12:40:55 PM
Where I download complete version with template file, or same template file where work %upload% and %login%.

Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 26, 2004, 01:43:44 PM
the EXE file is all-inclusive
just "edit html template" and hit the "restore default"
Title: bug
Post by: nanackleman on May 26, 2004, 04:36:39 PM
I just tried uploading to myself, and my friend just tried uploading to me from a different pc and the files appear to upload however when I check the folder where they uploaded to it is empty!

This is a major bug!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on May 26, 2004, 04:41:35 PM
Hi!

I have this question for long time in mind.

If there is a pc where hfs never ran and i start it. What happens?

I mean 1. searches for .ini in smae dir
2. searches registry
3. if nothing found wirtes to the reigstry?

Or what?

I hope u understand my question. Sorry for my baad english.

TGeRi
Title: bug
Post by: nanackleman on May 26, 2004, 04:45:16 PM
I have tried everything I know to try and I am still getting the same problem. Upload just does not work anymore... and i do not get the nice upload status on the from to the left as in the previously posted screenshot... in fact there is no frame on the left!
Title: bug
Post by: nanackleman on May 26, 2004, 04:49:06 PM
now that I went back to beta 9 the upload works. Why did it not work in beta 10? When will the new beta 10 come?
Title: Re: bug
Post by: Rafi on May 26, 2004, 04:56:00 PM
Quote from: "nanackleman"
now that I went back to beta 9 the upload works. Why did it not work in beta 10? When will the new beta 10 come?
Same here. I reported that as a bug. I think only  Mr. Amon has it working, but then - he wrote his own template...

@Amon - why don't you post the template here (if it works...)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 27, 2004, 05:27:59 AM
VER 2: Alpha 11
+ Upload Framed Page
+ Progress Page: Bytes Completed
http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha11.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 27, 2004, 06:00:13 AM
BA11-1: Upload "Access For All" Bug
When Access For All is selected for all, user logged in would not be able to see the folder when the list protected items... checkbox is checked.

BA11-2: Upload POST bug
Code: [Select]
<form action="%encoded-folder%~upload" method=post enctype="multipart/form-data">Only posting to %dir%//~upload works. Bug remains.
Can you change it so it would post to /~upload? :)

CA11-1: 2x Add Progress Frame
I wonder if there's anyway to stop HFS from having 2 progress frames at once.
I don't think it's possible but you might have better knowledge. :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 27, 2004, 07:06:06 AM
@Mr Anon - you should find/fix the bugs BEFORE announcing a new version, not after...  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Dutchman01 on May 27, 2004, 09:24:55 AM
I'm trying too chance this template with another background color (#7378FF).

I don't no wat i'm doing wrong,

Can someone help me out, the background color stil be the same as the default template.

Thanks.

this template is from HFS 2.0 Alpha 11.



<html>
<head>
<title>HFS %folder%</title>
<style>\n%style%\n</style>
</head>
<body>
%login-link%
%loggedin%
%upload-link%

<div class=label></div
<div class=folder>Welcome at...</div>
<div class=folder>Dutchman's FTP Server.</div>
<br>Server Build:21-04-2004
<br>Last Update:27-05-2004
<div class=body
<div class=l
<div class=label>folder
<div class=big>%folder%</div>

<div class=body>
%up%
%files%
</div>
<div class=label>

<div class=folder>Have Fun!!!</div>

<br>Server time: %timestamp%
<br>Server Uptime: %uptime%

</div>
</body>
</html>

[style]
body, .button, .row, .big, .label, th, comment { font-family:tahoma, verdana, arial, helvetica, sans; font-weight:normal; font-size:10pt; }
body { margin:0; background-color:#DDDDFF; padding:10px;}
.label { font-size: 10pt; }
div.body {
  border-bottom: 4px solid #7378FF;
     border-top: 4px solid #7378FF;
    border-left: 1px dotted #7378FF;
   border-right: 1px dotted #7378FF;
  background:#F3F3FF; padding:15px; margin:15px;
}
.big { font-size:16pt; font-weight:bold;  }
A { text-decoration:none;  background-color:Transparent; color:#0055FF; }
A:visited { color:#5555FF; }
A:hover { background-color:#EEEEFF; }
img { border-style:none }
.right { text-align:right }
.row { font-size:12pt; background:#FFFFFF; border:1px solid #7378FF }
.comment { font-size:7pt; color:#888888; background:#EEEEEE; padding:3px; border:1px solid #DDDDDD; margin-top:2px; }
.column { color:#555555; font-size:15pt; font-weight:bold; padding-bottom:0; }
.button { padding:5px; padding-top:7px; border:2px solid black; background:white; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold; }
.flag { font-weight:bold; font-size:10pt; background:white; color:red; text-align:center; border:1px solid red; }

[login-link]
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><a href="%encoded-folder%~login" class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img27"> LOGIN</a></div>

[loggedin]
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><span class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img27"> user: %user%</span></div>

[upload-link]
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><a href="%encoded-folder%~upload" class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img32"> UPLOAD</a></div>

[up]
<a class=big href="%parent-folder%"><img src="/~img14"> UP</a>

[nofiles]
<div class=big>No files</div>

[files]
<div class=label>%number-folders% folders,  %number-files% files - Total: %total-size%</div>
<table cellpadding=5>
<th><a href="%encoded-folder%?sort=n"><span class=column>Filename</span></a>
<th><a href="%encoded-folder%?sort=s"><span class=column>Filesize</span></a>
<th><a href="%encoded-folder%?sort=t"><span class=column>Filetime</span></a>
<th class=column>Hits
%list%
</table>

[file]
<tr><td class=row>%new% <a href="%item-url%"><img align=top src="/~img_file"> %item-name%</a>%comment%<td class="row right">%item-size%<td class="row right">%item-modified%<td class="row right">%item-dl-count%

[folder]
<tr><td class=row>%new% <a href="%item-url%"><img align=top src="/~img_folder"> <b>%item-name%</b></a>%comment%<td align=center class=row><i>folder</i><td class="row right">%item-modified%<td class="row right">%item-dl-count%

[link]
<tr><td class=row>%new% <a href="%item-url%"><img align=top src="/~img_link"> <b>%item-name%</b></a>%comment%<td colspan=3 align=center class=row><i>link</i>

[comment]
<div class=comment>%item-comment%</div>

[not found]
<html><head><style>\n%style%\n</style></head><body>
<h1>404 -  Not found</h1>
<a href="/">go to root</a>
<hr>
<div style="font-family:tahoma, verdana, arial, helvetica, sans; font-size:10pt;">

<br>%timestamp%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[overload]
<html><head><style>\n%style%\n</style></head><body>
<h1>Server busy</h1>
Please, retry later.
<hr>
<div style="font-family:tahoma, verdana, arial, helvetica, sans; font-size:10pt;">

<br>%timestamp%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[unauthorized]
<html><head><style>\n%style%\n</style></head><body>
<h1>Unauthorized</h1>
!!!  STOP  !!!

<br>This is a protected resource!!!
<br>
<br>Your username/password doesn't match.
<br>If you lost your password please contact me.
<hr>
<br>!!!  Your IP Adress is logged!  !!!
<hr>
<div style="font-family:tahoma, verdana, arial, helvetica, sans; font-size:10pt;">

<br>%timestamp%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[deny]
<html><head><style>\n%style%\n</style></head><body>
<h1>Unallowed</h1>
This resource is not accessible.
<hr>
<div style="font-family: tahoma, verdana, arial, helvetica, sans; font-size: 10pt;">

<br>%timestamp%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[ban]
<html><head><style>\n%style%\n</style></head><body>
<h1>You are banned.</h1>
%reason%
<hr>
<div style="font-family: tahoma, verdana, arial, helvetica, sans; font-size: 10pt;">

<br>%timestamp%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[upload]
<html>
<head>
<title>HFS %folder%</title>
<style>\n%style%\n</style>
</head>
<body>
%login-link%
%loggedin%
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><a href="%encoded-folder%~upload+progress" class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img10"> ADD PROGRESS FRAME</a></div>
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><a href="%encoded-folder%" class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img21"> CANCEL UPLOAD</a></div>
<div class=label>folder</div>
<div class=big>%folder%</div>
<div class=body>
<form action="%encoded-folder%~upload" method=post enctype="multipart/form-data">
%upload-files%
<input type=submit value='Upload files'>
</form>
<br>Before uploading you may want to open a <a target=_blank href='/~progress'>progress status window</a>.
</div>
<div class=label>

<br>Servertime: %timestamp%
<br>Uptime: %uptime%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[upload-file]
<input name=fileupload%idx% size=100 type=file><br>

[upload+progress]
<html>
<head>
<frameset cols=200,*>
  <frame src="/~progress" scrolling=auto marginwidth=0>
  <frame src="%encoded-folder%~upload" scrolling=auto>
</frameset>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>

[progress]
<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="3;URL=/~progress">
<title>HFS - Progress status</title>
<style>
%style%
.filename { font-weight:bold; font-size:10pt; }
.bytes { font-size:9pt; }
.perc { font-size:14px; vertical-align:middle; }
.out_bar { width:100px; font-size:15px; background:black; border:black 1px solid; margin-right:5px; }
.in_bar { height:16px; background:white; color:white;  }
div.body { margin-left:0; margin-right:0; }
body { padding:2px; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class=big>Progress status</div>
Auto-refresh: 3 seconds
<div class=body>
%progress-files%
</div>
<div class=label>

<br>Servertime: %timestamp%
<br>Uptime: %uptime%
</div>
</body>
</html>

[progress-nofiles]
<div class=big>Currently no file exchange is on with your address</div>

[progress-upload-file]
<span class=flag>&nbsp;up&nbsp;</span>
<span class=filename>%filename%</span>
<div class=bytes>%bytes% / %total% bytes</div>
<div style='margin-top:5px; margin-bottom:20px;'>
  <span class=out_bar><span class=in_bar style='width:%perc%px'></span></span> <span class=perc>%perc%%</span>
</div>

[progress-download-file]
<span class=flag>&nbsp;down&nbsp;</span>
<span class=filename>%filename%</span>
<div class=bytes>%bytes% / %total% bytes</div>
<div style='margin-top:5px; margin-bottom:20px;'>
  <span class=out_bar><span class=in_bar style='width:%perc%px'></span></span><span class=perc> %perc%%</span>
</div>

[newfile]
<span class=flag>&nbsp;NEW&nbsp;</span>
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 27, 2004, 12:25:51 PM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
If there is a pc where hfs never ran and i start it. What happens?

try to load config in this order, and stop at first found
1. ini file
2. user registry
3. local machine registry

the config is saved to the same place where it was found.
if it was not found, it saves to ini file (from version 1.6).
Title: Re: bug
Post by: rejetto on May 27, 2004, 12:26:14 PM
Quote from: "nanackleman"
I just tried uploading to myself, and my friend just tried uploading to me from a different pc and the files appear to upload however when I check the folder where they uploaded to it is empty!

yes, it is a bug in the template
it will be fixed in alpha12
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 27, 2004, 12:56:06 PM
BA11-1: can't reproduce it
BA11-2: alpha12 should fix it
CA11-1: i think it can be done using javascript, but i'm not smart with it. i let this job to someone else.

www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha12.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 27, 2004, 12:58:12 PM
Quote from: "Dutchman01"
I'm trying too chance this template with another background color (#7378FF).
I don't no wat i'm doing wrong,
see, you are changing the color of borders instead of background's one.
Title: alpha12
Post by: nanackleman on May 27, 2004, 01:20:24 PM
I think the progress frame should disappear when you are done uploading. As it is now, the progress frame will follow you everywhere after its been turned on. It would be great if there was a way to turn it off!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 27, 2004, 02:12:37 PM
sorry but i'm not an expert in javascript
Title: how?
Post by: nanackleman on May 27, 2004, 08:00:41 PM
how do you log out of HFS? Also, how long does HFS remember you after you stop browsing? It seems like a while from some of the testing I have done. Does it remember you via the connecting ip address or a cookie or what?

Thanks
Title: Re: how?
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 27, 2004, 11:10:09 PM
Quote from: "nanackleman"
how do you log out of HFS? Also, how long does HFS remember you after you stop browsing? It seems like a while from some of the testing I have done. Does it remember you via the connecting ip address or a cookie or what?

Thanks
HFS does not use web-based login like what you used to login into forums. This way it does not put any cookies or remember your IP anyway in order to login into HFS.

When you try to access a protected resource, HFS requests login credentials from your browser. (This is the popup that your browser displays.) When you enter your username and password in that dialog, your browser encodes that information and places it into a Authorization: HTTP header. When the Authorization: header is verified by HFS, HFS grants the access to the resource, otherwise it returns a Forbidden message. Because HFS have no control whether or not your browser sends the Authorization: header or not, there's no way for HFS to log you out. The only way to "logout" is when your browser stop sending the Authorization: header. Most browser will "forget" this header after the browser is closed/restarted. (This includes all the windows.)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 27, 2004, 11:33:05 PM
Same problem with uploads...
Title: Alfa 12 Production testing ....
Post by: Rafi on May 28, 2004, 05:51:30 AM
Here are results from my tests (Win98SE). In general - several notes are related to the user interface logic. Although  they are not effecting the UL operation itself, it looks to me that they can contribute to making  life easier for the user, and also - improve the overall look&feel...

BA12-1 Most important - Progress is not being displayed. I retested with previous versions - it started in Alfa10. Alfa 9 is  OK.  :cry:

BA12-2 "Sound ticks" are being heard for each progress refresh... 8O

BA12-3 if we "open frame" AFTRE the file names  are entered - they are being cleared  :(


CA12-1 HFS ID text in the frame is redundant (it is already in the UL screen...)

CA12-2 Buttons operation/logic (Bugs? Features? ):
a. "open frame" should be disabled IF the frame is already open
b. add "close frame" inside the frame (and re-enable the "open frame"). Actually if you right-click->back inside it - it closes ...) or just change the "open frame" to "close frame"
c.  upload button should be disabled after starting the upload, or better yet - act as an "append file" so you can add file DURING the upload. if you add a file and press it again - it restarts the whole upload.
d. Buttons will be nicer if they  look more like buttons (3D) and not like "user: xxx" display "button" ...
 
CA12-3 Is it possible to remember the last "state" of the open file  dialog  (sorting, detailed-list etc) ?  

CA12-4 UL folder name - should be in a separate line (bellow the buttons ?) since when it is long - it wraps to two lines anyway...


FA12-1 Add multiple selection capability to the file-open so several files can be selected for upload at the same time!

FA12-2 Add an option in HFS - for the  "browse" operation - if to open a new browser window or, like today,  use one that is already opened.

:idea:FA12-3:idea:
I list this last one as a feature and not a comment, since it may need some overall of the MMI. It actually redefines it... sorry, but it is only alfa, isn't it ?  We ARE open to new ideas ...  ;) ... so:

1-  Open the UL dialog as a separate page/window leaving the original UL folder view - unchanged
2- You have two options now:
 a* to request a new progress window (like now) but WITH cancel+close+timer upload control on it
 b* or to have a new frame for it (similar to now, again with cancel & close controls ON IT).
[*Note1]
 When you request to open a *new frame* add to the original HFS folder-view-screen the status/progress  frame at the  top or bottom of it (with/including  the "cancel+close" buttons and a refresh timer edit field, w/o the folder name...). [*Note2]
3- close the upload-file-open dialog
4- Each auto refresh will act on the progress frame only (like today), and I would also add bellow the progress bar the name of the currently uploading file.
5- When any file is finished UL-ing - you refresh also the whole regular folder frame, and can see the new UL-ed file in the regular folder view :) !
6- when all are finished (=100%) or manually aborted - auto-close the upload status frame, that also stops progress refresh.
7- The user is now - back to it's original (updated)  UL folder view  :^^:

Note1: It is desired that both the frame view and the separate page view - should have similar/same design & controls - for simplicity
Note2: if we choose the frame view as the only option, we can generate the frame when pressing the "upload" button and just start updating  when the user starts it from the open-files-dialog


Well, a new but an award winning design , right ?  :)  :!:

@Rejetto - If you want to only stabilize V2.0  I would not touch any of my bright ideas ( ;) ) in FA12-3, although I think they are the "way to go" in future alfas and the sooner the better...

Have a productive weekend!
Title: Re: Alfa 12 Production testing ....
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 28, 2004, 06:35:42 AM
BA12-2 "Sound ticks" are being heard for each progress refresh... 8O
Normal Behavior, nothing that HFS could change. Change your browser if you don't like the ticks :)

BA12-3 if we "open frame" AFTRE the file names  are entered - they are being cleared  :(
Same for this one, since your browser loads a new page, HFS have no control what is put it the fields.

CA12-2 Buttons operation/logic (Bugs? Features? ):
a. "open frame" should be disabled IF the frame is already open
rejetto already commented on that

b. add "close frame" inside the frame (and re-enable the "open frame").
rejetto also commented on this.
Actually if you right-click->back inside it - it closes ...) or just change the "open frame" to "close frame"
c.  upload button should be disabled after starting the upload, or better yet - act as an "append file" so you can add file DURING the upload. if you add a file and press it again - it restarts the whole upload.
Nothing HFS could change about the restart since the upload is handled by the browser and "re-clicking" the Upload button causes the browser to open a new POST connection to HFS.

d. Buttons will be nicer if they  look more like buttons (3D) and not like "user: xxx" display "button" ...
You know JavaScript? :)
 
FA12-1 Add multiple selection capability to the file-open so several files can be selected for upload at the same time!
Browser-dependant... No browser could do it now :(

:idea:FA12-3:idea:
I list this last one as a feature and not a comment, since it may need some overall of the MMI. It actually redefines it... sorry, but it is only alfa, isn't it ?  We ARE open to new ideas ...  ;) ... so:
Yes, but rejetto has to sumbit HFS to the contest really soon so he will need to stabilize it ATM.

 2- You have two options now:
 a* to request a new progress window (like now) but WITH cancel+close+timer upload control on it
If you know JavaScript, you might wanna help.
 b* or to have a new frame for it (similar to now, again with cancel & close controls ON IT).
HELP!!!!

3- close the upload-file-open dialog
What!?

4- Each auto refresh will act on the progress frame only (like today), and I would also add bellow the progress bar the name of the currently uploading file.
The filename is already on the progress window, isn't it?

5- When any file is finished UL-ing - you refresh also the whole regular folder frame, and can see the new UL-ed file in the regular folder view :) !
Are you talking about HFS not refreshing to the folder view after uploading? If so, I have the same problem!

6- when all are finished (=100%) or manually aborted - auto-close the upload status frame, that also stops progress refresh.
I couldn't figure out a way to do that, maybe someone could.

7- The user is now - back to it's original (updated)  UL folder view  :^^:
???

Note1: It is desired that both the frame view and the separate page view - should have similar/same design & controls - for simplicity
Similar controls?

Note2: if we choose the frame view as the only option, we can generate the frame when pressing the "upload" button and just start updating  when the user starts it from the open-files-dialog
Dunno how to do this...

Very hard to do ideas... Maybe you could provide JavaScripts for rejetto?  B)
Title: Re: Alfa 12 Production testing ....
Post by: Rafi on May 28, 2004, 07:29:18 AM
Sorry, but I'm not an expert  in JavaScript. For the rest - see bellow...

BA12-2 "Sound ticks" are being heard for each progress refresh... 8O
Normal Behavior, nothing that HFS could change. Change your browser if you don't like the ticks :)
really ? I'll try...


BA12-3 if we "open frame" AFTRE the file names  are entered - they are being cleared  :(
Same for this one, since your browser loads a new page, HFS have no control what is put it the fields.

really ?  no way to remember the input list and auto-re-input it ?

CA12-2 Buttons operation/logic (Bugs? Features? ):
a. "open frame" should be disabled IF the frame is already open
rejetto already commented on that

Can't find it... :cry:

b. add "close frame" inside the frame (and re-enable the "open frame").
rejetto also commented on this.

Can't find it either ... :cry:

Actually if you right-click->back inside it - it closes ...) or just change the "open frame" to "close frame"
c.  upload button should be disabled after starting the upload, or better yet - act as an "append file" so you can add file DURING the upload. if you add a file and press it again - it restarts the whole upload.
Nothing HFS could change about the restart since the upload is handled by the browser and "re-clicking" the Upload button causes the browser to open a new POST connection to HFS.
so - just disable the button !

d. Buttons will be nicer if they  look more like buttons (3D) and not like "user: xxx" display "button" ...
You know JavaScript? :)
 
Can't you just emulate the "upload" botton style ?

FA12-1 Add multiple selection capability to the file-open so several files can be selected for upload at the same time!
Browser-dependant... No browser could do it now :(

too bad  :cry:

:idea:FA12-3:idea:
I list this last one as a feature and not a comment, since it may need some overall of the MMI. It actually redefines it... sorry, but it is only alfa, isn't it ?  We ARE open to new ideas ...  ;) ... so:
Yes, but rejetto has to sumbit HFS to the contest really soon so he will need to stabilize it ATM.
I know, I mentioned it at the end. but see it as  "the future " thing


 2- You have two options now:
 a* to request a new progress window (like now) but WITH cancel+close+timer upload control on it
If you know JavaScript, you might wanna help.
 b* or to have a new frame for it (similar to now, again with cancel & close controls ON IT).
HELP!!!!

3- close the upload-file-open dialog
What!?
Yes ! I meant pressing the upload button will result in closing the whole dialog. The concept is to move controls over to the progress related frame-page.

4- Each auto refresh will act on the progress frame only (like today), and I would also add bellow the progress bar the name of the currently uploading file.
The filename is already on the progress window, isn't it?
well, see BA12-1 - I cannot see any progress at all starting from alfa10 ... :roll:  :cry:


5- When any file is finished UL-ing - you refresh also the whole regular folder frame, and can see the new UL-ed file in the regular folder view :) !
Are you talking about HFS not refreshing to the folder view after uploading? If so, I have the same problem!
No, I meant in a future-combined-pregress+UL-folder frames - refresh the folder per file UL. Now it works OK, it does show the updated folder when the upload dialog is returning back to folder view.
And HFS server itself does not show any files inside a real folder at all ...

6- when all are finished (=100%) or manually aborted - auto-close the upload status frame, that also stops progress refresh.
I couldn't figure out a way to do that, maybe someone could.
So just put a manual close  botton there that will do "back" ... ;)

7- The user is now - back to it's original (updated)  UL folder view  :^^:
???
You are not thinking "the new way" . There were two frames - progress + folder view. Now we close the progress, and left with the original updated folder. I think I'll have to draw a demo screen later...

Note1: It is desired that both the frame view and the separate page view - should have similar/same design & controls - for simplicity
Similar controls?
Yes, if possible, so that implementation code may  be the same

Note2: if we choose the frame view as the only option, we can generate the frame when pressing the "upload" button and just start updating  when the user starts it from the open-files-dialog
Dunno how to do this...
Well, nothing I can do to help. I'll just draw later it to make sure you guys followed my thoughts.

Very hard to do ideas... Maybe you could provide JavaScripts for rejetto?  B)

 Sorry, no can do. Well, life is hard... I'll try to compose demo screen-shot later
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 28, 2004, 12:39:36 PM
Here is two Illustrations of what I meant - by FA12-3 above.

(http://home.barak-online.net/rafi-d/tmp_files/HFS_demo.jpg)

And the temporary dialog:

(http://home.barak-online.net/rafi-d/tmp_files/HFS_demo2.jpg)

This is NOT an HTML code, it is only a drawing...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 28, 2004, 11:08:47 PM
Quote
Normal Behavior, nothing that HFS could change. Change your browser if you don't like the ticks :)
You could also disable the "tick" sound completely by disabling your Navigation sound in your Sounds control panel.

Quote
Can't you just emulate the "upload" botton style ?
I am not very sure what you meant by "3D". Do you mean normal buttons? They don't look good on the page. I would prefer the ones now.

Quote
Yes ! I meant pressing the upload button will result in closing the whole dialog. The concept is to move controls over to the progress related frame-page.
Close the dialog? What dialog?

Quote
well, see BA12-1 - I cannot see any progress at all starting from alfa10 ...
Did you try resetting your HTML Template? I will try to confirm this later.

Quote
You are not thinking "the new way" . There were two frames - progress + folder view. Now we close the progress, and left with the original updated folder. I think I'll have to draw a demo screen later...
Still not sure what you meant. Have fun with the demo screens. :)

Quote
Yes, if possible, so that implementation code may be the same
For the similar controls part, do you mean Minimize, Maximize, Close?
I don't think it's possible.

Quote
Well, nothing I can do to help. I'll just draw later it to make sure you guys followed my thoughts.
I don't think that function is possible via HTML. Have no clue with scripts though...

Code: [Select]
Screenshots
Quote
Switch On/Off the progress frame
This should be possible if JavaScript were used.

Quote
Activates the Upload Dialog, and the progress frame. Optionally - changes into "cancel upload" when upload is active.
The optional part of this is not possible since HFS could not return any reply until the POST command has been finished.

Quote
Selectable refresh rate
* This value can be changed via the HTML Template.
If you want this value to be changed via the client side, this will require a deep change in HFS engines and I would not recommend that. This value should only be defined by the server admin anyways. (If you do not like the refresh rate made, you could use a web filter to replace the value. ;))

Quote
alpha9
Although this is removable via the HTML Template, it is a good idea to remove it by default in later versions.

Quote
Starts uploads and closes window
CLOSES WINDOW!? How should your browser upload with the window closed?

Quote
Closes window
I am assuming that you are wanting the upload window "pop" instead of the method used now.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 29, 2004, 02:38:14 AM
mr.anon already answerd many points
guys, you don't like the quote feature anymore? :)

BA12-1: i can't figure it out. :( i unzipped sources for alpha9 and alpha10, compared them using CSDiff, but i found no change that could bug the progress page. and moreover, it works perfectly for me and anon. i have no idea.
BA12-2: i'm not aware of how to ask IE to do not toll bells when the page is reloaded. but i sadly guess there's no way to do that.
BA12-3: this is almost unexplainable! a sad effect from a sad piece of software, that is MSIE. i have no solution for it ATM, but i'm open to suggestions.
CA12-1: yes, you are right, but i didn't want to have 2 pages for frame and external window. a little uglier, but a better template.
CA12-2 a,b: i don't have the necessary javascript knowledge, and i wait for someone to submit a better template.
  c: done
  d: i will give it a try, using css, but i fear the result won't be that nice.
CA12-3: yes, but it is uselessly complex until we have a session-based login system.
FA12-1: already discussed, impossible, AFAIK
FA12-2: something similar is already planned
Quote
Open the UL dialog as a separate page/window leaving the original UL folder view - unchanged
i don't link this change. customize the template for your own needs. let it be known the license for HFS let you redistribute HFS with your own changes, if you wish to :)

rafi, alpha13 will have a behaviour much closer to what you asked
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 29, 2004, 04:41:53 AM
w00t! Alpha 13 is here!  :D

VER 2: Alpha 13
+ Grayed Upload Button When Upload In Progress
+ Avoid 2x Progress Frame
* HTML Template Changed, Please Reset Your HTML Template!

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha13.zip

Working on HFS Black, anyone interested? :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 29, 2004, 10:41:08 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
rafi, alpha13 will have a behaviour much closer to what you asked
Yes, much closer, about 10 KM now ...  ;) just kidding...

Quote from: "rejetto"
guys, you don't like the quote feature anymore?  
Since you like quotes  ---->

Quote from: "rejetto"
BA12-1: i can't figure it out. :(
[clearing UL file names]I can't figure it out either. May be related to older installs

Quote from: "rejetto"
BA12-2: i'm not aware of how to ask IE to do not toll bells
never mind, not too important

Quote from: "rejetto"
BA12-3: this is almost unexplainable!
[frame clears UL file names] "if you can't beat them - join them" --> maybe make the progress frame opened automatically - right away (+close button)

Quote from: "rejetto"
CA12-2 a,b: i don't have the necessary javascript knowledge  
[double/close frame] I see you did manage it in alfa13  ;) deleted the botton! if you  can do that - you can replace it with "close frame". see BA12-3

Quote from: "amon"
Do you mean normal buttons? They don't look good on the page. I would prefer the ones now.

CA12-2 d: gray buttons - i suggested this since current buttons are not behaving well (breaking...)  when you try make the window nerrower... also gray are dull but standard issue... ;)

Quote from: "amon"
Close the dialog? What dialog?
...Still not sure what you meant. Have fun with the demo screens.
...The optional part of this is not possible since HFS could not return any reply until the POST command has been finished.

Quote
Selectable refresh rate
* This value can be changed via the HTML Template.
...If you want this value to be changed via the client side, this will require a deep change in HFS engines and I would not recommend that. This value should only be defined by the server admin anyways

I'm no expert, but I'm sure it is simple. think of it as an additional filename + button. If you managed to pass 10 file names you can pass one small integer...  :)  and I don't agree with you - as I wrote - the HFS admin should define the min time allowed, the user can choose a bigger one.

again - somthing not too important but changing the template is NOT always a good  approach .

Quote from: "amon"
Quote
Starts uploads and closes window
CLOSES WINDOW!? How should your browser upload with the window closed?

Quote
Closes window
I am assuming that you are wanting the upload window "pop" instead of the method used now.
Yes, pop type thing (see my demo), but can be the same window.  again the sequence I suggest for later versions:

1. view upload forder (like today)
2. press upload (like today)
3. now -
  option A: popup a new window-dialog only for inputing file names
  option B(simpler): change current winodw  to this dialog (like today)
  Both - temporary views! (see demo)
4. press "upload"
5. if A -
** pass the info to the first window ...
** close the window
** return to original forder-view + new progress frame (see demo)
    if B - (simpler, may be better...):
** switch back to folder view + optional progress frame (see demo)
6. only now - start the post/upload (if required - in a new minimized/hidden window)
7. and - (I hope) progress can still work in the progress frame  8O and auto-refresh of the folder view if possible as well when each file is done...

Minor problems in the VFS:
BA13-1  : menu>switch-to-virtual should warn the user since there is no switch back to "real"
BA13-2  : creating a folder with the same name - should not be allowed (now - it has only a warning)
BA13-3 : moving a folder to a place were the name already exsists  - has no warning/error/auto-rename
BA13-4 : doing - upload, and then pressing "progress frame" to s ee the upload - cancels the upload :cry:

Edit -
Tray icon related problems:
BA13-5 - options->tray-message - help text missing %uploads%
BA13-6 - tray-icon->tray-icons-shows-># of UL - does not show a "v"
BA13-7 - right click menu should say tray icon not icons
BA13-8 - when selectin to show # of uploads - it is totally wrong, and also - does not zero at the end of the uploads
BA13-9 - # of downloads is suddenly always 2 ... :)
in general - a complete mess ... :cry:

Edit(2) -
Just tried downloading , and the progress works great for downloads.
On uploads  - no luck ... :cry: so maybe win98 does not give it a chance to get the data or something changed in Alfa10  in the permissions (I have both the tree roo and the upload folder user-protected).
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 29, 2004, 02:52:24 PM
BA12-3: i tested it, and it doesn't happen to me. i'm using IE6 with full windows update.
CA12-2:
  a,b: yes, i figured out how to do that
  d: they are links, not buttons
BA13-1: ok
BA13-2: i will change it in a yes/no question. i like to don't cancel the user action.
BA13-3: fixed
BA13-4: it doesn't to me. i tested it with IE and Opera. rafi, MSIE has problems, but YOUR MSIE has many problems!!!
BA13-5: i just don't want it in the default message. not yet.
BA13-6: fixed
BA13-7: nope, it is about more than one tray icon
BA13-8: it is not the number of uploads in progress, but of started uploads, that is, it counts canceled uploads also. i guess it is better to count only finished uploads, so i will change this in alpha14.
BA13-9: can't reproduce it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 29, 2004, 06:47:21 PM
VER 2: Alpha 14
+ Increased Performance of HFS
+ Throughput doubled for uploads
B- Fixed Upload Progress

*Reset HTML Template for updates!

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha14.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 29, 2004, 06:52:00 PM
HFS Black under Alpha 12:
(http://swg.fg.bz/HFS/HFSBlackA12.png)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 29, 2004, 07:14:38 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
VER 2: Alpha 14
+ Increased Performance of HFS
+ Throughput doubled for uploads
B- Fixed Upload Progress

Much better now!!!  :^^:  what was the problem, that was so hard to recreate  :?:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 29, 2004, 08:55:21 PM
and the bad news (I think might be Win 98 related):
BA14-1 - crash/hangs  the PC after 2-3 UL of 40 MB files. It is due to very large user resources drop on unknown ocations .I noticed that for example exactly when the UL finishes. When the system has less resources then the drop - the PC hangs.
I think it was observed also here:
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1480&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=39

(http://home.barak-online.net/rafi-d/tmp_files/hfs_A14_UL_end.jpg)

and the bug of ancel UL with the "open progres frame" still exsists

FA14-1 - have an option to show progress (%) in the icon (like getright) when selecting icon-per-UL/DL

CA14-1 BTW - I'm not sure multi icons  work for ULs + DLs running . check it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 30, 2004, 08:49:54 PM
to fix the win98 problem, i have to install win98, and i'm not sure i want to spend so much time for it.

about the icons, are you talking about uploads? because downloads icons already work, and they do it well, similar to getright.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 30, 2004, 09:17:58 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
about the icons, are you talking about uploads? because downloads icons already work, and they do it well, similar to getright.
Yes
Title: bug
Post by: nanackleman on May 31, 2004, 05:37:42 PM
When you open a vfs file on startup you cannot drag folders into the file list to add them. When you try you get a circle with a cross through it.

You can however right click and add a folder that way.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on May 31, 2004, 05:45:12 PM
I don't see any problems with alpha14.
Right clicking does not work while the Open VFS File is in place.
Or at least for me?  :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: nanackleman on May 31, 2004, 11:19:06 PM
Do you understand what I mean?

I save a vfs file... and then the program automatically reloads it on startup... this is great.

Well, I can no longer drag and drop files and folders from my windows desktop into the program... I just get that blocked icon for the mouse cursor. I must manually right click and choose add file or folder.... this is not good.

In order to be able to add again by dragging and dropping I must start over with a clean vfs file... or in other words... I must start the program without it loading a vfs file.

I am using winxp.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 01, 2004, 01:39:50 AM
nanackleman, it does not happen to me 8O
i use the autoload too
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on June 01, 2004, 04:41:49 AM
No problems here.
Title: Proxy & CRC error
Post by: Chien Yusin on June 01, 2004, 05:32:07 AM
1.when upload with alpha14 within intranet, an error of "can not found the page" occur. turn off the IE proxy option, that's ok.
2. when open the rar compressed file which uploaded, an error of "unexpected compressed file end" occur.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: nanackleman on June 01, 2004, 06:18:10 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
nanackleman, it does not happen to me 8O
i use the autoload too


 I noticed that the problem occurs specifically after I enable always on top from the menu. At that point I cannot drag anything into HFS. When I restart HFS if always on top is enabled, same thing. I must disable always on top and then restart HFS for it to go back to normal.... strange...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 01, 2004, 08:24:28 AM
Quote from: "nanackleman"
I noticed that the problem occurs specifically after I enable always on top from the menu. At that point I cannot drag anything into HFS.
yes. it is fixed from alpha15
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on June 03, 2004, 07:50:51 PM
I suggest to put alfa14 in the first post.
Title: hfs2.0alpha14 's BUg
Post by: maomao on June 05, 2004, 06:27:20 AM
the error is time of the file & folder

change to system' time....

 8O
Title: Alfa 14 crash:
Post by: Anonymous on June 06, 2004, 07:39:04 PM
Access violation at address 7F9DFCC6 in module 'RICHED32.DLL'. Read of address FFFFFFFF
HFS 2.0 alpha14
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 06/06/04 22:36:44
[7F9DFCC6]{RICHED32.DLL}
[0040413F]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004EA58B]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent (Line 3409, "main.pas" + 4) + $0
[004689A7]{HFS.EXE     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0043A84D]{HFS.EXE     } StdCtrls.TCustomEdit.DefaultHandler + $2D
[00465920]{HFS.EXE     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004688C3]{HFS.EXE     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[00431B8D]{HFS.EXE     } CommCtrl.TreeView_GetEditControl + $D
[00468540]{HFS.EXE     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[004267D8]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00455F96]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Idle + $EE
[0045560B]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $17
[0045581E]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F2B6C]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows 98 SE , Version: 4.10, Build: 40A08AE, " A "
Processor: Intel, Pentium III, 450 MHz MMX
Display  : 800x600 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hsg.exe: Build: 0 27/09/03 08:43:12
hfs16.exe: Build: 0 11/04/04 23:28:52
hfs.exe: Build: 0 29/05/04 20:27:22
hfs1_6_rc26b.exe: Build: 0 10/04/04 16:05:22
Title: Re: hfs2.0alpha14 's BUg
Post by: rejetto on June 06, 2004, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: "maomao"
the error is time of the file & folder
fixed in next alpha

Quote
Access violation at address 7F9DFCC6 in module 'RICHED32.DLL'. Read of address FFFFFFFF
HFS 2.0 alpha14
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 06/06/04 22:36:44
[7F9DFCC6]{RICHED32.DLL}
what was you doing when this did happen?
anyway, i fear it may be a win98 problem...i may have an older version of riched32.dll
Title: Re: hfs2.0alpha14 's BUg
Post by: Rafi on June 07, 2004, 04:21:05 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
Access violation at address 7F9DFCC6 in module 'RICHED32.DLL'. Read of address FFFFFFFF
HFS 2.0 alpha14
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 06/06/04 22:36:44
[7F9DFCC6]{RICHED32.DLL}
what was you doing when this did happen?
anyway, i fear it may be a win98 problem...i may have an older version of riched32.dll

Opsss, it was me above... and I don't remember what I was doing. I think - nothing...  :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on June 09, 2004, 04:51:46 AM
VER 2: Alpha 15
* Change of byte(s) variable in progress sections
+ Added upload/download speed detection (see new HTML Template)
+ Added Diskspace detection variable
+ Added Close Progress Bar button
+ Graph Changes
+ Incoming/Outgoing data size
-B This version should squash the bugs reported here.

** Change of HTML Template required in this version!
http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha15.zip
Title: So..
Post by: Iron Spring on June 09, 2004, 09:53:00 PM
So.. We should (if running alpha 14 black) restore default template
or is a alpha 15 template black available somewhere now..  Guess
I will go look around the forum and see if I can locate it.. Alpha 15
looks much better so far.. Don't know exactly,  got it running on
default template right now.. The band width meter looks much better..
Like the colors for up's and down's.. Cool..

Iron...

Ok.. I found it on the black template thread... Thanks Mr. Anon.. Looks
SUPER!!

IrOn SpRiNg :twisted:
>WAA<
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Squishy on June 10, 2004, 12:58:59 AM
Would it be possible in the next alpha to exclude web pages and images from the concurrent downloads limit?  Right now, if I set the limit to two concurrent streams, the Upload icon and a few file icons won't download, and show up as a red X.  Also, when I browse web pages at a relatively fast rate (3-5 pages per minute), it sometimes shows up as a blank white page until I hit the refresh button.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 10, 2004, 06:02:31 PM
weird, i can browse pages while the band is full
maybe you have some kind of problem

HFS uses a queue system
every connection is served
after a connection is served, it is put after others, and it won't be served again until other have been served too
Title: err :/
Post by: [LukAS] on June 18, 2004, 07:56:08 PM
Code: [Select]
Error 10022 in function Disconnect (closesocket)
Invalid argument
HFS 2.0 alpha12
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2004-06-18 21:54:28
[004AC7C5]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.RaiseException (Line 1666, "WSocket.pas" + 4) + $F
[004B1CA8]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.SocketError (Line 5373, "WSocket.pas" + 15) + $8
[004B156B]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.InternalClose (Line 5074, "WSocket.pas" + 32) + $8
[004B13ED]{hfs.exe     } WSocket.TCustomWSocket.Close (Line 4993, "WSocket.pas" + 1) + $9
[004C9637]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.Destroy (Line 503, "HSlib.pas" + 2) + $8
[00403C34]{hfs.exe     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004F11F8]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.beforeQuit (Line 5203, "main.pas" + 8) + $5
[004F1217]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 5209, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0044EBF7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DoClose + $17
[00452131]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.Close + $55
[004ED417]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Exit1Click (Line 4164, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0045C34A]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D523]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E202]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045E151]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[004267D8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[0043106E]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TObjectList.GetItem + $A
[00431202]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[004555C7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004555FE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045581E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F2B34]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   :  Advanced Server, Version: 5.2, Build: ECE, ""
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) processor, 1000 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

GG Banner Killer v6.0.xxx.exe: Build: 0 2004-01-31 21:37:26
hfs.exe: Build: 0 2004-05-27 14:55:04

well i installed NetLimiter  this may be the problem (socket bind ) but ... who knows :)
@ Rejetto :)
btw could you reactivate my account user LukAS mail was my nick @w....bb.org (i wont write complete just check...) this mail died sadly :P if you could do it i would be glad ;)

Lukas
Title: Downloading folders
Post by: joebuttkisser on June 19, 2004, 02:42:35 AM
Is there a way to just dowload an entire folder just by clicking on the folder instead of having to click on everything in that folder.  Since Im new with this program maybe it has this feature but I just dont know how to use it.  If this program doesnt have this feature that would a great feature to add.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 19, 2004, 05:38:22 PM
i don't knwo what that error might be.
it lets me think about an error in the socket lib.
anyway, since it is on server closing, i think it may be safe enough to just mute that error, so i will.

lukas reactivated

Quote
Is there a way to just dowload an entire folder
it can't be done by the server. maybe in the future there will be an on-the-fly zip feature.
in the while, you can use getright, it has such feature. just use the getright browser.
getright is not free, but i don't know any other software doing it.
well, maybe you can get something using wget. it is a command-line utility.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 19, 2004, 06:38:51 PM
2.0 alpha16 uploaded
+ graph pic
- upload link fixed


template changed, to display the graph.
you should have a look at the default one if you customized it.
Title: 2.0alpha16 url
Post by: Iron Spring on June 20, 2004, 03:46:19 AM
Cool.. Going to check it out.. Here is the URL if someone want's it..

www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha16.zip

Remember.. U will have to use the default template and not Black
alpha15 template.. I'm sure Mr Anon will give us a update soon on
the new template black.. That is if you want to use the upload bandwidth
meter now on alpha16.. Seems the Black alpha15 will also work but
with only the upload progress meter shown..

Mr. Anon has now posted a code line under the Black Template thread
to add the upload band meter if someone is looking for it.. I added it
and lost the effect of the progress meter but gained the band meter..
No display of upload bandwidth but I was on local.. Going to wait and
see what happens when someone uses it from the net side..
May just wait till everything is gone over to add that to the html code
for alpha16..
 

IrOn SpRiNg :twisted:
>WAA<
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on June 20, 2004, 06:09:15 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i don't knwo what that error might be.
it lets me think about an error in the socket lib.
anyway, since it is on server closing, i think it may be safe enough to just mute that error, so i will.

lukas reactivated

Quote
Is there a way to just dowload an entire folder
it can't be done by the server. maybe in the future there will be an on-the-fly zip feature.
in the while, you can use getright, it has such feature. just use the getright browser.
getright is not free, but i don't know any other software doing it.
well, maybe you can get something using wget. it is a command-line utility.

Hi!

There isa free plugin for TotalCommander (TC is not free)
which is very similar to getirght-s browser. It is called HTTPBrowser.

U can find it here: http://totalcommander.free.fr/fabio/ or
u can find many useful plugins for tc here: www.clubtotal.tk

-edit: spelling-

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on June 20, 2004, 06:37:23 AM
Yep, getright browser does this as well (and is free...)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: koichi on June 20, 2004, 03:17:38 PM
############# ERROR ON: 20/06/2004 17.15.47
D:\Documents and Settings\koichi\Desktop\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 004EAB2F in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000008
HFS 2.0 alpha16
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 20/06/2004 17.15.47
[004EAB2F]{hfs.exe     }
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     }
[004EA956]{hfs.exe     }
[004C98CD]{hfs.exe     }
[00442E3F]{hfs.exe     }
[00442D23]{hfs.exe     }
[00426818]{hfs.exe     }
[00455607]{hfs.exe     }
[0045563E]{hfs.exe     }
[0045585E]{hfs.exe     }
[004F3274]{hfs.exe     }
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+, 1800 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 19/06/2004 20.10.26
### END LOG
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 20, 2004, 06:35:47 PM
oops
i forgot to include debug info
that log is useless :(

i now re-upload alpha16 including debug info
please use this instead
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: koichi on June 24, 2004, 01:52:06 PM
############# ERROR ON: 24/06/2004 15.13.24
D:\Documents and Settings\koichi\Desktop\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 004EAB2F in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000008
HFS 2.0 alpha16
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 24/06/2004 15.13.24
[004EAB2F]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.refreshSbar (Line 3499, "main.pas" + 2) + $D
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004EA956]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent (Line 3464, "main.pas" + 76) + $3
[004C98CD]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.timerEvent (Line 567, "HSlib.pas" + 25) + $3
[00442E3F]{hfs.exe     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00442D23]{hfs.exe     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00455607]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045563E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045585E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F3274]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+, 1800 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 20/06/2004 20.20.20
### END LOG
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 25, 2004, 03:40:08 AM
how long does it take to happen? does it happen as you start HFS ? does it happen when you quit it? after some minute?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: nanackleman on June 25, 2004, 03:50:57 PM
is there a way to limit the type of file that can be uploaded... for instance if I only want *.doc to be allowed to be uploaded to me.... can I do that and if so how?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on June 25, 2004, 04:21:09 PM
Quote from: "nanackleman"
is there a way to limit the type of file that can be uploaded... for instance if I only want *.doc to be allowed to be uploaded to me.... can I do that and if so how?
It's a good (and important!!!) point. I don't think it is possible, but I suggest to quickly implement it, since it has to do with security. May be we can use the folder & files filter (for upload enabled folders) as a way to limit the allowed files types.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: koichi on July 01, 2004, 07:38:41 PM
it usually happens some minutes after i close the program...
Title: bug
Post by: grumbler on July 03, 2004, 03:13:53 PM
A key with the name of "83.166.43.162" already exists
HFS 2.0 alpha16
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 03.07.2004 18:08:23
[004DC24E]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListStrings.KeyIsValid + $82
[004DC6B4]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListStrings.Put + $3C
[004DAD53]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListEditor.SetCell + $AB
[004DB6EC]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListEditor.SetEditText + $108
[004D7D1F]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.UpdateText + $4B
[004D7B3C]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.HideEdit + $24
[004D7C82]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.UpdateEdit + $8E
[004D5225]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.FocusCell + $15
[004D6BC8]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.KeyDown + $450
[00402490]{hfs.exe     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004DBF18]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListEditor.KeyDown + $148
[004D26CC]{hfs.exe     } Grids.SendToParent + $20
[004D2995]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TInplaceEdit.KeyDown + $13D
[004D90C7]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TInplaceEditList.KeyDown + $47
[00469C87]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DoKeyDown + $4F
[00469CAA]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMKeyDown + $A
[00465960]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A64B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.CNKeyDown + $A7
[00465960]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468595]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004D2BFA]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TInplaceEdit.WndProc + $6E
[004D97A0]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TInplaceEditList.WndProc + $6C
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00455607]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045563E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004524BB]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.ShowModal + $147
[0048E83A]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TPageControl.SetActivePage + $3E
[004EFED7]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.BannedIPaddresses1Click (Line 4795, "main.pas" + 2) + $9
[0045C38A]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D563]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E242]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0042D234]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0045E191]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00455607]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045563E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045585E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F3274]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows 2000 Professional, Version: 5.0, Build: 893, "Service Pack 4"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+, 1800 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 20.06.2004 20:20:20

----------
it occured when i was trying to add user's IP to Bann list for the second time. I think, the mesage like "This IP is already in the list" should have appeared instead of this error message :)

p.s. the product is great!
Title: still don't see the upload function:(
Post by: grumbler on July 03, 2004, 03:56:22 PM
i've read all posts related to problem with upload button and still can't get, what should I do to make it appear  :(

HFS v2.0a16

this is a part of default template :
Code: [Select]
[upload]
<html>
<head>
<title>HFS %folder%</title>
<style>\n%style%\n</style>
</head>
<body>
%login-link%
%loggedin%
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;">
<script language="jscript">
if (!window.parent.progress) document.write('<a href="%encoded-folder%~upload+progress" class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img10"> ADD PROGRESS FRAME</a>');
else document.write('<a href="%encoded-folder%~upload" target=_parent class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img10"> CLOSE PROGRESS FRAME</a>');
</script>
</div>
<div style="float:right; padding:15px;"><a href="%encoded-folder%" target=_parent class=button><img border=0 align=absbottom src="/~img21"> CANCEL UPLOAD</a></div>
<div style="margin-top:60px" class=label>folder</div>
<div class=big>%folder%</div>
<div class=body>
<form name=frm action="%encoded-folder%" target=_parent method=post enctype="multipart/form-data" onSubmit="frm.upbtn.disabled=true; return true;">
%upload-files%
<input name=upbtn type=submit value="Upload files">
</form>
<br>Before uploading you may want to open a <a target=_blank href="/~progress">progress status window</a>.
</div>
<div class=label>
<a href="http://www.rejetto.com/hfs">HttpFileServer %version%</a>
<br>Servertime: %timestamp%
<br>Uptime: %uptime%
<br>Disk space: %diskfree%
</div>
</body>
</html>
Shall I correct something?

-----
greetings from Estonia (*.ee)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: grumbler on July 03, 2004, 04:41:03 PM
OH! I've managed to do it :)
Finally, i've understood, what "real folder" means :)

Thx to all
Title: too many connections from one user
Post by: grumbler on July 03, 2004, 04:53:22 PM
There is a question(?).
When i connect to my HFS,
I see 3 simultaneous connections from my IP in connections' list.
All connections are made to three consequtive ports.
Is it a bug? If not, what's the purpose?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on July 03, 2004, 06:01:31 PM
No, this is because your browser is making 3 simultaneous connections to HFS all at once. (pipelining)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: grumbler on July 03, 2004, 06:06:19 PM
Mr. Anon, thx!

To developer:
it would be great, if any message box appeared, when saving options.
Otherwise, users may be puzzled and unsure, whether the options were saved or not. (i was't sure until i looked up in config file in the programm's root folder and in the registry :) )
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 04, 2004, 08:47:17 AM
Quote
it usually happens some minutes after i close the program...
that is...HFS takes minutes to close on your system? 8O

Quote
it occured when i was trying to add user's IP to Bann list for the second time. I think, the mesage like "This IP is already in the list" should have appeared instead of this error message
i'll fix it

Quote
(pipelining)
pipelining is a different thing

Quote
All connections are made to three consequtive ports.
Is it a bug? If not, what's the purpose?
ports are not used only for incoming connections, but also for outgoing.
people don't talk about it because it is usually uninteresting.
ports for outgoing connections are assigned by the system.
the system will usually assign ports as a sequence

Quote
it would be great, if any message box appeared, when saving options.
ok
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: grumbler on July 04, 2004, 11:58:45 AM
One more wish.
When clicking
It is logical but inconvinient. It would be better to minimize it to tray.
And the only way to exit would be right click on tray icon--->Exit.
IMHO
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on July 04, 2004, 04:01:51 PM
I already suggested this feauter but Rejetto's opinion is that if u click X u know what ur doing so if u want to minimize hfs u will click "_".

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 04, 2004, 04:27:17 PM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
I already suggested this feauter but Rejetto's opinion is that if u click X u know what ur doing so if u want to minimize hfs u will click "_".

TGeRi
I suggest on ALL EXITs to  pop up with OK/cancel dialog box .
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: grumbler on July 04, 2004, 04:56:07 PM
But nowadays, there is a tendency to give
ok. then at least confirmation window should appear.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 05, 2004, 01:41:16 PM
i will put a confirmation option
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 05, 2004, 01:49:43 PM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha17.zip

just little changes
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on July 05, 2004, 06:51:25 PM
Sorry, the last 'guest' was me...
and rejetto - put #17 in the first post... + change list  :?

...and the first bug is :
Menu->start/exit->confirm-exit  - does not work ...  :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 09, 2004, 01:49:23 PM
i completely forgot to implement the feature  :roll:
http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha18.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on July 11, 2004, 07:26:19 PM
It looks like the template for A16 and A18 are identical.
Title: Yep Seems Ok Here..
Post by: Iron Spring on July 11, 2004, 10:06:47 PM
Hello all,
   Been out of cyber for a few weeks.. Got hit buy lightning on the main
server and lost it and two support computers.. Home Owners covered
my loss and back online now..

The new Alpha18 has been running with BlackAlpha16.tpl with no
problems or lock ups.. With my server being down for two weeks
the system was real busy.. GREAT JOB!!

Thanks.. Good to be back online..
You don't miss the water till the well runs dry...

IrOn SpRiNg
Title: Acces Violation
Post by: Only a Guest on July 18, 2004, 09:18:48 AM
I'm not quite sure where to post the error message, so sorry when its the wrong place here. But to help developing a real great program i hope you forgive me.

This violation appeard when one user was connected and i accesed the menu button of the GUI. But it stll run stable after the error.

ciao

BJ

PS.: HFS alpha 18


Access violation at address 00453070 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000004
HFS 2.0 alpha18
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 18.07.2004 11:11:51
[00453070]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetBoundsRect + $10
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[00453303]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.GetMonitor + $B
[00453527]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.FindMonitor + $23
[0045301A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetHeight + $A
[004541D3]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.MonitorFromPoint + $27
[004A2A5A]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CheckMenuDropdown + $22E
[0049E969]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolButton.CheckMenuDropdown + $39
[004A14C0]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CNNotify + $B8
[00465960]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F401]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041D694]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList + $4
[0042D234]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00468595]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A2081]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[00465730]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[00468A3B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[004690B9]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMNotify + $D
[00465960]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A2081]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004A1E43]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.SendDropdownMsg + $63
[004A2014]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $1C4
[004A2070]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $220
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00455607]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045563E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045585E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F350C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(TM) XP, 2080 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 09.07.2004 14:05:24
hfs.exealpha09: Build: 0 21.05.2004 14:53:56
hfs.exealpha16: Build: 0 20.06.2004 20:20:20
hsg.exe: Build: 0 03.03.2004 18:18:16
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 18, 2004, 03:18:10 PM
it seems the bug is not in my code but in delphi code :(

do you have multi-monitor ?
Title: Acces Violation
Post by: Only A Guest on July 21, 2004, 08:42:57 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you have multi-monitor ?

No, I even don't know what Multi Monitor is. but as i could easily reproduce the failure you could tell me what it is and how to use it.

But if you mean by multi-monitor if i am using two or more monitors with my graphics card, YES my tv is connected to the Pc.

Could this help you?

best regards

BJ
Title: Re: Acces Violation
Post by: rejetto on July 21, 2004, 02:00:07 PM
Quote from: "Only A Guest"
But if you mean by multi-monitor if i am using two or more monitors with my graphics card, YES my tv is connected to the Pc. Could this help you?
yes, that's what i meant
it seems there's a bug in delphi6 multi monitor support
the log does not refer to my code, i fear i can't fix it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 21, 2004, 02:19:24 PM
i just checked the Borland website, and i found an update for delphi6 i was not aware about.
i installed it, then you might check next alpha version if the bug disappears
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Coree on July 22, 2004, 10:50:57 AM
Upload Option, what I hate about it.
I hate that to the common person HFS makes it harder then it should be to create an upload folder or to define an upload Folder.
Why not make the Upload Option active and have sub options to Create New Upload folder or Browse and Define Upload Folder. As it is now the Upload option alway appears to be greyed out. It makes people think its not available at all. I just think it should be made much more user friendly in this regard.  Thank you!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 22, 2004, 12:07:41 PM
yes, something is to be done
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on July 24, 2004, 08:26:52 AM
Also make it so that you could select how many upload fields you want on the upload page?

Thanks!  :P
Title: Single Or Multi Option..
Post by: Iron Spring on July 25, 2004, 07:04:22 AM
Yep.. Multi or just single mode upload selection maybe...
Hmmmm.....

IrOn SpRiNg
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: kingleo on July 25, 2004, 12:55:34 PM
can make it become the windows service??
then it can start automatic with windows boot in windows 2000,xp,2003
and none tray icon showing in windows when it runs as a service
but there"s a problem in this stateยกAif it becomes a service , hiding in background, i can"t manly reopen the setting window, i have to stop it and restart the program again, but it"ll set the setting to default...... =_=
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on July 25, 2004, 01:47:03 PM
Hi!

Rejetto said i think that is is too hard to make hfs a service.
I think it is good now as a simple program.

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 25, 2004, 04:03:38 PM
Quote
can make it become the windows service??
it has already been discussed. search the forum.
there are several utilities to make software work as a service.
i use srvany.

Quote
restart the program again, but it"ll set the setting to default
try saving settings before quitting ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: kingleo on July 25, 2004, 07:01:31 PM
Quote
restart the program again, but it"ll set the setting to default
try saving settings before quitting ;)

become the windows service is easy fix
but...... my point is this

you can try this step
start the hfs.exe(hfs2.0alpha18),(first, please enable this"Tray icons-> show main tray icon"),then minimize to tray,right click the tray icon, disable this "Tray icons-> show main tray icon" , the tray icon will disappear.
Now, how do you open the setting window of hfs??
in my system, windows 2000 server, i can"t find anyway to open the setting window of hfs,again.
By the way ,that is how to make hfs disappear in windows... :lol:


if you do this step,the effect isn"t the same as up i say

enable
1.Menu->start/exit->start minimized
2.Menu->Tray icons->Minimize to tray
disable
1.Menu->Tray icons->Show main tray icon

make hfs start with windows system boot,
you can see the tray icon not disappear(i wish it be disappear,but not happen)

if my report isn"t clear,i will try again.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: yomo on July 26, 2004, 10:01:38 AM
When I use comment on hfs, Why program will break a two section on html grammar.

still are other uses ?

example:                             break section"<---"

use this:<b>HFS SERVER<b>

show this:<div class=comment><b>HFS SERVER<b></div><---
<---
<td ......
Title: Search via HFS
Post by: Rider on July 29, 2004, 06:34:16 AM
Hi! HFS very good programm. But I have many files, and the search is really necessary. Can you release "search" in HFS?
Title: Re: Search via HFS
Post by: Rafi on July 29, 2004, 03:37:32 PM
Quote from: "Rider"
Hi! HFS very good programm. But I have many files, and the search is really necessary. Can you release "search" in HFS?
A good idea - for both  the client and the server
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 29, 2004, 03:47:52 PM
Quote from: "kingleo"
Now, how do you open the setting window of hfs??
is it a problem? i don't think so


yomo, please tell me how to reproduce the problem with more detail

Quote
Can you release "search" in HFS?
sure, it is in to-do list
but i don't know when it will be there
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: yomo on August 02, 2004, 04:31:46 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
yomo, please tell me how to reproduce the problem with more detail

just a edit html template use problem,haha

and me find the solve method use java in the template

thx for supprot^^"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: michaelkane on August 14, 2004, 03:10:59 PM
can anyone point me to the latest version 2.0 sources ? :?:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: cpthk~~ on August 14, 2004, 05:05:32 PM
it wrote [302 - Redirection to /]on my screen.
it's different from alpha18, i use alpha19 now.
alpha18 wrote [302 - Redirection to %url%]
it happens in alpha19,too.

it happened every time...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on August 25, 2004, 05:07:48 PM
Quote from: "michaelkane"
can anyone point me to the latest version 2.0 sources ? :?:

you should check the "2.0" topic to stay up to date
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on August 25, 2004, 05:15:16 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "michaelkane"
can anyone point me to the latest version 2.0 sources ? :?:

you should check the "2.0" topic to stay up to date
you forgot to put the link there to the alfa 19 source ... (as usual...  ;) )
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~Lukas on August 29, 2004, 04:33:11 PM
well i had few issues on sp2 socket problems but it got fixed by it self :/ - but when i had problem it used about 04 % cpu all time :P

anyways :)

will there be maybe alternate version without gui - that could run use config files [like for example ServUDeamon] ? im just curious

[sorrry but my account died :/ cant use it lol]
Title: Re: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on August 30, 2004, 02:24:51 AM
Hi ! Superb program.. have been using alpha 19 for a while with no problems..
 switched to alpha 20 and things have changed..;-)
program goes straight in opening index.htm even if you log in as a user so you cannot see your private folder or the login button anymore..
 what am i missing out !
Is there a default option wich wasnt there before..all my folder are real and i tried to delete and recreate the upload folder, but no luck..
 had to revert to alpha 19..
John
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on August 30, 2004, 12:09:39 PM
Quote
you forgot to put the link there to the alfa 19 source ... (as usual...  )
no, i did not upload that intentionally.
i uploaded 20, anyway

Quote
maybe alternate version without gui
i would not wait for it

Quote
program goes straight in opening index.htm
yes, i put that option on by default. i thought it was good, but it seems it is not.
i shall revert in next release. in the while, you can just clear the "default file mask" option.

Quote
all my folder are real and i tried to delete and recreate the upload folder, but no luck
this sounds very strange to me
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: johnber on August 31, 2004, 02:20:58 PM
Will try it again tomorow.. thanks for the prompt answer
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 12, 2004, 03:23:20 AM
2.0 Alpha 21:
+ Add Rows (Bans) (Enhanced Ban Function)
+ Hide Ports in Address
etc etc :)

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha21.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 12, 2004, 04:41:28 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
2.0 Alpha 21:
....
etc etc :)

:? ...  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 12, 2004, 04:26:23 PM
that is not actual alpha21
please wait for it, because i have to complete it
anon, i'm doing what you have been waiting for months
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 12, 2004, 04:39:19 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
anon, i'm doing what you have been waiting for months
:? ... more hints please  :?:  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 12, 2004, 04:57:07 PM
:D:D:D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 13, 2004, 03:48:41 AM
Decreased CPU Loads... YAY! :)
Awaits final! :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 14, 2004, 12:01:07 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Decreased CPU Loads... YAY! :)
that's true only for some of you
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on September 14, 2004, 05:09:00 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Decreased CPU Loads... YAY! :)
that's true only for some of you
I hate riddles... ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Shark on September 15, 2004, 08:02:20 AM
Please put realy good link for lastes working version of hfs.

link to alpha 21 - not work correctly (erorro in download, file not found)

alpha 20 - don't starts (Windows XP Prof, now using hfs 2.0 alpha6 )...

Please help, i very interesting in evolution this project...

 :roll:

Thank you
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Shark on September 15, 2004, 08:20:58 AM
Quote from: "Shark"
Please put realy good link for lastes working version of hfs.

link to alpha 21 - not work correctly (erorro in download, file not found)

alpha 20 - don't starts (Windows XP Prof, now using hfs 2.0 alpha6 )...

Please help, i very interesting in evolution this project...

 :roll:

Thank you

Sorry, of course, i forgotten to discrabe erorrs: i testing all versions from alph 06 (its work correctly only) to alpha 20 - no one from that not work (process hfs.exe is in memory, but programm not work)... Help, please.

I am so sorry, for my bad english language... so, i think, you can understand me...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Corwin on September 15, 2004, 03:30:45 PM
.


The most current working version is alpha20.  There is a link to it in the first post of this thread.  When alpha21 comes out, the link in the first post will be changed.

The alpha21 that was posted on the previous page was an unfinished build, not ready for release.  It was not posted by the author (rejetto), and has been removed.

-- Rejetto, perhaps you could create a new topic called "Get the latest version here".  You could make it sticky and read-only.   It would eliminate a lot of confusion on the part of new visitors who don't know where to find it.

.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 15, 2004, 04:15:13 PM
new visitors should read the first post of this topic, and it is sticky.
he did, indeed, the confusion has been created by the "unofficial" link.
there will always be confusion in such a case ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Shark on September 16, 2004, 08:01:33 AM
How to be with what the program version alpha 20 is not started? In the list of the started processes hfs.exe is, but the program not work. Windows XP.

 :roll:

Thanks for the answer.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 16, 2004, 03:27:46 PM
it's sad, but ATM i see nothing i can do to fix your problem
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 16, 2004, 07:25:34 PM
alpha22 is out

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha22.zip

+ support for IP-ranges (syntax FROM_ADDRESS-TO_ADDRESS)
+ Log Menu -> "Do not log address"
+ Bans -> "Add row" (easier to understand)
+ Menu -> IP address -> "Don't include port in URL"
+ Menu -> IP address -> "Find external address"
+ Menu -> Start/Exit -> "Find external address at startup"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Save in/out totals"
- the uploading file was opened many times (it caused problems with other software)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 17, 2004, 12:46:58 AM
Heads up for alpha22:

+ How to invert the logic? Button in Bans

- Ban List ALLOW/DENY radioboxes. (DENY by default) To allow only a specific address, use something like: \127.0.0.1  "Put Reason for ALL other banned addresses for the reason).

Example:
10.0.0.1-10.0.0.255 Local Network access are not allowed for this server.
\127.0.0.1 Sorry, you are not allowed to access the server.

(\"IP" has to be the last line for additional block comments to work)

- Fixed: Block Ranges :)

+ Menu -> Start/Exit -> "Find external address automatically on startup"

- Fixed: External IP would not stay

- Fixed: Custom IP
Title: Sugestions for EASIER upload system ->
Post by: Rafi on September 18, 2004, 09:33:44 AM
I know that some of the points here have already been  suggested  in the past, but since I have recently tried many Photo Album Sharing sites here are a few ideas from this experience :

1. Upload - using drag and drop method into the upload list area. (used i n Yahoo Photo , VERY convenient !)
2. Upload a zipped file and auto-extract in the server side (also VERY useful)
3. auto-created dynamic list  for uploaded files. you have a button "add more file" that create for you another dialog for browsing. (Nice and useful)
4. use  special add on for both multiple selection or drag & drop. (VERY nice,  see example here:
http://www.ofoto.com/HelpUpload.jsp?#easyupload

One thing that no-one had - is the ability to DOWNLOAD multiple files/pictures. Well, getright browser is the only method I am aware of that can be used with HFS. An option in the template to view the files with  "check boxes" near them and have the option to select multiple files - will be a nice add-on too.

I hope this will be of some help and give you useful ideas! Being able to see  thumbwheel pictures is also VERY useful  if HFS is used for Album  sharing .
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 18, 2004, 05:34:01 PM
They are very good ideas, but I am afraid most of them are impossible to do without addons. (ex. ActiveX addons)
1. Not everyone likes or can use ActiveX plugins.
2. Even if it were to be in Java, it still requires a lot of work. :?

They are somewhat hard to do features... :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on September 18, 2004, 05:50:02 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
They are somewhat hard to do features... :?
But you can then be more compatitive and "sell" more copies of the software ... ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 21, 2004, 08:57:31 PM
1,2,4 already discussed
i don't understand 3
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on September 21, 2004, 09:26:12 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i don't understand 3
it is used in spymac.com. you have only one dialog-line to upload one file. Then you have another botton "upload more files?" that creates for you another dialog-line to browse and upload one more file.

SO you realy end up with the exact # of dialog-files you need. is it more clear ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 22, 2004, 02:53:08 PM
yes, i got it now, but it requires DHTML, and i don't know it.
some user could send me a template based on the default one but with this feature, cross-browser of course.
it would be welcome.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on September 22, 2004, 05:51:11 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
some user could send me a template based on the default one but with this feature, cross-browser of course.
it would be welcome.
I can't , but the best I can do is send you this source & JPG example   "borrowed" from spymac... I'll email it to you.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 23, 2004, 02:47:31 AM
Volia! :)
alpha23 is out!
+ Menu -> IP address -> "Dynamic DNS updater"
+ Bans -> "Disconnect with no reply"
+ double-clicking on statusbar can activate some related features

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha23.zip
Title: lame lame lame ?!?!?!??!!?
Post by: Anonymous on September 23, 2004, 02:15:21 PM
havent been here for long time
not so much moved forward

bug that make me sick:

when i define IP address (i got 1 for lan and 1 internet h00h00)
the bug is
im setting up my lan ip as 'main' after restarting the app my inet ip is 'main' again

same shit if i define ip myself in custom position my ip goes to inet after restart

any plans of fixing this annoying shit?

(dont say that i dont have options saved on hd on exit plz)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 23, 2004, 04:31:09 PM
there will be an option for it in the next alpha release
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 23, 2004, 05:54:24 PM
:)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 25, 2004, 04:16:48 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
I can't , but the best I can do is send you this source & JPG example   "borrowed" from spymac... I'll email it to you.
i saw how it works, and i quickly tested it with opera and mozilla.
i will see if i find a way to include it in HFS without breaking any copyright.
but it is a lot of work for me, because i'm not used to dynamic html.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on September 25, 2004, 07:19:23 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
I can't , but the best I can do is send you this source & JPG example   "borrowed" from spymac... I'll email it to you.
...
but it is a lot of work for me, because i'm not used to dynamic html.
So leave it alone. The other options for multiple files upload are better anyway .  I'll email you the multi-select + drag&drop example from Yahoo. Maybe it's easier...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 27, 2004, 10:04:32 PM
Bans isn't working very well for me. I tried adding:

192.167.1.1-192.168.255.255 (using non existant ip's here just to show).

It just lets it through. Adding 1 single ip worked though, but I had to restart HFS to get the effect there.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on September 28, 2004, 12:18:30 AM
May I ask the version you are using? :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 28, 2004, 03:38:07 PM
IP ranges work from 2.0alpha22
you may be using an older version
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Etraman on September 30, 2004, 10:34:59 AM
First off:  Thnx for this nifty little program, rejetto !  I think it's great, keep up the good work.

Struggling thru 18 pages in this thread I found this:

Quote from: "Only a Guest"
Access violation at address 00453070 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000004
HFS 2.0 alpha18
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 18.07.2004 11:11:51
[00453070]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetBoundsRect + $10
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[00453303]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.GetMonitor + $B
[00453527]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.FindMonitor + $23
[0045301A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetHeight + $A
[004541D3]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.MonitorFromPoint + $27
[004A2A5A]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CheckMenuDropdown + $22E
[0049E969]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolButton.CheckMenuDropdown + $39
[004A14C0]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CNNotify + $B8
[00465960]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F401]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041D694]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList + $4
[0042D234]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00468595]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A2081]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[00465730]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[00468A3B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[004690B9]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMNotify + $D
[00465960]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468903]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A2081]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[004A1E43]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.SendDropdownMsg + $63
[004A2014]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $1C4
[004A2070]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $220
[00468580]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00426818]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc + $14
[00455607]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045563E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045585E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004F350C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(TM) XP, 2080 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 09.07.2004 14:05:24
hfs.exealpha09: Build: 0 21.05.2004 14:53:56
hfs.exealpha16: Build: 0 20.06.2004 20:20:20
hsg.exe: Build: 0 03.03.2004 18:18:16

Quote from: "rejetto"
it seems the bug is not in my code but in delphi code :(

do you have multi-monitor ?

Quote from: "rejetto"
i just checked the Borland website, and i found an update for delphi6 i was not aware about.
i installed it, then you might check next alpha version if the bug disappears

I'm using HFS 2.0 alpha23 and I encounter this same error too.

The pc that runs HFS over here hasn't got multiple monitors but it hร s got Remotely Anywhere installed.
And RA creates a virtual monitor driver (that shows up in Device Manager under Display Adapters) so I guess you are right, rejetto.

But no worries; the error doesn't destabilize nor terminates HFS.   B)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 01, 2004, 04:31:00 PM
I've been using alpha 23

Ranges doesn't work for me, just direct IP's. :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 01, 2004, 04:32:47 PM
My ip is in this range, and my work IP is in this range, but I still get let through. Hope I haven't made any mistake in the range.

213.114.1.1-213.114.255.255
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 01, 2004, 04:35:08 PM
Sorry for spamming, can't edit posts when only a guest.

If i turn off "Block silently" it works, but not if i turn it on.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 01, 2004, 04:35:41 PM
Doh... I mean "Disconnect with no reply"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 01, 2004, 09:31:28 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Doh... I mean "Disconnect with no reply"
in facts this was bugged
fixed in next release
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 03, 2004, 08:14:42 PM
.24 please  :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 06, 2004, 03:47:07 PM
Hello rejetto,

can you add an option to set Upload and Download Limit in KB or MB or GB?

thanks

mdg
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 06, 2004, 04:56:39 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Hello rejetto,
...Download Limit in KB or MB or GB?
mdg

1G=1000M=1000000K . you can enter it in "limits" options

for Uploads - yes, please...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 06, 2004, 09:10:54 PM
1GB = 1024 MB = 1,048,576 KB = 1,073,741,824 bytes
1 MB = 1,024 KB = 1,048,576 bytes
1 KB = 1,024 bytes
1 byte = 1 byte
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 06, 2004, 11:37:10 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
can you add an option to set Upload and Download Limit in KB or MB or GB?
it is already in to-do list
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 07, 2004, 04:24:38 AM
alpha24 is here!

Changes:
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Delete partial uploads"
+ Download counter now works also for real folders
+ "File list" link generating a list to feed download managers
- "Flash task button: on download" was flashing on every GET request
- fixed the "Disconnect no reply"

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha24.zip

* Changes to the template might be needed for this version.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 07, 2004, 07:48:52 AM
2 more features and we'll enter beta stage
Title: Converting saved FileSystem
Post by: Shark on October 07, 2004, 09:03:44 AM
Wanted to ask to make possibility of converting of the saved file system for various versions HFS (HFS 2.0 beta 24 don't undersand saved FS from 1.6a).
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 07, 2004, 09:33:25 AM
it does for me!
please, report how to reproduce the problem
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 07, 2004, 10:26:54 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
2 more features and we'll enter beta stage
Any hints? Can we vote/choose which two... ;)  :)  

BTW - what were the results of the Italian software competition ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 07, 2004, 12:37:42 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Any hints? Can we vote/choose which two... ;)  :)
nope, they are already planned
Quote
BTW - what were the results of the Italian software competition ?
it seems they failed arranging the contest :(
Title: Using Alpha --- Waiting for Beta!
Post by: DGC on October 07, 2004, 05:43:34 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
alpha24 is here!
...
* Changes to the template might be needed for this version.

Greetings from Sweden. Found HFS last week, and have been goin crazy every since! GREAT JOB!

Just downloaded alpha and love the uploading capability! I have installed this on my home network so
I do not have to create shared folders!  However, you are right...
The template I made for 1.6a didnt work...
 :roll:
Title: Re: Using Alpha --- Waiting for Beta!
Post by: Rafi on October 07, 2004, 06:24:39 PM
Quote from: "DGC"
... I have installed this on my home network so
I do not have to create shared folders!
Why do you think it is better then standard sharing of resources for internal LAN ?
Title: Re: Using Alpha --- Waiting for Beta!
Post by: DGC on October 07, 2004, 08:25:24 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Why do you think it is better then standard sharing of resources for internal LAN ?

First, we are just sharing that same ADSL modem using mixed OSs....
XP just doesnt want to see or talk to win98se systems (at least at my home).


I am also using this for a test bed case for my school. They do not need
shared resources all the time. Just a only if the teacher wants to share a
document or 2 during class. Saves space on the mail server, too...
Not needing to email every student the files. AND This lets the teachers
maintain their own system without needing the ADMIN all the time.
Saves space and time... Just create a Swedish Template and there you go.
 WOW not bad, ej?  :idea:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 07, 2004, 08:52:52 PM
Not bad, but also not the right way to my opinion . Sharing resources IS possible also with 98-XP combination (same workgroup is required, and the same username is preferred  ) .
And the teacher CAN share a single directory with the class easily.

Well, have fun with HFS...
Title: Two bugs.................
Post by: Rafi on October 09, 2004, 07:42:49 AM
two minor problems:
*  when pressing F9 for self-browsing, it always using the lasy opened IE window. It wil help if we can have an opition to choose to open a new window (so not to "destoy" previous page)
* when disconnecting a downloading session - the other side sees a normal finish of the download, and the partial file is saved, Is it possible to "signal" it - NOT to save the file ? like abnormal connection termination ?
* Does the global setting for "realm text" in other-options work ? It DOES seem to work for indevidual forlders' setting
* speed limit - does not work for uploads. I thing we should have different limitter for uploads
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 09, 2004, 02:32:56 PM
1. there's no standard way to ask the browser to open a new window. what i can do is to let you customize the command line (already in to do)
2. there's no way to "signal" it, and there's no need, because the client already knows the total size, and then it know it has been disconnected before complete. your client may think it is better to save the partial file.
3. that is the login realm. the global realm should be the one associated to the root node, but it is disabled if it is not protected. it should be enabled regardless of the protection. the question is? should this be true only for the root?
4. i fear we will never see upload speed limit. didn't i discussed about it yet?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 09, 2004, 03:45:28 PM
1. I'm sure it is possible somehow (like activating IE6)
3. So it doesn't work. It says ""password protected resource" and NOT what the option contains. I would use the following logic: whenever nothing is defined in ANY folder's realm setting - use the text in the "options" or the standard text if nothig is there as well ...
4. I don't remember you did...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 10, 2004, 01:22:49 AM
1. i said there's no STANDARD way to do it
3. the realm is "recursive", then by logic the main realm has to be bound to the root node, not in menu->options
4. i fear there's no way to get control over incoming bandiwidth but using multi-thread. i don't want to switch to MT, because it would require a lot of work.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 11, 2004, 02:36:35 AM
Ladies and Gentleman...
alpha25 is in testing... currently waiting for bugs to be fixed...
new features coming soon! stay tuned! :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 11, 2004, 01:30:05 PM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0alpha25.zip

alpha25
+ ETA for uploads
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Minimum disk space"
+ upload result page
- the realm was disabled sometimes


the template has new sections, so edit yours!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oat on October 11, 2004, 03:09:10 PM
Roar!!
HuraH!
rejetto is god
i love u!!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 12, 2004, 02:29:33 PM
alpha stage ends, beta stage begins
features planned for 2.0 are implemented
i will introduced in the progress of the beta stage only features i think easy to make&debug, nothing big

the beta stage ends when almost every known fixable bug is fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 12, 2004, 06:38:42 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i will introduced in the progress of the beta stage only features i think easy to make&debug, nothing big
So you don't want to add the dynamic-upload dialogs I sent you the code for ? Also the auto upload & unzip is not planed, right ?

BTW - an idea for upload speed-limiter might be 3rd party software such as "netlimiter".
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 14, 2004, 03:51:12 AM
the template is not concerned
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 21, 2004, 02:55:49 PM
beta1 available at www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta1.zip

+ Bans -> "Delete row"
+ Log -> "Ban this address" (an address must be at caret position)
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Modal dialog for options"
- sometimes the VFS was not flagged as modified (and then not auto-saved)
* "Access for users" renamed in "Restrict access"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 21, 2004, 04:34:37 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
1+ Log -> "Ban this address" (an address must be at caret position)
2+ Menu -> Other options -> "Modal dialog for options"
1- couldn't find it... where ? how ?
2 - what dose it mean/do  ?

VFS save -seems OK now...
Title: Limit on page
Post by: Dwarrel on October 21, 2004, 10:44:36 PM
Hello,

Is it possible to make a option how many lines you want on a page... If there more lines then make a page 2....

I have now 1 page with 200 lines, I prefer 4 pages with 50 lines....

Maybe in the future...???

Dwarrel
Title: Beta 1 "bug"
Post by: Rafi on October 22, 2004, 12:06:57 PM
@rejjeto - somewhere on your way to Beta1 ,  you lost  the feature of the dialog confirming Exit from the software...  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 22, 2004, 03:42:13 PM
rafi:
1. click on the green text and the right click
2. when a window is modal, you can't access other windows (of the same applications)

Dwarrel:
yes, it may be interesting for a future version
Title: bug?
Post by: MarkV on October 23, 2004, 03:05:37 AM
If you click "No Tray icon for file extension...", nothing happens.
Am I missing something?  :?: (2.0 beta1)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 23, 2004, 05:30:55 AM
HFS 2.0 Beta 2:
- fixed a problem downloading empty files
http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta2.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 23, 2004, 05:34:48 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
rafi:
1. click on the green text and the right click
A small bug here  - you remembered not to include the port # in the address, you forgot not to include the username (user@11.22.33.44) when someone logs in with user/password

I also suggest that in the new dialog box - intrended for the comment - you also add a field showing the IP - so the user can  correct/change  it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: guest on October 23, 2004, 07:19:44 AM
Using beta 1, in the connections window, when i kick a connection or one closes, the line is blank but it never goes away.  really annoying to have to scroll to get to the active connections.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 23, 2004, 07:42:42 AM
Quote from: "guest"
Using beta 1, in the connections window, when i kick a connection or one closes, the line is blank but it never goes away.  really annoying to have to scroll to get to the active connections.
looks OK here (Win98)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 23, 2004, 11:30:43 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
rafi:
2. when a window is modal, you can't access other windows (of the same applications)

Can anyone tell me what "modal" means in english?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 23, 2004, 11:41:12 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "rejetto"
rafi:
2. when a window is modal, you can't access other windows (of the same applications)

Can anyone tell me what "modal" means in english?
well, rejetto tried...

WikipediA can tell you too-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_window

Looks like we need an encyclopedia to understand HFS... ;)

BTW - why don't you register?
Title: Re: bug?
Post by: rejetto on October 23, 2004, 02:51:05 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
If you click "No Tray icon for file extension...", nothing happens.
Am I missing something?  :?: (2.0 beta1)

the changelog says
Quote from: "What's new"
* "No tray icon for file extentions" has been removed because obsolete
so the error is: i forgot to remove the menu command.
it will be removed in the next release.

"Don't count as download" in the file menu does the same, and is much more powerful, because it works with filemasks and you can set it at different depth level in the VFS.

Quote from: "Rafi"
you remembered not to include the port # in the address,
it does not make sense. the ban feature does not work with ports.
Quote
you forgot not to include the username (user@11.22.33.44) when someone logs in with user/password
azz
Quote
I also suggest that in the new dialog box - intrended for the comment - you also add a field showing the IP - so the user can correct/change it
it makes sense
Title: Re: Limit on page
Post by: Anonymous on October 23, 2004, 02:56:00 PM
Quote from: "Dwarrel"
Hello,

Is it possible to make a option how many lines you want on a page... If there more lines then make a page 2....

I have now 1 page with 200 lines, I prefer 4 pages with 50 lines....

Maybe in the future...???

Dwarrel
-link removed-

DO NOT CLICK ON DWARREL's URL!!!!
It takes you to a website that installs a ADDWARE Trojan to your
system dirrectory called (mjaxczh.exe)

To get it off your system just hit control alt and delete and disable
the running file so windows will let you delete it from your system
dirrectory...

Dwarrel your a real JACKASS!! :eek:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 23, 2004, 03:13:31 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "guest"
Using beta 1, in the connections window, when i kick a connection or one closes, the line is blank but it never goes away.  really annoying to have to scroll to get to the active connections.
looks OK here (Win98)

i either don't have that bug
are you able to tell me how to reproduce it?
or can you say something about your software enviroment?
Title: Re: Limit on page
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 23, 2004, 05:06:23 PM
Quote
DO NOT CLICK ON DWARREL's URL!!!!
It takes you to a website that installs a ADDWARE Trojan to your
system dirrectory called (mjaxczh.exe)

To get it off your system just hit control alt and delete and disable
the running file so windows will let you delete it from your system
dirrectory...

Dwarrel your a real JACKASS!! :eek:

I see that there are a lot of ad scripts in the page... Maybe the malware is hidden in the script?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: guest/kos on October 23, 2004, 08:10:45 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "guest"
Using beta 1, in the connections window, when i kick a connection or one closes, the line is blank but it never goes away.  really annoying to have to scroll to get to the active connections.
looks OK here (Win98)

i either don't have that bug
are you able to tell me how to reproduce it?
or can you say something about your software enviroment?

Using WinXP Pro SP1,  it just happens by default I dont really 'do' anything.  

Could it be that it is using the 1.6a config files? All I did was replace the main 1.6a .exe with the 2.0 beta1 .exe
Title: thanks
Post by: MarkV on October 23, 2004, 10:08:35 PM
Thanks for the quick reply rejetto! HFS is a great program with lots of features, sometimes you miss a new option, like me...  :roll:

Now to my questions:  ;)

1. Would it be possible to add a startup delay before HFS tries to start the server? Sometimes my network drivers/firewall initializes too slow so HFS program starts but not the server (OFF). Currently I'm using a batch file but adding this option to the program would be the the better way.

2. I'm using the "Flag files added recently..." feature but having a problem. For files and real folders, it works great. All files/folders show up with correct date/time of modification. But virtual folders always get the current date/time  at startup of HFS and are re-flagged as new after every reboot. Would it be possible to just use date/time of adding them to the VFS? Or, the possibility to disable the feature for (virtual) folders entirely? I'm on NTFS if that helps.

Thanks in advance, MarkV B)
Title: Re: thanks
Post by: Anonymous on October 23, 2004, 11:18:25 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"

2. I'm using the "Flag files added recently..." feature but having a problem. For files and real folders, it works great. All files/folders show up with correct date/time of modification. But virtual folders always get the current date/time  at startup of HFS and are re-flagged as new after every reboot. Would it be possible to just use date/time of adding them to the VFS? Or, the possibility to disable the feature for (virtual) folders entirely? I'm on NTFS if that helps.

I agree with MarkV.  It would be nice if you could somehow omit the new flag on virtual folders on HFS startup.  It affects virtual sub-folders as well. If a new file is added to a virtual folder then the new flag should appear for the folder.  Makes sense.

It's kind of misleading to the user when they open one of those folders marked new to find older dated files inside.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: guest/kos on October 24, 2004, 03:01:34 AM
Quote from: "guest/kos"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "guest"
Using beta 1, in the connections window, when i kick a connection or one closes, the line is blank but it never goes away.  really annoying to have to scroll to get to the active connections.
looks OK here (Win98)

i either don't have that bug
are you able to tell me how to reproduce it?
or can you say something about your software enviroment?

Using WinXP Pro SP1,  it just happens by default I dont really 'do' anything.  

Could it be that it is using the 1.6a config files? All I did was replace the main 1.6a .exe with the 2.0 beta1 .exe

Me again, I installed beta 2 and deleted the ini file,  reset all my settings, and it seems to work ok now :)  Thanks for the prompt reply earlier,  over 40 gigs served up without a problem so far!
Title: Re: Beta 1 "bug"
Post by: rejetto on October 24, 2004, 04:53:59 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
@rejjeto - somewhere on your way to Beta1 ,  you lost  the feature of the dialog confirming Exit from the software...  ;)
it does work for me  :?
Title: Re: Beta 1 "bug"
Post by: Rafi on October 24, 2004, 05:22:28 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
@rejjeto - somewhere on your way to Beta1 ,  you lost  the feature of the dialog confirming Exit from the software...  ;)
it does work for me  :?
:? Win 98 ? may be something to do with modal dialogs' change  ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 24, 2004, 05:46:44 AM
markv:
1. done
2. fixed

in next release
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 24, 2004, 06:06:10 AM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta3.zip
beta3
+ Template editor -> Find
+ command line: -d X (waits at start for X tenth of second)
- virtual folders timestamp was reset loading a VFS file
Title: thanks again
Post by: MarkV on October 24, 2004, 06:23:32 AM
@rejetto Thanks again! It gets better every day now...
Some large companies need months to do such changes  ;)

At least for now I'm out of questions... :roll:

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Kos on October 24, 2004, 06:27:34 AM
Dang rejetto,  you keep releasing new versions every time i turn my back.. Keep up the great work!  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Limit on page
Post by: dwarrelx on October 24, 2004, 09:16:19 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Dwarrel"
Hello,

Is it possible to make a option how many lines you want on a page... If there more lines then make a page 2....

I have now 1 page with 200 lines, I prefer 4 pages with 50 lines....

Maybe in the future...???

Dwarrel
-link removed-

DO NOT CLICK ON DWARREL's URL!!!!
It takes you to a website that installs a ADDWARE Trojan to your
system dirrectory called (mjaxczh.exe)

To get it off your system just hit control alt and delete and disable
the running file so windows will let you delete it from your system
dirrectory...

Dwarrel your a real JACKASS!! :eek:

I have nothing installed.... I think it is in a script from one of the advertisers.... I have removed the poll, I think that was it.... How
you find the addware, so I can take a look at my PC before I go any further...

Sorry for everyone who's got this....

Dwarrel
Title: Quit confirm dialog - does it work in the Beta version ?
Post by: Rafi on October 24, 2004, 08:05:54 PM
can anyone with Win98 check if the quit confirm, dialog works  ?
It "disappeared" on my system starting from beta1
Title: Message Prompt after upload finish
Post by: rol801 on October 25, 2004, 04:06:57 AM
The message "Drive Letter" Failed --- "File size" return after the upload finish.. I find this happen begin at alpha 22. Is there something wrong ?
Title: exception
Post by: MarkV on October 25, 2004, 04:31:26 AM
Got an error from HFS 2.0 beta3:

If you try to add a file to a virtual folder that already exists in that folder, you should get a dialog window asking if you want to replace the file. But I got this:

############# ERROR ON: 25.10.2004 06:08:12
C:\Programme\hfs\hfs.exe
there's already another file with name: buginfo.txt (C:\code\mine\hfs\main.pas, line
2783)
HFS 2.0 beta3
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 25.10.2004 06:08:11
[004F0D9C]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.addFileRecur (Line 2783, "main.pas" + 22) +
$47
[004341EF]{hfs.exe     } CommCtrl.TreeView_GetItem + $F
[00494E72]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TTreeNodes.GetNode + $1A
[004F0C3E]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.addFile (Line 2748, "main.pas" + 1) + $4
[004FA8C2]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Addfiles1Click (Line 4975, "main.pas" + 5) +
$2E
[0045DFBA]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045F193]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045FE72]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0041DFC2]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) +
$7
[0042F89C]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A1B0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[0045FDC1]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[004338AA]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00457237]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045726E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045748E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FEA88]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Home Edition, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+, 1660 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 24.10.2004 07:48:24
hfs16a.exe: Build: 0 24.05.2004 01:20:54
### END LOG

This error occours every time I try to replace a file in a virtual folder, I tried several times...

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 25, 2004, 06:06:43 AM
No problems here... Ummm  :?
Title: bug report
Post by: MarkV on October 25, 2004, 06:36:19 AM
Get the same error with WinNT 4.0 SP6a...
Maybe a problem with file system? I'm on NTFS.

MarkV
Title: addition to bug report
Post by: MarkV on October 25, 2004, 06:41:59 AM
Sorry for spamming here, but it might be of interest that the error does only show up if I use the right-click-menu's "Add files..." command. Using drag'n drop method, everything is fine.  :?

MarkV
Title: Re: Quit confirm dialog - does it work in the Beta version
Post by: DGC on October 25, 2004, 08:07:29 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
can anyone with Win98 check if the quit confirm, dialog works  ?
It "disappeared" on my system starting from beta1
Running 98se + Hfs 2 beta 3
Menu+Start/Exit+Confirm Exit is marked
Got quit confirm dialog.

Dennis
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Coree on October 25, 2004, 09:47:05 AM
Thank you for adding the "Why is upload disabled?"
That is better then before.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 25, 2004, 02:48:09 PM
Feature request: adding IP comment on log window.

Thanks rejetto & others for HFS (more reqs on the way :P)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 25, 2004, 03:14:27 PM
What's an IP comment?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 25, 2004, 03:59:26 PM
Normal:
25.10.2004 18:52:10  195.174.***.***:2330  Connected
With comment:
25.10.2004 18:52:10  195.174.***.***:2330 (comment) Connected


25.10.2004 18:52:10  195.174.***.***:2330 (john) Connected
25.10.2004 18:52:10  201.120.***.***:2330 (mySister) Disconnected by server - 1785 bytes sent
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 25, 2004, 04:36:23 PM
humm. not comment, explanation or...

Sorry for my English  :roll:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 26, 2004, 02:00:49 AM
do you want HFS to have a table to translate addresses to names?
it seems a good idea
the table could also work with masks/ranges
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 26, 2004, 02:42:49 AM
Beta 4 is here!

Changes:
- folders' count was zero
- now VFS is flagged as modified when download counters are modified

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta4.zip
Title: Re: Quit confirm dialog - does it work in the Beta version
Post by: Rafi on October 26, 2004, 04:39:40 AM
Quote from: "DGC"
Quote from: "Rafi"
can anyone with Win98 check if the quit confirm, dialog works  ?
It "disappeared" on my system starting from beta1
Running 98se + Hfs 2 beta 3
Menu+Start/Exit+Confirm Exit is marked
Got quit confirm dialog.

Dennis
Found the problem. somehow - when the Modal Windows option was introduced, the enable mark for "confirm exit "  was erased...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 26, 2004, 04:45:09 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you want HFS to have a table to translate addresses to names?
it seems a good idea
the table could also work with masks/ranges
There are endless # of IPs.
You can give an option to use either IPs, or auto-DNS translation to show domain names.
And for comments enable to enter either IP OR domain name.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 26, 2004, 04:51:28 AM
Just, able to adding explanation on log window for easily remember the IP address. But more advanced log window... sounds good  :D

(Sorry for English again. I must learn English  :cry: )
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 26, 2004, 05:19:09 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you want HFS to have a table to translate addresses to names?
it seems a good idea
the table could also work with masks/ranges

That sounds good!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 26, 2004, 03:10:30 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
the enable mark for "confirm exit " was erased...
erased?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 26, 2004, 06:36:45 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
the enable mark for "confirm exit " was erased...
erased?
I cannot tell how, but it was disabled. Either I accidentally unchecked it, or while I upgraded it got unchecked. Never mind, it is fine now!  :)
Title: Still return fail message after upload..
Post by: rol801 on October 27, 2004, 01:28:53 AM
what's going on ?no one have this problem ?
Title: The Function [UPLOAD] seems has error
Post by: Anonymous on October 27, 2004, 01:33:13 AM
After I upload a file, HFS will show a page and has a error message.

D: FAILED --- 107710:

107710 is the file's size

But this file uploaded OK ! (You will find it in the upload directory)
Title: Re: The Function [UPLOAD] seems has error
Post by: Rafi on October 27, 2004, 05:15:01 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
After I upload a file, HFS will show a page and has a error message.

D: FAILED --- 107710:

107710 is the file's size

But this file uploaded OK ! (You will find it in the upload directory)
Quote from: "rol801"
what's going on ?no one have this problem ?
maybe somthing to do with the new feature of "menu->limits->disk-space".
Did you put something there ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 27, 2004, 05:28:29 AM
No, this bug is due to Internet Explorer sending the full paths to HFS which HFS did not phrase correctly. (ex. C:\Test.txt instead of Test.txt)

For example, uploading a text file of 4 bytes with a path of D:\Test.txt with Internet Explorer will cause this error:
D: FAILED --- 4:

Maybe rejetto will kindly fix this bug :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 27, 2004, 12:31:29 PM
fixed in beta5
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 27, 2004, 12:40:33 PM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta5.zip

+ template: [error-page] section
+ now real folders' counters are saved to disk (in VFS)
- "Reset downloads" was not resetting files in real folders
- FAILED is reported for successful uploads using IE
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 27, 2004, 07:54:03 PM
A small problem  ( Beta5 ):
* in the upload page - input some file names
* then - try open the progress frame
* sadly - all file names entered - are cleared.

Can you try not to erase the data when you open/close the progress frame?

Also - I was glad to see that upload progress IS showing  on the server side. Didn't you say it was impossible... ? :)

What is the "bandwidth" number showing on the bandwidth graph, in the progress frame ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 27, 2004, 10:40:57 PM
No, this is usual browser behavior due to it loading a new URL. When the browser first fetches upload+progress, it sees a page telling it to load two frames. When it does load the new frames, the browser leaves the previous page and stores it in the Back history then loads the two new frames which does not contain any filled in blanks. (This is not a bug and could not be fixed.)

The bandwidth number should be the maximum speed the server has reached for a certain period of time.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 27, 2004, 10:58:12 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Also - I was glad to see that upload progress IS showing  on the server side. Didn't you say it was impossible... ? :)
nope

Quote
What is the "bandwidth" number showing on the bandwidth graph, in the progress frame ?
the top speed?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 28, 2004, 12:30:51 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta5.zip

- FAILED is reported for successful uploads using IE

I think this is better, if files upload success,
you can show the file list under UPLOAD DIR directly
because showing upload success message and click a link to
show the uploaded file list may be unnecessary.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 28, 2004, 05:31:09 AM
Quote
Quote
What is the "bandwidth" number showing on the bandwidth graph, in the progress frame ?
the top speed?
Then, it looks wrong. Also I will call it so ...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 28, 2004, 05:33:52 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
No, this is usual browser behavior due to it loading a new URL. When the browser first fetches upload+progress, it sees a page telling it to load two frames. When it does load the new frames, the browser leaves the previous page and stores it in the Back history then loads the two new frames which does not contain any filled in blanks. (This is not a bug and could not be fixed.)
I'm realy no expert on that, but how came in many places, you can retrieve a previous page (using "Back") with all the filled data - in place ?
For example - in this very forum - try entering a message and with two "back"s you get the edit dialog again WITH the data...   8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on October 28, 2004, 06:06:51 AM
Some browser stores the data in memory.
While your browser is requesting a new URL with frames (although same URLs), your browser is storing those in a new memory instead. Because your browser does not compare the framed page with your history. (That would cause many problems anyways)
Title: error again
Post by: MarkV on October 28, 2004, 07:03:23 AM
Error reported for beta3 still there...
The box says 'Please report this error'. So I do (again)  :roll:
(Adding a file to a virtual folder that already exists in that folder using the 'Add files...' command)

there's already another file with name: buginfo.txt
Tip: you may try to re-save your VFS. (C:\code\mine\hfs\main.pas, line 2782)
HFS 2.0 beta5
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 28.10.2004 08:57:39
[004F1038]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.addFileRecur (Line 2782, "main.pas" + 22) + $47
[0045AB43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFC2]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[00430340]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0045A7C0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[0045A7D5]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433F5F]{hfs.exe     } CommCtrl.TreeView_GetItem + $F
[00494E72]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TTreeNodes.GetNode + $1A
[004F0EDA]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.addFile (Line 2746, "main.pas" + 1) + $4
[004FAE3A]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Addfiles1Click (Line 5018, "main.pas" + 5) + $2E
[00468A86]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[00469C5F]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0046A93E]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0046A88D]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00476BC7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[00476BFE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00476E1E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FF008]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows NT 4.0 Workstation, Version: 4.0, Build: 565, "Service Pack 6"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+, 1666 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.10.2004 14:35:42

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 28, 2004, 11:41:22 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta5.zip

+ template: [error-page] section
+ now real folders' counters are saved to disk (in VFS)
- "Reset downloads" was not resetting files in real folders
- FAILED is reported for successful uploads using IE
The FAILED reported for successful uploads in IE is now partially fixed.  It is now shown on the upload OK page correctly but when you click on the BACK link to go back to the upload directory file listing nothing happens.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 28, 2004, 09:10:15 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "rejetto"
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta5.zip

+ template: [error-page] section
+ now real folders' counters are saved to disk (in VFS)
- "Reset downloads" was not resetting files in real folders
- FAILED is reported for successful uploads using IE
The FAILED reported for successful uploads in IE is now partially fixed.  It is now shown on the upload OK page correctly but when you click on the BACK link to go back to the upload directory file listing nothing happens.
I forgot to say above that the back link to the upload directory file listing page doesn't work on the upload-success and upload-failed pages after an upload with Internet Explorer.  Nothing happens.  Works correctly with Opera and Netscape.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 29, 2004, 10:23:27 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
the enable mark for "confirm exit " was erased...
erased?
I cannot tell how, but it was disabled. Either I accidentally unchecked it, or while I upgraded it got unchecked. Never mind, it is fine now!  :)
I found out what happened - I accidentaly activated HFS V 1.6 . This effected the setup somehow.
Title: Re: error again
Post by: rejetto on October 30, 2004, 02:15:59 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
Error reported for beta3 still there...
The box says 'Please report this error'. So I do (again)  :roll:
(Adding a file to a virtual folder that already exists in that folder using the 'Add files...' command)

i think i found when it happens: when you have a shortcut to a file.
HFS resolves the shortcut to the real file, and if the shortcut and the file lie in the same folder, then the error pops up.
since this is a safe situation, i will just remove the instruction that pops up the error.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 30, 2004, 02:21:57 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I think this is better, if files upload success,
you can show the file list under UPLOAD DIR directly
you can do it yourself
just edit the template, and put an automatic redirection in section [upload-results]
Title: thanks
Post by: MarkV on October 30, 2004, 05:11:39 AM
Thanks rejetto for looking into this.
I'll test it when the next beta is out...

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Shodan on October 30, 2004, 12:12:12 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you want HFS to have a table to translate addresses to names?
it seems a good idea
the table could also work with masks/ranges

Sounds like a good idea.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 30, 2004, 03:23:05 PM
Quote from: "Shodan"
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you want HFS to have a table to translate addresses to names?
it seems a good idea
the table could also work with masks/ranges
Sounds like a good idea.
ok, but now i need a name for this feature.
internally, it is called localDNS, but it is not a good name for any user.
a lot of people would not understand what it is, and some more would think it is actually a standard DNS server (but local).
please advice...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on October 30, 2004, 07:00:18 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Shodan"
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you want HFS to have a table to translate addresses to names?
it seems a good idea
the table could also work with masks/ranges
Sounds like a good idea.
ok, but now i need a name for this feature.
internally, it is called localDNS, but it is not a good name for any user.
a lot of people would not understand what it is, and some more would think it is actually a standard DNS server (but local).
please advice...
I would like to think it IS standard DNS IP resolver +  local names support.  I was trying a small program called NetMsg (I think freeqopen source) - it uses the local PC names for intenal mesages' ID . May be you can do the same, w/o any translation.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 31, 2004, 08:55:17 PM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta6.zip

+ Log Menu -> "Address2name"
- some fixes



yomo, please test it and report if the problem persists
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: guest on October 31, 2004, 09:56:53 PM
im sorry if its in wrong place or it was posted erlier

there are 2 things that i was found missing in hfs.

-folder "new" flag shuld be added only if there is new file inside somwhere up in tree. not when folder is new.
-it whuld be usefull (if it is possible) to combine multiple downloads from same file\user (like when user uses (damn english) download accelerating software that splits it, and suck simultaneously) to one line.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 01, 2004, 02:39:40 PM
Quote from: "guest"
-folder "new" flag shuld be added only if there is new file inside somwhere up in tree. not when folder is new.
i should check every file in the folder, and in subfolders. this may take several seconds. it would overload the server. i think it is not a good idea.

Quote
-it whuld be usefull (if it is possible) to combine multiple downloads from same file\user (like when user uses (damn english) download accelerating software that splits it, and suck simultaneously) to one line.
it seems possible, i will think about it hereafter
Title: Error message
Post by: jungle.kk on November 01, 2004, 02:52:11 PM
Access violation at address 004EEA73 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 030BE578
HFS 2.0 beta4
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2004/11/1 ยคUยครˆ 10:38:48
[004EEA73]{hfs.exe     } main.setupDownloadIcon (Line 2161, "main.pas" + 1) + $B
[004041AF]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[0047D849]{hfs.exe     } JclDebug.TJclStackBaseList.Create (Line 3114, "..\Source\JclDebug.pas" + 3) + $0
[00450030]{hfs.exe     } StrUtils.AnsiStartsText + $30
[004F5544]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.purgeConnections (Line 3586, "main.pas" + 14) + $3
[004FC602]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.beforeQuit (Line 5477, "main.pas" + 7) + $2
[004FC62B]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 5484, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[004701F7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DoClose + $17
[00473731]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.Close + $55
[004F87FB]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Exit1Click (Line 4443, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[00468A86]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[00469C5F]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0046A93E]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0046A88D]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00476BC7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[00476BFE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00476E1E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FEAB4]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows 2000 Server, Version: 5.0, Build: 893, "Service Pack 4"
Processor: Intel, Pentium 4, 1950 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2004/10/26 ยคWยครˆ 04:02:52
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 01, 2004, 07:22:22 PM
Would it be possible to include in the logs the speed in KB/s when a file is downloaded and uploaded?  Somehow getting the speed information from the download and upload progress windows or wherever else the download and upload speed is recorded.

That log information would tell the admin just how well the server is performing with the connection that they have.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 02, 2004, 12:29:21 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i should check every file in the folder, and in subfolders. this may take several seconds. it would overload the server. i think it is not a good idea.

ohh i see your point. hmm but meyby option to disable "new" flag for folders only, whuld be more applicable then.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 02, 2004, 07:47:28 PM
just edit the template and under the [folder] section remove %new%
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 03, 2004, 07:52:37 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Would it be possible to include in the logs the speed in KB/s when a file is downloaded and uploaded?  Somehow getting the speed information from the download and upload progress windows or wherever else the download and upload speed is recorded.
in next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 03, 2004, 08:17:35 PM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta7.zip

beta7
+ new HTML template symbols: %speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections%
+ average speed are logged
- other minor bugs fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 04, 2004, 03:22:16 PM
feature request: able to use all html template symbols on all hfs pages (main, upload...) for more useful hfs templates.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 04, 2004, 03:39:44 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta7.zip

beta7
+ new HTML template symbols: %speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections%
+ average speed are logged
- other minor bugs fixed
Thanks rejetto.  Average speed is now logged.

However, I don't see new HTML template symbols %speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections% in the beta 7 HTML template anywhere like you say in your comment above.  Is that the way it should be?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 04, 2004, 08:41:24 PM
I added  %speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections% to my template in various locations and it didn't work.  The only thing that was shown was  the symbols text (%speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections%) but no values for those were shown for those symbols.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 05, 2004, 02:43:12 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I added  %speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections% to my template in various locations and it didn't work.  The only thing that was shown was  the symbols text (%speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections%) but no values for those were shown for those symbols.
are you using beta7? are you sure you didn't mistyped?
i wrote them in the main section and they work for me.

Quote
feature request: able to use all html template symbols on all hfs pages (main, upload...) for more useful hfs templates.
it should be possible from beta7
if not, tell me which symbol and which section

Quote
I don't see new HTML template symbols %speed-out%, %speed-in%, %connections% in the beta 7 HTML template anywhere like you say in your comment above. Is that the way it should be?
you are free to add them your customized template, but they are not used in the default one.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 05, 2004, 05:13:30 AM
Using Beta 7 - XP Pro SP1 - Opera

The %speed-in% and %speed-out% symbols aren't working for me.

I included both of those symbols in my template in the main page section to try it out and after downloading and uploading, and refreshed my screen, below is what I see....

Quote
Average Upload Speed : 0.00 KB/s <- doesn't change
Averaqe Dowload Speed : 0.00 KB/s <- doesn't change
No. of Connections : 2 <- this works

I would also like to include the %speed-in% symbol in the [upload-success] section and when I do the following is an example of what I see after a successful upload....

Quote
ac3filter_0_70b.exe: File Transfer OK --- 295.59 KB --- Average Upload Speed : %speed-in% KB/s

Any ideas?
Title: Speed-in / out
Post by: dwarrel on November 05, 2004, 08:52:40 AM
I think it only works when there are really users downloading er uploading... When there is no activity the speed-in/out will be 000....

On my site it works verry good....

Dwarrel
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 05, 2004, 11:48:59 AM
Quote
Average Upload Speed : 0.00 KB/s <- doesn't change
Averaqe Dowload Speed : 0.00 KB/s <- doesn't change
No. of Connections : 2 <- this works
that's because the page is created before it is sent.
when it is created speed is zero, because you are not downloading.
it is right.

Quote
I would also like to include the %speed-in% symbol in the [upload-success] section and when I do the following is an example of what I see after a successful upload....
%speed%, from next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 05, 2004, 02:01:14 PM
-main page:
Servertime: 05.11.2004 07:57:12
Uptime: 00:18:16
Build-time: 0,016
speed-out: 0,00
speed-in: 0,00
connections: 1
Disk space: 0 B

-folder page:
Servertime: 05.11.2004 07:59:34
Uptime: 00:20:39
Build-time: 0,015
speed-out: 0,76
speed-in: 0,30
connections: 1
Disk space: 3,38 GB

-upload page:
Servertime: 05.11.2004 07:55:29
Uptime: 00:16:34
Build-time: %build-time%
speed-out: %speed-out%
speed-in: %speed-in%
connections: %connections%
Disk space: 3,38 GB

-upload progress window:
Servertime: 05.11.2004 07:55:55
Uptime: 00:17:00
Build-time: %build-time%
speed-out: %speed-out%
speed-in: %speed-in%
connections: %connections%
Disk space: %diskfree%


maybe some of them is unnecessary but some people want to use these symbols on their page. if you want this template, you can download from http://poq.sytes.net:4444/
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 05, 2004, 05:43:02 PM
Quote
maybe some of them is unnecessary but some people want to use these symbols on their page. if you want this template, you can download from http://poq.sytes.net:4444/
Put the tpl file in a zip or rar file etc.  Otherwise can't download.  It just opens the tpl contents on the screen.  Try to make an english version of it if possible.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on November 05, 2004, 05:50:36 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote
maybe some of them is unnecessary but some people want to use these symbols on their page. if you want this template, you can download from http://poq.sytes.net:4444/
Put the tpl file in a zip or rar file etc.  Otherwise can't download.  It just opens the tpl contents on the screen.  Try to make an english version of it if possible.
Right-click on it & do "save as..."
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 05, 2004, 05:55:29 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote
maybe some of them is unnecessary but some people want to use these symbols on their page. if you want this template, you can download from http://poq.sytes.net:4444/
Put the tpl file in a zip or rar file etc.  Otherwise can't download.  It just opens the tpl contents on the screen.  Try to make an english version of it if possible.
this is default template, with all symbols on all sections. not my own template...
Title: ^^
Post by: yomo on November 05, 2004, 10:28:30 PM
See my hfs http://3679383778:3838 yomo style

Running hfs2.0beta7 Welcome to Download Files OR Test.

But Don't Destroy^^"""
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 05, 2004, 10:44:00 PM
feature request: an option to auto-save VFS on every changes (not exit). for protecting VFS from crashes and some other things.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 06, 2004, 03:30:33 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
feature request: an option to auto-save VFS on every changes (not exit). for protecting VFS from crashes and some other things.
You don't need that type of auto-save.  Go to Menu/Save File System after you make changes and it's done.
Title: Re: ^^
Post by: Anonymous on November 06, 2004, 03:45:24 AM
Quote from: "yomo"
Running hfs2.0beta7 Welcome to Download Files OR Test.
Folders don't open.  Can't do any testing.
Title: Re: ^^
Post by: Anonymous on November 06, 2004, 05:18:34 AM
Quote from: "yomo"
See my hfs http://3679383778:3838 yomo style

Running hfs2.0beta7 Welcome to Download Files OR Test.

But Don't Destroy^^"""

YOMO, nice template, very fancy, any chance on getting a copy of the tpl file?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on November 06, 2004, 08:18:47 AM
Nice template YOMO.
But I would try to cut down the use of Javascript to a minimum to meet the browsers which have JavaScript disabled or etc.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: yomo on November 06, 2004, 10:07:38 AM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
Nice template YOMO.
But I would try to cut down the use of Javascript to a minimum to meet the browsers which have JavaScript disabled or etc.

thx! Mr.Anon  

Use the java just let the guest easy to browsers.

= = have a people attack to me 3838port, Close test...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 07, 2004, 01:37:58 AM
Quote
feature request: an option to auto-save VFS on every changes (not exit). for protecting VFS from crashes and some other things.
ok
Title: Auto-save VFS
Post by: MarkV on November 08, 2004, 02:34:19 PM
The autosave VFS option sounds cool, but it would be nice to keep a backup of the VFS before the autosave (in case you need to 'undo' the last change)

An 'Undo' button maybe?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on November 08, 2004, 03:33:57 PM
undo button is too complex at this position i think. but backup file would be nice.
Title: Undo button
Post by: MarkV on November 08, 2004, 05:17:46 PM
oroill wrote:
Quote
undo button is too complex at this position i think. but backup file would be nice.

As the backup is done before the change, on clicking 'Undo' button HFS could just restore the backup made and reload the VFS.

Doing it manually is IMHO more comlicated...  :roll:

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 08, 2004, 05:23:04 PM
MarkV wrote:
Quote
Doing it manually is IMHO more comlicated... :roll:

complicated of course! Damn typos...  B)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 09, 2004, 03:54:17 AM
there's an easy way to implement the undo.
it will be an undo that will waste memory and may be slow, but...who cares? better than nothing.
it will be configurable to N levels.
zero levels = no undo, for those who don't want it.
i planned it for 2.1
Title: Login...
Post by: sharp on November 11, 2004, 07:21:44 AM
Hi!

Maybe this has been disscussed somewhere, I'm sorry for asking if that's the case...  :roll:

(I'm using HFS 2.0 Beta7) Login doesn't work for me! It always shows a page with the text below when I click the Login button! The same one when I try to access a folder with a password or restricted to a specific user!


Unauthorized

This is a protected resource.
Your username/password doesn't match.



Thanks in advance!  :)
sharp
Title: Running Beta7 Now
Post by: Iron Spring on November 11, 2004, 10:55:00 PM
Hi Rejetto..

 Haven't been on in a while and had some catching up to do.. Started running Beta7 a few days back with Mr Anon's NEW Black Template
and all is working fine "so far" with no problems.. I took my web page down off the server and now only run HFS to pass a few files now and then..
Not quite the activity the system had before but still gets a good workout.
Hope all is well in Rejetto land.. Best wishes and thanks again for such a cool program..

La8er..
Title: Re: Login...
Post by: rejetto on November 13, 2004, 02:52:14 AM
Quote from: "sharp"
(I'm using HFS 2.0 Beta7) Login doesn't work for me! It always shows a page with the text below when I click the Login button!
that page is not sent by HFS with a normal code.
HFS sends an error code, and your browser should pop up a dialog for user/pass.
don't you see any dialog?
it has been tested with IE, Mozilla, Opera and it works.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 13, 2004, 02:56:37 AM
hi iron :)
2.0 is going quite well
the real problem now is the instability bug using the speed limiter
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 13, 2004, 04:40:46 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
hi iron :)
2.0 is going quite well
the real problem now is the instability bug using the speed limiter
Is it that one that caused my crashes - when I started with it  ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on November 13, 2004, 04:43:59 AM
Sorry, forgot to login...last one was me...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 13, 2004, 05:57:30 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Is it that one that caused my crashes - when I started with it  ?
yes
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: lv4 on November 13, 2004, 06:51:54 AM
I have a problem with displaying icons

Whenever You browse through real directories (did not test it with virtual directories)

some of the icons don't display right...I always have to click enter in web browser to see them all or go to another directory and click back botton..

Is there a way to fix it?

THX

btw.. I'm on Win XP Pro SP1 + IE6.0

It works OK with Mozilla Firefox
Title: if somebody make a chinese edition?
Post by: fissure on November 13, 2004, 07:18:41 AM
i like it very much.the same as many many chinese.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 16, 2004, 01:16:22 AM
Quote from: "lv4"
I have a problem with displaying icons

did you set menu->limits->max connections ?
Title: bug - beta7 - mark new
Post by: screwyluie on November 16, 2004, 06:34:04 AM
if you put a new file a couple folders deep, it marks the previous folders with "NEW" to help people find the new file... this is great, however, if you go back and delete the new file, the folder doesn't lose it's "NEW" marking
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 18, 2004, 09:00:51 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "lv4"
I have a problem with displaying icons

did you set menu->limits->max connections ?

Yes I did Rejetto...

I also tried to save settings to registry and it worked fine for some time and then the same thing started appear again...

I wonder why it does that?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 19, 2004, 05:26:20 AM
you may try disabling that option
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Logan on November 21, 2004, 11:56:19 PM
It's works exellent!!!! But could you do something with icons. I have no one page with correctly downloading icons.. Always at least 1% x
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Logan on November 21, 2004, 11:57:02 PM
Sorry... http://82.199.98.187:34520
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 25, 2004, 03:17:30 AM
I have it set to keep the same URL but I found out that when I reboot I haft to resetup my folders and passwords. Is there a fix?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on November 25, 2004, 05:18:45 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I have it set to keep the same URL but I found out that when I reboot I haft to resetup my folders and passwords. Is there a fix?
Did you set it to  "save setup on exit" ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 26, 2004, 04:20:14 AM
How is that done?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 26, 2004, 04:21:50 AM
Nevermind I figured it out. Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on November 26, 2004, 05:52:56 AM
menu->start/exit->reload , and autosave
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on November 26, 2004, 08:36:14 AM
feature request: an option to add " - uncompleted" tag to end of file names when upload fails.


real file name: asdasd.txt
when upload fails: asdasd - uncompleted.txt
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on November 26, 2004, 05:21:13 PM
You could have the uncompleted uploads deleted instead.
Right now you have no ways to resume an uncompleted download so partial uploads are useless.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2004, 11:32:23 PM
############# ERROR ON: 03/12/2004 19:17:13
G:\Program Files\hfs 2\hfs.exe
I/O error 21
HFS 2.0 beta7
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 03/12/2004 19:17:13
[004AA79C]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004028A2]{hfs.exe     } System.ErrorAt + $16
[004AA79C]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004AB36F]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDirectory + $9F
[004AB299]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDrive + $59
[004AC8BE]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TSelectDirDlg.DriveListChange + $12
[0043DD88]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.Change + $1C
[004AA249]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.SetDrive + $115
[004AA485]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.Click + $4D
[0043DCFB]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.CNCommand + $FB
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A533]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043DBF2]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043ECE5]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[00467360]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[0046A66B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[0046ACC7]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $B
[00452F0C]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMCommand + $2C
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0043ED11]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WMPaint + $D
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00403F0B]{hfs.exe     } System.TObject.Dispatch + $13
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A533]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFC2]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) +
$7
[00451031]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A1C5]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[0046A1B0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046A617]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0046ACD6]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $1A
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A617]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00467360]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[00440D1C]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomListBox.WMPaint + $24
[00467590]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0041D3AC]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TList.Delete (Line 2725, "classes.pas" + 9) + $A
[0046A533]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043DBF2]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043ECE5]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[0046A1B0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457237]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045726E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004540EB]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.ShowModal + $147
[004ACCA3]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.SelectDirectory + $16F
[004FB423]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Addfolder1Click (Line 5068, "main.pas" + 1) +
$D
[0045DFBA]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045F193]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045FE72]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045FDC1]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428DF0]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457237]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045726E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045748E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FF5C8]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 49, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 12) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: Intel, Pentium III, 733 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 03/11/2004 20:37:08
### END LOG


Accidentally clicked on my dvd drive when I went to add a folder - the drive was empty and I got this error instead of a nice "the drive is not ready" or something similar.
Title: How to register as service in system
Post by: rol801 on December 05, 2004, 05:33:23 AM
May be a old question already . But I cant find out at those old post. Please advice again . Thank you very much .
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Iron Spring on December 08, 2004, 02:24:39 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
hi iron :)
2.0 is going quite well
the real problem now is the instability bug using the speed limiter

Welll.. I don't use "speed limit" but went ahead and set mine up to
run users at 200kbs with 4 max connections. It  has now
run for about a week now with no problems or lock ups...  Can't find
anything crazy here.. What is FTS doing when the lock up or whatever
happens? I have had as many as 3 uploading and downloading at the
same time and FTS holds all levels at 200kbs on T1...  I will keep it
set at 200kbs for a week or so more and see if it cracks...

La8er...Jet
Title: Separate Users info into XML file?
Post by: tomex_ou on December 08, 2004, 04:08:45 PM
Is it possible to separate users info into a XML file?

if do that,
there are some custom applications for third-party programs.

It's also better for transfering systems or backup.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 09, 2004, 07:36:08 PM
Quote from: "Iron Spring"
I will keep it set at 200kbs for a week or so more and see if it cracks...
ok, let us know
Title: Re: Separate Users info into XML file?
Post by: rejetto on December 09, 2004, 07:37:55 PM
Quote from: "tomex_ou"
Is it possible to separate users info into a XML file?
if do that, there are some custom applications for third-party programs.
It's also better for transfering systems or backup.
please, explain, what is it for?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 10, 2004, 05:45:13 PM
Code: [Select]
รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta7
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 10.12.2004 19:34:17
[0042C99B]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0042C9D3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE0B]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FB96]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312BD]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307BF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B14]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FA635]{HFS.EXE     } main.mimetypeByFile + $B4F1
[004F5E8E]{HFS.EXE     } main.mimetypeByFile + $6D4A
[004F6082]{HFS.EXE     } main.mimetypeByFile + $6F3E
[00444A53]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444937]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428DF0]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457237]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045726E]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045748E]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FF5C8]{HFS.EXE     } hfs. + $0
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08
รรฎรทรฅรฌรณ รงรครฅรฑรผ รญรฅรฒ รดรฎรฐรณรฌร  รฏรฐรฎ HFS รญร  รฐรณรฑรฑรชรฎรฌ? รˆ รฏรฎรทรฅรฌรณ รญรฅรฒ HFS รญร  รฐรณรฑรฑรชรฎรฌ รฟรงรปรชรฅ? รรปรซรฎ รกรป รฏรฎรซรฅรงรญรฎ, รฅรฑรซรจ รกรป รข HFS รกรปรซร  รขรฎรงรฌรฎรฆรญรฎรฑรฒรผ รขรปรกรฎรฐร  รฟรงรปรชร .

Code: [Select]

Out of system resources
HFS 2.0 beta7
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 11.12.2004 12:23:40
[0042C8FF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.OutOfResources + $2F
[0042C9A2]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $7E
[0042C9D3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE0B]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FB96]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312BD]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307BF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B14]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FA635]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F5E8E]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F6082]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[00444A53]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444937]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428DF0]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 7553, "classes.pas" + 0) + $29BD
[00457237]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045726E]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[0045748E]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FF5C8]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D4
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 12, 2004, 01:43:24 AM
darn windows ME and resources problem

i hope you speak english: what was you doing when the error pop up?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 13, 2004, 07:53:26 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Accidentally clicked on my dvd drive when I went to add a folder - the drive was empty and I got this error instead of a nice "the drive is not ready" or something similar.
yes, i see, but i didn't found any way to get rid of it.
anyway, it seems to be harmless.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 13, 2004, 07:54:00 AM
Quote from: "oroill"
feature request: an option to add " - uncompleted" tag to end of file names when upload fails.
implemented in next release
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 13, 2004, 09:18:29 AM
2.0 beta8 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta8.zip

+ new HTML template symbols: %total-out%, %total-in%
+ File Menu -> "Reset <new> flag"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Rename partial uploads"
+ Menu -> Flash taskbutton -> "Also beep"
+ new real/virtual folder dialog
- other minor bugs fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on December 13, 2004, 12:52:18 PM
Menu -> Flash taskbutton -> "Also beep"
isn't working correct.

very thanks rejetto.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 13, 2004, 05:19:54 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
v2.0 beta8
+ new HTML template symbols: %total-out%, %total-in%
+ File Menu -> "Reset <new> flag"
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Rename partial uploads"
+ Menu -> Flash taskbutton -> "Also beep"
+ new real/virtual folder dialog
- other minor bugs fixed
Hi rejetto.  Thanks for the update.  Everything appears to be working correctly so far except for...

+ Menu -> Flash taskbutton -> "Also beep"

1.  In menu/flash taskbutton -> I cannot select "also beep" to turn the option off or on.  (no check mark).  It appears to stay on all of the time.  I cannot turn it off.

2.  My preferred selection is to flash taskbutton on connection.   My systems default beep goes off everytime I get a connection which I guess is what it was designed to do, but....

3.  My tray icon is also set for each download and also seems to be affected with the system beep.  The beep goes off everytime my tray icon flashes on download and everytime I switch folders (real folders as I don't use virtual right now).  This beep seems to go off more in uncached folders.    Also,   I have a real folder with a bunch of wallpaper thumbnails.  Everytime a wallpaper thumb loads on the screen, the default system beep goes off.  This is driving me crazy.

4.  Can this be fixed?  At least give us the option to turn the beep off completely.

Thanks.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 13, 2004, 05:32:11 PM
rejjeto,

I know there is a menu option to kill a connection with an inactivity timeout.

but

I would also like to add a "log out" option to my hfs screen.  Can you tell me what html code I would use to do this so the user can kill his own connection when they are done?  Or would this have to be coded right into hfs.exe?  If this has to be coded into hfs.exe it should be done as an option that can be turned on or off.

What do you think?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 13, 2004, 06:07:15 PM
sorry for it, download beta9

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta9.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2004, 06:44:53 AM
Menu -> Flash taskbutton -> Also beep when selected isn't saved when HFS is shutdown even though Menu -> Save Options -> Auto-save options on exit is enabled.

Can this be fixed please.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 14, 2004, 06:54:14 AM
2.0 beta10 @ http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta10.zip

beta10
+ Menu -> "Self Test"
+ progress bar loading big VFS files
- "also beep" was not saved
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: frw on December 14, 2004, 08:26:41 AM
CLOSE PROGRESS FRAME -----open a new windows ? :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 14, 2004, 06:36:02 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ new real/virtual folder dialog
Nice! just one comment - when you click the top right
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Shodan on December 15, 2004, 07:09:18 AM
In the new beta 10
I like the what you did with the dialogue.

"What kind of folder do you want?"

Can you add these two things.

Uploading is not allowed!

Uploading is allowed!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 16, 2004, 12:53:32 AM
Just a small cosmetic change needed in next beta

Successful Self-Test Message says
Quote
The test is successful.  The server should working fine.
should be

The test is successful.  The server should be working fine.
Title: Re: Separate Users info into XML file?
Post by: tomex_ou on December 16, 2004, 05:17:54 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "tomex_ou"
Is it possible to separate users info into a XML file?
if do that, there are some custom applications for third-party programs.
It's also better for transfering systems or backup.
please, explain, what is it for?

My member information is saved in MySQL database,
if the user info file is separated as xml file from hfs.exe,
I could update these by my other program easily.

A suggestion else,
is it possible to run HFS as WinNT service in background?
Let hfs.exe just be a client-side GUI shell only?
Its concept likes WarfFtpd service (a ftp service in Win32),
is better to run in server side.

Thanks for thinking these.  B)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 17, 2004, 02:23:37 AM
Quote from: "frw"
CLOSE PROGRESS FRAME -----open a new windows ? :?
i fear it is a cache problem
it may be solved if i use 2 different urls
i'll try
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 17, 2004, 02:24:21 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ new real/virtual folder dialog
Nice! just one comment - when you click the top right
  • to cancel - it defaults to a  virtual folder...
nope, it defaults to real folder.
the reason is: real folder is fast to add, and can be switched to virtual at a later time
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: camus on December 17, 2004, 02:24:22 AM
bummer, I want to test the 2.0 ver, but it's offline! cant you put it trough bitorrent or smth? I really want to get this and help get some bugs
Title: Re: Separate Users info into XML file?
Post by: rejetto on December 17, 2004, 02:30:16 AM
Quote from: "tomex_ou"
My member information is saved in MySQL database,
if the user info file is separated as xml file from hfs.exe,
I could update these by my other program easily.
this feature is almost planned
but i don't know when it will be available
Quote
is it possible to run HFS as WinNT service in background?
yes, search the forum for instsrv
Quote
Let hfs.exe just be a client-side GUI shell only?
this is not possible, and has been already discussed on the forum
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 17, 2004, 02:32:12 AM
Quote from: "camus"
bummer, I want to test the 2.0 ver, but it's offline! cant you put it trough bitorrent or smth? I really want to get this and help get some bugs
sorry, the link has been fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: camus on December 17, 2004, 02:55:45 AM
*dances the happy filesharing dance*

great, now obviously the first thing I want to check is file upload...I'd ask how it's done (dont see the button), but I think it has been discussed in this topic so I'll just do that
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 17, 2004, 04:48:36 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ new real/virtual folder dialog
Nice! just one comment - when you click the top right
  • to cancel - it defaults to a  virtual folder...
nope, it defaults to real folder.
the reason is: real folder is fast to add, and can be switched to virtual at a later time
You missed the point. What I meant was - that the "bug" is that the [X] should function as a "cancel" button, if the user like to quit w/o doing anything... :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 17, 2004, 05:38:27 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
You missed the point. What I meant was - that the "bug" is that the [X] should function as a "cancel" button, if the user like to quit w/o doing anything... :?
here on my computer is different!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 17, 2004, 06:08:19 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
here on my computer is different!
Either my Italian is not so good and I don't understand what you mean  or I'm not explaining well enough... ;)
So let me try again. On my Win98 PC, when I do :
* add folder
* select the folder
* view the new dialog
* decide to do nothing
* press the top right
* and .... expect it to close w/o doing anything
the folder IS being created in HFS.

Is it a feature or a bug ? I think it should do nothing... :!:  :)
Maybe a Win98 related issue ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 17, 2004, 07:18:36 AM
sorry, i must have been drunk or something :D
it is not a bug, but what you say makes sense (next release)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: PhoenixPath on December 18, 2004, 06:54:15 PM
BUG REPORT at least versions beta7 to current beta10.

Any folder or file with an apostrophe in it is inaccessible.

It displays the file/folder, but you cannot access the folder or download the file.

Examples:

Folder:
Anthrax [I'm The Man] 1987 EP

Cannot click on folder to view file list.

Renamed folder to "Anthrax [Im The Man] 1987 EP"
 
Now I can see the files, but cannot download them because each track contains the album name in the title. (including the apostrophe)

Any way you could fix this, or shall I simply go ahead and rename all my files?

[PM me if you need more info]
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2004, 02:21:29 AM
it does work right to me
are you using a customized template? (HFS tells you in the status-bar)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: PhoenixPath on December 19, 2004, 03:59:27 AM
Matter of fact, I am.  Odd how that should affect it so.  

Any ideas what in the template could cause something like this?  So's I know where to start looking?  I'd hate to have to go back to the basic one.  Looks nice and all, but...
Title: error info
Post by: kison on December 20, 2004, 09:19:41 AM
Access violation at address 00403CA4 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address FFFFFFFC
HFS 2.0 beta10
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2004-12-20 17:13:05
[00403CA4]{hfs.exe     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004041AF]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004FF500]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.beforeQuit (Line 5611, "main.pas" + 8) + $5
[004FF51F]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 5617, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0045089B]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DoClose + $17
[00453DD5]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.Close + $55
[00453098]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMClose + $0
[004675C4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A567]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[00498127]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TCustomTreeView.WndProc + $83
[00467394]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[0046A69F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[0046AD1D]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMNotify + $D
[004675C4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A567]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[00451065]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A1E4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046A64B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00452416]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DefaultHandler + $5A
[0046BC07]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMSysCommand + $9F
[00453179]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMSysCommand + $55
[004675C4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A567]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[00451065]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A1E4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046A64B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00452416]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DefaultHandler + $5A
[004678A1]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WMNCLButtonDown + $15
[00452EA9]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMNCLButtonDown + $85
[004675C4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A567]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[00451065]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A567]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[00451065]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A1E4]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0043374A]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TObjectList.GetItem + $A
[0045726B]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004572A2]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574C2]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[00501E11]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 53, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 13) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows 2000 Professional, Version: 5.0, Build: 893, "Service Pack 4"
Processor: Intel, Pentium 4, 2390 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2004-12-14 7:53:18
Title: error info
Post by: kison on December 20, 2004, 09:22:05 AM
run on win2k
when shut down hfs2.0
this occured n donot let me shut it down!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 23, 2004, 01:18:52 AM
Quote from: "PhoenixPath"
Matter of fact, I am.  Odd how that should affect it so.  Any ideas what in the template could cause something like this?  
yes, your template may be using 'single quotes' for enclosing filenames.
it has to use "double quotes"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 23, 2004, 01:21:59 AM
IMPORTANT
i made some changes that may help fixing the ominous error with speed limit, that one that comes up after some hour.
i ask you, the ones who know this error, to test this version and report here if the error has been fixed or not.

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta11.zip

beta11
- instability adding files via clipboard
- other minor fixes
Title: Progress
Post by: Anonymous on December 23, 2004, 02:10:34 AM
the progress bar in the "progress status window" don't work for me.
it does not even move. Only the pecent uploaded/downloaded changes.

Is this a bug?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 23, 2004, 02:15:40 AM
the "get external address on startup" is not accurate.
i cannot access my server use that address.
the best tool to get external address is currently the mirc.

Is there a way to imitate the get method of the irc?
Title: Re: Progress
Post by: Anonymous on December 23, 2004, 02:38:50 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
the progress bar in the "progress status window" don't work for me.
it does not even move. Only the pecent uploaded/downloaded changes.

Is this a bug?
I've noticed this behavior with Netscape but in Internet Explorer and Opera it works fine.  Are you using Netscape?
Title: HFS
Post by: MarkV on December 23, 2004, 04:34:33 AM
I use Mozilla Firefox to upload files, and the progress bar didn't work for me either. Still have to test it with the newer betas...
Maybe all browsers based on Gecko show this behavior?

Also, the button "Add progress frame" doesn't appear when I'm using Firefox.
I guess it is hidden intentionally?

MarkV
Title: Re: HFS
Post by: Anonymous on December 23, 2004, 05:09:11 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
I use Mozilla Firefox to upload files, and the progress bar didn't work for me either. Still have to test it with the newer betas...
Maybe all browsers based on Gecko show this behavior?

Also, the button "Add progress frame" doesn't appear when I'm using Firefox.
I guess it is hidden intentionally?

MarkV
From what I've seen Netscape, Mozilla Firefox based on Gecho show this behavior.   The progress bar works fine in IE and Opera.   Maybe rejetto can fix.

To get the "add progress frame" in all browsers, you have to have javascript enabled.
Title: HFS
Post by: MarkV on December 23, 2004, 06:23:15 AM
That's the problem: I have Javascript enabled, still the button does NOT
appear in Firefox... IE works fine.
If you manually type /~upload+progress in the Fox, there are no problems
except the statusbar prob mentioned above.

But I have another problem:

I'm using HFS with WinNT 4.x Worstation, too.
It runs from Autostart (of course  :lol: ) and everything is fine.
BUT, if I shutdown Windows, HFS does not terminate and NT pops up
a box asking if the process should be terminated. This is very annoying
since NT does wait forever without doing anything unless you click 'Terminate'.
ATM I solved the problem by activating NT's 'AutoEndTasks' setting, but I
would like to have it fixed for two reasons:

1. NT's setting is globally set for all programs, and
2. VFS and options will NOT be saved as HFS is not shutdown gracefully.

And yes, XP works fine.  :P

Now that's a long post...   :roll:

Merry X-mas, MarkV :bye:
Title: Re: Progress
Post by: Anonymous on December 23, 2004, 09:41:12 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
the progress bar in the "progress status window" don't work for me.
it does not even move. Only the pecent uploaded/downloaded changes.

Is this a bug?
I've noticed this behavior with Netscape but in Internet Explorer and Opera it works fine.  Are you using Netscape?



Yes i am using mozilla firefox.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 24, 2004, 12:22:30 PM
Quote
the button "Add progress frame" doesn't appear when I'm using Firefox. I guess it is hidden intentionally?
nope, the problem was the label "jscript" instead of "javascript". fixed

Quote
the "get external address on startup" is not accurate.
i cannot access my server use that address.
the best tool to get external address is currently the mirc.
Is there a way to imitate the get method of the irc?
yes, but...you should provide more information on your problem.
1. a full list of addresses HFS detected (menu -> ip address)
2. the address HFS detected as external (that is, the non-working one)
3. the address MIRC detect (that is, the working one)
4. tell if you are or aren't behind a router

Quote
if I shutdown Windows, HFS does not terminate and NT pops up a box asking if the process should be terminated.
HFS detects the WM_QUERYENDSESSION message. This way HFS knows if Windows is shutting down, and should never break the shutdown sequence.
This message is reported to work with Windows XP, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT Workstation, Windows Me, Windows 98, and Windows 95.
I don't know why should it work differently with NT4, but i have no way to test it.
I don't know how to fix BUT i noticed a little bug in the quitting code, and made some change.
If we are lucky, it fixed your problem also.
This in next 2.0 beta12.

Quote
Don'T know why it happend, i wasn't home. But it seems that the error occured while somebode tried to download some stuff from the server.
i attempted to fix the processQ bug in beta11. you are using beta10. try again.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 24, 2004, 12:29:13 PM
2.0 beta12 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta12.zip

- solved problem with "add progress frame" and firefox
- force non-persistent connections with wget
- "Confirm exit" was not working correctly answering NO
Title: HFS
Post by: MarkV on December 24, 2004, 07:58:30 PM
Thanks rejetto. The Add Progress frame now works in Fox.
I'll test the new shutdown code ASAP and report if it fixed it or not.

Note: Windows NT 4.x = Windows NT Workstation/Server ;)

Merry X-mas, MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 25, 2004, 03:16:12 AM
yes, but...you should provide more information on your problem.
1. a full list of addresses HFS detected (menu -> ip address)
2. the address HFS detected as external (that is, the non-working one)
3. the address MIRC detect (that is, the working one)
4. tell if you are or aren't behind a router




1. 192.168.0.153
2. 165.21.154.17
3. 220.255.148.176
4. Yes, I am behind a router.
Title: Shutdown
Post by: MarkV on December 26, 2004, 07:00:23 AM
Shutdown code works now, tested with 2 machines. All OK.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 27, 2004, 02:05:10 PM
Quote
1. 192.168.0.153
2. 165.21.154.17
3. 220.255.148.176
4. Yes, I am behind a router.
as far as i can see, the IP detected by HFS is a cache server.
HFS uses several servers to detect the IP, i fear one of them is not detecting cache systems.
since i don't know which one is not working, i will keep only rejetto.com and no-ip for the next beta.
you can download it @ http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta13.zip
please test it and report here if the problem is fixed.
the IP detection installed on rejetto.com does
Code: [Select]
if ($ip = getenv('HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR')) return $ip;
return getenv('REMOTE_ADDR');
and this should make the cache systems be detected.

does someone know how to test servers?
how should the http request be to simulate a proxy system?

Quote
Shutdown code works tnow, tested with 2 machines. All OK.
excellent
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 27, 2004, 07:31:18 PM
Sometimes I can't download files...

Code: [Select]
รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:12
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428E1C]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005028A5]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D5
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.12.2004 15:06:42
hfsbackup.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08





รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:48
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
Product Versions






รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:47
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428E1C]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005028A5]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D5
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.12.2004 15:06:42
hfsbackup.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08





รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:46
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428E1C]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005028A5]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D5
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.12.2004 15:06:42
hfsbackup.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08





รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:45
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428E1C]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005028A5]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D5
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.12.2004 15:06:42
hfsbackup.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08





รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:44
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428E1C]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005028A5]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D5
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.12.2004 15:06:42
hfsbackup.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08






รร รฐร รฌรฅรฒรฐ รงร รคร รญ รญรฅรขรฅรฐรญรฎ.

HFS 2.0 beta13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 27.12.2004 22:18:43
[0042C9CF]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042CA07]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042FE3F]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403C5C]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00404052]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042FBCA]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403CA4]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004312F1]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[004307F3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[00431B48]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004FD291]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox + $41
[004F843A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph + $62
[004F862E]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent + $76
[0040445A]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[00444A7F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00444963]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428E1C]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005028A5]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs + $D5
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium II, 350 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 27.12.2004 15:06:42
hfsbackup.exe: Build: 0 03.11.2004 20:37:08
 
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 28, 2004, 01:53:03 AM
as far as i can see, the IP detected by HFS is a cache server.
HFS uses several servers to detect the IP, i fear one of them is not detecting cache systems.
since i don't know which one is not working, i will keep only rejetto.com and no-ip for the next beta.
you can download it @ http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta13.zip
please test it and report here if the problem is fixed.


Thanks rejetto. The ip detected is correct now. Well, the problem is fixed.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 28, 2004, 01:56:30 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
as far as i can see, the IP detected by HFS is a cache server.
HFS uses several servers to detect the IP, i fear one of them is not detecting cache systems.
since i don't know which one is not working, i will keep only rejetto.com and no-ip for the next beta.
you can download it @ http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta13.zip
please test it and report here if the problem is fixed.


Thanks rejetto. The ip detected is correct now. Well, the problem is fixed.


Only the rejetto.com is working. No-ip does not work.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: psyphen on December 29, 2004, 05:23:23 AM
Yeah, just a really small bug, but the check for updates option doesn't work. I had to come here to find beta 13, while in beta 11, it said it was still the latest version.

I absolutely love this program (coming from a fellow Delphi coder :P),
~psyphen
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on December 29, 2004, 08:09:28 AM
Quote from: "psyphen"
Yeah, just a really small bug, but the check for updates option doesn't work. I had to come here to find beta 13, while in beta 11, it said it was still the latest version.

This is not a bug in HFS itself. HFS just downloads a small text file from
the server (www.rejetto.com) and uses the update info stored there.

So, it's just this file not beeing up to date (as well as the link in the 1st post  :roll: ).
Shit happens...  ;)

Feature request:

- The possibility to comment the root folder, this comment should be
  placed above the file list. So you can introduce people to your server,
  give directions, place a disclaimer or anything else you like. Would be
  usefull on servers hosting a complicated directory structure so new users
  don't get confused and leave. (FTP uses a similar feature)

MarkV

(Sorry for the poor English)
Title: Re: New version ...
Post by: RazTK on January 01, 2005, 10:20:15 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
:) New version ...
read all about it here:
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1962
I didn't saw any new version! >:(
and i want to tell you guys about some problem: i made a Real Folder with the upload function, i was enter to the Real Folder in my server and i pressed on the Upload button and then on the "ADD PROGRESS FRAME" and then on "CLOSE PROGRESS FRAME" and it opened to me a new window with the closed progress frame, and my question is: why it's opening a new window instead of close the progress frame in the same window? :cry:
Title: Re: New version ...
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2005, 10:36:51 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
Quote from: "Rafi"
:) New version ...
read all about it here:
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1962
I didn't saw any new version! >:(
:P V2005.0 ...

Be happy...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on January 02, 2005, 04:15:10 PM
Read my last post please, i was wrote there some problem that i have... ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 02, 2005, 05:26:24 PM
Quote
The possibility to comment the root folder,
in bet14

Quote
in beta 11, it said it was still the latest version.
i sometimes forget to update that information on rejetto.com

Quote
Only the rejetto.com is working. No-ip does not work.
sad thing
i fear to overload rejetto.com
report me working services

Quote
Sometimes I can't download files...
please, try disabling the bandwidth graph
just resize it until it disappears
Title: Re: New version ...
Post by: rejetto on January 02, 2005, 05:31:22 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
1and then on "CLOSE PROGRESS FRAME" and it opened to me a new window with the closed progress frame, and my question is: why it's open a new window instead of close the progress frame in the same window? :cry:
it should not
i don't know why it happened to you
retry
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on January 02, 2005, 06:26:05 PM
Try and see it in yourself :#) :(
it's happening in firefox too :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 02, 2005, 08:27:50 PM
right, fixed

2.0 beta14 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta14.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on January 02, 2005, 09:18:03 PM
Thank you very much, rejetto :!:  :!:  :D  B)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 03, 2005, 09:39:44 AM
http://checkip.dyndns.org/

This is one fine website the help check an ip.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2005, 12:10:45 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
http://checkip.dyndns.org/
This is one fine website the help check an ip.
does it work also for those users who reported other servers to not work?
Title: FireFox dumb...
Post by: DGC on January 03, 2005, 12:32:31 PM
Hello,

Can anyone help me on this...

#1 I am having problems with FF when I open the Upload progress window. It keeps opening in a new window instead of a frame in the  current window/tab.

#2 Also, when uploading a file, if the file or files are small, I never get the message that the upload was successful. So, I cancel the upload and return to the folder only to find that the upload WAS successful; "the files ARE there". (Happy that it was successful .. Unhappy that is does not work the way that I expected it to. *(this happens both on the local machine (uploading from the computer to the folder) and between 2 machines located on the same network

These are probably 2 seperate problems... But it might be just that I do not know how to setup Firefox to respond correctly... In this case, like IE does in opening a frame in the current Window/(Tab) FF.
Secondly, give me the upload succesfull page and then return to the folder that the files where uploaded to.

THKS Dennis

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0
HFS v2 beta 014 (default.template)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mr. Anon on January 03, 2005, 04:09:25 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
http://checkip.dyndns.org/
This is one fine website the help check an ip.
does it work also for those users who reported other servers to not work?
It's one of those which is not plain. Contains Current IP Address: in front.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2005, 07:21:22 PM
Quote from: "Mr. Anon"
It's one of those which is not plain. Contains Current IP Address: in front.
that's not a big issue
Title: Re: Error
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2005, 07:25:33 PM
Quote from: "BJ"
Don'T know why it happend, i wasn't home. But it seems that the error occured while somebode tried to download some stuff from the server.
PLEASE BJ, test beta14 or later, and report here if this problem still exists
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on January 03, 2005, 07:35:28 PM
Beta 14 - speed limit: it seems that the actual limit is about 10% less then you specify... :?  setting it to 100K  got me  ~90K
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 03, 2005, 07:58:24 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
The possibility to comment the root folder,
in bet14
Looking around in beta 14 and can't find a working option to comment the root folder.  Where and how do I comment the root folder using beta 14?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on January 03, 2005, 08:05:45 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
The possibility to comment the root folder,
in bet14
Looking around in beta 14 and can't find a working option to comment the root folder.  Where and how do I comment the root folder using beta 14?
right-click"/"->comment

But - the font is very small and not too bold.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on January 03, 2005, 10:49:06 PM
feature request: ability to creating a list for multiple ip adresses. so admins can make own ip list and easily select the ip adress. that will be better than write it to "custom ip adress" box every times.

i will learn english :roll:. sorry


a little thing,
if you click, menu :arrow: ip adress :arrow: "don't include port in url", its not refreshing the adress field. you must click on other file/folder to refresh the adress.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 04, 2005, 01:13:04 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
The possibility to comment the root folder,
in bet14
Looking around in beta 14 and can't find a working option to comment the root folder.  Where and how do I comment the root folder using beta 14?
right-click"/"->comment

But - the font is very small and not too bold.
Thanks Rafi.  Your comment above made me check further.  I have a very customized template.  Haven't looked at the default for months.  Loaded Beta 14 default template and I notice I'm missing the following:

%folder-comment%

and

[folder-comment]
<div style='font-size:9pt; color:#888888; background:#EEEEEE; padding:3px; border:1px solid #DDDDDD; border-bottom:3px solid #DDDDDD; margin-top:2px;'>
%item-comment%</div>

I added the above to my template and now all is well.  :)

(all I had to figure out was where to place the %folder-comment% in my template so the folder comment would show up where I wanted it to)

If you are having trouble with font size or color, you can change it to whatever you want in the [folder-comment] section above.  For example if you want a darker color font, change the #888888 to #000000 and that will give you a black font.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 04, 2005, 01:26:47 AM
Rejetto:

Since beta 12 I first noticed the following and today I again noticed it with beta 14....  

503 Server is overloaded, retry later

I didn't even have the server online when I got that message today.  All I was doing was browsing the server, did a test upload to myself, the upload completed successfully but before the upload results page showed up, I got the message above???

I don't get that server overloaded message all of the time.  In fact I think I noticed it only about 4 times all together since beta 12 came out.  Never saw that message at all before v2 beta 12.

What causes this message and why does it happen?

Thanks.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 04, 2005, 10:47:13 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
But - the font is very small and not too bold.
the font was 9pt
i now set it to 10pt

Quote from: "oroill"
feature request: ability to creating a list for multiple ip adresses. so admins can make own ip list and easily select the ip adress. that will be better than write it to "custom ip adress" box every times.
you are saying you have several "custom ip"s ? :?

Quote
if you click, menu :arrow: ip adress :arrow: "don't include port in url", its not refreshing the adress field. you must click on other file/folder to refresh the adress.
fixed in next beta

Quote
503 Server is overloaded, retry later
What causes this message and why does it happen?
that's because you set something in menu :arrow: limits
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 04, 2005, 12:30:49 PM
2.0 beta15 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta15.zip

+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary downloads"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary downloads from single address"
- other minor fixes
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 04, 2005, 02:49:23 PM
Feature request :

Custom  menu names and buttons in HFS. Its really needed for non-english users. We may make localizations for it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on January 04, 2005, 08:53:41 PM
Quote
Quote from: "oroill"
feature request: ability to creating a list for multiple ip adresses. so admins can make own ip list and easily select the ip adress. that will be better than write it to "custom ip adress" box every times.
you are saying you have several "custom ip"s ? :?

umm, i mean custom ip = domain  :#)
a domain list on adress field's right click menu, like that

(http://n.1asphost.com/zipne/hfs_domainmenu.jpg)

that will be better than write it to "custom ip adress" box every times.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 05, 2005, 01:14:52 AM
Rejetto,

Thanks for doing such a good job on HFS.  I have been testing HFS and all of it's alpha and beta versions for about a year now and the program is evolving very good.

I have a few comments with regards to the last v2.0 beta 15 that maybe you can look into:

1. Root Folder Comment:
It works as it is expected to work but there is one problem with it and it has to do with login.

- if the root "/" restrict access is set to "NONE" and a person attempts to log in they are presented with the normal browser login popup asking for username and password etc.  Also, this popup shows a message that says "Password Protected Resource" which is what it should be.

- **BUT** if the root "/" restrict access is set to "ALL" (which is the way I Normally have it set) the browser popup asking for username and password shows a message that doesn't say "Password Protected Resource" but says whatever folder comment that has been used for the root folder including any html coding?  This is wrong and has to be fixed.


2. Limits:
Having limits is definitely needed with a http server as you are working with a limited amount of bandwidth.

Your latest two additions for max contempory downloads was definitely needed and work the way they are expected to work by limiting the amount of downloads a person can download at the same time.  However, I have a few comments I would like to make and maybe you can look into this:

- when max downloads has been reached or if max connections etc. have been reached up pops the 503 Server is overloaded, retry later page.  That must be an internal HFS message because it isn't coming from the [overload] section in the template.  As a matter of fact when do the [overload], [unathorized], [deny], and [ban] sections from the template get used?  The messages I have ever seen appear to be internal from HFS itself because they are different than what is in the template.

- the 503 Server is overloaded, retry later message I don't like.  That message to me, and others that have received it, infers that the server is to slow and can't keep up with the traffic which isn't true at all and is deceiving to anyone that receives it.  The message should be more meaningful with a "true" message of why it is being displayed.  If for example the max download limit has been reached, it should say something like "The maximum number of downloads at one time limit setup by admin has been reached, retry later" but not that the server is overloaded.

- This is the worst part about all of the limit settings except for disabled....  If there is a limit setting of any kind in limits it affects the whole server in a negative way.  For example, images that don't load especially when you have many users on your server at the same time. They could be file or folder icons, button icons, a logo, page of wallpaper thumbnails etc. don't all load if **any** of the limits are enabled.  If the limit, whether it be a connection limit or a download limit, is reached the images stop loading.  Even browser refreshing doesn't always load all images which sure doesn't look good on your page.

- I think the HFS concept of limits has to be re-thought and looked at again.

Thank you and hope you can answer my concerns because they affect everybody using HFS.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on January 05, 2005, 06:38:04 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
For example, images that don't load especially when you have many users on your server at the same time.
Yes, I noticed that too (20K-200K limits, 3 users ). but the problem was not the speed limit, but the # of users from the same address. Those extra connections were over the limit when browsing from the same address they download.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 05, 2005, 06:53:04 AM
Rafi,

That's right.  My post above isn't referring to speed limit but connection and download limits.  It's the connection and download limits that is causing the problems with things not loading if those limits have been reached.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on January 05, 2005, 06:59:12 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Rafi,

That's right.  My post above isn't referring to speed limit but connection and download limits.  It's the connection and download limits that is causing the problems with things not loading if those limits have been reached.
I think the # limit should *optionally* apply only to downloading connections.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 05, 2005, 09:02:15 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
I think the # limit should *optionally* apply only to downloading connections.
I agree.  The max download limit and max download limit from a single address should only come into affect when a file from a file listing is actually being downloaded and not the normal downloading of images etc. that make up the look of your pages.

Right now it seems as if max connections, max connections from a single address, max downloads and max downloads from a single address are all related and are all setup the same way which affect the whole workings of the server.

Somehow rejetto should try to better seperate these limits.

Actually the more I think of it, the more I don't see the need for max connections or max connections from a single address.  They aren't needed.

HFS is a file server meaning people will be downloading files from our file listings.  So if rejetto can fix max downloads and max downloads from a single address to **only** affect the download of files from our file listings and **not** the downloading of images etc. that make up the look of our pages, that is all that is really needed.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 05, 2005, 10:13:00 AM
Quote
the browser popup asking for username and password shows a message that doesn't say "Password Protected Resource" but says whatever folder comment that has been used for the root folder including any html coding? This is wrong and has to be fixed.
disable menu :arrow: other options :arrow: use comment as realm

Quote
That must be an internal HFS message because it isn't coming from the [overload] section in the template.
i just edited [overload] and the change is reflected on the browser output.
i guess you are using a customized template. check the statusbar, it should be saying.
your template may be incompatible with latest version.

Quote
- the 503 Server is overloaded, retry later message I don't like.
ok, i'll put a specific section

Quote
They could be file or folder icons, button icons, a logo, page of wallpaper thumbnails etc.
about the HFS generated icon, i don't know why this may happen. Maybe it is a limit over number of connections. Most browsers open several connections. If a connection fails, the browser may not retry to load again. I fear there's no solution on this. You may trying avoiding using "Connection limits".

about logos, etc, you should configure your HFS to not count them as downloads.
"Download limits" applies only to downloads.
File menu :arrow: Don't count as download
Since it is a filemask, you may even specify single filenames, like *.htm*;*.css;wallpaper.jpg
or even more, since this option is folder-based, you can have a folder for your extra stuff, and set * in don't count as download of that folder. This way HFS will exclude all files from that folder from being counted.

Quote
I agree. The max download limit and max download limit from a single address should only come into affect when a file from a file listing is actually being downloaded and not the normal downloading of images etc. that make up the look of your pages.
it is ALREADY SO
check my comment above

Quote
Actually the more I think of it, the more I don't see the need for max connections or max connections from a single address. They aren't needed.
it may be a way to prevent DoS, or something. it may just be superflous for you but useful for someone.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 05, 2005, 01:50:27 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
disable menu :arrow: other options :arrow: use comment as realm
Thanks.  It works.  Actually I thought I had that disabled.  Noticed that HFS doesn't save the disable as it defaults to on (checked) every time I load HFS.  Maybe you should take a look at this.

Quote
i just edited [overload] and the change is reflected on the browser output. i guess you are using a customized template. check the statusbar, it should be saying. your template may be incompatible with latest version.
Yes I'm using a customized template with beta 15.  All the status bar says is customized template.  There is nothing there  saying anything about being incompatible.  I don't get the messages from the template for some reason.

Quote
- the 503 Server is overloaded, retry later message I don't like.
ok, i'll put a specific section
Thanks.

Quote
about logos, etc, you should configure your HFS to not count them as downloads.
"Download limits" applies only to downloads.
Thanks, I didn't know that.  I don't think many people do.  I'll give it a try.

Quote
Since it is a filemask, you may even specify single filenames, like *.htm*;*.css;wallpaper.jpg
Should those be separated with a comma (,) or does it matter?

Quote
or even more, since this option is folder-based, you can have a folder for your extra stuff, and set * in don't count as download of that folder. This way HFS will exclude all files from that folder from being counted.
Good to know.  I didn't know that either.  I guess it's good to ask the developer questions like this to learn how to use his product correctly.

Thanks rejetto.  Your answers should help Rafi too.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on January 05, 2005, 04:19:11 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote
or even more, since this option is folder-based, you can have a folder for your extra stuff, and set * in don't count as download of that folder. This way HFS will exclude all files from that folder from being counted.
Good to know.  I didn't know that either.  I guess it's good to ask the developer questions like this to learn how to use his product correctly.
... or to ask him to make it better... ;)  Excuse me, but "things" like file-icons or any other "downloads" that are not REAL downloads but system related - should not be counted as such automatically (for the purpose of limits) . No filter should be required, especially - no folder related filter.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 05, 2005, 08:28:50 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Excuse me, but "things" like file-icons or any other "downloads" that are not REAL downloads but system related - should not be counted as such automatically (for the purpose of limits) . No filter should be required, especially - no folder related filter.
Totally agree.  Dont' know why ALL downloads (system related and REAL file downloads) are automatically "defaulted" to count as a download then we have to play around with a filter to block which ones we don't want counted in limits. Rejetto's workaround seems to work but I will have to do some more testing.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 06, 2005, 12:29:27 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
about logos, etc, you should configure your HFS to not count them as downloads.
"Download limits" applies only to downloads.
Your advice works better but doesn't work 100%.

With certain images configured not to  count them as downloads, and with max downloads for a single address set to any number, some images (a logo for example) loads sometimes and sometimes not.  I've tested with two different browsers and Opera works better than Internet Explorer in displaying images but still in both browsers all images *sometime* don't load even if you press refresh.  Once whatever connections there were timed out, then the images that didn't load, loaded when the browser is refreshed again.

If all limits were disabled, no problem loading images.  Something still wrong here.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 06, 2005, 02:12:21 PM
Quote
Noticed that HFS doesn't save the disable as it defaults to on (checked) every time I load HFS. Maybe you should take a look at this.
a bug
fixed

Quote
There is nothing there saying anything about being incompatible.
there's no "incompatibility" detection, indeed

Quote
Should those be separated with a comma (,) or does it matter?
comma won't work. you got to use semicolons ";"

Quote
"things" like file-icons or any other "downloads" that are not REAL downloads but system related - should not be counted as such automatically (for the purpose of limits)
it is already so
all files generated by HFS are not counted.
but HFS does not know what's your "wallpaper"...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 06, 2005, 02:47:09 PM
Quote
Your advice works better but doesn't work 100%.
there's a bug in the "download counter"
fixed in next beta (16)

i made a test with beta16 using 2 pics in a template, and setting them as to not be counted as downloads.
they always loaded correctly with both IE and Opera.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 06, 2005, 02:52:49 PM
2.0 beta16 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/2.0beta16.zip

what's new
+ new template section: [max contemporary downloads]
- fixed a problem with download counting
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 06, 2005, 03:04:39 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
2.0 beta16 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/2.0beta16.zip

what's new
+ new template section: [max contemporary downloads]
- fixed a problem with download counting
Not Found

The requested URL /temp/2.0beta16.zip was not found on this server.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 06, 2005, 03:57:02 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ new template section: [max contemporary downloads]
You forgot to tie in this new template section with  [error-page].

Thanks for the update.  You have a filename error to download beta 16 above.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Sk8er_Bender on January 06, 2005, 04:01:29 PM
:cry:  how much to wait for 2.0?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Error URL beta16 on January 06, 2005, 05:00:37 PM
The goob link is :

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta16.zip

 :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 06, 2005, 08:01:35 PM
Quote
You forgot to tie in this new template section with [error-page]

whooops :roll:

www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta17.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: yomo on January 07, 2005, 11:48:19 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
You forgot to tie in this new template section with [error-page]

whooops :roll:

www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta17.zip

 :lol:  :eek:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 07, 2005, 03:34:34 PM
Quote from: "yomo"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
You forgot to tie in this new template section with [error-page]

whooops :roll:

www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta17.zip

 :lol:  :eek:
Why is it too fast?? :eek:
i mean beta 17
but no update on the first page!!?? 8O  :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on January 07, 2005, 09:03:51 PM
Access violation at address 00465CD0 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address FFFFFFFF
HFS 2.0 beta17
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 07.01.2005 22:58:31
[00465CD0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.ScreenToClient + $10
[004041AF]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[0047D42D]{hfs.exe     } JclDebug.TJclStackBaseList.Create (Line 3114, "..\Source\JclDebug.pas" + 3) + $0
[00464A26]{hfs.exe     } Controls.FindDragTarget + $26
[00457AD2]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.DoMouseIdle + $12
[00457B69]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Idle + $25
[004572A7]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $17
[004574BA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005030E9]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 53, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 13) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: Intel, Pentium 4, 1490 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 06.01.2005 20:53:06
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on January 07, 2005, 10:00:52 PM
a little request: different minimize and tray buttons.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 07, 2005, 11:33:01 PM
what was you doing when the error did pop up?
do you have more than one monitor?
Title: problem with HFS ...
Post by: P1_P1_P1 on January 08, 2005, 12:56:04 AM
when I try to upload any file from Mac (OS 10) upload freeze .... and i cant finish uploadnig ...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on January 08, 2005, 08:46:06 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
do you have more than one monitor?
no. but i have an onboard and an agp graphics card. i'm using agp.
driver: Nvidia Omega Drivers 1.5672a

Quote from: "rejetto"
what was you doing when the error did pop up?
my friend was viewing the main page.
Title: Re: problem with HFS ...
Post by: rejetto on January 09, 2005, 03:46:05 PM
Quote from: "P1_P1_P1"
when I try to upload any file from Mac (OS 10) upload freeze .... and i cant finish uploadnig ...
what browser?
can you test using other browsers?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 09, 2005, 03:47:09 PM
Quote from: "oroill"
Quote from: "rejetto"
what was you doing when the error did pop up?
my friend was viewing the main page.
from a quick look to the report, it seems it is not related to what your friend was doing, but to what you was doing
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oroill on January 09, 2005, 04:47:32 PM
i wasn't doing anything. only thing related with hfs was that.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 10, 2005, 05:33:27 AM
Rejetto:

Don't count as Download...

V2.0 beta 17

The Don't count as Download option "only" appears and is available for the root (/), folders and sub-folders - real or virtual.  **BUT** is not available for individual files (greyed-out).  Is that the way it is supposed to work??

The reason why I ask, is that it isn't working for my logo.jpg which is included in the root as well as in folders and sub-folders so the logo is loaded when any folder page opens.  Even though the *.jpg is used in the Don't count as Download in all of my folders and root, the logo.jpg is still counted "every time" a page opens.  Of course I have the logo.jpg hidden so it doesn't show up as a file available for download in my pages, but this file is definitely counted everytime it is loaded.  All I have to do is unhide the file to see the hundreds of hits.

I don't think the Don't count as Download option is working correctly.  If it is, tell me what I'm doing wrong.  I also believe that a person should be able to select "any" file within a folder to not count as a download, but that option isn't available to individual files.

Please advise.  Thank you.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 10, 2005, 11:31:16 AM
please, report the "dount count as download" file mask you specified in the root, so i can know if it is a bug or you are doing something wrong

i expect you are using a wrong file mask. like "*.jpg" and a file name "logo.jpeg" (notice the extra "e").

anyway, it seems a good idea to extend that feature to files.
ATM the feature is a "filemask". a file mask makes sense to folders. but i could implement it also as a flag.
i don't know if this will come in 2.0
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 10, 2005, 01:00:29 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
please, report the "dount count as download" file mask you specified in the root, so i can know if it is a bug or you are doing something wrong

i expect you are using a wrong file mask. like "*.jpg" and a file name "logo.jpeg" (notice the extra "e").

anyway, it seems a good idea to extend that feature to files.
ATM the feature is a "filemask". a file mask makes sense to folders. but i could implement it also as a flag.
i don't know if this will come in 2.0
Here is a copy of my don't count as download root settings.  The first 3 items are your defaults.
*.htm;*.html;*.css;*.jpg

I don't use *.jpeg anywhere.  That extension is not used here.  I looked over everything here carefully and don't see anything wrong with the way I setup the don't count as download in the root or folders.

Hope you can't figure this out and please let me know.  Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 10, 2005, 01:09:37 PM
i put that filemask on my root, put a logo.jpg file, and it is NOT counted.

you can contact me on ICQ (13324358) so we can work in real-time on this issue.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 10, 2005, 01:13:27 PM
Rejetto,

Another note about the don't count as download problem explained above:

I once had a *.html file in my file listings.  Everytime that html file was opened it counted as a download  with hits in the hits column even though as you can see in the above post, *.html is included as a default in the don't count as download in the root.

Don't count as download doesn't seem to be working.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 10, 2005, 01:16:56 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i put that filemask on my root, put a logo.jpg file, and it is NOT counted.

you can contact me on ICQ (13324358) so we can work in real-time on this issue.
Strange.  Very Strange.  It definintely doesn't work here.  I don't use ICQ.  Any other suggestions?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 10, 2005, 01:19:33 PM
Rejetto,

Could the problem be template related?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 10, 2005, 02:15:56 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I once had a *.html file in my file listings.  Everytime that html file was opened it counted as a download  with hits in the hits column even though as you can see in the above post, *.html is included as a default in the don't count as download in the root.
at this stage it is not useful talking about memories
i need a pragmatic approach to the problem
Quote
Could the problem be template related?
i think it can't be
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 10, 2005, 02:18:08 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Strange.  Very Strange.  It definintely doesn't work here.  I don't use ICQ.  Any other suggestions?
do you use any other chat system?
Title: HFS 2.0 beta17
Post by: MarkV on January 11, 2005, 04:59:10 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
The Encode Spaces is enabled by default.  When enabled, %20 is shown in the file lists as well as when I hover my mouse over a filename (Opera).  When I turn-off Encode Spaces (uncheck), %20 is still shown in the file lists and when I hover over a filename.  Is this a bug?

No Problem with the encode spaces option I think, but especially new browsers do conversion by themselves. Spaces are not allowed in URL strings, anyway ...

@rejetto
IF I enable the option "Use UNICODE in HTML", save options, close, then restart, the option is not remembered and deselected again.
Maybe that's a bug?  :roll:

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 12, 2005, 01:19:51 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I don't think the Don't count as Download option is working correctly.  If it is, tell me what I'm doing wrong.  I also believe that a person should be able to select "any" file within a folder to not count as a download, but that option isn't available to individual files.

IMPORTANT
ok folks, in private we clarified this issue.
There's no a bug, just misunderstanding.
The "Don't count as download" feature is referring to the global counter.
Every file has a counter, and it is displayed in the HITS column.
But there is a global counter, you can read it in the tray icon.

The extra images in your template you were talking about, are normally hidden, you don't want to show them in file listing. So what's the point in preventing HFS from counting the "hits" of that files. It is not shown, so preventing counting is not useful.

More than one user falled in this pit, anyway. If you want to suggest a better label to put in the menu, let me know.
Title: Re: HFS 2.0 beta17
Post by: rejetto on January 12, 2005, 01:24:49 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
IF I enable the option "Use UNICODE in HTML", save options, close, then restart, the option is not remembered and deselected again. Maybe that's a bug?  :roll:
you got it
fixed in next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rider on January 17, 2005, 04:26:04 AM
Can you make "restart HFS" after HFS crash?
Title: Secure communication?
Post by: in4matik on January 18, 2005, 12:34:22 AM
Is there a way to make HFS use SSL for secure communications? OpenSSL is open-source so...

What do you think?
Title: Re: Secure communication?
Post by: rejetto on January 18, 2005, 02:03:26 AM
Quote from: "in4matik"
Is there a way to make HFS use SSL for secure communications? OpenSSL is open-source so...
i'm not going to work on SSL soon
Title: HFS Error
Post by: BJ on January 20, 2005, 02:36:51 PM
Hfs had run for 3 1/2 day. then i pressed menu and the error occured.


Access violation at address 00454CCC in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000004
HFS 2.0 beta16
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 20.01.2005 15:34:45
[00454CCC]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetBoundsRect + $10
[004041AF]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[00454F5F]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.GetMonitor + $B
[00455183]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.FindMonitor + $23
[00454C76]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetHeight + $A
[00455E2F]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.MonitorFromPoint + $27
[004A670A]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CheckMenuDropdown + $22E
[004A2619]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolButton.CheckMenuDropdown + $39
[004A5170]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CNNotify + $B8
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0045105D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[0046A1F1]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0045105D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A5D31]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[0046738C]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[0046A697]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[0046AD15]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMNotify + $D
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A5D31]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[004A5AF3]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.SendDropdownMsg + $63
[004A5CC4]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $1C4
[004A5D20]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $220
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457EF9]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.StopHintTimer + $15
[00457263]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[005030A9]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 53, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 13) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(TM) XP, 2080 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Title: A suggestion for a small improvement - disk names in HFS
Post by: Rafi on January 22, 2005, 02:48:59 PM
Here is a suggestion for a small improvement -
When you add a whole disk to HFS - enter both it's label AND it's drive letter as HFS tree-node-name.
Also - enable to drag it (like any other directory).

And a small thing I've just learned - defining virtual disk drives in Windows 98+ you can enter it to HFS as any other drive!
Here is the  is a command that does it:

C>subst
Associates a path with a drive letter

SUBST [drive1: [drive2:]path]
SUBST drive1: /D

drive1:        Specifies a virtual drive to which you want to assign a path
[drive2:]path  Specifies a physical drive and path you want to assign to a virtual drive
/D             Deletes a substituted (virtual) drive/

Type SUBST with no parameters to display a list of current virtual drives
Title: Woa!
Post by: Drowiz on January 23, 2005, 05:20:00 PM
Hi!
I'm just posting to say 'BRAVO' to rejeto and whoever work on dev of HFS!

I'm running 2.0b17 for 2 weeks now and no problem in general, just few thing I'd like to be improved.  Looking forward for next release!!

Thanks again for keeping it free, and we all know that makes it a superior software!!

Keep up the good work!
Title: HFS
Post by: MarkV on January 24, 2005, 03:36:24 AM
Hi folks.

First I want to say, HFS 2.0 b17 runs without a crash on my machines (with a mix of several OSes and other software). But I don't use any speed limitation or other features which are known to cause problems.
HFS is an excellent piece of software!

There are still some questions  :roll:  :

Q1. Options

From what I have read so far HFS loads options in the following order
 1. HFS.INI
 2. user registry (HKCU)
 3. global registry (HKLM)

Now the problem is that if you have an old HFS.INI without knowing and save the new settings to registry, HFS loads the older INI file before the registry (correct) settings at startup.
Solution: If saving to registry, HFS should add a simple timestamp to the settings. Now, at startup HFS compares these timestamp(s) with the "Last Modification Date" from HFS.INI and loads the most recent (last saved) settings instead the hardcoded priority above. Hope you understand what I'm trying to say rejetto...

Q2. As I'm frequently moving whole directory structures/files to different locations, I learned that there is only a single way to get the VFS entries working in HFS again: remove and re-add them.
So what I (and I think some others too) need is:

 1. right click on a file/directory
 2. choose "change file path"
 3. point HFS to the new location of the file/dir
 4. The VFS entry is updated to represent the new file/dir just selected
     (The entry name should NOT be changed, we already have Rename for that.)

Q3. If you need to set restrictions on several files/dirs and have a large number of users defined, there are a LOT of clicks 'till you trough with it. I think we need an extra window (to save several hundred clicks...) where you can put checkmarks and press OK once...
Ability to change permissions recursively would also be very nice...  ;)

Q4. I'm having a small problem with icons. If I'm trying to set a new icon for a file/dir, the list is cut at the bottom of the screen and there is no scrolling feature, at least on my machine. So, I never get to the last icons... Testing with WinNT Workstation. Is there a way to switch to multi column view? Is there a way to use custom (externally loaded) icons?

Q5. If I browse a large real folder, there is a very long delay until the page appears. From what I guess this is HFS loading filenames and file icons, right? Would there be a way to 'cache' the icons (no I don't mean browser cache) so HFS just has to collect icon data once. Also the cache should timeout after some time in case some icons were changed/deleted.
This way, HFS would only load the filenames, cached icons and icons of new files, thus decreasing the build time.

Note: Should any of these questions be already on to-do, just ignore it.
After all, only suggestions... HFS is great anyway!

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martinez1981 on January 24, 2005, 08:26:25 AM
Hi, I have too the new beta (nr. 17)
I have no problems with it, but a friedn of mine has the following problem:

When he arrives at 99% of a file it takes approx 5 Minutes to jump from 99% to 100%

On my side I see the file already as completed ...

Don't know if it's a bug ...

Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 24, 2005, 09:48:12 PM
Quote from: "Martinez1981"
Hi, I have too the new beta (nr. 17)
I have no problems with it, but a friedn of mine has the following problem:

When he arrives at 99% of a file it takes approx 5 Minutes to jump from 99% to 100%

On my side I see the file already as completed ...

Don't know if it's a bug ...

Thanks

Hm, sounds like he is using Internet Explorer... You should ask him if there is heavy disk activity during the delay.
IE first downloads the file to a temporary location (Temporary Internet Files, TIF) , then, upon completion, the file is copied to the final destination (download folder). Now, if the file is fairly big, the final step of moving to the download folder can take some time. There are several factors that add to the delay:

1. slow or fragmented hard disk
2. slow computer hardware
3. the Temporary Internet files and the download folder are on different partitions (even if on the same disk) -> in this case IE physically moves the file from one location to the other

With some versions of IE you get the normal 'copy progress window', with other versions you don't see anything...

If HFS shows the file as transferred 100%, it's a client-side issue anyway.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 25, 2005, 04:30:16 AM
Q1. when you save cfg to a place, HFS deletes cfg in all other places, so what you are saying should never happen
Q2. are you talking about real folders, right? i think it may be better if HFS detects the movement and auto-update
Q3. the dialog is planned for 2.1 and access permissions are already recursive
Q4. i get the scrolling arrows. i fear it is a limit of NT4 and i don't know any way to solve this. to load an icon just add the file to HFS, then remove it. icons are saved inside the VFS.
Q5. i tried caching the icon of the file, and yes, it greatly improved the speed. my system32 folder was 3.3s and now is 1.5s
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 25, 2005, 04:37:18 AM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta18.zip

+ greatly improved speed loading icons for real folders
- "Use UNICODE in HTML" was not saved

i also introduced a little change that may help detecting where the processQ bug is :sick:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on January 25, 2005, 04:45:36 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Q4. i get the scrolling arrows. i fear it is a limit of NT4 and i don't know any way to solve this. to load an icon just add the file to HFS, then remove it. icons are saved inside the VFS.
maybe give an option to either have a one-column  long list or split to multiple columns (like Windows start->programs...)
BTW - doesn't the length of the list it have to do with the display  resolution ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martinez1981 on January 25, 2005, 08:11:55 AM
Hi there yesterday we transferred some jpgs - the problem occurs also with the old release.
He has no hard drive activity during this and I don't thing that 12 KB is a big size???

Well thanks again, we will check ...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Igoriosha on January 25, 2005, 04:13:26 PM
An exception occured when I'm trying to access the CDROM drive, when there is no disc
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: AwPhuch on January 25, 2005, 06:39:50 PM
Quote from: "Igoriosha"
An exception occured when I'm trying to access the CDROM drive, when there is no disc

I do believe that constitutues a DUH!!!!!  You always get an error message when you try to access a drive that has no media...

Brian
AwPhuch
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 26, 2005, 02:42:04 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
maybe give an option to either have a one-column  long list or split to multiple columns (like Windows start->programs...)
BTW - doesn't the length of the list it have to do with the display  resolution ?
i have no control over it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 26, 2005, 05:56:47 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Q1. when you save cfg to a place, HFS deletes cfg in all other places, so what you are saying should never happen

That's good to know BUT:

The method of deleting works well if you only have one user (like most people have).
If you have more than one user, there could be problems:
At the moment, you have 3 choices - HFS.INI, HKCU and HKLM.
HFS.INI and HKLM - all users
HKCU - only the active user

Say you (the administrator) set up the options for all users (HKLM) and most of them are happy with it. But there's one user making a change and saving options only for him/herself. As HFS then deletes all other settings (as you stated), settings for all other users would be lost. So I recommend that HKCU should override the HKLM settings, but not delete it. Of course we need a switch so that users can delete their own HKCU settings and get HKLM settings back. Maybe you could modify the delete option a bit?

HSF.INI should be kept for people who don't like programs messing with the registry and for portability of the options.

Quote from: "rejetto"
Q2. are you talking about real folders, right? i think it may be better if HFS detects the movement and auto-update

I'm talking about real folders and virtual entries for files...
Virtual folders only exist inside the VFS, that'why they are called 'virtual', right? But, every other entry in the VFS points to a physical location on your disk(s). What I meant was that I moved the physical files/folders  from one location to another. Now the VFS-entries point to the old (now invalid) targets. I just wanted an option to tell HFS 'Hey, the file is now there' without deleting and readding the entry. The tooltip already shows me the path (second line), just no way to edit it... :?

Quote from: "rejetto"
Q3. the dialog is planned for 2.1 and access permissions are already recursive

Good to know that it is already on to-do...
So the permissions are always recursive? Ok, but the VFS does not show it. The lock should appear next to all entries permissions apply to. You should change the lock's color for entries that 'inherit' permissions.
Is it possible to add an option to disable inheritation of permissions for some entries? So you could have an unprotected file in your otherwise protected folder. Everyone knowing the correct URL could access that file, but nothing else.

Example 1 - The current situation:
I restrict permissions for folder A. A has a subfolder B.
1. The lock appears next to A. NOTHING in VFS shows me than subfolder B is also protected. (now I know but other's may not)
2. If I right-click B and select 'Restrict access', it tells me that there is NO restriction (no users selected). But it's restricted.

Example 2 - How it could be better (i fear it would require a rewrite of the VFS)
I restrict permissions for folder A. A has a subfolder B. Same situation.
1. The lock appears next to A. B gets a different colored lock showing me that it inherited permissions from A (its parent).
2. The 'Restrict access' option for B is read-only until I disable 'inherit' for B. Then I can set different restrictions for B.

I wish I could speak English better...  ;)

Quote from: "rejetto"
Q4. i get the scrolling arrows. i fear it is a limit of NT4 and i don't know any way to solve this. to load an icon just add the file to HFS, then remove it. icons are saved inside the VFS.

That' why I asked for multi-column view. :roll:
Icons for files I load and then remove are saved in the VFS? Good. But icons I don't use should be thrown out after some time or else the VFS would get bigger every time I add and remove files (I do this very frequently).

Quote from: "rejetto"
Q5. i tried caching the icon of the file, and yes, it greatly improved the speed. my system32 folder was 3.3s and now is 1.5s


Very nice. I had build times of 10 seconds and more (LAN!). Even M$ discovered years ago that caching icons is a good thing. :lol: But like in Q4 the icons should get thrown out after some time to avoid excessive growth of the cache.

edit: Where does it cache? Only in RAM or also disk?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Igoriosha on January 26, 2005, 02:35:38 PM
AwPhuch
You know the difference between EXCEPTION and ERROR??

sorry for my English..
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 26, 2005, 04:54:58 PM
Quote from: "Igoriosha"
AwPhuch
You know the difference between EXCEPTION and ERROR??

sorry for my English..

1. right click anywhere in the VFS
2. Select 'Add folder...'
3. Now select a drive without media in it
4. You get 'Unhandled exception (I/O error 21 or I/O error 87)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on January 26, 2005, 06:50:53 PM
Hi!

I think it would be nice if the ROOT folder could be REAL folder.

Example:
I have c:\stuff where are files i want to share. Now i have to
create a folder in hfs root and under that i see the files. It would
be nice if the files were in the root.

TGeRi

UI: by doing this it would be possible to upload to the root folder
too if allowed.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Igoriosha on January 26, 2005, 06:54:18 PM
MarkV
I mean the same thing. But why there isn't message box with warning, or something.. or just leave the file dialog with cdrom empty.. Exception must be caught :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 26, 2005, 06:56:19 PM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
I think it would be nice if the ROOT folder could be REAL folder.

Quote from: "to-do list"
2.1 FINAL
+ bind the root to a folder (acts as a real-folder)

As you see, already in to-do list for 2.1... ;)
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=763

MarkV
Title: HFS
Post by: MarkV on January 26, 2005, 07:05:43 PM
Quote from: "Igoriosha"
MarkV
I mean the same thing. But why there isn't message box with warning, or something.. or just leave the file dialog with cdrom empty.. Exception must be caught :)

At least HFS allows you to continue and does not terminate like some other software.
The box states "Please report this error", and so:

Quote from: "HFS 2.0 beta18"
I/O error 21
HFS 2.0 beta18
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 26.01.2005 20:03:10
[004AC160]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004028A2]{hfs.exe     } System.ErrorAt + $16
[004AC160]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004ACD33]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDirectory + $9F
[004ACC5D]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDrive + $59
[004AE282]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TSelectDirDlg.DriveListChange + $12
[0043DDBC]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.Change + $1C
[004ABC0D]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.SetDrive + $115
[004ABE49]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.Click + $4D
[0043DD2F]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.CNCommand + $FB
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043DC26]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043ED19]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[0046738C]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[0046A697]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[0046ACF3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $B
[00452F38]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMCommand + $2C
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0045105D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0045105D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0045105D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0046AD02]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $1A
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043DC26]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043ED19]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00454117]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.ShowModal + $147
[004AE667]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.SelectDirectory + $16F
[004FE86B]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Addfolder1Click (Line 5296, "main.pas" + 1) + $D
[0045DFE6]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045F1BF]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045FE9E]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045FDED]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[00503245]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 53, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 13) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows NT 4.0 Workstation, Version: 4.0, Build: 565, "Service Pack 6"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+, 1666 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 25.01.2005 05:26:20
hfs16a.exe: Build: 0 24.05.2004 00:20:54

Quote from: "HFS 2.0 beta18"
I/O error 87
HFS 2.0 beta18
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 26.01.2005 20:07:21
[004AC160]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004028A2]{hfs.exe     } System.ErrorAt + $16
[004AC160]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.DriveChange + $74
[004ACD33]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDirectory + $9F
[004ACC5D]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDirectoryListBox.SetDrive + $59
[004AE282]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TSelectDirDlg.DriveListChange + $12
[0043DDBC]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.Change + $1C
[004ABC0D]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.SetDrive + $115
[004ABE49]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.TDriveComboBox.Click + $4D
[0043DD2F]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.CNCommand + $FB
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043DC26]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043ED19]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[0046738C]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[0046A697]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[0046ACF3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $B
[00452F38]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMCommand + $2C
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0042F8D0]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0041DFEE]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0045105D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[0046AD02]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMCommand + $1A
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A643]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[004675BC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0046A55F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0043DC26]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomCombo.WndProc + $102
[0043ED19]{hfs.exe     } StdCtrls.TCustomComboBox.WndProc + $3D
[0046A1DC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00454117]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.ShowModal + $147
[004AE667]{hfs.exe     } FileCtrl.SelectDirectory + $16F
[004FE86B]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Addfolder1Click (Line 5296, "main.pas" + 1) + $D
[0045DFE6]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045F1BF]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045FE9E]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045FDED]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428E1C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00457263]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045729A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[004574BA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[00503245]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 53, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 13) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows NT 4.0 Workstation, Version: 4.0, Build: 565, "Service Pack 6"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+, 1660 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 25.01.2005 05:26:20
hfs16a.exe: Build: 0 24.05.2004 00:20:54

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Igoriosha on January 27, 2005, 10:37:50 AM
MarkV

  try {
     
           .....
         FileDialog.Open... (I'm not familiar to DELPHI, if DELPHI was used.. )

   }

      catch (Exception e) { MessageBox.Show("The CDROM is empty"); }

 or something like that..
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2005, 10:40:20 AM
or more precise

  catch (IOException e) {............. }
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Traz on January 27, 2005, 02:57:02 PM
Hi, dunno if this was requested already I don't see it tho.

Traffic bar shuld not include localhost trafic.
Traffic bar scalling shuld ignore one second spikes of data flow.

that is all.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 27, 2005, 05:55:27 PM
Quote from: "Igoriosha"
MarkV

  try {
     
           .....
         FileDialog.Open... (I'm not familiar to DELPHI, if DELPHI was used.. )

   }

      catch (Exception e) { MessageBox.Show("The CDROM is empty"); }

 or something like that..

Quote from: "guest"
or more precise

catch (IOException e) {............. }

Delphi 6 PE...
But we have to wait for rejetto - he should try to fix.
I'm not familiar to Delphi., sry

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 31, 2005, 01:09:43 AM
*push*

Hope the thread's not dead...  :roll:

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 03, 2005, 06:19:13 PM
Quote from: "Igoriosha"
catch (Exception e) { MessageBox.Show("The CDROM is empty"); }
sad, but this was impossible to do (dunno why)
so i changed the code for folder selection, it was in the to-do since month
it is much better now, it will be available in beta19

Quote from: "MarkV"
Hope the thread's not dead...  :roll:
hold on, i just need some time
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 04, 2005, 08:19:54 AM
Hi!

On www.rejetto.com/sw tha FORUM link is not working.
(sorry, couldn't find a better place to post)

TGeRi
Title: FORUM link
Post by: MarkV on February 04, 2005, 10:51:03 AM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
On www.rejetto.com/sw tha FORUM link is not working.

FORUM link is working, at least for me. Tested with Firefox and IE6

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on February 04, 2005, 07:39:33 PM
Hi!

I get this: http://rejetto.gamesnet.it/forum/index.php?c=5

and there i can not see any topic or anything.

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on February 05, 2005, 07:00:52 AM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
Hi!

I get this: http://rejetto.gamesnet.it/forum/index.php?c=5

and there i can not see any topic or anything.

TGeRi

Just klick the line saying 'HFS - Http File Server' to open.
Then, 'HFS forum - ENGLISH' and you're there.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on February 05, 2005, 03:07:58 PM
Stupid, stupid, stupid me. Sorry....
Title: Forum link
Post by: MarkV on February 06, 2005, 09:59:52 AM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
I get this: http://rejetto.gamesnet.it/forum/index.php?c=5

@rejetto

Please update the FORUM link, the cookies won't work if you come from http://www.rejetto.com/sw via that link.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 10, 2005, 12:32:16 PM
Time for an update?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 11, 2005, 07:10:02 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Time for an update?
Why ? to what ?

Just to v2.0 Final possibly  :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on February 11, 2005, 07:19:05 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Time for an update?
Why ? to what ?

Just to v2.0 Final possibly  :D
getting bored with  Beta 18 ?  ;)   not good enough ? :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 11, 2005, 12:20:04 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Just to v2.0 Final possibly  :D
do you have the fix for the processQ bug? ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 13, 2005, 09:30:55 PM
Quote
Say you (the administrator) set up the options for all users (HKLM) and most of them are happy with it. But there's one user making a change and saving options only for him/herself. As HFS then deletes all other settings (as you stated), settings for all other users would be lost. So I recommend that HKCU should override the HKLM settings, but not delete it. Of course we need a switch so that users can delete their own HKCU settings and get HKLM settings back. Maybe you could modify the delete option a bit?
yes, you are right.
but i fear to complicate things (the GUI), since the situation you tell is very rare and would help few people while aggravating others. If you have suggestions....
Anyway, if you ask HFS to save cfg in a file, it won't delete registry.
So you can have safely user-based settings keeping them in files.
You just have to change the "working folder", HFS will read hfs.ini from there.

Quote
The tooltip already shows me the path (second line), just no way to edit it...
you'll find it in beta19

Quote
The lock should appear next to all entries permissions apply to.
i already thought about it and think it would be a mess.
you can't have all information, always, at the same time.
i made a change in the tooltip to get this information.

Quote
Is it possible to add an option to disable inheritation of permissions for some entries?
if it is unprotected, why keep it in a protected folder?
put it elsewhere and hide it
you can have 2 links to the same file, one in the folder and visible, one out of the folder and hidden

Quote
(now I know but other's may not)
the "recursion" on a protected structure is the classic behaviour.
it is what you get if you protect a folder on your disk.
it is what you get if you use other web servers.

Quote
it tells me that there is NO restriction (no users selected)
the fact is: it doesn't tell you, and you think it is not.
this now has been solved by adding a "telling" feature.

Quote
Even M$ discovered years ago that caching icons is a good thing.
yes, i thought that too. i was about to reply you "i ask icons to Windows, and it already caches by itself".
but i decided to make a try, and found ..... it is better to not trust M$ ;)

Quote
Where does it cache? Only in RAM or also disk?
only RAM

Quote
But icons I don't use should be thrown out after some time or else the VFS would get bigger every time I add and remove files (I do this very frequently).
this wasting concerns only RAM. did someone noticed HFS wasting too much memory for icons? like 1MB...

my reply delayed a lot because your message was very long ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 13, 2005, 09:35:02 PM
2.0 beta 19 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta19.zip

please, report "processQ" errors

beta19
+ better "open folder" dialog
+ File Menu -> "Edit resource"
* file tooltip -> before: "Users" displaying local settings, now: "Access for" displaying the lock in a recursive way
- requests from banned ones were logged, now ignored
Title: Looong post
Post by: MarkV on February 13, 2005, 10:54:30 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Anyway, if you ask HFS to save cfg in a file, it won't delete registry.
So you can have safely user-based settings keeping them in files.
You just have to change the "working folder", HFS will read hfs.ini from there.
Agreed. ;)

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
The tooltip already shows me the path (second line), just no way to edit it...
you'll find it in beta19
Excellent! I'll test it ASAP...

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
The lock should appear next to all entries permissions apply to.
i already thought about it and think it would be a mess.
you can't have all information, always, at the same time.
i made a change in the tooltip to get this information.
Tooltip is OK. You can't have everything. But it's open source, I should learn Delphi... B)

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
Is it possible to add an option to disable inheritation of permissions for some entries?
if it is unprotected, why keep it in a protected folder?
put it elsewhere and hide it
you can have 2 links to the same file, one in the folder and visible, one out of the folder and hidden
Hmm, yes but if you protect the root, there is no 'elsewhere' :?

Why not allow the admin to 'declare' another root (user-based)? That way  every user could have its own 'home directory'!
e.g. you create a VFS folder 'UserA' and declare it as root for user A... Endless possibilities...:roll:

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
(now I know but other's may not)
the "recursion" on a protected structure is the classic behaviour.
it is what you get if you protect a folder on your disk. (...)

Right, every folder in NT inherits rights to subfolders and files. For every subfolder/file, I can disable inheritation and set different rights. Maybe in 3.0... :roll:


Quote from: "rejetto"
(...)but i decided to make a try, and found ..... it is better to not trust M$ ;)
I trust only open source completely 8O

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
But icons I don't use should be thrown out after some time or else the VFS would get bigger every time I add and remove files (I do this very frequently).
this wasting concerns only RAM. did someone noticed HFS wasting too much memory for icons? like 1MB...
I added my WINNT folder to the VFS (real) and opened it in my browser. HFS memory consumption jumped from 4012KB to 7432KB. More than 3 MB... After some time HFS should release the memory if nobody browsed that folder again...

Quote from: "rejetto"
my reply delayed a lot because your message was very long ;)
Yes, we should keep posts shorter...  :#)

MarkV
Title: Much shorter post
Post by: MarkV on February 13, 2005, 11:29:50 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ File Menu -> "Edit resource"
Thank you... B)

edit:
Quote from: "maverick"
Would it be possible to add a "browse function" to "edit resource". It would make changing the path a lot easier.
Indeed that would make it a lot easier...


Quote from: "rejetto"
- requests from banned ones were logged, now ignored
You mean these lines?
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Connected
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Not served: 403 - Deny
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Disconnected by server: banned - XXX bytes sent

I get it with beta19 as well. Do you mean file log or also screen log?

One (final ;) ) question:
There is an option 'Let browse'. If you untick it, HFS denies listing of the resource. If I know the name of a file in that folder, I can download it (tested beta19). Is it possible to add 'Let download' to deny any downloads?
e.g. Allow listing (and upload if set) but not download?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 15, 2005, 02:20:11 AM
Quote
Hmm, yes but if you protect the root, there is no 'elsewhere'
if not all has to be protected, you don't protect the root
that is: you can do it some way, you may want to get the same result but in a different way, like protecting the root and stopping inheriting the protection.
it is lawful, but it would require an option to stop inheritation of protection, another for visibility, another for filters, another for upload, another for the default file mask, etc etc.
do we want a software with 10 thousands options?
if we had config files in every folder, like Apache, it would be ok, but with a GUI we get a mess on the screen just to be able to do the same thing in multiple ways.

Quote
Why not allow the admin to 'declare' another root (user-based)?
same as before
do you have an idea on how to design an easy-to-use GUI for this?
advice if you do, because i do not.
you can get the same thing by creating a folder for each account.
it won't be the root, but to just get the root should we get a hard-to-use software?

Quote
I added my WINNT folder to the VFS (real) and opened it in my browser. HFS memory consumption jumped from 4012KB to 7432KB. More than 3 MB... After some time HFS should release the memory if nobody browsed that folder again...
yes, here it goes from 8M to 17M
i tried making this function
Code: [Select]
while iconsCache.Count > 0 do
  begin
  iconsCache.objects[0].free;
  iconsCache.Delete(0);
  end;
imagescache:=NIL;
while images.count > startingImagesCount do
  images.Delete(images.count-1);
and triggered it: just 100-200k were unallocated.
the fact is: i do not control the memory allocation. Windows does.
i don't know how to lower memory consumption, but we are on a forum, maybe someone will advice.

Quote
Would it be possible to add a "browse function" to "edit resource".
yes, it will come

Quote
You mean these lines?
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Connected
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Not served: 403 - Deny
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Disconnected by server: banned - XXX bytes sent
yes...sad

Quote
Is it possible to add 'Let download' to deny any downloads?
hmm, ok
i fear there's something better we could do, but i don't know what :)
Title: Writing programs is not an easy job
Post by: MarkV on February 15, 2005, 03:47:22 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
if we had config files in every folder, like Apache, it would be ok
.htaccess files would solve a lot of problems regarding protection...

Quote from: "rejetto"
you can get the same thing by creating a folder for each account.
Yes and if I could enter it as 'root' in the user profile HFS could just modify the URL so the user gets his folder as root. However, it was just an idea...

Quote from: "rejetto"
yes, here it goes from 8M to 17M
i tried making this function
Code: [Select]
iconsCache.Clear();
imagescache:=NIL;
while images.count > startingImagesCount do
  images.Delete(images.count-1);
and triggered it: just 100-200k were unallocated.
the fact is: i do not control the memory allocation. Windows does.
i don't know how to lower memory consumption, but we are on a forum, maybe someone will advice.
At least you tried. :) It could become a problem if you serve very large real folders and HFS stays up a very long lime. Damn Windows, I hate memory leaks... Anyway, please leave this code in the program, maybe someone gets better results (maybe Windows needs some time to release memory)

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
Would it be possible to add a "browse function" to "edit resource".
yes, it will come
Hooray! ;)

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
You mean these lines?
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Connected
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Not served: 403 - Deny
127.0.0.1:2388{loopback} Disconnected by server: banned - XXX bytes sent
yes...sad
:(

Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
Is it possible to add 'Let download' to deny any downloads?
hmm, ok
i fear there's something better we could do, but i don't know what :)
If the options 'Let Browse', 'Let download' and 'Upload' are independent from each other, it would be a solution, at least for now.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 15, 2005, 04:01:20 AM
i investigated on the memory problem, and found that a lot of memory is managed by delphi and not windows, and it is labeled as free memory.
it is free but reserved to the app.
i noticed most of this free memory is created by the icons cache system.
i read somewhere that things like this are caused by fragmentation.
i'm still investigating
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 15, 2005, 04:30:16 AM
ok, i programmed a new icons cache system.
low fragmentation, and it purges icons older than 5 minutes.
in next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on February 15, 2005, 05:44:43 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i don't know how to lower memory consumption, but we are on a forum, maybe someone will advice.
May be use some disk cache oriented and not memory cache ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 15, 2005, 07:12:02 AM
icons in memory takes less than 1MB
Title: New feature
Post by: vbTheKing on February 15, 2005, 06:57:56 PM
rejetto, i have an idea - add a feature which scans all VFS and makes a report if any files or folder is no more at same location or just was deleted. I mean a feature that automaticaly shows invalid liks and gives easy way to edit the URL entry.
Function like Winamp's "Remove all dead files".  :roll:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 16, 2005, 12:48:15 AM
it is already in to-do list
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Impact on February 16, 2005, 10:39:39 AM
hi is it possible to add an image preview?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 16, 2005, 11:10:54 AM
Is it possible for a meta-search in HFS??
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 16, 2005, 05:29:08 PM
Quote from: "Impact"
hi is it possible to add an image preview?
it is already in to-do list
Quote
Is it possible for a meta-search in HFS??
what's that?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: mocelet61 on February 17, 2005, 12:26:41 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
2.0 beta 19 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta19.zip

please, report "processQ" errors

beta19
+ better "open folder" dialog
+ File Menu -> "Edit resource"
* file tooltip -> before: "Users" displaying local settings, now: "Access for" displaying the lock in a recursive way
- requests from banned ones were logged, now ignored

Why have you not updated the firs post with the last beta?

Is too difficult found the last of it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Avneet on February 17, 2005, 08:19:35 PM
i cant find the log out button..is theer any ??
Title: Log out
Post by: MarkV on February 17, 2005, 08:39:31 PM
Quote from: "Avneet"
i cant find the log out button..is theer any ??
HFS uses HTTP Basic AUTH, you have to close your browser to logout...
HFS can't do anything against that, sorry...  :?
Correct me if I'm wrong rejetto...  B)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on February 19, 2005, 06:11:17 AM
:idea: Feature request :
make on option in the right-click menu  to "browse" REAL folder with Windows explorer, as well as F9-IE

:idea: Idea :
A. Within the template  - add integration to a local VNC server (such as a link/button at the bottom). This way a user can choose (if allowed) to view the whole desktop with this free remote access software.

B. In a "link-type" VFS entry - Have a possibility to use the local IP (also used by HFS) to build an access pint/link to another server running on the PC. Example:
URL = http://%ip%:1214  - access the KaZaa "server" share folder

:idea: Bug :
there is a small bug:  when using the format http://<ip>:<port#> as a link definition in HFS, in the remote IE interface -  it does NOT show or use the port # at all  :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2005, 06:43:12 AM
FR: it is already there, it is called "run it"

IDEA: you already can do it. just make a like to the port 5800 where VNC has a web server with java applet

BUG: it works correctly here. i made a link to another web server on port 123, it was displayed on the screen by IE and then it worked like a charm.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on February 19, 2005, 07:29:23 AM
OK, you are right (as usual...), some notes, though

FR:
right, but maybe rename it to "open it" - so it will fit both files & folders

IDEA:
A. right again... what was confusing me - was the incorrect display of the tooltip on HFS defined "links" .  "file/path name" - is mis-leading. may be you can fix that to either not show anything, or try to detect correctly the REAL filename at the and of the link-"path" if any.

B. still if will be useful - for those who do not have domain names - to have a %ip% symbol to use inside link.

Bug:
right. it works . sometimes, at first  it does not. probably - IE problem.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2005, 08:45:22 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
right, but maybe rename it to "open it" - so it will fit both files & folders
ok
Quote
A. right again... what was confusing me - was the incorrect display of the tooltip on HFS defined "links"
it was a bug, fixed in beta20
Quote
B. still if will be useful - for those who do not have domain names - to have a %ip% symbol to use inside link.
right
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2005, 09:13:23 AM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta20.zip

beta 20
+ %ip% symbol available in URL for links
* now the "folder kind" dialog stays on top until you answer
* "run it" has been renamed to "open it"
- solved memory wasting problem
- the file tip was showing wrong fields for links
- "get passworded url" was not working for user/pass
- "get passworded url" was not encoding user and password
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on February 19, 2005, 11:29:00 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
A. right again... what was confusing me - was the incorrect display of the tooltip on HFS defined "links"
it was a bug, fixed in beta20
Quote
B. still if will be useful - for those who do not have domain names - to have a %ip% symbol to use inside link.
right

Great! thanks
Title: Search in HFS
Post by: Evdo on February 20, 2005, 07:04:55 AM
Hello. Excuse for my English language. I from Kazakhstan.

Whether probably in your program to organize search of files on virtual folders. If it is possible whereas?

Beforehand thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 20, 2005, 07:09:17 PM
it is already in to-do list
Title: Search
Post by: Evdo on February 21, 2005, 05:04:56 AM
Thanks!
Your program has very much liked us.
Tell please when it is approximately possible to expect realization of search?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 21, 2005, 05:12:08 AM
i don't know, sorry
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 21, 2005, 02:06:02 PM
Access violation at address 0041D792 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 700A0D7F
HFS 2.0 beta20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2/19/2005 8:18:40 PM
[0041D792]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TList.Assign (Line 2971, "classes.pas" + 17) + $3
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[0041D78C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TList.Assign (Line 2970, "classes.pas" + 16) + $5
[00403F97]{hfs.exe     } System.@ClassCreate + $7
[00403FEF]{hfs.exe     } System.@AfterConstruction + $7
[00403C0C]{hfs.exe     } System.TObject.Create + $10
[004C6BA1]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.disconnectAll (Line 672, "HSlib.pas" + 3) + $C
[004F9C43]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.beforeQuit (Line 5798, "main.pas" + 6) + $7
[004F9C73]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 5806, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0044EEA3]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DoClose + $17
[004523DD]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.Close + $55
[004516A0]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMClose + $0
[00465BCC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468B6F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F66D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00455873]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[00455892]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessages + $A
[004CD9F2]{hfs.exe     } HttpProt.THttpCli.DoRequestSync (Line 2046, "HttpProt.pas" +
17) + $7
[004CE412]{hfs.exe     } HttpProt.THttpCli.Get (Line 2366, "HttpProt.pas" + 1) + $7
[004D218A]{hfs.exe     } utilLib.httpGet (Line 930, "utillib.pas" + 7) + $3
[004D2250]{hfs.exe     } utilLib.getExternalAddress (Line 942, "utillib.pas" + 2) + $16
[004F8FD1]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.finalInit (Line 5595, "main.pas" + 22) + $11
[004FC8E1]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 57, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 13) + $7
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Home Edition, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: Intel, Pentium III, 500 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2/19/2005 10:08:34 AM
Title: HFS log file
Post by: MarkV on February 21, 2005, 03:31:56 PM
FR: Would it be possible to add log file limitation?

- size limit (FIFO maybe?)
- some symbols to use with log file name, e.g. %date%.log - this would allow rotation of logs
- delete old logs after xxx days

Or is it already there?
The logfile can get very large over time, that's why I ask...  B)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 21, 2005, 11:57:39 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
[004F9C73]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 5806, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
...
[004F8FD1]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.finalInit (Line 5595, "main.pas" + 22) + $11
i introduced something that should fix this (next beta)
Title: Re: HFS log file
Post by: rejetto on February 22, 2005, 01:23:40 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
- some symbols to use with log file name, e.g. %date%.log - this would allow rotation of logs
you'll get this in beta21
Title: Re: HFS log file
Post by: MarkV on February 22, 2005, 02:18:59 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "MarkV"
- some symbols to use with log file name, e.g. %date%.log - this would allow rotation of logs
you'll get this in beta21

Not only me, I think I'm not alone...  :roll:
As for the options, why you don't hide 'advanced' settings by default? Advanced users had to enable 'expert options' to see all. This way, less experienced users would not be confused at first... I've seen many programs doing it this way.

edit: I looked through the options again and some of them could be hidden by default as the casual user does not need to change it...

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 22, 2005, 02:31:21 AM
it seems a good idea
i'll do it before or later
please, in the while someone make a list of options to hide ;)
Title: Experts only
Post by: MarkV on February 22, 2005, 03:14:35 AM
OK lets start. Feel free to add/remove items to/from the list, at least it's only my 2 cents...

from Other options:
-Send HFS identifier
-Persistent connections
-Specific HTML for download managers
-MIME types (if you have good defaults)
-Compressed browsing
-Modal dialog for options

from Start/Exit:
-Find external address on startup

from Virtual File System
-List files with <system> attribute

from Limits:
(maybe the one causing trouble?)

from IP-Address:
-Custom...
-Don't include port in URL

from URL-encode:
-I would hide this section completely, no need with modern browsers...

OK that's it, at least for now.  B)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 22, 2005, 05:47:19 AM
Quote
i'll do it before or later
already done :D

i also added:
dynamic dns updater
max connections
max connections from single address
only 1 instance



should we remove something else?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on February 22, 2005, 06:18:43 AM
Hi!

And i think autoload last vfs and autosave settings should be default options if they are not now.

TGeRi

PS: if u have a "clean" hfs. You satart is. Make the vritual file system of yours and exit i think nothing asks for you if you want to save this. It is ok if you save vfs the with autoload and autosave it will be ok but not for the first time. I hope everyone can understand my problem.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on February 22, 2005, 06:24:28 AM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
Hi!

And i think autoload last vfs and autosave settings should be default options if they are not now.

TGeRi

PS: if u have a "clean" hfs. You satart is. Make the vritual file system of yours and exit i think nothing asks for you if you want to save this. It is ok if you save vfs the with autoload and autosave it will be ok but not for the first time. I hope everyone can understand my problem.

Confirmed. It asks you: Quit? If you say Yes, that's it...
There should be a warning like: "VFS has not been saved, really quit?"

edit: Through testing with VFS I found another serious issue:
If Autosave VFS is checked, and you clear the VFS and set up another, at shutdown the old is overwritten. It should prompt for another name if you cleared it and set up a new but forgot to save under new name. I just lost my whole VFS because of that!  8O

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Sadistic on February 22, 2005, 01:56:24 PM
i d/led the last version 20 but when i turn it on it cannot be browsed. even i can't open the page and i have not touched any settings - there are the same as the ones from beta 18. I have a firewall ZoneAlarm but it is not switched on, i have removed it from startup...
Title: edit resource
Post by: MarkV on February 22, 2005, 11:59:08 PM
The 'Edit resource...' works very well for folders. It does not work for files, as  you can only pick folders. I can't enter/change the filename, and the filename gets stripped.

Entries for filenames get DESTROYED when using this function with files... :(

edit: I tested some more with WinXP and found out what's going on here:

With WinXP, there's no problem at all! The dialog pops up and looks like this:

[edit: picture link removed]

But with NT Workstation, it looks very different.

[edit: picture link removed]

As you see, no option for picking files here. To my knowledge, this was introduced in Windows 2000, so it works only there... Too bad. :(

MarkV

edit: removed picture links, speeds up the page loading...
       (problem is solved anyway...)
Title: Question
Post by: Anonymous on February 23, 2005, 11:26:25 PM
Where is saved "Address2name" list?
I want to export it and then import to another HFS?
Title: Re: Question
Post by: rejetto on February 24, 2005, 12:48:37 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Where is saved "Address2name" list?
I want to export it and then import to another HFS?
you got to open the registry or hfs.ini file (it depends on where you save options) and search the line address2name=

then you can just copy & paste on another config
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 24, 2005, 04:46:14 AM
Quote
There should be a warning like: "VFS has not been saved, really quit?"
HFS is meant to be used as a on-the-fly server, by default.
if you want i can insert an option to get that dialog, but it won't be on by default.

Quote
It should prompt for another name if you cleared it and set up a new but forgot to save under new name.
done

Quote
But with NT Workstation, it looks very different.
ok, changed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 24, 2005, 04:49:06 AM
be mindful with this release, i changed some inner things, possible bugs

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta21.zip

beta 21
+ Easy/Expert mode
+ Log Menu -> Log what -> "Banned"
+ new symbols in the log filename for log rotation
- Log Menu -> Log what -> "Progress" was not saved
- Clearing the file system, no new file name was asked
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 24, 2005, 04:59:01 AM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
And i think autoload last vfs and autosave settings should be default options if they are not now.
if "you" (classic user) create something, save it, then edit it, you expect it to NOT be saved until you ask for, because this is the default behaviour for 98% of the software around

you may expect to be asked for saving before quit, but this has just been discussed 2-3 posts before :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Guest on March 01, 2005, 02:33:09 AM
Featute request:
Lim it the speed per IP. (Selective)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Guest on March 01, 2005, 02:33:45 AM
Feature request 2:
Make it run as a service under win 2000 server
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 01, 2005, 02:45:27 AM
Quote from: "Guest"
Feature request 2:
Make it run as a service under win 2000 server
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1389&

Quote
Lim it the speed per IP. (Selective)
already in to-do list
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Trazi on March 06, 2005, 10:51:12 PM
Hi,

It whuld be good to have possibility to make multilangual templates (or it is implemented somehow allready?).
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on March 07, 2005, 05:35:53 PM
i support this idea
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 08, 2005, 04:31:01 AM
Quote from: "Trazi"
Hi,

It whuld be good to have possibility to make multilangual templates (or it is implemented somehow allready?).

You mean the HTML template used in HFS? You can edit it yourself.
1. Switch to Expert mode (only beta21+)
2. Other options - Edit HTML Template
3. Search for the text and customize/translate
4. If you succeed, it would be nice to share it in this forum... in the template section  B)

If you mean the program itself - no, you would have to translate the sourcecode and recompile.

@rejetto: As the sourcecode is free - I could translate it to german probably, but I have no Delphi. Can we send the translated source zip back to you and you compile it? Of course we have to wait for the final to do that. (At the moment it's quiet, but who knows  :roll: )

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on March 08, 2005, 05:07:31 AM
Languages *in the server* should be supported NOT inside the code but in some external file-resource with keywords.
As far as I see it - English is good enough for most people.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Trazi on March 08, 2005, 12:13:27 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
Quote from: "Trazi"
Hi,

3. Search for the text and customize/translate

MarkV

Yes I know I can do that, but it whuld still be only one language it whuld be worse becouse it whuld not be english and most people on the world don't know Polish (my langage) I meant Multilanguage. so serwer whuld choose version of template based on data from i dont know from browser or just clickable flag buttons. if there is such option then I missed it if not... I cant do a thing.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 08, 2005, 10:35:03 PM
Quote from: "Trazi"
Yes I know I can do that, but it whuld still be only one language it whuld be worse becouse it whuld not be english and most people on the world don't know Polish (my langage) I meant Multilanguage. so serwer whuld choose version of template based on data from i dont know from browser or just clickable flag buttons. if there is such option then I missed it if not... I cant do a thing.
Have 2 templates.  One English and the other Polish (use a different filename like polish.html).  In the English template (which would be your default hfs.tpl) include a link to the Polish template and show the link in a button next or near to the logged in user name.  Your Polish users could click on that Polish template link and should be presented with HFS pages in Polish except for maybe filenames.  I haven't tested it, but should work unless there is something hardcoded in the HFS engine stopping it.

maverick
Title: multilanguage tpl
Post by: MarkV on March 08, 2005, 10:42:02 PM
No, no such option yet. But a good idea...
The browser defines the preferred language in the HTTP header.
Code: [Select]
Accept-Language: de-de,de;q=0.8,en-us;q=0.5,en;q=0.3 HFS should be able to read this info and use the corresponding template. Default should be the english template.

MarkV
Title: About Time for V2 ...
Post by: Rafi on March 10, 2005, 09:20:06 PM
I think it is about time For V 2.0 to be public  :!:  enough beta's ...
Let's give the "world" a chance to use  it too...  :)  At lease - a public RC !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How about it ? what do you say, rejetto  :?:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: NN on March 11, 2005, 07:45:31 AM
Agree with Rafi.
The world must see HFS 2.0 RC  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Trazi on March 11, 2005, 09:42:06 PM
World is using it look for google betas, people whuld not care less. Now people use HFS 2 beta for sure, there is no point in rushing it to realese. For me current version is fully stable but i did not menage to crash eny version since first beta of hfs 2. It's all to Rejetto to call it done.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: PhoenixPath on March 16, 2005, 03:02:04 AM
Language templates...

Ever considered going PHP?  It'd require something as simple as a language directory and suer-submitted language.php files.  (english.php, polish.php..etc)

Would also make it possible to use a theme-folder, so users could select the theme, instead of the operator, as well as open up the possibility for user-created modules.
Title: ERROR - BIG FILES !!!!
Post by: P1_P1_P1 on March 17, 2005, 12:24:30 AM
little bug - I try to share 4GB file and download it and i can download only 200MB !!!!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Username on March 17, 2005, 08:53:25 AM
Could there be an option to keep hidden files hidden?

 :drunk:
Title: Re: ERROR - BIG FILES !!!!
Post by: rejetto on March 17, 2005, 11:59:40 AM
Quote from: "P1_P1_P1"
little bug - I try to share 4GB file and download it and i can download only 200MB !!!!
this is not an HFS bug. it's a bug of the software you used to download. you should complain with the ones who made it ;)
it was long discussed on this forum.

Quote from: "Username"
Could there be an option to keep hidden files hidden?
yes, just save the file system after you hide
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 17, 2005, 03:38:23 PM
OK, what program can download it correctly ???? cause DAP, GetRight, IE 6.0 SP2, IE 6.0 SP1, IE 5.5, IE 5.1 shows 200MB file ...
and when i try use APATCHE - its everything OK (4 500 047 900 Bytes)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 18, 2005, 07:56:39 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
OK, what program can download it correctly ???? cause DAP, GetRight, IE 6.0 SP2, IE 6.0 SP1, IE 5.5, IE 5.1 shows 200MB file ...
and when i try use APATCHE - its everything OK (4 500 047 900 Bytes)

FileZilla
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on March 18, 2005, 09:05:45 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
OK, what program can download it correctly ???? cause DAP, GetRight, IE 6.0 SP2, IE 6.0 SP1, IE 5.5, IE 5.1 shows 200MB file ...
and when i try use APATCHE - its everything OK (4 500 047 900 Bytes)

FileZilla
Isn't FZ an ftp client/server ? I think he meant - using HFS...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 18, 2005, 09:09:31 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
and when i try use APATCHE - its everything OK (4 500 047 900 Bytes)
8O are you sure?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 18, 2005, 01:15:33 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
and when i try use APATCHE - its everything OK (4 500 047 900 Bytes)

It does NOT work, even with Apache...
I run Apache 2.0.53 on my machine, aside from HFS (as HFS can't do Perl/CGI yet). Tested with a file of 4500000000 Bytes (ca. 4,19GB):

- IE 6.0SP2: 195MB  8O
- Mozilla Firefox 1.01: 200227KB  :?
- Metaproducts Download Express: 4500000000 bytes

Download Express did work, the others not.

Now HFS tests:

- IE 6.0SP2: 195MB
- Firefox: 200227KB
- Download Express: DE does not work with HFS...

Why DE doesn't work with HFS? Apache works great.
HFS log says 'Connected', then 'Disconnected', '166760 bytes sent.'. DE shows 'aborted'. Hm. :(

BTW download is http://www.metaproducts.com/download/desetup.exe

MarkV

@rejetto: The tooltips in HFS show the correct filesize now. I don't know why they were wrong before, maybe it was NT4... Anyway, no more NT4, no more complaints... :roll:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Trazi on March 18, 2005, 02:12:10 PM
Hi,

I just made a test with Reget Deluxe, file was 6658032928 bytes and first

400 Mb downloaded properly (and then i run out with free space on hdd) but im sure full file whuld downloaded without problems.

Im using HFS 2.0 B21, windows XP SP2 and Reget Deluxe 4.1

FireFox 1.0.1 could not tell filesize on start but downloaded 400 Mb as well i think it whuld finnish if space whuld be sufficient

Internet Explorer downloaded 0KB and stopped there.

all my test were local so i dont know if they are helping enywhere. but mayby it does.
Title: Re: ERROR - BIG FILES !!!!
Post by: Rafi on March 18, 2005, 02:26:01 PM
Quote
little bug - I try to share 4GB file and download it and i can download only 200MB !!!!

Check what file system you guys use ? NTFS ? If you have FAT32 - the max file size IS 4G -1byte ...

http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/prkc_fil_tdrn.asp
Title: Exploring "real" folders; explorer-list-style file
Post by: Rafi on March 18, 2005, 02:50:12 PM
I'm not sure if this was mentioned here...
It would be nice if there will be an option (on the server side) to display the details - size, date/time of files/folders in  "explorer style" . meaning - adding a view-menu, with "list","details" menu-list (with or w/o showing "icons") .
This may apply to both virtual AND real folders, and can optionally replace the comments. this way, the user can view the whole tree details w/o the need to drag the mouse over each and every file (much like in the remote template view) . Also local file operations such as file - delete, rename, copy-pastes can be available to the server-user ( and eventually - when permissions will evolve - to the remote user) .

What do you think ?
Title: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: Rafi on March 18, 2005, 03:20:00 PM
I've just moticed that HFS has sound-effects  8O when it is a background window and "signals" by blinking the minimized window . Can those be disabled , and/or - re-defined as some a user .wav file ?
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: MarkV on March 18, 2005, 11:22:38 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
I've just moticed that HFS has sound-effects  8O when it is a background window and "signals" by blinking the minimized window . Can those be disabled , and/or - re-defined as some a user .wav file ?

You can disable it by unchecking

Menu - Flash Taskbutton - Also beep, and choose Menu - Flash Taskbutton - Never

You have to switch to 'Expert Mode' first (beta21)
There is no way to customize a sound (yet), I think? :?:

MarkV
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: maverick on March 19, 2005, 12:50:23 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
There is no way to customize a sound (yet), I think? :?:
Just go into the Control Panel > Sounds and change the system default to anything you would like.
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: Rafi on March 19, 2005, 05:39:35 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
There is no way to customize a sound (yet), I think? :?:
Quote
...and change the system default ...
Better do it in the correct way, or not at all  ...

Edit:
Expert mode - on my system (Win98) most of the times is does not work ..  :( the "other options" menu changes, but the main menu stays in easy mode...  a bug ?
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: maverick on March 19, 2005, 07:08:00 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Better do it in the correct way, or not at all  ...
:?:
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: Rafi on March 19, 2005, 07:12:57 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Better do it in the correct way, or not at all  ...
:?:
You don't change SYSTEM defaults to accommodate a single program. Each application should take care of itself...
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: maverick on March 19, 2005, 10:14:26 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
You don't change SYSTEM defaults to accommodate a single program. Each application should take care of itself...
While what you say is true, the option is simple - to "beep" or "not to beep" on download or connection.  IMHO this is definitely nothing major that requires a HFS code change.  A system default sound is a system default sound nothing more.  I enabled beep for a while then disabled it as it was driving me (http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/spineyes.gif) going off every few seconds.
Title: Re: HFS sound effects ?
Post by: Rafi on March 19, 2005, 11:56:46 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "Rafi"
You don't change SYSTEM defaults to accommodate a single program. Each application should take care of itself...
While what you say is true, the option is simple - to "beep" or "not to beep"  ... was driving me (http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/spineyes.gif) going off every few seconds.
Me  (http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/spineyes.gif) too...
But I aimed higher then the "to beep or not to beep" dilemma ... like a user defined .wav file...
Title: HFS Error Report
Post by: maverick on March 26, 2005, 11:20:03 AM
.
Well I got my very first error report.  Here it is...

Access violation at address 004F82F9 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 0000000C
HFS 2.0 beta20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 3/26/05 2:57:04 AM
[004F82F9]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.BanIPaddress1Click (Line 5366, "main.pas" + 0) + $D
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004F82F4]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.BanIPaddress1Click (Line 5366, "main.pas" + 0) + $8
[0045C5F6]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D7CF]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E4AE]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0041DC7A]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0042F264]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[0045E3FD]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433192]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455873]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004558AA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455ACA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FC8E8]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 58, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: Intel, Pentium 4, 3000 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 24 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2/19/05 10:08:34 AM

So, what does this tell anybody?

maverick
Title: Address2Name became banned
Post by: roirraW *edor* ehT on March 26, 2005, 03:34:06 PM
Something weird happen last week which closing the program and relaunching cured.  First time I've ever seen this, and I access my own computer from work every day, and have used beta 21 since it came out.

I couldn't gain access from either of the two computers/network connections in my office.  When I came home and looked through the log, HFS showed those IPs as banned, but only in the log.  I have my work IPs set up with Address2Name, and it was showing these names correctly, but also showing them as banned.  I couldn't find those addresses in the ban list.

Eventually I just quit the program and relaunched it and everything's been fine since then.  Sorry I don't think there's anything I can send you to track this down, since nothing crashed or had any other obvious error.

I just thought it was weird and kindof funny and wanted to share this.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 27, 2005, 03:09:42 PM
Quote
Address2Name became banned
could someone else have used your computer while you was away? (s)he may have banned and unbanned in the while.

logs and ban configuration could have been useful, anyway
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 27, 2005, 03:10:13 PM
Quote
like a user defined .wav file...
i will introduce such feature if someone ACTUALLY plans to use it

Quote
"explorer style" . meaning - adding a view-menu, with "list","details" menu-list (with or w/o showing "icons") .
a tree with columns is unlikely to be.
there's no such thing in delphi and the VirtualTree i used for &RQ is too big, i want HFS to stay little.
an option could be to have an explorer style, with no tree structure. this is available in delphi. you would have to enter/exit from folders, just like explorer.

Quote
Also local file operations such as file - delete, rename, copy-pastes can be available to the server-user
you already have such operations, but for the virtual file system.
how to introduce for the real file system without confusing the user?

Quote
So, what does this tell anybody?
never mind, i just fixed it ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 27, 2005, 03:13:51 PM
please, try this beta against the processQ bug.
i had the idea for the fix last night, while i was in bed almost drunk.
if no report are made in a month, well, we got the stable one.

http://www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta22.zip

beta22
- again, trying to fix the "processQ" bug
+ statusbar shows aside "Connections", the number of different addresses
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 27, 2005, 05:04:12 PM
Download Express is not fully compliant with RFC 2183.
anyway, beta23 will workaround this issue.

ok, at the moment these are the clients that have been tested and resulted supporting 4GB+ files:
- Reget Deluxe 4.1
- MetaProducts Download Express 1.7
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 27, 2005, 09:01:57 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i had the idea for the fix last night, while i was in bed almost drunk.
(http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/g0/beer.gif)
I had other ideas when I was in bed last night, but I won't talk about that right now.(http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/r/nahaha.gif)

Hope the processQ bug is fixed.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 28, 2005, 03:24:53 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
Address2Name became banned
could someone else have used your computer while you was away? (s)he may have banned and unbanned in the while.

logs and ban configuration could have been useful, anyway

No, my wife has her own computer she uses for everything, and wouldn't know how to ban or unban if you asked her to, much less know how to bring up HFS or that it's there to bring up at all.  No kids in the house, and my cat is a smart alec, but not that kind of smart.  :D
Title: Folder names
Post by: MarkV on March 28, 2005, 04:13:51 AM
In the VFS HFS currently accepts folder/filenames names containing 'insane' characters.

I'm referring to folder-/filenames containing the following characters: \ / : * ? " < > |
These are INVALID in file/foldernames and lead to inaccessible structures. rejetto could you prevent that?

MarkV
Title: Remote file delete
Post by: PaZuR on March 29, 2005, 08:55:07 PM
Can sb tell me if there is any way to delete file that is already stored no server in real or virtual file system from a remote machine. If yes where can   be set the priviliges to do that for both file/folder and selected users
Title: Suggestion
Post by: PaZuR on March 29, 2005, 10:48:13 PM
One more thing that I think may be useful is a possibility giving users from certain (chosen) accounts ability to coonect even that max connection number is exceded. That would be useful if someone needed acces to data despite any limitations ie: the system admin who also wants acces to his data remotely.
Title: Re: Remote file delete
Post by: rejetto on March 30, 2005, 01:01:38 AM
Quote from: "PaZuR"
Can sb tell me if there is any way to delete file that is already stored no server in real or virtual file system from a remote machine. If yes where can   be set the priviliges to do that for both file/folder and selected users
no way, it is in to-do list
Title: Re: Suggestion
Post by: rejetto on March 30, 2005, 01:05:15 AM
Quote from: "PaZuR"
One more thing that I think may be useful is a possibility giving users from certain (chosen) accounts ability to coonect even that max connection number is exceded. That would be useful if someone needed acces to data despite any limitations ie: the system admin who also wants acces to his data remotely.
it seems a good idea
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 30, 2005, 02:33:55 AM
is anyone testing beta22 with speed limiter on his own?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 30, 2005, 04:51:55 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
is anyone testing beta22 with speed limiter on his own?
Are you talking about the Speed Limit option in Limits?

maverick
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 30, 2005, 05:49:47 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "rejetto"
is anyone testing beta22 with speed limiter on his own?
Are you talking about the Speed Limit option in Limits?
yes, that one
Title: speed limit
Post by: MarkV on March 30, 2005, 06:28:19 AM
Currently testing HFS 2.0 beta22 in local LAN.

Test file size: 2'122'183'726 bytes (1,97GB)
Speed limiter: 200 KB/s
Seperate downloads: 5 (3xFirefox, 1xIE6, 1xWGet)

Running for 2 hours now. No crash or unexpected behavior so far. Will let it run for several more hours.


MarkV
Title: Another weird thing
Post by: PaZuR on March 30, 2005, 06:59:02 PM
While using HFS I've came across another weird and rather disturbing thing.
I don't know if anyone else has it also but every time I restart HFS server the port on which it runs changes. I think it shouldn be hard to add selected port do config file so it was a perm value not changing with every run. It would be  just easier to access such a service, while sometimes reboots just hapens, and Server may be added to autostart
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 30, 2005, 07:04:20 PM
if port 80 is already occupied, Windows decide for a free port, and it changes everytime.
someone like this behaviour for security reasons.
if you want a fixed port, just type the number yourself, and it will never change.
Title: Port problem
Post by: PaZuR on March 30, 2005, 08:07:17 PM
Thx for a tip and reply, it realy works as it should.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 02, 2005, 01:40:55 AM
2.0 beta23 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta23.zip

what's new
+ should be 50% faster (you can notice it in LAN)
- should fix the "No buffer space available" bug
- fixed a compatibility issue with Download Express
- now prevent files from being renamed using illegal characters
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on April 02, 2005, 01:55:25 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
- now prevent files from being renamed using illegal characters

It is only one step... Can you prevent it for folders, too (in VFS) ?
e.g. 1. Create new folder in VFS
       2. Choose "Rename"
       3. Now you can name it "/\/\/\/\" (or similar dumb name) :eek:
       4. The folder doesn't work in the browser for obvious reasons

Tested with beta23!

MarkV

P.S. Now I'll try out Download Express...  B)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 02, 2005, 03:17:21 AM
hmm, the only annoyng character is "/", isn't it?
others get encoded
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on April 02, 2005, 04:10:47 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
hmm, the only annoyng character is "/", isn't it?
others get encoded

Yes we're talking about HTML  :rage:
You are right, I mean the / character. The browser threats it as seperator, it should not be allowed in a folder/filename. Sorry, it was late...  :#)

Now there is Download Express - I'll have to cancel the test because DE is damn slow and does not work properly (now it even broke the connection!). This is wasted time.  :crazy: I think I'll get the other program mentioned here and try again.

Mark V
Title: Getright
Post by: MarkV on April 03, 2005, 03:17:38 AM
Finished tests with Getright and 10GB file. The file is downloaded OK only if you don't use segmenting. I think it is a problem with Getright. But I can live with it. ;)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Trazi on April 06, 2005, 05:40:39 PM
I think it whuld be usefull to have shell integrated option to quickly add files to default (designated by user) virtual folder. Drag and dropping is little hard with meny windows open.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 06, 2005, 06:00:31 PM
Quote from: "Trazi"
I think it whuld be usefull to have shell integrated option to quickly add files to default (designated by user) virtual folder. Drag and dropping is little hard with meny windows open.
did you try using copy&paste?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 06, 2005, 11:14:04 PM
heh did not know about copy paste capabilities but its much worse than drag and drop aproach so its not solving enything.

I meant command from right click menu that puts file to HFS and user ends up with link to this file instantly, without need to bring HFS windows from taskbar
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 07, 2005, 03:59:55 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I meant command from right click menu that puts file to HFS and user ends up with link to this file instantly, without need to bring HFS windows from taskbar
Here:
right-click->add files
right-click->add folder
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 07, 2005, 04:18:51 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I meant command from right click menu that puts file to HFS and user ends up with link to this file instantly, without need to bring HFS windows from taskbar
menu -> shell context menu -> add for all
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on April 07, 2005, 08:38:40 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
menu -> shell context menu -> add for all
It would be nice if there was a "check-mark" or something beside our selected choices in menu -> shell context menu.  Thanks.

maverick
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 07, 2005, 10:26:58 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I meant command from right click menu that puts file to HFS and user ends up with link to this file instantly, without need to bring HFS windows from taskbar
menu -> shell context menu -> add for all

O dear i Missed it. Im sorry.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Trazi on April 07, 2005, 02:42:46 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I meant command from right click menu that puts file to HFS and user ends up with link to this file instantly, without need to bring HFS windows from taskbar
menu -> shell context menu -> add for all

I played with it for a while and it seems not working very good. Sometimes it opens new session of hfs with blank tree, and it drops file on root.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 07, 2005, 04:55:38 PM
Quote from: "Trazi"
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I meant command from right click menu that puts file to HFS and user ends up with link to this file instantly, without need to bring HFS windows from taskbar
menu -> shell context menu -> add for all

I played with it for a while and it seems not working very good. Sometimes it opens new session of hfs with blank tree, and it drops file on root.
Confirmed. It does not drop the file inside the highlighted folder. The root should be the destination only when there is no folder selected or that the root itself is selected.
Also - I suggest to change the shell text from  "HFS" to: "Add to HFS"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on April 07, 2005, 11:20:19 PM
Quote from: "Trazi"
I played with it for a while and it seems not working very good. Sometimes it opens new session of hfs with blank tree, and it drops file on root.
Also select associate.vfs from the same menu then it won't open a new HFS vfs session.  If it is just a file or files you are adding, they will be added to the root of your current vfs.  You can move them to wherever you want after that.  I think rejetto's idea of adding this shell option is to give you an easy way to get files or folders into the HFS vfs which it does.

maverick
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 08, 2005, 04:21:02 PM
"add to" is true only if "only 1 instance" is enabled
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on April 08, 2005, 05:50:42 PM
.
:?:  

There is no way to know what is enabled or not in the shell context menu options by looking at it. (no check marks available for selected option).

maverick
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on April 08, 2005, 06:00:25 PM
if it is disabled, it does not add, it opens a new HFS with only that file
but, uh, it may be ok anyway :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2005, 11:19:52 AM
HFS 2.0 beat 23 , big bug!

Menu -> Limits -> Speed Limit.

try~

 8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 13, 2005, 03:53:13 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
HFS 2.0 beat 23 , big bug!

Menu -> Limits -> Speed Limit.

try~

 8O
It works (win98...)
Title: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 14, 2005, 04:04:22 AM
.
rejetto,

Is there any chance that you would be able to include and option that would let us limit (select) how many different IP's we allow access to the server at the same time?

In most cases, without a commercial account, upload bandwidth on the net is much slower than download bandwidth.  If there are to many different IP's downloading from the server at the same time, these users experience slow KB/s as available server bandwidth is shared.  If we could limit the number of IP's accessing the server at the same time, the users will experience better performance and better download speeds and we will receive less complaints about having a slow server.

In my case, I have an upload limit of 60 KB/s.  I have been averaging at least  8-10 different IP's on at the same time downloading.   That results in slow download KB/s for them and really ties up the server until these downloads complete and they finally leave.  I have even limited the max downloads per IP to 1 at a time, but that makes no difference.
 
Hope you can include an IP limit feature.  I think this was brought up before some place but I don't recall seeing a reply.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 10:21:49 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
.
rejetto,

Is there any chance that you would be able to include and option that would let us limit (select) how many different IP's we allow access to the server at the same time?
I think - Menu->limits->Max connections +  Max connections per IP + Max downloads + max downloads per IP -
I'm sure you can manages with some of those...  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: oat on April 15, 2005, 12:02:21 PM
Hi i'm oat from thailand
before i ask some question i'm feel glad to thanks you very much rejetto ur program very useful and easy to use :D  :D
but now i have something mistake with my HFS coz my client can't load file *.r01 .r02 and.... any file which have r0x
what does it seem like? bug? or my mistake

thx rejetto

p.s. file type r0x (x is number of file number)is extract file of winrar

sorry for my english
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 01:22:15 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
I think - Menu->limits->Max connections +  Max connections per IP + Max downloads + max downloads per IP -
I'm sure you can manages with some of those...  ;)
All of those options serve their intended purposes and work well for what they have been designed to do.  But, they don't limit the number of different IP's entering the server at the same time.  I have tried all different combinations of settings for those options to get things running more smoothly but they don't solve the issue I stated above.

Rejetto even refers to that issue in his thread called announcement: help me testing where he states, and I quote, "if many other people is downloading while you are, you may find the speed to be much lower".

I'm sure that anyone who has an active site with many people accessing their server at the same time know what I'm talking about.

We have to have a way to limit the number of different IP's accessing the server at the same time.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 01:49:11 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "Rafi"
I think - Menu->limits->Max connections +  Max connections per IP + Max downloads + max downloads per IP -
I'm sure you can manages with some of those...  ;)
All of those options serve their intended purposes and work well for what they have been designed to do.  But, they don't limit the number of different IP's entering the server at the same time.
If so - I sure it is simply a bug. Thank you for helping with the testing ...  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 01:56:00 PM
Quote from: "oat"
i have something mistake with my HFS coz my client can't load file *.r01 .r02 and.... any file which have r0x
what does it seem like? bug? or my mistake
p.s. file type r0x (x is number of file number)is extract file of winrar
Works fine here.  In the Virtual File System pane of HFS, just right click on the root, or wherever you want to put those files, then select add files from the menu, select which files from your drive,  and they will be added to your VFS.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 02:01:10 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
If so - I sure it is simply a bug.
No, not a bug.  That option or feature I would like to see hasn't been implemented in HFS - yet.  

I know it can be done because I also run BulletProof FTP Server where you can select Maximum Number of Users (a.k.a. Max. No. of IP's).

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 02:22:28 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "Rafi"
If so - I sure it is simply a bug.
No, not a bug.  That option or feature I would like to see hasn't been implemented in HFS - yet.  

I know it can be done because I also run BulletProof FTP Server where you can select Maximum Number of Users (a.k.a. Max. No. of IP's).

maverick
So what is limits->"max # of connections/downloads" ?
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 02:36:43 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
So what is limits->"max # of connections/downloads" ?
You are confusing connections and individual IP addresses.

Connections are connections.  For example, with the available  limit options in HFS you can allow one IP (one address) to have a maximum limit of 10 connections or even no limit of connections while surfing your site.  Everything displayed from your site - icon, gif, folder etc. takes a different seperate connection to begin with before it is displayed to the user.  You can easily see that activity in your logs.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 03:40:27 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "Rafi"
So what is limits->"max # of connections/downloads" ?
You are confusing connections and individual IP addresses.
I don't think I'm confused ... May be you have to explain again what YOU want.  
HFS/HTTP term connection is the only object HFS can refer to. As I understand it - IPs are making   connections and shortly after - those are disconnected.
If I put "Max connections" to 60 , and "Max connections per IP " to 20 , and some timeout, you can have a *minimum* of 3 surfing . Maximum is unknown... depends on the timeout and your HFS file tree size.
I did check it and you get "Server busy, retry later" message when they exceed this.

More important - is that you can control total # of concurrent DLs & per IP.

I think you cannot do more then that in HTTP. or - I don't understand what you wanted in the first place ...  ;)

BTW - you can easily check it with two anonymous proxy services. I used: http://www.guardster.com & http://anonymouse.ws
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 04:05:18 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
I don't think I'm confused ... May be you have to explain again what YOU want.  
I explained that very clearly in my posts above in this thread.  Re-read them.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 04:17:31 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "Rafi"
I don't think I'm confused ... May be you have to explain again what YOU want.  
I explained that very clearly in my posts above in this thread.  Re-read them.

maverick
Well, I did read it.  I thing we'll wait to rejetto to tell you the same thing.
Quote
"I have been averaging at least 8-10 different IP's on at the same time downloading.That results in slow download KB/s for them and really ties up the server until these downloads complete and they finally leave. I have even limited the max downloads per IP to 1 at a time, but that makes no difference"
add: Menu->limits->Max downloads   = 4-5

@rejetto: May be an extra speedlimit option PER download will help too.
Title: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 04:59:24 PM
.
Well I just finished reading through a whole bunch of posts looking for this subject.  Finally found it and here is a reply from rejetto (which I missed)....

Quote
If I want only 5 people (5 different IP addresses) access to my server at one time, how do I set that limit?
Quote from: "rejetto"
you can't, currently. there's no such feature. but it sounds interesting.

http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2180&highlight=&sid=b88a820497feb1b3d226da59ad1a7147

Hopefully it hasn't been forgotten but in the todo list.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 05:07:27 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
.

Hopefully it hasn't been forgotten but in the todo list.

maverick

It cannot easily be done, since there is no "session"/logout in HTTP...
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: maverick on April 15, 2005, 06:13:36 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
It cannot easily be done, since there is no "session"/logout in HTTP...
There is a lot of information about this on the net.  I just did a search and here is just one of many examples I found...

Quote
Allow HTTP Users to Log Out!

Ever wanted to have your authenticated users log out from their current session without having to close all browser windows (which doesn't *really* close the HTTP user session anyways)?

Of course you have! So here's the how-to:

Domino allows for you to kill a user's HTTP session by simply appending "/?logout" in a URL after the database in accordance to the following scheme:

http://server/path/database.nsf/?logout

(*NOTE - Session Authentication needs to be enabled for this to work properly)

Now you could hardcode this... but that's sloppy design.
Easiest this to do would be to create a Computed Text string (highlight and mark as pass-thru HTML) with the following:

db := @ReplaceSubstring( @Subset( @DbName; -1); "\\"; "/");
url := "<a href=\"/" + db + "/?logout\">Log Off " + @Name([CN];@UserName) + "!</a>";
@if(@UserName="Anomymous";""; URL)

This will show a log off link for your authenticated users (a logout for anonymous would just be plain silly) as well as keeps the logout dynamic:

Not only displaying the user's common name for "personalization" but also keeping the pathing totally relative... so you don't have to recode!

http://www.dominoguru.com/dominoguru/home.nsf/0/cc75d65176b75b2085256c7e0015af31?OpenDocument
So it can be done.  

Also...
A similar feature to the current connection inactivity timeout feature in HFS limits might be used --> called IP inactivity timeout (or something like that) which would be used to kill an inactive IP therefore allowing a new IP into the server until the max chosen IP limit is reached. Rejetto would know more if this is workable.

maverick
Title: Re: Limit IP's
Post by: Rafi on April 15, 2005, 09:19:35 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Rejetto would know more if this is workable.
Sounds feasible. Good luck rejetto ...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2005, 07:00:03 AM
I can't download the files named with Chinese characters shared by HFS2.0 beta23 like "记事本.mp3", but I can upload them. I hope it
can be fixed. An old version does not have this problem, but I
already deleted it, and forgeted the version. :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on April 16, 2005, 07:05:14 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I can't download the files named with Chinese characters shared by HFS2.0 beta23 like "记事本.mp3", but I can upload them. I hope it
can be fixed. An old version does not have this problem, but I
already deleted it, and forgeted the version. :(
Maybe: menu->url-encoding->encode_non-acsii_characters
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 16, 2005, 07:47:35 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I can't download the files named with Chinese characters shared by HFS2.0 beta23 like "记事本.mp3", but I can upload them. I hope it
can be fixed. An old version does not have this problem, but I
already deleted it, and forgeted the version. :(
Maybe: menu->url-encoding->encode_non-acsii_characters

It works now, Thank you!
Title: processQ Bug
Post by: maverick on April 17, 2005, 11:50:54 PM
Rejetto,

Just thought I would let you know that my server has been really busy the last few days - running HFS 2.0 beta 23 - and not one processQ error or any other error.  The processQ errors I recently reported were with beta 22.  Maybe this bug has been fixed with beta 23.  Good work.  Looks like a v2.0 FINAL is getting close. :D

maverick
Title: Re: processQ Bug
Post by: MarkV on April 18, 2005, 10:22:06 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Rejetto,

Just thought I would let you know that my server has been really busy the last few days - running HFS 2.0 beta 23 - and not one processQ error or any other error.  The processQ errors I recently reported were with beta 22.  Maybe this bug has been fixed with beta 23.

No, unfortunately it has not. Read my post from Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:19 am (ATM on page 29), I got ProcessQ error with beta23 as well.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 18, 2005, 12:36:35 PM
here is the exception log:

############# ERROR ON: 2005/4/17 PM 11:40:44
E:\HFS\HFS.EXE
參數錯誤。

HFS 2.0 beta23
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2005/4/17 PM 11:40:44
[0042C363]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDIError + $77
[004043EA]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0042C39B]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.GDICheck + $7
[0042F7D3]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.CopyBitmap + $117
[004043EA]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[0040217B]{HFS.EXE     } System.TryHarder + $BB
[004024A8]{HFS.EXE     } System.SysFreeMem + $164
[004027A1]{HFS.EXE     } System.@FreeMem + $5
[00403BEC]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.FreeInstance + $C
[00403FE2]{HFS.EXE     } System.@ClassDestroy + $2
[0042F55E]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmapImage.Destroy + $52
[00403C34]{HFS.EXE     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[00430BA5]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.NewImage + $E1
[00430187]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.CopyImage + $63
[004313FC]{HFS.EXE     } Graphics.TBitmap.SetHeight + $3C
[004F7499]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.refreshGraphBox (Line 5127, "main.pas"
+ 4) + $D
[004F257A]{HFS.EXE     } main.recalculateGraph (Line 3884, "main.pas" + 14) + $9
[004F26EB]{HFS.EXE     } main.TmainFrm.timerEvent (Line 3935, "main.pas" + 11)
+ $2
[004043EA]{HFS.EXE     } System.@HandleFinally + $2A
[004C6B2C]{HFS.EXE     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.timerEvent (Line 612, "HSlib.pas" + 16) +
$1
[0044308F]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00442F73]{HFS.EXE     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428AA8]{HFS.EXE     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) +
$0
[00455873]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004558AA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455ACA]{HFS.EXE     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FD648]{HFS.EXE     } hfs.hfs (Line 58, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows ME , Version: 4.90, Build: 45A0BB8, " "
Processor: Intel, Pentium III, 890 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 16 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2005/4/2 AM 03:37:48


==remarks==
the line after "E:\HFS\HFS.EXE" is in traditional chinese
(I am in Hong Kong)
it means "wrong parameters" in English.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on April 18, 2005, 06:39:18 PM
.
I think there will come a time that we have to realize not all errors will get fixed.  There's a good possibility that some of the errors reported may be system specific or resulted from something that was done in the background that shouldn't have been while the server was busy.

The same errors don't appear to be happening over and over again.   In my case, over the last year or more, I can only think of 2 times I had an error popup (both of which I reported) and my server is used every day.  I would say that's pretty good performance for a excellent small free program like HFS.

maverick
.
Title: HFS
Post by: MarkV on April 18, 2005, 09:21:47 PM
I would say, it's stable enough to go final, rejetto.  :) You will never get it 100% stable. There are many commercial programs crashing frequently... :roll:

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: vbTheKing on April 19, 2005, 01:03:26 PM
Yes, rejetto! We want 2.0 final! ;)
IMHO, beta 23 is stable enough! B)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: traxxus on April 24, 2005, 07:48:19 AM
i miss a logout button (for the security)  8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on April 24, 2005, 01:22:58 PM
Hi!

Just close ur browser. This kind of login does'nt support logging out explicitly.

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on April 24, 2005, 02:27:29 PM
sure ? ummmm...  :?

ok, thanks for the answer  :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: vbTheKing on April 24, 2005, 10:17:40 PM
Code: [Select]
Access violation at address 00404EE0 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 0000000B
HFS 2.0 beta23
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 26.4.2005 г. 01:12:21
[00404EE0]{hfs.exe     } System.@LStrAddRef + $4
[0040413F]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004D1C34]{hfs.exe     } utilLib.addressmatch (Line 797, "utillib.pas" + 0) + $20
[004EB48C]{hfs.exe     } main.doLog (Line 2419, "main.pas" + 17) + $18
[004EC69D]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.httpEvent (Line 2687, "main.pas" + 93) + $1
[004C6B64]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.Notify (Line 619, "HSlib.pas" + 0) + $10
[004C697D]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.processDisconnecting (Line 555, "HSlib.pas" + 9)
+ $6
[004C68E6]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.Destroy (Line 535, "HSlib.pas" + 14) + $3
[00403C34]{hfs.exe     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[004FA79C]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.beforeQuit (Line 5952, "main.pas" + 8) + $5
[004FA7BB]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 5958, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0044EEA3]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DoClose + $17
[004523DD]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.Close + $55
[004516A0]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMClose + $0
[00465BCC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468B6F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F66D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00468C53]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00450A1E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DefaultHandler + $5A
[0046A20F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMSysCommand + $9F
[00451781]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMSysCommand + $55
[00465BCC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[0042F264]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00468801]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00468B6F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F66D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0042F264]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00468C53]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.DefaultHandler + $D7
[00450A1E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DefaultHandler + $5A
[00465EA9]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WMNCLButtonDown + $15
[004514B1]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WMNCLButtonDown + $85
[00465BCC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468AA1]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $89
[00468B6F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F66D]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433192]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455873]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004558AA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455ACA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FD648]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 58, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, Unknown CPU Typ, 2300 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 02.4.2005 г. 03:37:48
8O  :(

I started HFS, bbrowsing some folders, then try to close HFS.
I have 5000kb/s speed limit, 11 connections per single address.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on April 28, 2005, 04:53:56 AM
I found some bug, I wrote about him in this topic: http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2238
Title: VFS NOT Too Happy
Post by: SexyMaster on May 04, 2005, 10:49:46 AM
hey there I run HFS on a homenetwork. My typical music, ebooks, cd images, etc etc. Altogether +- 280GB and HFS does not quite list all the folders or files.... I open up then add it everything works fine. Safe the directory layout close open and only half of it is there. Is there a limit on the VFS amount of files? If there is I'm kinda buggered..... Anyone have any ideas on a workaround? Oh and I use no physical folders....
thanx in advance... :)
Title: Re: VFS NOT Too Happy
Post by: Rafi on May 04, 2005, 03:05:57 PM
Quote from: "SexyMaster"
hey there I run HFS on a homenetwork. My typical music, ebooks, cd images, etc etc. Altogether +- 280GB and HFS does not quite list all the folders or files.... I open up then add it everything works fine. Safe the directory layout close open and only half of it is there. Is there a limit on the VFS amount of files? If there is I'm kinda buggered..... Anyone have any ideas on a workaround? Oh and I use no physical folders....
thanx in advance... :)
Did you enable start\exit->autosave VFS + reload VFS on startup ?
Title: VFS Error
Post by: SexyMaster on May 05, 2005, 07:47:13 AM
Hi Rafi Sorry I'm on the otherside of the world. Yes I do have autosave on... still The directories are all there under root. But as soon as we delve in under that then there are some directories which are complete and some not. We have four standard hdd's in the machine. the machine ran stable all the way through without problems. Untill Yesterday - then all of a sudden we have this funny problem pop up. I personally are guessing there are too many folders... no idea really... being blonde is hard work... and the pay is very bad....
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on May 05, 2005, 11:22:02 PM
try using real folders instead of virtual folders ....?
Title: selective coralize
Post by: Trazi on May 06, 2005, 04:04:31 PM
Just small idea for people with slow upload. Automatic adding of caching domain to file links (but no to html ones) like with coral network one ".nyud.net:8090".

If you use it for whole server the file indexes wont be refreshed like they shuld becouse cache servers dont check for changes every time somones calls page (you can set expiration date when server will check but it wont work well with small often changing fileservers).

More about Coral http://wiki.coralcdn.org
Title: Re: selective coralize
Post by: Rafi on May 07, 2005, 05:36:00 AM
Quote from: "Trazi"
Just small idea for people with slow upload. Automatic adding of caching domain to file links (but no to html ones) like with coral network one ".nyud.net:8090".

If you use it for whole server the file indexes wont be refreshed like they shuld becouse cache servers dont check for changes every time somones calls page (you can set expiration date when server will check but it wont work well with small often changing fileservers).

More about Coral http://wiki.coralcdn.org
But... ->
Quote from: "[url
http://wiki.coralcdn.org[/url]"]
...What is Coral?
Coral is peer-to-peer content distribution network, comprised of a world-wide network of web proxies and nameservers. It allows a user to run a web site that offers high performance and meets huge demand, all for the price of a $50/month cable modem.
:?:  8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on May 07, 2005, 08:03:09 AM
Maybe he means HFS should cache filelists/-links...  :?:

MakV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 07, 2005, 11:12:06 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
Maybe he means HFS should cache filelists/-links...  :?:

MakV
cache where ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on May 08, 2005, 03:47:52 PM
To be honest, I don't know exactly what he was trying to say...
I guess the VFS is cached in memory anyway, and so are the file links (if not, it would be a good idea). Talking about confusion... :crazy: :drunk: :bigeyes:

MarkV  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 08, 2005, 06:01:24 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
To be honest, I don't know exactly what he was trying to say...
I guess the VFS is cached in memory anyway, and so are the file links (if not, it would be a good idea). Talking about confusion... :crazy: :drunk: :bigeyes:

MarkV  ;)

Well, I check it up... They DO store files on their OWN cache servers!!!
So for every file that you give a <your URL>.nyud.net:8090/<path> - the first call is slow, using YOUR upload bandwidth, the later downloads are from THEIR server... interesting... :!:  :idea:  

Try specifying a Menu->IP->custom IP:
<your IP/URL>.nyud.net:8090   + F9 .
Download a file - twice. see the difference... try closing the server and download it once more...  ;)
The problem is  - that it is NOT so nice URL for others to use ...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on May 09, 2005, 06:57:21 AM
So HFS should simply have an option to automatically append a specified string like ".nyud.net:8090/" to every link in the html pages generated? Sounds interesting... That option could be used also for other URL manipulations, maybe upcoming similar services. Should ask rejetto if it's possible, either in the program itself or in the HTML template.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: traxxus on May 09, 2005, 01:25:13 PM
How i can download a complete folder (with subfolders an files) ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 09, 2005, 03:35:28 PM
Quote from: "traxxus"
How i can download a complete folder (with subfolders an files) ?
Use GetRight...
Title: Download complete folders...
Post by: DGC on May 09, 2005, 04:41:52 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "traxxus"
How i can download a complete folder (with subfolders an files) ?
Use GetRight...

Another way would be to create a "subfolder.zip" file which contains all files found in that subfolder.
When I add and delete files to the folder, I just refresh the .zip file. Works for me...

Yeah, it means more work but those who use my service don't need to get and use another program either... :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on May 09, 2005, 06:20:40 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "MarkV"
Maybe he means HFS should cache filelists/-links...  :?:

MakV
cache where ?

I think googles' new service does something like this too.
(Google Web Accelerator)

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 09, 2005, 07:08:12 PM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "MarkV"
Maybe he means HFS should cache filelists/-links...  :?:

MakV
cache where ?

I think googles' new service does something like this too.
(Google Web Accelerator)

TGeRi
No, it does not.
Title: HFS v2.0 beta 24
Post by: maverick on May 10, 2005, 10:16:27 AM
rejetto,

You made reference to HFS v2.0 beta 24 in this thread
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2237&sid=171ef59eaa6e55802b6f92cb246bb204

Unless I missed it, I didn't notice you announced that beta 24 is available.  If it is, please let us know what it fixes, what's new and the link where to get it.

Thanks.

maverick
Title: VFS & Download Managers
Post by: Sexymaster on May 10, 2005, 10:54:34 AM
Pain in the but again. I got the directory listing sorted it seems to be taking a while to actually add them. Like I said there are a huge amount of folders. But now whenever I use a download manager such as dap or mpdap the whole dl crashes. I have set the user limit per download, which is quite funny as soon as I start a second dl it tells me "server overloaded try again later" which I thought was quite funny....
Back to the point... must I set the download speed in order to be able to use a dl accelerator? Thanx for the help and sorry for my slow replies - I'm running around like a mad cow... mooooooo.....
Title: Re: HFS v2.0 beta 24
Post by: MarkV on May 10, 2005, 12:53:00 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
rejetto,

You made reference to HFS v2.0 beta 24 in this thread
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2237&sid=171ef59eaa6e55802b6f92cb246bb204

Unless I missed it, I didn't notice you announced that beta 24 is available.  If it is, please let us know what it fixes, what's new and the link where to get it.

Thanks.

maverick

Beta24 is not yet available to the public, maybe rejetto referred to his internal build.

MarkV
Title: Re: HFS v2.0 beta 24
Post by: rejetto on May 10, 2005, 02:37:03 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
Beta24 is not yet available to the public, maybe rejetto referred to his internal build.
yes, that's it
i was waiting for an idea for the processQ bug :?

Quote from: "Sexymaster"
I got the directory listing sorted it seems to be taking a while to actually add them.
folder addition may be slow only if you use virtual folders.

Quote
Like I said there are a huge amount of folders. But now whenever I use a download manager such as dap or mpdap the whole dl crashes.
the download "crashes" ? please be clearer

Quote
Back to the point... must I set the download speed in order to be able to use a dl accelerator?
nope

Quote
Thanx for the help and sorry for my slow replies - I'm running around like a mad cow... mooooooo.....
i warn you, i ain't vegan
Title: ProcessQ
Post by: MarkV on May 18, 2005, 12:28:53 PM
I think we should start a seperate thread for the ProcessQ messages, as they can get very large...
This damn bug is really persistent >:(

MarkV
Title: another bug
Post by: vbTheKing on May 18, 2005, 02:27:43 PM
In "address2name", when I add name that already exist there is an exception.

A key with the name of "йй" already exists
HFS 2.0 beta23
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 18.5.2005 г. 17:27:28
[004E0FB2]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListStrings.KeyIsValid + $82
[004E1418]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListStrings.Put + $3C
[004DFAB7]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListEditor.SetCell + $AB
[004E0450]{hfs.exe     } ValEdit.TValueListEditor.SetEditText + $108
[004DCA83]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.UpdateText + $4B
[004DC8A0]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.HideEdit + $24
[004DB9A3]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.MouseDown + $1B
[00465E3A]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.DoMouseDown + $76
[004649DB]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.SetMouseCapture + $17
[00465E86]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WMLButtonDown + $3E
[004DCB89]{hfs.exe     } Grids.TCustomGrid.WMLButtonDown + $5
[00465BCC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[004689D3]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.IsControlMouseMsg + $4F
[00468B6F]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004687EC]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433192]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455873]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004558AA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00452727]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.ShowModal + $147
[00490586]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TPageControl.SetActivePage + $3E
[004F8AF5]{hfs.exe     } main.showOptions (Line 5461, "main.pas" + 2) + $1A
[004FC28C]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Address2name1Click (Line 6380, "main.pas" + 0) + $10
[0045C5F6]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D7CF]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E4AE]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045E3FD]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428AA8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433192]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455873]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[004558AA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455ACA]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[004FD648]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 58, "C:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, Unknown CPU Type, 2300 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 02.4.2005 г. 03:37:48
Title: Re: ProcessQ
Post by: Anonymous on May 18, 2005, 08:41:12 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
I think we should start a seperate thread for the ProcessQ messages, as they can get very large...
This damn bug is really persistent >:(

MarkV
I agree to a seperate thread for ProcessQ messages.

maverick
Title: hosting HTML page and default bage
Post by: thecow5 on May 18, 2005, 10:49:14 PM
Hi all, I am using the latrest version and found i can host an html page as someone mention earler.
I would like to know how i can have it host my html page and have tab a to the default page of HFS, well i dont know what HTML code i can place in the HTML to the Tab to the default page.

on another not,
Is there a way i can place a banner on any of the pages as i cant seem to get that bit to work.

thanks
by the way
this is a great program, you guys/girls deserve the key to the city.  :)
Title: Re: ProcessQ
Post by: MarkV on May 19, 2005, 04:27:29 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
I think we should start a seperate thread for the ProcessQ messages, as they can get very large...

MarkV

A single topic (as current) with 32 pages can be annoying sometimes... :P
I think nobody here for the first time wants to read it completely just to scroll through these (very) long messages. A seperate thread would tidy up a bit... B)

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: traxxus on May 27, 2005, 11:29:45 AM
Is the Project dead or sleeps ?  B)

The To-Do list are very nice, when comes the new version with this features ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on May 27, 2005, 02:09:59 PM
Quote from: "traxxus"
Is the Project dead or sleeps ?  B)
hibernates... :idea:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on June 05, 2005, 02:29:27 PM
Hi!

A clicek on "copy to clipboard" when i got an error message
but i couldn't copy it too.

I know this is not too much but maybe it is better if rejetto
knows about this.

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on June 05, 2005, 02:30:24 PM
Hi!

Ups. I cannot copy anything. Sorry. The problem is mine.

TGeRi
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Kamikaze on June 08, 2005, 10:57:30 AM
Hi there.
If I run hfs can I upload to a person who is connected to me? Or does he also needs hfs on his computer?

Thank you
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on June 08, 2005, 06:39:26 PM
Quote from: "Kamikaze"
Hi there.
If I run hfs can I upload to a person who is connected to me? Or does he also needs hfs on his computer?

Thank you
He needs HFS.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on June 08, 2005, 10:51:47 PM
Quote from: "Kamikaze"
Hi there.
If I run hfs can I upload to a person who is connected to me? Or does he also needs hfs on his computer?

Thank you
No he doesn't need HFS on his computer.  All you have to do is include the file you want to upload to him within HFS.  He goes to your server and downloads the file.  (when he downloads you are actually uploading to him).
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on June 09, 2005, 03:22:08 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Quote from: "Kamikaze"
Hi there.
If I run hfs can I upload to a person who is connected to me? Or does he also needs hfs on his computer?

Thank you
No he doesn't need HFS on his computer.
I think he meant  "UPLOAD" (=by himself) not download by the other side.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Kamikaze on June 09, 2005, 06:30:10 AM
I meant uploading by myself if my friend is not at his computer ...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: lukfish on June 13, 2005, 02:00:48 AM
Quote from: "Kamikaze"
I meant uploading by myself if my friend is not at his computer ...

Your friend needn't download Hfs.He  can download your files only use IE.
Title: I hope that if hfs would build multi language version?
Post by: wongs on June 14, 2005, 12:23:52 PM
as irfanview, 7 zip, mass download, setup generator, ......
They are Multi language version at all.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 22, 2005, 10:50:15 AM
just moved the processQ bug posts on another thread
Title: About Upload Button
Post by: ommibook on June 30, 2005, 12:31:05 AM
Hi guys, I`m an old HFS user - today I decided to try the "upload" option, but I can`t figure out where is the "upload" button that all you are talking about. And btw I downloaded the last 23 beta from rejetto`s site and there was a folder with some kind of script, how to use that script ? My OS is XO Pro. Thanks for the attention  8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 30, 2005, 04:31:20 AM
method 1:
add a real folder
right click


method 2:
click the search link of the forum ;)
already asked 50+ times
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 01, 2005, 10:12:00 AM
rejetto,

In case you missed the following post, you might want to take a look at it as it may help you solve the processq error.

http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1012021&sid=6b88c71fd58679fe1c81a2eadb921c74#1012021
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 03, 2005, 08:06:48 AM
i didn't miss it :)
it is in my "to read" list
i have exams these days!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Shodan on July 04, 2005, 11:54:31 AM
Nice to hear your still alive rejetto. Good luck on your exams. There was a thread about where is rejetto.  :eek:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maksim on July 11, 2005, 07:47:08 AM
Hi all. I can not find this "+ File Menu -> "Flag as new"".
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 11, 2005, 02:57:26 PM
Quote from: "maksim"
Hi all. I can not find this "+ File Menu -> "Flag as new"".
(http://img284.imageshack.us/img284/4016/flag4qm.jpg) (http://www.imageshack.us)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 12, 2005, 02:17:49 AM
-Or- in the virtual file system window of HFS on the left, right click on the file you want to flag and select flag as new.  Either this method or the one shown above will solve your problem.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maksim on July 13, 2005, 04:58:08 AM
I have no in menu of this options. I have done all what have written. The Version of the program HFS2.0 beta23.
In menu there is "Files filter", "Folders filter", "Default file mask", "Don't count as downloud", but no "Flag as new" and else one options removing "Flag as new". Maybe is it bug?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on July 13, 2005, 07:08:00 AM
Rejetto, what about this bug (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2238)?
When will you release a new version?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 13, 2005, 11:45:02 AM
Quote from: "maksim"
I have no in menu of this options. I have done all what have written. The Version of the program HFS2.0 beta23.
In menu there is "Files filter", "Folders filter", "Default file mask", "Don't count as downloud", but no "Flag as new" and else one options removing "Flag as new". Maybe is it bug?
The HFS version I am referring to is the same as your's v2.0 beta 23.  There is NO BUG.  I don't know what you mean with your reply above.

Here... let me show you with another screen shot...

(http://img320.imageshack.us/img320/9702/hfs3nk.jpg) (http://www.imageshack.us)

Hope this helps.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maksim on July 13, 2005, 03:49:21 PM
Oooo, I am sorry. I was not registered in the forum. And I did not see the picture above my message. The question falls off. I have solved a problem.  :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on July 13, 2005, 06:12:27 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
Rejetto, what about this bug (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2238)?
it's not lost, it is in my to-read list, don't worry
Quote
When will you release a new version?
as soon as i can be back at coding
i had exams till today
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on July 14, 2005, 08:25:00 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "RazTK"
Rejetto, what about this bug (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2238)?
it's not lost, it is in my to-read list, don't worry
Quote
When will you release a new version?
as soon as i can be back at coding
i had exams till today
Ok, Thanks! :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Watson on July 20, 2005, 04:35:15 AM
So, any news?... :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 20, 2005, 08:46:14 AM
Quote from: "Watson"
So, any news?... :)
About What?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 21, 2005, 06:48:25 PM
i think about the final Version.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 22, 2005, 05:40:28 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
i think about the final Version.
The Final Version could be years away.  It's taken like 3 years to get this far.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on July 22, 2005, 10:48:28 PM
idiot.... hes mean 2.0 final.
Title: file over 2G
Post by: ccwrccwr on July 28, 2005, 01:49:42 PM
When File Over 2G ,I can't download For Flashget Ver 1.5
Title: some bug about log window
Post by: Tiantain on July 29, 2005, 08:37:38 PM
Right click in the log window and click "Log what"-""Bytes sent",then it cause a flood of log imformation and lost control till the download is finished or canceled.It's terrible.

Here's of the log:
4:28:47  222.18.62.7:1414 Connected
4:28:47  222.18.62.7:1414 Requested GET /BMW-7.avi
4:28:47  222.18.62.7:1414 Request dump
> GET /BMW-7.avi HTTP/1.1
> Accept: */*
> Accept-Language: zh-cn
> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
> Host: 222.18.62.7
> Connection: Keep-Alive
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes
4:29:00  222.18.62.7:1414 Sent 1460 bytes

............

4:32:04  222.18.62.7:1414 Disconnected - 70583736 bytes sent
Quote
Title: Re: file over 2G
Post by: rejetto on July 30, 2005, 04:40:21 PM
Quote from: "ccwrccwr"
When File Over 2G ,I can't download For Flashget Ver 1.5
what HFS version are you using?
HFS has been tested for 4GB+ files with some download managers, so i guess it is a bug in your flashget.
Title: Re: some bug about log window
Post by: rejetto on July 30, 2005, 04:41:23 PM
Quote from: "Tiantain"
Right click in the log window and click "Log what"-""Bytes sent",then it cause a flood of log imformation and lost control till the download is finished or canceled.It's terrible.
hmm...got it...i will find a workaround
Title: bug: download tray icon
Post by: LittleBiG on August 15, 2005, 08:22:31 AM
If the download is cancelled for example at 45%, and the user continue the download later, the tray icon begin 1%, not 45%. In the program window shows well.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on August 15, 2005, 03:29:26 PM
because it shows the percentage of the partial download.
the main window has more space, and displays the info in another way.
i admit this sounds as an incoherence.
i think i will change it.
Title: rejetto
Post by: mefisto on August 16, 2005, 04:04:22 AM
:D Hello!

  You stopped with new versions of HFS ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on August 18, 2005, 12:36:30 PM
temporarily
i hope to restart soon
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: traxxus on August 23, 2005, 12:08:48 PM
i hope too :!:  :!:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ebimail on August 30, 2005, 06:39:53 PM
No you can't!!!!!

I have to say, HFS is the best programm I ever saw!

I dream of it! REALY! I use it everyday!!!!


GOOD WORK!  

Greetings EBI, a big big fan....
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on August 31, 2005, 11:04:16 AM
please ban from mac adress!!! ban ip- user make change ip.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 01, 2005, 07:24:49 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
please ban from mac adress!!! ban ip- user make change ip.
as far as i know you can read MAC address only for computers of your LAN.
would this be good for you, or you want to ban MAC address on the internet?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: traxxus on September 02, 2005, 05:25:39 PM
rejetto, what for new functions have you already implemented ? Or you don't working on new HFS ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: TGeRi on September 05, 2005, 04:15:44 AM
Hi!

I got an idea for a new feature.

"Link version" of any page.

I mean: when u browse a "shared dir" in hfs there would be a link to a page where there are only plain links to the files of that folder.

It would be good if u want to feed these links with tcmd or wget of whatever.

What do u think?
Title: having probs with poepel seeing my HFS outside my network
Post by: guest on September 07, 2005, 03:39:55 AM
what ip addy do i give peeps outside my network in a diff city!! I have and exsisting network and it gives me a ip of the network to post eg 192.168.0.103... this is my laptop ip on th network. However my realy ip is 24.xxx.x. etc how do i get my buds in a diff city to view my shit????
Title: Re: having probs with poepel seeing my HFS outside my networ
Post by: Anonymous on September 07, 2005, 06:40:01 AM
Quote from: "guest"
However my realy ip is 24.xxx.x. etc how do i get my buds in a diff city to view my shit????
Duh... give them the real IP!!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 07, 2005, 03:27:32 PM
Quote from: "traxxus"
rejetto, what for new functions have you already implemented ? Or you don't working on new HFS ?
i'm not working on HFS, but beta24 has some news from long time.
i was waiting for working on the processQ-bug before releasing it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on September 07, 2005, 03:31:26 PM
Quote from: "TGeRi"
I mean: when u browse a "shared dir" in hfs there would be a link to a page where there are only plain links to the files of that folder.
we already have the file list, won't we end being plenty of sh%t?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 07, 2005, 07:23:09 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i'm not working on HFS, but beta24 has some news from long time. i was waiting for working on the processQ-bug before releasing it.
You said you aren't working on HFS - does that mean this is the end to HFS once beta 24 is released???
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 09, 2005, 08:43:27 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Anonymous"
please ban from mac adress!!! ban ip- user make change ip.
as far as i know you can read MAC address only for computers of your LAN.
would this be good for you, or you want to ban MAC address on the internet?

Lan!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: justaguest on September 09, 2005, 09:11:04 PM
I use this all the time and it works fine even if you don't work on it much anymore. Thanks for a convenient program.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 10, 2005, 09:10:43 AM
Dear Rejetto!
We wait new version, because I use beta23 and works great! I hope you will work on newer versions!  :roll:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: arty on September 12, 2005, 04:21:23 PM
this program is so great!!!!! thank you very much for your time developing it!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 12, 2005, 09:24:34 PM
Quote from: "ebimail"
No you can't!!!!!

I have to say, HFS is the best programm I ever saw!

I dream of it! REALY! I use it everyday!!!!


GOOD WORK!  

Greetings EBI, a big big fan....
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 15, 2005, 08:15:09 PM
Hello,

I wanted to say THANK YOU rejetto. This program is very very useful!!!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Guest on September 17, 2005, 03:40:01 PM
rejetto-you are the best !!!
Thanx for this cool software :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: kamzata on September 17, 2005, 08:38:46 PM
Rejetto for President!  :lol:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: alex. on September 18, 2005, 02:25:27 AM
THANK YOU rejetto program is very very useful
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Robo on September 26, 2005, 11:13:41 PM
Hi, I'm with HFS 2.0beta23
and i discover a BUG:
<<Adding User with Pass>>
With my Opera v8.5: In http://HFS Server page/ -> LOGIN when i enter User and Pass everytime when i reopen http://HFS Server page/ with Opera shows my username instead Login Button and the program HFS show status user@ip (without reEnter user and pass in LOGIN) After  removing the user & pass and reopen http://HFS Server page/ with Opera
instead Login button again the same user and HFS still shows in status
the same user@ip why? There's no such a problem with Internet Explorer and a'm not sure for Firefox or other browsers.
[ :? sorry for my bad english :#) ]
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on September 27, 2005, 06:48:20 AM
I'm running HFS v2.0 beta 23 and Opera v8.50 build 7700 and no problems at all.  Everything works perfectly.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 02, 2005, 01:28:19 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
You said you aren't working on HFS - does that mean this is the end to HFS once beta 24 is released???
no, not working at this time
i'm busy with my exams and job
but since HFS will be my thesis (for graduation) i will restart working on it for sure, if not now in next months

Quote
everytime when i reopen http://HFS Server page/ with Opera shows my username instead Login Button and the program HFS show status user@ip (without reEnter user and pass in LOGIN)
this is not a bug :)
as you can see, opera resend the user/pass, why should HFS reject it?
the fact is: opera remembers your user until you close it. to close the tab is not enough.
i'm an opera user and i already knew this.
there is no way for HFS to know you closed the tab in the while.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: SkyLink on October 04, 2005, 02:20:30 AM
The best soft ever .... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 04, 2005, 03:33:18 AM
i really hope that work can continue soon. especially making it static root. it makes it very difficult to use images on at the moment.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Robo on October 07, 2005, 10:50:36 PM
Quote
this is not a bug as you can see, opera resend the user/pass, why should HFS reject it?

YES because the user (with pass) already was removed from Users List
and HFS still RECOGNIZE this user@ip (which i've removed from the list)

Quote
After removing the user & pass and reopen http://HFS Server page/ with Opera
instead Login button again the same user and HFS still shows in status
the same user@ip why?

Quote
there is no way for HFS to know you closed the tab in the while.

and everyone who sit on my PC will use my protected resources? (or someone with my IP)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Sadaam on October 07, 2005, 11:02:30 PM
Quote from: "Robo"
After removing the user & pass and reopen http://HFS Server page/ with Opera
instead Login button again the same user and HFS still shows in status
the same user@ip why?
When you remove a user and password from your user list, are you applying the change?  If not do so.  Doesn't hurt to resave you virtual file system from time to time as well to save all new changes.

All the problems you seem to have do not happen here and I am an Opera user as well.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on October 18, 2005, 01:04:47 AM
yes, ensure you apply changes
Title: Users Tab Bug
Post by: FGump on October 21, 2005, 09:46:43 PM
Hello, I've just downloaded the Beta and am giving it a try.  I noticed the following issues that may be considered bugs.

1). From the Menu option select Other Options -> Users.  You'll notice there are a couple of Tabs at the top of this screen "Bans" and "Tray Messages".  The "Users" tab is missing, so if you select one of these, you can never get back to the users screen.

2). In 1.6a, I would create a user from the "Other Options -> Users" menu and then I could "Set Access For Users".  In this beta, I do not see that option (not that it even worked correctly before as I believe it kept forgetting this when the program was shut down and restarted).

Thank you for such a nice program and all your hard work!

FGump
Title: Correction...
Post by: FGump on October 21, 2005, 10:23:13 PM
As per my previous post, I see these are actually available while in Expert mode and not in Easy mode.  So, these are not issues.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on October 25, 2005, 02:11:17 AM
Is that you.. Forest - Forest Gump?  No need to apologize for the mistake, we understand.. :)
Title: Selecting "Dont count as download..."
Post by: Just a simple newbie! =) on November 08, 2005, 12:29:52 AM
First of all I must say you're doing a great job with the HFS server! :D

My "problem" is this (I run HFS v2.0 Beta23 build #008):

I have made a new HTML template as "index page" and I load template pictures from folders listed in the server.
Since I dont want these pictures to be counted as "hits" I tried to chose "Dont count as download..." from the menu. I get the filemask box and enter *.jpg;*.gif  but the program wont accept it.
What am I doing wrong?

Thanks.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on November 09, 2005, 09:20:55 PM
fu22bu22
Quote
I have this error and it isn't the first time I encountered one.

Anyone can tell me how to resolve this problem?

First of all you posted all of that in the wrong section.  It should go here -> http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2309&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

Secondly, it's a bug that hasn't been fixed yet.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 10, 2005, 03:04:58 AM
thank you mike
moved
Title: Re: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 10, 2005, 05:51:15 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
this is a beta version, for those of you who want help testing...
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta23.zip

Hey rejetto,
maybe I got a point there, which could be improved an updated by you.
It goes like this: Everytime I share files with my friends, I wish HFS would have a feature, where you can set those upload speeds/limits, for each file you upload. And if this file is finished, the rest of the speed, which is now free, will be moved to the other files in same parts. That would be a nice and helpful feature, I guess ...

In this sense,
Scare
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 12, 2005, 04:47:48 AM
are you talking about limiting per-connection or per-file ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 13, 2005, 04:02:18 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
are you talking about limiting per-connection or per-file ?

Hey,
I'm talking about the files ... but a connection limit would be nice too.
Both are cool ideas. ;)

Bye,
Scare
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 13, 2005, 09:58:03 PM
Ohh, now i understand your point rejetto.
I really meant the connections on one file ... not the file itself ... so everyone which ist downloading one file has the same downloadspeed like the other one downloading the same file. Understood?

ICQ: 270-755-031 ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 15, 2005, 04:51:05 AM
er... no
A and B are downloading the same file.
do you need to slow down only A or both?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: scubasteve on November 15, 2005, 07:13:16 PM
i think what he means is that each ip address connected to hfs is given equal bandwidth. eg instead of 1 ip using 20kB/s and another using 30kB/s they instead both use 25kB/s.

per IP bandwidth throttling would be nice.
being able to see the complete progress of an upload when the other person is using multiple connctions. ( i find it hard to tell the persons speed and overall % when they are using a download manager which uses multiple connections at a time )

also just wondering how the Static Root implementation is coming along as its the one thing i am really dying to have.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 17, 2005, 02:29:13 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
er... no
A and B are downloading the same file.
do you need to slow down only A or both?

Ok, I meant that you can limit anything, per file (so A has 20 kb and B has 45) and per ip (A has at all 40 and B at all 40, too)

understood?

Scare
Title: Re: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 19, 2005, 08:35:38 PM
that i quit the sofware the folder that i uploaded delete
why ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: scubasteve on November 20, 2005, 12:48:38 AM
just wondering. say i have a folder that has 200 .avis in and i want the folder to be browseable but not for ppl to download the files. is there anyway i could easily set a password to all 200 of those files without just locking the entire folder ?
Title: Re: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 20, 2005, 04:47:13 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
that i quit the sofware the folder that i uploaded delete
why ?
please?
maybe you are not saving the file system
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 20, 2005, 04:50:46 AM
Quote from: "scubasteve"
just wondering. say i have a folder that has 200 .avis in and i want the folder to be browseable but not for ppl to download the files. is there anyway i could easily set a password to all 200 of those files without just locking the entire folder ?
hmm, no, for now you got to do the job for 200 files.
i hope in the future there will be a better solution.
but please notice that if you they job using the keyboard only (and accounts) it is much faster: menu-key, R, account-key. you could even automate with macros' software.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 25, 2005, 05:18:58 AM
Quote from: "scubasteve"
i think what he means is that each ip address connected to hfs is given equal bandwidth. eg instead of 1 ip using 20kB/s and another using 30kB/s they instead both use 25kB/s.
that's already so
if 2 connections get different speed, is because one of them is slow
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 25, 2005, 05:20:57 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Ok, I meant that you can limit anything, per file (so A has 20 kb and B has 45) and per ip (A has at all 40 and B at all 40, too)
it's easy to ask... what do you want? everything :)
such things not only takes time to be done, but one of them may be incompatible with others, or create ambiguity and the user doesn't realize what it will actually do.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 25, 2005, 05:31:52 AM
2.0 beta24 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta24.zip

what's new
+ shell context menu: checkbox instead of add/delete (moved to Other options)
+ first start: a dialog suggest to enable shell integration
+ Menu -> Upload -> "Number files on upload instead of overwriting"
+ "Ignore limits" for accounts
* save options -> "delete" replaced by "Clear options and quit"
- "delete partial uploads" disables "rename partial uploads"
- download tray icons' tips were sometimes outdated
- files from the shell were not added to the selected folder
- adding files with same name from the shell, did not focus the dialog
- fixed the "Cannot make a visible window modal"
- real folders were not checked for existence (404)
- "leave disconnected connections" prevented tray icons from being removed
- tray icons now display total percentage, to be consistent with the main window
- address2name bad message on duplicates
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on November 25, 2005, 06:52:21 AM
.
Thanks rejetto for the update.  Very much appreciated. B)
.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Time-X on November 25, 2005, 11:32:52 AM
Big THX rejetto!!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 25, 2005, 09:22:02 PM
What about this problem (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1011680)? :P
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: GeeS on November 28, 2005, 06:44:10 PM
Many thanks Rejetto !
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 29, 2005, 01:30:48 AM
2.0 beta25 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta25.zip

what's new
+ multiselect files
+ "copy URL" as submenu
- fixed problems with unicode
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 29, 2005, 01:44:55 AM
Thank you rejetto for fixing that bug!
There is a little problem in the 'File list'.
When you have a file in Unicode, it translated to HTML.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 29, 2005, 02:03:53 AM
ok, i got the problem
i hope it won't be too hard to fix :?

anyway the URL you submitted doesn't work for me
i tried to contact you in MSN and ICQ but no reply
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 29, 2005, 02:09:46 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
ok, i got the problem
i hope it won't be too hard to fix :?

anyway the URL you submitted doesn't work for me
i tried to contact you in MSN and ICQ but no reply
Weird. I have no problem to connect my external IP. :eek:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 29, 2005, 02:49:38 AM
problem fixed in next beta (26)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 29, 2005, 02:12:53 PM
How does "Multiselect files" work? Finally for Downloading more than one file at one klick? :) Have the new beta running but cant find a option...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 29, 2005, 03:58:12 PM
use SHIFT or CTRL in the virtual file system
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 29, 2005, 05:27:09 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
use SHIFT or CTRL in the virtual file system
Oh, I didn't know what it means too. Until now.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on November 29, 2005, 07:00:19 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
Quote from: "rejetto"
use SHIFT or CTRL in the virtual file system
Oh, I didn't know what it means too. Until now.
And I still don't know what it means...  ;) You need multi-select to do what ? Not to download, right ? OK, drag & drop (=move) seems not to work... It
"takes" only one of the selected files...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 29, 2005, 08:02:46 PM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "RazTK"
Quote from: "rejetto"
use SHIFT or CTRL in the virtual file system
Oh, I didn't know what it means too. Until now.
And I still don't know what it means...  ;) You need multi-select to do what ? Not to download, right ? OK, drag & drop (=move) seems not to work... It
"takes" only one of the selected files...
In the software itself, you can select more than one file/folder using CTRL or SHIFT.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on November 29, 2005, 08:11:13 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
In the software itself, you can select more than one file/folder using CTRL or SHIFT.
And ? As I said - I could not move more then one of the selected files...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on November 30, 2005, 12:50:00 AM
please please add the function to download a whole directory at one click! :D I love the software, but then i would love it even more! :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: mj on November 30, 2005, 01:00:54 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
please please add the function to download a whole directory at one click! :D I love the software, but then i would love it even more! :)
It's discussed here -> http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2563
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 30, 2005, 06:23:11 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "RazTK"
In the software itself, you can select more than one file/folder using CTRL or SHIFT.
And ? As I said - I could not move more then one of the selected files...
Yeah I noticed that too.
Well, I don't know if I really understood it right.
You can ask rejetto.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 30, 2005, 06:28:22 AM
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "RazTK"
In the software itself, you can select more than one file/folder using CTRL or SHIFT.
And ? As I said - I could not move more then one of the selected files...
ah, i even forgot about drag&drop :)
i was talking about the context menu (file menu)
i'm sorry i'm not spending much time explaning this, but sure this is a long expected feature
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 30, 2005, 06:48:46 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "Rafi"
Quote from: "RazTK"
In the software itself, you can select more than one file/folder using CTRL or SHIFT.
And ? As I said - I could not move more then one of the selected files...
ah, i even forgot about drag&drop :)
i was talking about the context menu (file menu)
i'm sorry i'm not spending much time explaning this, but sure this is a long expected feature
When I select more then one file on the desktop (for example) and then drag them to HFS everything is fine. HFS add them all. :)
Also, the context menu works fine.
Anyway, it would be nice to be able to select more then one file and move them all into a folder. You can't do that in the current version; it only moves the file you clicked with the mouse.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on November 30, 2005, 04:07:35 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
When I select more then one file on the desktop (for example) and then drag them to HFS everything is fine. HFS add them all. :)
this was working also 1 year ago
Quote
Also, the context menu works fine.
i'm talking about the context menu in HFS not in explorer
Quote
Anyway, it would be nice to be able to select more then one file and move them all into a folder. You can't do that in the current version; it only moves the file you clicked with the mouse.
it will work in next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on November 30, 2005, 06:30:41 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i'm talking about the context menu in HFS not in explorer
Oh, what's wrong with it?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 04, 2005, 06:03:59 AM
Quote from: "RazTK"
Quote from: "rejetto"
i'm talking about the context menu in HFS not in explorer
Oh, what's wrong with it?
nothing wrong. it works on multifile
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 04, 2005, 06:04:33 AM
HFS 2.0 beta 26 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta26.zip

what's new
- "Files list" was not working with unicode
- removed annoying messages for address2name
- fixed the drawProgress and httpEvent errors
- fixed a problem with the "Only 1 instance"
- multiselect in VFS was not working with drag&drop
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: JameeL/Boom on December 04, 2005, 11:32:08 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
HFS 2.0 beta 26 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta26.zip

what's new
- "Files list" was not working with unicode
- removed annoying messages for address2name
- fixed the drawProgress and httpEvent errors
- fixed a problem with the "Only 1 instance"
- multiselect in VFS was not working with drag&drop

Thank you rejetto :)

My Regards
Title: Minor "bug" ...
Post by: GeeS on December 04, 2005, 01:59:38 PM
... or call it cosmetics:

In the HFS status window, the column "%":
the number in the progressbar doesn't change and remains "0" during downloads.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 04, 2005, 03:38:03 PM
THANK YOU !!!
THANK YOU !!!
THANK YOU !!!
THANK YOU !!!
THANK YOU !!!

 :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)  :)
Title: Re: Minor "bug" ...
Post by: rejetto on December 04, 2005, 04:27:39 PM
Quote from: "GeeS"
In the HFS status window, the column "%":
the number in the progressbar doesn't change and remains "0" during downloads.
ops
fixed in next beta (27)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: GioSoul on December 04, 2005, 04:44:37 PM
there's a bug... in the prgressive bar doesn't increase the percentage number ..."0%" for all the time...  :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 05, 2005, 05:22:11 AM
2.0 beta27 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta27.zip

what's new
+ multiple custom addresses
- progress bar was stuck on 0%
- logging bytes sent/received could stuck
- event logging for banned was not working
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 05, 2005, 06:10:36 AM
if someone downloaded beta 27 before this post, please redownload
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 05, 2005, 09:43:48 AM
Got it! Thanks Again!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 09, 2005, 11:41:22 AM
Uff, Error after 2 Days running and then i will click on the Menu Button:

Access violation at address 00472CA0 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000004
HFS 2.0 beta27
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 09.12.2005 12:39:15
[00472CA0]{hfs.exe     }
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     }
[00472F33]{hfs.exe     }
[00473157]{hfs.exe     }
[00472C4A]{hfs.exe     }
[00473E03]{hfs.exe     }
[004A4D06]{hfs.exe     }
[004A0C15]{hfs.exe     }
[004A376C]{hfs.exe     }
[004562A8]{hfs.exe     }
...
[0047526E]{hfs.exe     }
[0047548E]{hfs.exe     }
[0050EA40]{hfs.exe     }
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, 2200 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 05.12.2005 07:09:08
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 09, 2005, 05:24:30 PM
whoops, i notice that i forgot to include debug information in beta27  
please redownload it to post meaningful reports
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 09, 2005, 05:29:34 PM
beta28 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta28.zip

what's new
+ "don't count as download" available for single files
+ minor improvements to options dialog
+ command line: -q (quit, useful with "only 1 instance")
* by default config is now saved in user registry
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: GeeS on December 09, 2005, 06:37:44 PM
Quote
* by default config is now saved in user registry

Does that mean that HFS will leave traces in the registry?   :(
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 09, 2005, 06:52:30 PM
Quote from: "GeeS"
Quote
* by default config is now saved in user registry

Does that mean that HFS will leave traces in the registry?   :(
A good question. I'm confused now... I thought we can select either to auto- save to file OR to registry on exit. Now I can't find how...  :?:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 09, 2005, 07:00:25 PM
No HFS.INI configuration now? :^^:
Quote from: "Rafi"
A good question. I'm confused now... I thought we can select either to auto- save to file OR to registry on exit. Now I can't find how...  :?:
HFS now saves the configuration to the registery, not the VFS.
You can erase the data from the registery by selecting the option Clear options and quit under Menu -> Save options.
You can auto-save the VFS on exit by selecting the option Auto-save VFS on exit under Menu -> Start/Exit.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: GeeS on December 09, 2005, 07:09:20 PM
Let me put the question more precisely:
Do I have to clean the registry to remove any traces of HFS?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 09, 2005, 07:14:51 PM
Quote from: "GeeS"
Let me put the question more precisely:
Do I have to clean the registry to remove any traces of HFS?
If you are using the shell context menu, remove it, and then clean the registery.
Because cleaning the registery won't remove the shell context menu.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: GeeS on December 09, 2005, 07:52:51 PM
Thx for clarification.
In some cases I'm not allowed (by policy) to change the registry ... as long HFS gives me the freedom to operate and to chose myself whether or not to make entries in the registry then it's ok for me.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: l3tw00t on December 10, 2005, 01:00:04 AM
Excellent software, any plans for HTTPS support?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 10, 2005, 01:25:44 AM
Quote from: "GeeS"
Thx for clarification.
In some cases I'm not allowed (by policy) to change the registry ... as long HFS gives me the freedom to operate and to chose myself whether or not to make entries in the registry then it's ok for me.
yes, sure
the only thing that changed is the DEFAULT way, you can still choose yourself

Quote
Excellent software, any plans for HTTPS support?
it was already discussed, use the SEARCH
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 10, 2005, 05:38:45 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "GeeS"
Thx for clarification.
In some cases I'm not allowed (by policy) to change the registry ... as long HFS gives me the freedom to operate and to chose myself whether or not to make entries in the registry then it's ok for me.
yes, sure
the only thing that changed is the DEFAULT way, you can still choose yourself
How?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 10, 2005, 05:56:39 AM
menu -> save options
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 10, 2005, 06:05:48 AM
But, I don't see how  I have control on the destination when auto-saving 8O

Edit:
Or they are not auto-saved at all ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 10, 2005, 06:10:52 AM
the autosave will just use the location where it has been saved last time
it has always been this way ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 10, 2005, 06:22:33 AM
You see, probably - the last time I visited this place-menu was a year ago, and I forgot...  my memory is not what it used to be ...  ;)
So can you  be so nice and put a check-mark near each save "option" to show this ? like you do in IP address for example...

10x
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 10, 2005, 07:18:20 AM
a checkmark may be misleading
i will use the bold: it may be misleading too, but i think slightly less than the checkmark

from next beta: autoupdate!
the system download the new HFS and replace it for you B)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 10, 2005, 07:36:31 AM
Thanks. Bold ?! first time ? a new 'concept' in HFS...  ;)
Actually it raises a more general  issue of the standard (in this software and in general) of indicating to the user that an item is being selected.  
I believe that you have to distinguish between two cases: a multiple selection-list-options (like start/exit list) and a single choice - one-of...

I would consider to use the same method for each case - check-marks for multiple choices and bold for the second (BTW - I like radio buttons more...).
SO why not change & use it all around ? IP list, flash task-button, tray-icon-show etc... this way the user can anticipate and understand better . What do you think ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 10, 2005, 11:54:10 AM
The next thing in next beta i wish:

deleting files/folders
search files/folders

 :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 10, 2005, 07:25:37 PM
i'm already using checkbox
as checkbox => you click and de/activate
as radiobutton => you click to select a value in a pool
(sorry but delphi doesn't give me radiobuttons in menu)

in save options, it is a different case: that ones are commands, with a side-effect affect on autosave. bold is just there as a reminder.

bold is a standard in windows context menu to point out the default action. so, actually, mine is a misuse.  :#)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 11, 2005, 07:42:15 AM
beta29 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta29.zip

what's new
+ uninstall
+ autoupdate (automatic download & replace)
+ the place where options will be saved is marked in bold
- "search better IP" was not saved
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: JameeL/Boom on December 11, 2005, 11:32:02 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta29 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta29.zip

what's new
+ uninstall
+ autoupdate (automatic download & replace)
+ the place where options will be saved is marked in bold
- "search better IP" was not saved

Thank you rejetto :)

My Regards
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 11, 2005, 01:51:58 PM
Great :-)
Updating...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: mario_a on December 11, 2005, 08:49:19 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta29 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta29.zip

what's new
+ uninstall
+ autoupdate (automatic download & replace)
+ the place where options will be saved is marked in bold
- "search better IP" was not saved

Just upgraded to this from version 1.6. But now I don't see the 'Users' option under "Menu->Other Options".

Also, is there any documentation for this version ?

Thanks,
Mario
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 11, 2005, 08:50:51 PM
Click on the button named Easy mode.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: mario_a on December 11, 2005, 08:59:14 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
Click on the button named Easy mode.

Thanks, that did it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 11, 2005, 09:10:36 PM
Quote from: "RazTK"
Click on the button named Easy mode.
Easy Mode or Expert Mode - No problems here with v2.0 beta 29 on XP Pro SP2.  It almost sounds like the problem described above is system specific for some reason.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 11, 2005, 09:13:32 PM
Quote from: "Mike Hunt"
Quote from: "RazTK"
Click on the button named Easy mode.
Easy Mode or Expert Mode - No problems here with v2.0 beta 29 on XP Pro SP2.  It almost sounds like the problem described above is system specific for some reason.
What are you talking about? the users button? you can only see it in expert mode.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 12, 2005, 04:47:20 AM
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta30.zip

OR you can use the check update feature and let it upgrade by itself ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 12, 2005, 05:55:26 AM
Hey I was just wondering the the full program, instead of the beta would be released?

By the way thanks for the great program, keep up to good work :D

Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: DJArty on December 12, 2005, 07:12:00 AM
Can be added update via proxy (with autorizations)?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: HFS user on December 12, 2005, 08:08:05 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta30.zip

OR you can use the check update feature and let it upgrade by itself ;)
I can see the check, but how does the update work ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 12, 2005, 10:56:50 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta30.zip

OR you can use the check update feature and let it upgrade by itself ;)
I was trying to use the update feature and everything worked fine until HFS asked me if I want to quit and you know what happened next... :lol:  so I can't really tell you if it's working. Just make the next version and we will let you know. :^^:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ants on December 12, 2005, 11:09:53 AM
Hello I just downloaded the BETA but can you please please please change the 'open directly in browser' so that if there is no extensions listed in the box then it will have normal browser behaviour and the browser will open any files it directly can (like it is in 1.6a)

Thankyou
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 12, 2005, 11:40:05 AM
rejetto, I found a few uninstalling problems: http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2609
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 13, 2005, 10:49:45 PM
I would like to thank rejetto for this wonderful work!!
Thank you  ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2005, 10:33:42 PM
HOW DO IPUT AN RSS FEED ON MY PAGE??????
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 17, 2005, 02:33:45 PM
bug found:

menu->upload->number files xxxx....

i don't like it so i untick it
but HFS doesn't save it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 18, 2005, 03:47:46 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
bug found:

menu->upload->number files xxxx....

i don't like it so i untick it
but HFS doesn't save it

Yes.  It's a bug here too.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on December 18, 2005, 06:53:28 PM
Very strange behaviour:

During the last weeks I worked on a personalized template and updated HFS 2.0 in the mean time. The update to version 30 I did with automatic which worked flawlessly. Because I screwed up the tpl-file, I backuped everything (on drive D:\HFS ...)

With a clean desktop, no HFS.exe or HFS.ini on it, I downloaded version30.zip to desktop, unpacked HFS.exe on desktop, moved the zip to archive and started hfs.exe. But then to my very surprise hfs showed up with my old personalized template and not with the default, as I would have expected. And there was no HFS.ini created anymore on the desktop.
Tried the same with older versions (23 26)  ... but same result.
Bug? Where does get a fresh HFS the old template? How does it know?  :roll:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 18, 2005, 07:03:14 PM
Close HFS then Delete hfs.tpl found in the hfs directory.  When you start HFS again the default hfs.tpl will be re-created.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on December 18, 2005, 07:34:04 PM
Did it with version 20 and 30. Version 20 creates hfs.ini in the hfs.exe directory and shows up with default tpl.
Did the same with version 30. No hfs.ini created in hfs.exe directory and shows up with my old tpl (which is on drive D:)
Will try and investigate further...
Question: does the fresh hfs beta 30 look somewhere (register)  for a recently used tpl ???
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on December 18, 2005, 07:40:43 PM
emptied browser caches (Opera & IE), reload, got hfs.ini and hfs.tpl in hfs directory by changing menuoptions and saving them, deleted ini and tpl as suggested, still the same (edited:xx.xx.xx.xx.x)... will try it on a different machine.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Rafi on December 18, 2005, 07:40:49 PM
Your HFS could have saved the config in the registry. You probably have to clean that for a REAL fresh install: Save-options->clean-options
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on December 18, 2005, 07:55:46 PM
Thanks Mike and Rafi! I forgot that a fresh HFS saves into the registry by default. I don't like it, but it is as it is & I will never forget  :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2005, 09:25:38 PM
Quote from: "HFS user"
I can see the check, but how does the update work ?
what exactly do you want to know?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 19, 2005, 09:33:38 PM
Hey rejetto, good to see you again. ;)
I found a few problems in the uninstallation process: http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2609
Another thing, because of the questions about the routers, I made a topic about it: http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2622 - I hope you will make it sticky :^^:
Also, a guest user found a bug:
Quote from: "Anonymous"
bug found:

menu->upload->number files xxxx....

i don't like it so i untick it
but HFS doesn't save it
- And this is my report message :P
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: HFS user on December 19, 2005, 09:38:50 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "HFS user"
I can see the check, but how does the update work ?
what exactly do you want to know?
Menu->check for news-updates  - just show you the newest update available, or can you go ahead and perform the update somehow ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 19, 2005, 09:41:13 PM
Quote from: "HFS user"
Menu->check for news-updates  - just show you the newest update available, or can you go ahead and perform the update somehow ?
HFS 2.0 can automatically perform the update if necessary since beta29.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: HFS user on December 19, 2005, 10:07:15 PM
But how ? I use Beta 30 , what am I missing ?  Do you have to activate/confirm  it somehow ?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 19, 2005, 10:09:43 PM
Quote from: "HFS user"
But how ? I use Beta 30 , what am I missing ?  Do you have to activate/confirm  it somehow ?
HFS 2.0 beta30 is the latest version right now. You have nothing to update.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2005, 10:14:02 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
HOW DO IPUT AN RSS FEED ON MY PAGE??????
discussed on other threads
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2005, 10:21:52 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
bug found:

menu->upload->number files xxxx....

i don't like it so i untick it
but HFS doesn't save it
fixed in next beta (31)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2005, 10:22:40 PM
Quote from: "ants"
Hello I just downloaded the BETA but can you please please please change the 'open directly in browser' so that if there is no extensions listed in the box then it will have normal browser behaviour and the browser will open any files it directly can (like it is in 1.6a)
i didn't get what you want me to do  :?
if it is a bug, please show me how to reproduce it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2005, 10:25:24 PM
Quote from: "~GeeS~"
But then to my very surprise hfs showed up with my old personalized template and not with the default, as I would have expected.
if you used "uninstall", it is a bug
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 19, 2005, 11:02:21 PM
beta31 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta31.zip

what's new
- "number files on upload" was not saved
- uninstall had problems
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 20, 2005, 12:09:56 AM
I used the update feature to get the new version and everything worked fine.  :^:
However, can you make it to delete the hfs.old.exe file? (or add an option)
Edit: rejetto, are you sure HFS cleans all the settings from the registery when you use the uninstall feature? I'm not sure about that...
Title: Update Problems
Post by: Martok on December 20, 2005, 05:48:14 PM
When I use the Update function, there is a problem (not the one described above):

It first downloads normally, then closes the old HFS and in starting the new hfs it produces a fully reproducable error saying there was an error in program "hfs.new.exe" and it has to be terminated. After this, it starts normally, but in Process Explorer it always says "hfs.new.exe" is running, but the exe's name is "hfs.exe".
I think this may be something with the ini-file, because if I change the first line in it to something not representing the correct version, it returns the same error.

Maybe in is a bug, maybe some mistake by me....

PS: Using Win2K SP3

PPS: ...now I cant even get the update, it won't start downloading...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on December 20, 2005, 05:55:50 PM
Again, it's me...

Now I got it to download the Update, but still the same.
Here is the Error:
(German W2K)

(http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/4672/hfs1mr.th.jpg) (http://img4.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hfs1mr.jpg)

In the Background you see that HFS is Up&Running again.

Hope this helps...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Weasel on December 23, 2005, 08:52:31 AM
Hi,

after using the update function I got a "monoLib error" message by hfs when hfs tried to restart. after this i could normally start hfs in the newest version with out errors.

don't know if this is allready known,


greets

BJ
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: PikachuEXE on December 23, 2005, 02:30:26 PM
I think there is no need to have a uninstall function
Because no install, it is useless.
Only delete all files is OK for uninstalling, isn't it?
Install function is not suitable for a developing,
I mean not completed program
Because it is too complex
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: RazTK on December 23, 2005, 06:43:15 PM
Quote from: "PikachuEXE"
I think there is no need to have a uninstall function
Because no install, it is useless.
Only delete all files is OK for uninstalling, isn't it?
Install function is not suitable for a developing,
I mean not completed program
Because it is too complex
Why complex?
1. Remove the settings from the registery.
2. Remove the configuration file. (.ini)
3. Remove HFS from the shell context menu.
4. Remove the HFS executable. (hfs.exe by default)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 26, 2005, 01:35:35 AM
Quote
are you sure HFS cleans all the settings from the registery when you use the uninstall feature?
er, i didn't test :D
anyway, there are only 2 places where to look

Quote
When I use the Update function, there is a problem (not the one described above):
could you please tell me how to reproduce this problem?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 26, 2005, 02:27:32 AM
Quote from: "PikachuEXE"
I think there is no need to have a uninstall function
Because no install, it is useless.
HFS can save settings to registry
someone complained because he deleted the exe but things remained in registry: he didn't cleared settings before deleting.
but many people will not clear settings before deleting, so...the feature.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 26, 2005, 02:37:48 AM
beta32 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta32.zip

what's new
+ Menu -> Other options -> "Keep old version updating"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary addresses"
+ Menu -> Limits -> "Max contemporary addresses downloading"
- possible crash quitting
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 26, 2005, 05:24:46 AM
rejetto,

I got a couple of questions re: v2.0 beta 32...

1.) What does "Keep old version updating" do?

2.) Re: the "max contemporary addresses and downloading" addition to limits... did you make any additions to the default template because of these?

Thanks,
Mike
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 26, 2005, 05:36:03 AM
rejetto,

Sorry.  1 more question....

Is there much difference between the two limits below and if so what is it?

"Max contemporary addresses downloading" and "Max contemporary downloads from a single address"?

Mike
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 26, 2005, 05:41:03 AM
rejetto,

Just came across something else.  Menu/Other Options/Shell context menu - when I click on it nothing happens.

Mike
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 26, 2005, 05:03:13 PM
1) it is a recent FR. if you disable this, no hfs.old.exe is created updating.

2) no change to the template.

3a) "Max contemporary addresses downloading", e.g. only 3 people can download at once

3b) "Max contemporary downloads from a single address", e.g. everyone can download only a file at once.

the last is very useful for people who hates having 8 streams open by download managers.

4) it makes appear "Add to HFS" in the shell context menu (right click on a file/folder)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 26, 2005, 06:04:25 PM
Thanks rejetto. :^^:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on December 26, 2005, 11:40:03 PM
Quote
could you please tell me how to reproduce this problem?

1. I clicked on "Check for Updates", then HFS told me there is an Update.
2. Then I chose to download it. This is done correctly.
3. Then a DOS-Box pops up and HFS is closed.
4. A new HFS is opened, this is the new version.

The error I described (DrWatson opening) happens somewhere between 3 and 4.

I will try to translate some parts of DrWatson's log:

Code: [Select]
Application Exception occured:
        Application:  (pid=932)
        When: 27.12.2005 @ 00:21:15.687
        Exception number: c0000025

This seems to be a common error, as the results of a google search show

Code: [Select]
       778b1847 e9a7ccfdff       jmp     RtlSetBits+0x3e3 (7788e4f3)
        778b184c 48               dec     eax
        778b184d 7422             jz  RtlConvertUlongToLargeInteger+0x1ad4 (778bdf71)
        778b184f c745a0260000c0                                  ss:013dd03e=????????
                                  mov     dword ptr [ebp+0xa0],0xc0000026
        778b1856 8d45a0           lea     eax,[ebp+0xa0]         ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b1859 c745a401000000   mov   dword ptr [ebp+0xa4],0x1 ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b1860 50               push    eax
        778b1861 8975a8           mov     [ebp+0xa8],esi         ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b1864 894db0           mov     [ebp+0xb0],ecx         ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b1867 e8c4f8ffff       call    RtlRaiseException (778b1130)
ERROR ->778b186c e995ccfdff       jmp     RtlSetBits+0x3f6 (7788e506)
        778b1871 8b45f0           mov     eax,[ebp+0xf0]         ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b1874 834e0410         or    dword ptr [esi+0x4],0x10 ds:013dd056=????????
        778b1878 3b45fc           cmp     eax,[ebp+0xfc]         ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b187b 0f8685ccfdff     jbe     RtlSetBits+0x3f6 (7788e506)
        778b1881 8945fc           mov     [ebp+0xfc],eax         ss:013dd03e=????????
        778b1884 e97dccfdff       jmp     RtlSetBits+0x3f6 (7788e506)
        778b1889 c745a0250000c0                                  ss:013dd03e=????????
                                  mov     dword ptr [ebp+0xa0],0xc0000025
        778b1890 ebc4             jmp     strtol+0xe3 (778b9c56)
        778b1892 834e0408         or     dword ptr [esi+0x4],0x8 ds:013dd056=????????
        778b1896 e972ccfdff       jmp     RtlSetBits+0x3fd (7788e50d)
        778b189b 834e0406         or     dword ptr [esi+0x4],0x6 ds:013dd056=????????

HFS itself is not able to produce an error log as it is terminated before.

This error is still existant with 2.0b32 and fully reproducable on my machine which is as follows:

Code: [Select]
       User: Administrator
        Number of Processors: 1
        Processor type: x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0
        Windows 2000-Version: 5.0
        Build: 2195
        Service Pack: 3
        Curent Type: Uniprocessor Free

[/code]
Title: beta 32
Post by: MicroMonkey on December 27, 2005, 12:34:13 AM
I updated with the built in updater since beta 30, and have no errors so far at all (on a win 2003 eneterprise box). Just one question (more like a request), is there a way to add the date on the downloads? The time shows next to thefile being downloaded, but the date would be nice also.  When I check mine, I see all these downloads and all these times, but I have no idea what day they were taken. I hope I was clear in all this mumbling ramble. :)
Title: Re: beta 32
Post by: Mike Hunt on December 27, 2005, 01:24:50 AM
Quote from: "MicroMonkey"
Just one question (more like a request), is there a way to add the date on the downloads?

I see all these downloads and all these times, but I have no idea what day they were taken.
Your system doesn't show a file date for files on your system :?:

If I'm understanding you correctly, that is strange and has more to do with your system rather than with HFS.

No problem with date and time file stamps here on my system or pages produced with HFS.
Title: Re: beta 32
Post by: rejetto on December 27, 2005, 07:21:05 AM
Quote from: "MicroMonkey"
is there a way to add the date on the downloads? The time shows next to thefile being downloaded, but the date would be nice also.
what are you talking about, the webpages produced by HFS, the log, the disk of the client machine?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 27, 2005, 07:27:21 AM
Quote from: "Martok"
in the Background you see that HFS is Up&Running again.
the one running on the background, is the old version or updated version?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maksim on December 27, 2005, 11:10:14 AM
Hi all. What about search? Lately I asked about this option. What are you planing to do in this way?
P.S. thanks  for NICE program.
Sorry for my english. I just learn it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on December 27, 2005, 05:38:32 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
the one running on the background, is the old version or updated version?

It is the new one.
The text in Process explorer is always"hfs.new.exe", not the exe name(hfs.exe).

This error seems to be a bit confusing... :cry:

Martok
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ANTS on December 28, 2005, 09:02:41 AM
Quote from: "maksim"
Hi all. What about search? Lately I asked about this option. What are you planing to do in this way?
P.S. thanks  for NICE program.
Sorry for my english. I just learn it.

Hi maksim. Don't worry your English is easy to understand :D :D
I agree with you. A search feature would be great!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 28, 2005, 11:35:00 AM
the "search" is already in the to-do and has been discussed
why don't you start using the search feature of the forum in the while? ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on December 29, 2005, 03:19:04 AM
Hi rejetto,
Today I tried to merge some of my old vfs's. I noticed some other bug there:
If one vfs has a comment for the root folder(the "/"), and after it a vfs without a comment in root is loaded, the comment is not removed as it should be. If I use "Clear VFS" before loading the second one, everything works fine.

Even if there are some minor probs, I can't say it often enough: THANK YOU FOR HFS! :^^:

PS: Is there any summary of the auto-generated files like ~imgxx,~img_folder,~files.lst etc.?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 29, 2005, 01:14:25 PM
fixed in next beta (33)

full list:
~img
~progress
~files.lst
~login
~upload progress
~upload
~upload-no-progress
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rxs2k5 on December 30, 2005, 02:04:31 AM
in HFS.exe beta 32

Is HFS unable to add custom site to mask the ip ???

coz previously in beta 31 there's is this functions

I hope you can retain that function as it is very useful

thanks for creating such a cool software
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 30, 2005, 08:41:56 AM
did you forget the option or what?
menu -> ip address -> custom
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rxs2k5 on December 30, 2005, 04:14:24 PM
O hi rejetto,

I manage to solve my problem, I was on easy mode, should have changed to expert mode in order to use custom address.

excellent piece of art, do you collect donations???

I loving this piece of software and would like to pay a little$$ for your hardwork even though this is a GPL license
Title: donation
Post by: MarkV on December 30, 2005, 05:00:20 PM
Go to http://www.rejetto.com, on the page there is a Paypal button to donate.

MarkV

edit: Oops, typo...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 31, 2005, 01:39:06 AM
Quote from: "rxs2k5"
I manage to solve my problem, I was on easy mode, should have changed to expert mode in order to use custom address.
many people had this problem.
from next beta, if HFS detects an upgrade, it will default to expert mode instead of easy mode
Code: [Select]
// i was already seeing all the stuff, so please don't hide it
if build < '006' then easyMode:=FALSE;

Quote
excellent piece of art, do you collect donations???
sure i would :D sadly i never get them :(
use paypal if you want, and thanks in advance
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 31, 2005, 02:20:26 AM
beta33 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta33.zip

what's new
- ban list was unproperly saved in configuration
- loading a new VFS didn't discard completely old settings
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on December 31, 2005, 07:00:59 PM
Hey rejetto,

just to tell you, updating worked very fine this time. Did you change something in the updating process?
Very nice work!

Happy new year 2006 and all the best to you and yours!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on December 31, 2005, 08:30:10 PM
Quote from: "Martok"
just to tell you, updating worked very fine this time. Did you change something in the updating process?
nope, nothing changed :)
Title: Logout
Post by: YdieresiS on January 02, 2006, 08:00:37 PM
Is there a function that users can logout of the system?

I use FF and can't logout, so everyone on the computer i come on and login to can use the system.

I don't want this so can you please fix a logout thing or so, or can you make it that when the browser closes it deletes your "visit"

Greetz,
YdieresiS
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 02, 2006, 08:16:04 PM
discussed hundreds times: http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2672
just CLOSE the browser, it works
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 02, 2006, 08:48:40 PM
beta34 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta34.zip

NOTE for who does not use the default template
"max contemporary downloads" was renamed to "max contemp downloads"

NOTE i made another attempt to fix this darned processQ bug, help us testing it

what's new
+ ~files.lst template can be loaded from external file "filelist.tpl"
- attempt to fix the processQ bug
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 03, 2006, 12:27:52 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta34 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta34.zip

NOTE for who does not use the default template
"max contemporary downloads" was renamed to "max contemp downloads"

NOTE i made another attempt to fix this darned processQ bug, help us testing it

what's new
+ ~files.lst template can be loaded from external file "filelist.tpl"
- attempt to fix the processQ bug
rejetto, thanks for the update.

Wow! I learned a new word today - "contemporaneous".  I didn't think there was such a word but "yes" there is (http://opera.answers.com/contemporaneous). :)

How do I create the external file "filelist.tpl"?  HFS didn't seem to create this file for me.  I looked all over for it including HFS root directory and can't find it anywhere.

I found one small spelling error - Menu/IP address/costantly - s/b constantly.

Hopefully you got that processQ bug this time.  You know, this bug isn't reported as much as it was in the past.  So maybe, you are getting close to killing the little bugger once and for all! :)  I haven't seen it for quite a few months on my system.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MicroMonkey on January 03, 2006, 03:09:05 AM
Sorry if I wasnt clear on my post earlier. When I look at the screen of the pc hosting HFS, it shows folders on the left (virtual file system), and on the right (log) it shows any downloads along with the time. I wanted to know if there was a way to show the date also. :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 03, 2006, 03:44:10 AM
Quote from: "MicroMonkey"
When I look at the screen of the pc hosting HFS, it shows folders on the left (virtual file system), and on the right (log) it shows any downloads along with the time. I wanted to know if there was a way to show the date also. :)
Easy.  Anywhere in the log window side - right click, select "log what", and you are presented with a list of options.  Select "date".  Done.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2006, 08:00:27 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Wow! I learned a new word today - "contemporaneous".  I didn't think there was such a word but "yes" there is (http://opera.answers.com/contemporaneous). :)
i'm not good at english
i had a look at the dictionary and saw

  contemporary [conยทtemยทpoยทrarยทy || kən'tempərərɪ]
adj. modern, current
n.  person living at about the same time as another; person of about the same age as another

so i thought it was not the right word to be used in the context maximun contemporary downloads, and searched for another one.
found contemporaneous :)
now you make me think i did wrong... i hope someone will help me solving

Quote
How do I create the external file "filelist.tpl"?
create the file in the same folder of HFS with this content:
Code: [Select]
%files%

[files]
%list%

[file]
http://%host%%item-url%

Quote
I found one small spelling error - Menu/IP address/costantly - s/b constantly.
10q

Quote
Hopefully you got that processQ bug this time.  You know, this bug isn't reported as much as it was in the past.
i think it is because people stopped posting it, and someone else just disabled the speed limit to get rid of it
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: blaster on January 03, 2006, 11:19:39 AM
i wonder if there is an option that the software can reload the setting(file system) after windows start up
thx~
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2006, 12:00:40 PM
sure
instead of running just hfs, run hfs filename.vfs
where filename.vfs is your saved file system
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2006, 12:34:00 PM
in the next beta, i greatly improved the self test.
now if the first try fails, it automatically tries all IP addresses, and if this is not enough, it tries to switch to different ports.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rxs2k5 on January 03, 2006, 12:58:17 PM
hmm I still do not understand how does the filelist.tpl works out or enable me to create an external filelist.tpl.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2006, 01:11:03 PM
Quote from: "rxs2k5"
hmm I still do not understand how does the filelist.tpl works out or enable me to create an external filelist.tpl.
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2653
that's what it is about
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Frederik25 on January 03, 2006, 06:47:34 PM
Hello,

I used your program a lot and it was great.
Since today - now I have a problem:

I installed a ROUTER and have FIX IP ADRESS (my Computer has 192.168.1.25), Now I wanted to share some photos from new year with a friend. It didnt work. I can only choose 192.168.1.25 as IP. But of course my provider gives me another IP adress.

What do I have to do?

Thank you  :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 03, 2006, 07:41:37 PM
menu -> help -> F.A.Q.
it is the first question.......  :roll:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: blaster on January 04, 2006, 09:09:29 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
sure
instead of running just hfs, run hfs filename.vfs
where filename.vfs is your saved file system
it works :lol:
thx for ur great stuff :lol:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Westony on January 05, 2006, 07:18:42 PM
can you tell me how to delete the stuped port example:   127.0.0.100:8000
how can I dellete the stuped port to we port allown pls telll me  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on January 05, 2006, 07:55:45 PM
Quote from: "Westony"
can you tell me how to delete the stuped port example:   127.0.0.100:8000
how can I dellete the stuped port to we port allown pls telll me  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:
i don't understand what you want
anyway, if you want to be see the port, you have to use port 80
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: westony on January 05, 2006, 09:32:24 PM
I just want to delete the port i want mu ftp have just the IP without the port
how can turn on te HFS without the stuped port
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ANTS on January 05, 2006, 09:35:42 PM
westony, if your not using Port 80 then you MUST type the port in the address or it wont work. Trey www.no-ip.org to make a no-ip account with your own name and you don't see the port.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MicroMonkey on January 06, 2006, 06:15:47 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "MicroMonkey"
When I look at the screen of the pc hosting HFS, it shows folders on the left (virtual file system), and on the right (log) it shows any downloads along with the time. I wanted to know if there was a way to show the date also. :)
Easy.  Anywhere in the log window side - right click, select "log what", and you are presented with a list of options.  Select "date".  Done.
Thank you very much for your help. HFS is a real nice program, been using it for a long time. :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 06, 2006, 07:19:29 AM
:)  :(  :twisted:
Title: error report
Post by: Weasel on January 06, 2006, 01:37:10 PM
FIRST
When updating is still get monolib error after update and hfs doesn't start automaticly after update. if i start manualy it works normal

SECOND
got this error when clicking the menu button. Shortly befor i activated 2nd monitor in multi monitor environment.

Code: [Select]
Access violation at address 004533B0 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000004
HFS 2.0 beta32
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 06.01.2006 14:32:09
[004533B0]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetBoundsRect + $10
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[00453643]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.GetMonitor + $B
[00453867]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.FindMonitor + $23
[0045335A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetHeight + $A
[00454513]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.MonitorFromPoint + $27
[004A4D0E]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CheckMenuDropdown + $22E
[004A0C1D]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolButton.CheckMenuDropdown + $39
[004A3774]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CNNotify + $B8
[00465CA0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468C43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F741]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041DD4E]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[0042F338]{hfs.exe     } Graphics.FreeMemoryContexts + $98
[004688C0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[004688D5]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $41
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00468C43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[0044F741]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.WndProc + $421
[0041DD4E]{hfs.exe     } Classes.TThreadList.UnlockList (Line 3097, "classes.pas" + 1) + $7
[00468C43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A4335]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[00465A70]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[00468D7B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[004693F9]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMNotify + $D
[00465CA0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468C43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A4335]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[004688C0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[004A40F7]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.SendDropdownMsg + $63
[004A42C8]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $1C4
[004A4324]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $220
[004688C0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[004565DD]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.StopHintTimer + $15
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FCBC]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2800+, 2090 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------

[/code]
Title: feature request
Post by: francorosso on January 06, 2006, 11:51:56 PM
feature request

please add option auto close program by timeout inactivity
for example if nobody downloads within five minutes the program will be exit
sorry my bad english  :#)
Title: Re: feature request
Post by: MarkV on January 07, 2006, 12:54:32 AM
Quote from: "francorosso"
feature request

please add option auto close program by timeout inactivity
for example if nobody downloads within five minutes the program will be exit
sorry my bad english  :#)

Already in there... Go to

Code: [Select]
Menu - Start/Exit - Auto-close - No downloads timeout:
MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: GeeS on January 09, 2006, 08:23:17 AM
Quote
maverick wrote:   
Wow! I learned a new word today - "contemporaneous". I didn't think there was such a word but "yes" there is.
   
Quote
i'm not good at english
i had a look at the dictionary and saw

contemporary [conยทtemยทpoยทrarยทy || kən'tempərərɪ]
adj. modern, current
n. person living at about the same time as another; person of about the same age as another

so i thought it was not the right word to be used in the context maximun contemporary downloads, and searched for another one.
found contemporaneous  
now you make me think i did wrong... i hope someone will help me solving

Nevertheless English is not my first or second language, I strongly suggest, the correct word should be"simultaneous":

http://opera.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2083&dekey=S1381300&gwp=8&curtab=2083_1&linktext=simultaneous

BTW. Nice feature in Opera: dubbelclick a word in a webpage, it will be highlighted, rightclick, chose Dictionary, Encyclopedia or Translation. Never used it before.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 09, 2006, 02:40:33 PM
rejetto,

1.) Is the template section [upload-failed] still valid?  If so, how is it triggered and when?  I have tried different things (cancelling upload etc.) and this section of the template doesn't get activated.

2.) I also think "simultaneous" is a better word to use instead of "contemporaneous".

mav
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: westony on January 09, 2006, 08:48:54 PM
Quote from: "ANTS"
westony, if your not using Port 80 then you MUST type the port in the address or it wont work. Trey www.no-ip.org to make a no-ip account with your own name and you don't see the port.
now when i try with port "80" HFS sayd me that can't open the port please helpme i don't whant the stuped port help pls
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on January 09, 2006, 09:08:41 PM
Rejettto,
could you please open a topic called "Router&Port Problems" and make it sticky.
Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ANTS on January 10, 2006, 12:23:34 PM
Quote from: "westony"
Quote from: "ANTS"
westony, if your not using Port 80 then you MUST type the port in the address or it wont work. Trey www.no-ip.org to make a no-ip account with your own name and you don't see the port.
now when i try with port "80" HFS sayd me that can't open the port please helpme i don't whant the stuped port help pls

Hi, are you on a network or do you have a router?
Title: Error Code
Post by: jdog on January 11, 2006, 02:02:09 AM
I received this error and I was wondering if someone could help me out...

Access violation at address 004D1ABE in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 02426B40
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 1/10/2006 8:58:15 PM
[004D1ABE]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.processQ (Line 595, "HSlib.pas" + 4) + $4
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004D1BBE]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.timerEvent (Line 621, "HSlib.pas" + 16) + $1
[00443163]{hfs.exe     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00443047]{hfs.exe     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433266]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2600+, 1600 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 1/2/2006 9:29:14 PM
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: prob on January 13, 2006, 06:37:26 AM
Whats the file size limit. I tried to tranfer this 6 gig file in my home network but it seems to not be able to. I tried it with a download manager but the same things happens. It seems that it has a  2gig limit. Is that true?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on January 15, 2006, 10:14:50 AM
Got this error when trying to open shell context menu:

Code: [Select]
Failed to create key *\shell\Add to HFS\command
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 15-01-06 11:11:20
[00482501]{hfs.exe     } Registry.TRegistry.CreateKey + $B1
[004D5DCA]{hfs.exe     } utilLib.saveregistry (Line 624, "utillib.pas" + 5) + $6
[00404D67]{hfs.exe     } System.@LStrCat + $2F
[0050CD53]{hfs.exe     } main.addToContextMenuFor (Line 6433, "main.pas" + 3) + $43
[0050CDEE]{hfs.exe     } main.integrateInShell (Line 6438, "main.pas" + 1) + $5
[0050E803]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Shellcontextmenu1Click (Line 6811, "main.pas" + 2) + $0
[0045C6CA]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D8A3]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E582]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045E4D1]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433266]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: Intel, P6 (Model 13), 800 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 02-01-06 21:29:14
This is my default hfs.ini. I run hfs with this .ini to avoid gettting that "first time" nag screen. Maybe that's the reason?
Code: [Select]
HFS 2.0 beta34 - Build #019
active=yes
window=216,139,961,679
window-max=no
easy=no
port=80
log-read-only=yes
log-width=539
log-file-name=hfs_log Y%y% M%m% D%d% .txt
log-font-name=
log-font-size=0
log-date=yes
log-time=yes
log-server-start=yes
log-server-stop=yes
log-connections=yes
log-disconnections=yes
log-bytes-sent=yes
log-bytes-received=yes
log-replies=yes
log-requests=yes
log-full-downloads=yes
log-dump-request=yes
log-browsing=yes
log-icons=yes
log-progress=yes
log-banned=yes
confirm-exit=yes
keep-bak-updating=no
ip=10.0.0.150
custom-ip=
dynamic-dns-updater=
search-better-ip=no
start-minimized=no
connections-height=175
files-stay-flagged-for-minutes=10
auto-save-vfs=no
folders-before=yes
use-comment-as-realm=yes
getright-template=yes
save-options-on-exit=no
dont-include-port-in-url=no
persistent-connections=yes
modal-options=no
beep-on-flash=yes
delete-partial-uploads=no
rename-partial-uploads=PARTIAL_%name%
use-unicode-in-html=no
use-system-icons=yes
minimize-to-tray=yes
tray-icon-for-each-download=no
show-main-tray-icon=yes
always-on-top=no
send-hfs-identifier=no
list-hidden-files=no
list-system-files=no
list-protected-items=no
tray-shows=connections
tray-message=%ip%:%port%\nUptime: %uptime%\nHits: %hits%\nDownloads: %downloads%
speed-limit=-1
max-ips=0
max-ips-downloading=0
max-connections=0
max-connections-by-ip=0
max-contemporary-dls=0
max-contemporary-dls-ip=0
login-realm=
open-in-browser=*.htm;*.html;*.jpg;*.jpeg;*.txt;*.swf
flash-on=connection
graph-rate=50
graph-size=40
graph-visible=yes
no-download-timeout=0
connections-timeout=300
no-reply-ban=no
ban-list=
last-file-open=C:\HFS_Default_Grey\hfs.vfs
reload-on-startup=yes
find-external-on-startup=no
encode-non-ascii=yes
encode-spaces=yes
only-1-instance=yes
mime-types=*.htm;*.html|text/html|*.jpg;*.jpeg;*.jpe|image/jpeg|*.gif|image/gif|*.png|image/png|*.bmp|image/bmp|*.ico|image/x-icon|*.mpeg;*.mpg;*.mpe|video/mpeg|*.avi|video/x-msvideo|*.txt|text/plain
address2name=
recents=C:\HFS_Default_Grey\hfs.vfs
leave-disconnected-connections=no
accounts=login:R3Vlc3Q6R3Vlc3Q=|enabled:yes|no-limits:no; Edit: That's Guest:Guest; duh!  /Edit
compressed-browsing=yes
hints4newcomers=yes
save-in-out-totals=no
number-files-on-upload=yes
do-not-log-address=
last-external-address=
min-disk-space=500
out-total=16314
in-total=5984
copy-url-on-start=no
copy-url-on-addition=yes
section-IP-width=170
section-Filename-width=160
section-Status-width=100
section-Speed-width=80
section-Time left-width=55
section-%-width=173
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: HOMER on January 15, 2006, 06:22:19 PM
Access violation at address 004D1ABE in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 02101940
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 15.01.2006 20:24:22
[004D1ABE]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.processQ (Line 595, "HSlib.pas" + 4) + $4
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004D1BBE]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.timerEvent (Line 621, "HSlib.pas" + 16) + $1
[00443163]{hfs.exe     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.Timer + $F
[00443047]{hfs.exe     } ExtCtrls.TTimer.WndProc + $2B
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433266]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+, 2090 MHz MMX
Display  : 800x600 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 02.01.2006 21:29:14
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 21, 2006, 11:10:15 PM
Clicked on MENU button... I see the TScreen and GetMonitor strings, I dunno if it matters or not, but i'm in a dual-screen environnement...



Access violation at address 004533B0 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000004
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 2006-01-21 18:10:00
[004533B0]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetBoundsRect + $10
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[00453643]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.GetMonitor + $B
[00453867]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.FindMonitor + $23
[0045335A]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TMonitor.GetHeight + $A
[00454513]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TScreen.MonitorFromPoint + $27
[004A4D0E]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CheckMenuDropdown + $22E
[004A0C1D]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolButton.CheckMenuDropdown + $39
[004A3774]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.CNNotify + $B8
[004692AB]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMPaint + $3F
[00465CA0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468C43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A4335]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[00465A70]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.Perform + $24
[00468D7B]{hfs.exe     } Controls.DoControlMsg + $23
[004693F9]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WMNotify + $D
[00465CA0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TControl.WndProc + $188
[00468C43]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.WndProc + $157
[004A4335]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $231
[004688C0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[004A40F7]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.SendDropdownMsg + $63
[004A42C8]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $1C4
[004A4324]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc + $220
[004688C0]{hfs.exe     } Controls.TWinControl.MainWndProc + $2C
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433266]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[004565DD]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.StopHintTimer + $15
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+, 1990 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 2006-01-02 21:29:14
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: AniFran on January 22, 2006, 09:45:37 PM
Hi, i was wondering is there any plans for "https" protical support? I would like to be able to use HTTPS and not normal http protical.

Thanks
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 23, 2006, 04:49:09 AM
No. Was discussed before.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 24, 2006, 03:41:24 PM
Quote from: "prob"
Whats the file size limit. I tried to tranfer this 6 gig file in my home network but it seems to not be able to. I tried it with a download manager but the same things happens. It seems that it has a  2gig limit. Is that true?

So is there a limit?  8O
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on January 24, 2006, 06:50:55 PM
i think the latest version started suddenly take lots of CPU and the window didn't update when transferring one file...why are the older betas removed? would be nice if they were available still... didn't have this problem with beta 31 i think it was...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Ralf on January 25, 2006, 07:44:38 PM
Access violation at address 004D1A37 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000008
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 25.01.2006 20:43:57
[004D1A37]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.processDisconnecting (Line 561, "HSlib.pas" + 1) + $3
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[0047BA69]{hfs.exe     } JclDebug.TJclStackBaseList.Create (Line 3114, "..\Source\JclDebug.pas" + 3) + $0
[004D1C64]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.freeConnList (Line 649, "HSlib.pas" + 7) + $B
[0047BA69]{hfs.exe     } JclDebug.TJclStackBaseList.Create (Line 3114, "..\Source\JclDebug.pas" + 3) + $0
[004D1999]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpSrv.Destroy (Line 549, "HSlib.pas" + 7) + $3
[00403C70]{hfs.exe     } System.TObject.Free + $8
[0040EB50]{hfs.exe     } SysUtils.FreeAndNil + $8
[0050BD98]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.beforeQuit (Line 6177, "main.pas" + 9) + $5
[0050BDB7]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.FormClose (Line 6183, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0044EF77]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.DoClose + $17
[004524B1]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TCustomForm.Close + $55
[00507427]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Exit1Click (Line 4938, "main.pas" + 0) + $3
[0045C6CA]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D8A3]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E582]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045E4D1]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00433266]{hfs.exe     } Contnrs.TComponentList.GetItems + $A
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: Intel, Pentium 4, 2820 MHz MMX
Display  : 1280x1024 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 02.01.2006 21:29:14
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 26, 2006, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
i think the latest version started suddenly take lots of CPU and the window didn't update when transferring one file...why are the older betas removed? would be nice if they were available still... didn't have this problem with beta 31 i think it was...
I have most of the old betas available.  If you still need one or more to try, just let me know which ones you need.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ~GeeS~ on January 26, 2006, 09:08:25 PM
maverick:
Maybe you already know: Thx , I was served!  :^: and how to save some time:
http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=decode+javascript&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8  
But anyway:  :^^:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 26, 2006, 10:47:18 PM
~GeeS~
Yes, I'm well aware of all of that.  Not new to me.  Just a personal choice for personal reasons.  Thanks for dropping by. :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: slothman on January 27, 2006, 04:15:00 AM
prob: The 2gb limit is inside your download manager.  I'm pretty sure hfs doesn't suffer from this limitation.  It was removed about a dozen betas ago.  To test you are able to download the file, try using wget for win32

http://users.ugent.be/~bpuype/wget/

Yes it is a command line utility, so it may be kind of annoying to use.  What I do, is on the computer you want to download from the hfs server, launch a web browser and browse to the hfs page.  Then right click on a file and click copy link url.  Then goto start -> run -> cmd

Browse to the directory where you put wget.exe and type wget

Then hit the space bar.

Then right click anywhere in the cmd window.  Then click paste.  Then hit enter.  It should be downloading at that point.  If it doesn't get past 2gb, either hfs or your file system is limiting it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: xman2002 on January 28, 2006, 12:12:34 AM
Hello :)

The maximum file size seems to be 533 MB.

Greetz Tillo
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 28, 2006, 09:22:41 PM
Quote from: "xman2002"
Hello :)

The maximum file size seems to be 533 MB.

Greetz Tillo

No that is not correct. I made another test. 2.0beta34

Created a 10GiB testfile and added it to HFS. Then downloaded...

Internet Explorer 6.0SP2: stopped exactly at 2147483648 bytes, no error.
Mozilla Firefox 1.5: stopped at 4294971734 bytes with an error.
Opera 8.51: stopped at 2.147.483.648 bytes, no error.
Getright was able to download the whole file. Note that I used only one file-segment, that means, 10GiB with one connection.

This is the logfile from Getright:
Code: [Select]
GetRight Download Log For testfile.zip
--------------------------------------------------
URL: http://pluto:81/testfile.zip
To: E:\Download\2006-01-28\testfile.zip
--------------------------------------------------
Start: 2006/01/28 21:36:00 at byte 0
Finish: 2006/01/28 23:02:19
--------------------------------------------------
Size: 10,737,418,240
Time: 1:27:11
Speed: 2004.5K/sec
--------------------------------------------------

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 28, 2006, 10:26:25 PM
MarkV

Interesting.  Looks like the max file size limitation is determined by the type of browser used and possibly by the type of download manager used.  Doesn't look like there is a limitation as far as HFS goes  otherwise I don't think HFS would have accepted the 10GB file.

I'm curious.  Can you run the same test with Opera (latest is v8.51)? It would be nice to see how the 3 major browsers compare.  If you don't  use it, I understand.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on January 28, 2006, 10:54:28 PM
No I don't use Opera, but I'm in a testing mood B)
I think I'll give it a try...
edit: Opera test completed, original post updated.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 29, 2006, 04:54:38 AM
Thanks MarkV.

I thought the download limit for IE and Opera would be around 2 GB.  Your testing confirms that.  Firefox test results is a little troubling to me as I also thought it should have the same/similar download capacity as the other two browsers.  Your test results show firefox has about twice the download capacity compared to the other 2 browsers *but* with a download error which isn't good.  I don't imagine such huge files are transfered that often to be really concerned about it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on January 29, 2006, 10:15:35 AM
Hello Maverick,

Firefox having twice as much bytes downloaded is clear concerning the data types and their ranges in windows:

Code: [Select]
integer   32 bit  -2147483647 -  2147483648
DWORD     32 bit            0 -  4294971734
Int64     64 bit        -2^64 - 2^64

DWORD is sometimes called Unsigned Integer or something like this. I used the Delphi/Pascal names of the data types, in C(++) they are named slightly different.

HFS uses Int64 all the time. This means files can be nearly unlimited in size. If you type 2^64 in your calculator, you know what I mean  :D
16 Million Terabyte, if I didn't make a mistake in dividing it down from number of bytes...

So you see, the only problem can be the downloader. HFS is great!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on January 29, 2006, 12:32:22 PM
Hello Martok.

Thanks for the information.  Very interesting.  An "YES" HFS is GREAT!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 04, 2006, 10:52:07 AM
Access violation at address 004D364F in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 0000003E
HFS 2.0 beta34
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 04.02.2006 12:04:18
[004D364F]{hfs.exe     } HSlib.ThttpConn.disconnect (Line 1175, "HSlib.pas" + 1) + $0
[0040417B]{hfs.exe     } System.@HandleAnyException + $33
[004FF3CC]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Kickconnection1Click (Line 3376, "main.pas" + 2) + $0
[0045C6CA]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click + $A6
[0045D8A3]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand + $13
[0045E582]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc + $82
[0045E4D1]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc + $1D
[00428B7C]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 10565, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[00455947]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage + $83
[0045597E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage + $A
[00455B9E]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run + $96
[0050FF8C]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 62, "c:\code\mine\hfs\hfs.dpr" + 14) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows XP Home Edition, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 1"
Processor: AMD, AMD Sempron(tm)   2200+, 1566 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
hfs.exe: Build: 0 02.01.2006 21:29:14
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 06, 2006, 03:14:51 AM
does any one know when the final version is coming out?


------------

Love the program, keep it up
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 06, 2006, 03:44:59 AM
maybe in 5 or 6 years
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on February 07, 2006, 03:10:09 AM
I think final version will be out as soon as this ProcessQ bug is swatted... :roll:

MarkV
Title: HFS Good
Post by: Torp on February 10, 2006, 02:06:46 PM
Wow! HFS is a real good program.. I really like it!
Especially the 2.0 version. Keep up the good work!
I found no bugs yet.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: BowflexMaster on February 12, 2006, 12:28:06 AM
It seems to like using 100%CPU when people are downloading big files, and I'm not quite sure why.

EDIT: Nevermind... I found that was only because stupid Symantec Auto-Protect was scanning the server logs, for every byte that changed...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 15, 2006, 03:31:53 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
why are the older betas removed? would be nice if they were available still... didn't have this problem with beta 31 i think it was...
previous beta is always available just forging the URL for download
since i have little webspace, i can't keep all versions online
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 17, 2006, 09:36:36 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
rejetto,
oui, c'est moi
Quote
1.) Is the template section [upload-failed] still valid?  If so, how is it triggered and when?  I have tried different things (cancelling upload etc.) and this section of the template doesn't get activated.
i fear the only way to get that section ATM is this one: Minimum disk space reached
Quote
2.) I also think "simultaneous" is a better word to use instead of "contemporaneous".
accepted
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 17, 2006, 09:54:46 AM
Quote from: "~GeeS~"
Rejettto,
could you please open a topic called "Router&Port Problems" and make it sticky.
since there is no possibility to move a post to an existant topic, i created a forum
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 17, 2006, 10:01:42 AM
Quote from: "~GeeS~"
Failed to create key *\shell\Add to HFS\command
HFS 2.0 beta34
you got this because, i guess, you were using a limited user instead of an administrator.
anyway, that kind of error is unwanted, i thought it was managed in another way
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 17, 2006, 10:42:08 AM
beta35 has many news, but i want to work on some bugs before releasing it
be patient
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 17, 2006, 10:49:22 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote
1.) Is the template section [upload-failed] still valid?  If so, how is it triggered and when?  I have tried different things (cancelling upload etc.) and this section of the template doesn't get activated.
i fear the only way to fail to get that section ATM is to this: Minimum disk space reached
Doesn't seem to work here.  To test, I have used a minimum disk space free MB number (in limits) that's greater than my actual partition free where my upload folder is located and a upload still went through completely without error.  Maybe that minimum disk space free limit only works with MB's in a certain size range or your drive is "really" short of available free space.  I know this isn't a big issue, but if you get the time, try it and see if it works for you.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 18, 2006, 06:32:11 AM
Can't wait for beta35 :D

Please, Rejetto, can you add an option to the 'Open directly in browser' so that if you leave it blank it acts like a browser normally would and change it so than when you type in the extention it's for what doesn't open directly in the browser because its hard and annoying to go through every extension to open in the browser like it normally would.

Hope you know what I mean, thanks.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2006, 06:34:16 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Doesn't seem to work here.
yes, it was a bug
fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2006, 07:13:22 AM
beta35 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta35.zip

what's new
+ self test improved
+ Menu -> Virtual File System -> "Auto-save every..."
+ Menu -> Options -> "Auto-save every..."
+ File Menu -> "Visible only to anonymous users"
+ File Menu -> "Let download"
+ File Menu -> "Auto-hide empty folders"
+ new template symbols: %number-addresses%, %number-addresses-downloading%
* more external address sources
* filetime sorts from newer to older
* many menu items restricted to expert mode  
- sometimes IE hangs after reaching 100%
- progress frame: progress bar was not working in Firefox and Opera
- ~files.lst showing filenames it shouldn't
- "let browse" was not inherited by subfolders of real folders
- AV on kick connection
- template: [upload-failed] was not working
- other minor bugs
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2006, 07:24:32 AM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
Can't wait for beta35 :D
here it is

Quote
Please, Rejetto, can you add an option to the 'Open directly in browser' so that if you leave it blank it acts like a browser normally would
and how a browser normally would?
the open directly is just a suggestion the browser, it is not forced to do it
if you leave it blank, HFS won't suggest nothing

Quote
and change it so than when you type in the extention it's for what doesn't open directly in the browser because its hard and annoying to go through every extension to open in the browser like it normally would.
you don't have to type normal things... HFS by default already is configured with such things. if you miss something, just tell here.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 19, 2006, 09:57:09 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "maverick"
Doesn't seem to work here.
yes, it was a bug
fixed
Thanks for checking this out rejetto.  [upload-failed] is now detected based on the minimum disk space free set in limits.

However, I have a question for you.  Doesn't HFS first check to see if there is enough free diskspace for the upload before the upload starts?  HFS already knows the full transfer size with %total bytes%.

To test I started a 20MB upload which far exceeded the minimum disk space free limit.  The whole 20MB was first uploaded (somewhere), taking up the same amount of upload time for a full 20 MB file, **BEFORE** the [upload-failed] notification popped up.  I would sure hate to be the one who is actually waiting for an upload like this to complete before being notified that the minimum disk space free limit was exceeded and the upload failed.

Is this the behavior you wanted?

An upload that exceeds the minimum disk space free limit
1.  shouldn't even be allowed to start IMHO
  -or- similar to what you have now ...
2.  the upload should be allowed to start and run but **just until** the minimum disk space free limit is reached, then quit, and the [upload-failed] notification pops up with the reason why the upload failed.
Title: Only Port 80
Post by: Quanta on February 19, 2006, 10:17:49 AM
G'Day Rejetto,

After I upgraded to Beta35 I only can use port 80. Before I can use every port I want. I Checked everything and did not chance anything. Every time I put in the portnumber I want to use and switch over to ON, the port chanced back to port 80. The portnumber I want to use is not in use by any other program. In fact, every other portnumber than 80 won't work.

I'm goin back to Beta34 to see if the problem is gone, I will let you now if it does.

Greetz, Quanta.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 19, 2006, 10:33:06 AM
I confirm quanta's finding.

HFS v2.0 beta 35 will only allow port 80 no matter what other port you try to use.

Must be a bug.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Quanta on February 19, 2006, 10:42:37 AM
Oke, i'm back and running Beta34 now without any problems. So I also think it's a bug in Beta 35.

Keep up the good work (whenever you have the time for it..:-))

Greetz, Quanta.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 19, 2006, 10:54:13 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta35 what's new
+ Menu -> Options -> "Auto-save every..."
I don't see this in menu -> options (other options?).  I do see it in menu -> virtual file system
This might be just a posting error.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on February 19, 2006, 01:23:55 PM
Yep HFS is only working with port 80. Please fix this rejetto.

Thanks!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2006, 06:48:58 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Is this the behavior you wanted?
this is the behavior expected by HTTP.
an upload is an HTTP request.
i can answer only after the request is complete.
well, i could break the connection, but this way the browser would just say that an error has occurred.
the break would PROBABLY be a better solution for big files, but SURELY a worst solution for little files.
thereforse, it is a protocol limitation.
of course, if anyone has suggestions...
maybe adding a warning in the upload page...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2006, 06:54:28 PM
beta36 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta36.zip

- fixes the port bug
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 19, 2006, 06:56:09 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta35 what's new
+ Menu -> Options -> "Auto-save every..."
I don't see this in menu -> options (other options?).  I do see it in menu -> virtual file system
This might be just a posting error.
yes, it is a typo, Menu -> Save options ->...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 19, 2006, 09:50:28 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "maverick"
Is this the behavior you wanted?
this is the behavior expected by HTTP.
an upload is an HTTP request.
i can answer only after the request is complete.
If it is a protocol limitation, we will have to live with it.  Breaking the connection producing a browser error wouldn't be a good solution as the person uploading wouldn't know what happened and why it happened and may just attempt to send the file again producing the same error.

Adding a warning to the upload page may be the best solution for now.  We can easily do this with a folder comment or by adding some additional comments when using %diskfree% in the upload pages.  I guess you can consider this issue closed.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 20, 2006, 01:05:37 AM
Is there a list somewhere that shows all of the valid template symbols?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 20, 2006, 05:03:09 AM
beta37 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta37.zip

please, tell if processQ is still alive (no need for full reports)

what's new
+ Log Menu -> "Apache log file format..."
- N-th attempt to fix the processQ bug
- possible AV switching off the server
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 20, 2006, 05:09:58 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Is there a list somewhere that shows all of the valid template symbols?
yes, it is sticked in the template forum ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 20, 2006, 09:06:35 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "maverick"
Is there a list somewhere that shows all of the valid template symbols?
yes, it is sticked in the template forum ;)
Thanks.  Didn't think to look there.  That list was posted on Dec 16, 2004 and never updated.

Quote
what's new
+ Log Menu -> "Apache log file format..."
Can you suggest a good freeware apache log analyzer that would work with these log files from HFS?

Quote
what's new
- possible AV switching off the server
What does this mean? Is it to stop antivirus programs from switching off the server?

HFS is really taking shape.  Good Job,Well Done.  With luck you just might have killed that processQ bug this time.  I feel that a HFS v2.0 FINAL is getting very close.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Azag on February 20, 2006, 10:58:58 AM
This is sweet! I had been waiting for an apache type compliant log format just so I could see or send myself logs that group the data nicely for viewing and stats, ect.  Wasn't expecting it any time soon as you had bigger things to take on with processQ bug and understandibly so. Thankfully not suffering this bug myself or at least not getting an error per se. My AV scanner which I use a lot haven't had conflict either tahnk goodness as I can imagine this would be quite a hassle for those effected.  I use mine AV and AS scanners in on-demand only in general and they are not used for monitoring as I do this myself since I am well versed in detecting and collection /analysis of malware (I'm kind of a security hobbist you could say.)  But have had some strange behavior which is only best shown in screen shots.
This problem has got better for me since around beta30 or so and doesn't eat up cpu cycles anymore which is very good to see but still eats up the RAM and connections in log window in GUI leave grayed out ghosts of old connections even after beeing closed and making the little scroll on the side fill up and by the way this behavoir still happens with external logging all off and no logging in video just the current connections on the bottom of the interface fill up and sometimes can't cope. this seems to be the result of to many connections to fast from abusive download managers which probably seem really great to the end user but totally disregard the hammering of a server and seems the buggier they are the more people like them...since most people using them to visit me don't realize or know any better.   ;)   This hammering also causes some weird phantom ports (ususally one to open) sometimes that is connected to nothing and it is not a rootkit, trojan, or worm ect. of any sort as I have tracked this and checked extensively to be sure and scan with Kaspersky Anti-Virus Pro  and NOD32 and SpyBot S&D and Ad-Aware SE Pro, SpywareBlaster, MS AntiSpyware Beta, UnHackMe, AnalogX Script Defender, F-secure Blacklight Beta, CWShedder, HiJackThis, IceSword, and CCleaner si used after browsing before I ever reboot.  :lol:  :P   Sorry for long list I like to test a lot of software and all is not active or run at once or anything crazy but is used fequently and kept updated daily.  I run Win XP SP1 w/ all updates (SP2 sucks imho) on 1GHz Athlon processor w/ 640MB SDRAM everything runs cool and no hardware problems and don;'t overlclock but use an open side panel with large oscillating fan for extra cooling so my system will last until I can afford better.  :lol: Probelm seems to start a while after a byte ranged download manager (or browser?) tries to access/downlaod file to fast like I said but I have only screenshots as this is not causing an erro  or shutdown of HFS.  I try to hide the true nature of the server taht is running from my guests due to the type of people my site sometimes attracts as the would love to find a way to exploit me or hack out a backdoor so to speak and as such I have edited the template be clear. So if you see my site don't think I remove the link here or HFS tag for any other reason as I am not looking to steal your hard work and would never even think of doing so ...if it weren't for your software I would have no site to play with hell I don't even use any ads to pay for my weak broadband through wireless and I'm lucky to get what I have speed wise at all since I am 150' from router w/out wires. ;)   If anybody has any hints or Ideas about this weird problem of mine which could help or improve it let me know.   rejetto hats off to you for the quick update responses you have made recently and nice new features.  If I new which libs were needed and learned how to code Delphi better I would try to help add features sicne this is open source but I need to learn more and read a couple of books of course it would take many years before I would have a fraction of your skills as a coders but we all gotta start somewhere.  :lol:  Here is links to the errors/weird problem and don't forget to notice the grayed out lines and lengthy scrool filled up in the connections list.  Thanks again.  Screenshot are here please not e files are set with there attributes hdden so you may have to use FOLDER OPTIONS--> Show Hidden Files and Folders
(for you to view them in windows this is done for obvious reasons ..again to hide them from regulars who surf my site ssadly or some other hacker types or wannbe ones):

http://vxchaos.cjb.net/Uploads/SERVER%20ERRORS/Abnormal%20Extra%20Port%20Open%20in%20HFS.JPG

http://vxchaos.cjb.net/Uploads/SERVER%20ERRORS/Clogged%20with%20dead%20connections.JPG

http://vxchaos.cjb.net/Uploads/SERVER%20ERRORS/HFS%20Problem%20pic2.JPG

http://vxchaos.cjb.net/Uploads/SERVER%20ERRORS/HFS%20Problem%20pic1.JPG


I will leave these links to these hidden files up for only a few days hopefully long enough for others to see pics and see if anyone elses has exxperienced this beside me.  I they give to much detail about visitors or anything than please admin view and remove links from the forum if you wish hopefull not a problem thoughI don't think otherwise I wouldn't post to forum and just send info direct from email. Thanks in advance for any help or hints all.  :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 20, 2006, 01:41:23 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Thanks.  Didn't think to look there.  That list was posted on Dec 16, 2004 and never updated.
then surely it lacks something

Quote
Quote
what's new
+ Log Menu -> "Apache log file format..."
Can you suggest a good freeware apache log analyzer that would work with these log files from HFS?
http://www.snapfiles.com/freeware/webpublish/fwlogalyzer.html

Quote
Quote
what's new
- possible AV switching off the server
What does this mean? Is it to stop antivirus programs from switching off the server?
AV in what's new always stands for access violation
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 20, 2006, 04:33:39 PM
about the extra open port:
it is not normal at all, i had a look at source code and it should be impossible, so i would ensure that port is open.
try telnetting localhost at such port and see if it opens.
if it doesn't, then it is fake information.
if it even opens, i would test quitting HFS and watching the port to see if it stay open.

about the ghost connections, well, it is a bug, so it should be fixed, doesn't matter if downloader are polite or not. :)
how can i reproduce this bug?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 20, 2006, 05:02:33 PM
Azag

Try Current Ports (freeware) - gives you much more information than what you are using now. I've caught some spyware using this.

http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/cports.zip
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 20, 2006, 07:56:39 PM
v2.0 beta 37

The default template progress bar in [progress-upload-file] and [progress-download-file] hasn't been fixed. (must have been missed).

To fix, should be:
<div class=out_bar><div class=in_bar style="width:%perc%px"></div></div><span class=perc>%perc%% complete</span></div>
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 21, 2006, 12:01:01 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
The default template progress bar in [progress-upload-file] and [progress-download-file] hasn't been fixed. (must have been missed).
forgot one thing recompiling... |)
next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Azag on February 21, 2006, 06:06:00 AM
Thanks for the feedback both rejetto and maverick. I was mistaken on what AV meant hehe but rarely had that problem.  :#)  Thx for taking time to answer me back.  I am using TCPView v2.34 and Active Ports v1.4 for monitoring. I will try the program you suggested maverick so I can try to gather more info and maybe get some insite as to if this is a bug or other problem. I have tried a lot of angles to analyze this for months including various sniffers but i'm still scratching my head trying to figure out the cause and how to reproduce the bug sicne I have no log or debug data for this since there is no error or log info to show.  :eek:  Does HFS have a debug switch hidden that i can use from commandline maybe? I will try the telnet to check in case did try http and ftp to open listening port that shouldn't be there but connection was refused adn it doesn't look like anyone has ever gotten in on a different port other than normal port 80, so I don't think I am being comprimised in any way. I might also mention I use a free redirect to my real IP which is obvious but worth mentioning.  It used to be no-ip.com service but now is cjb.net but not sure this would have any real impact on the situation. Also some of the listening ports you will notice are from the router i believe and aren't anything to worry about but are normally there after there when my connection is alive but can't be accessed by others either. It was just the extra occasional listening port from HFS that has had be baffled. :?    I will keep watching and post back any new info that might help shed light on this soon as I have new data and of course keep reading the forum.  Thanks for all the help and this great program.  My email is vxchaos-at-gmail.com and site is http://vxchaos.cjb.net or http://vxchaos.official.ws if anyone wants to reach me privately or otherwise for anything. Feel free to stop by my site anytime if anyone needs some good tools, info/eBooks,ect. I got lots of stuff.   :D   Sorry, I am long winded sometimes.  ;)

Peace,

Azag
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Azag on February 21, 2006, 06:31:33 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
about the extra open port:
it is not normal at all, i had a look at source code and it should be impossible, so i would ensure that port is open.
try telnetting localhost at such port and see if it opens.
if it doesn't, then it is fake information.
if it even opens, i would test quitting HFS and watching the port to see if it stay open.

about the ghost connections, well, it is a bug, so it should be fixed, doesn't matter if downloader are polite or not. :)
how can i reproduce this bug?

Almost forgot to mention it but yes extra port closes after quitting HFS. I checked that several times in the past to see what would happen after quitting.
Not sure how to reproduce the ghost conections yet but I will try some several download managers on myself to test. I can only say that the ghost connections and extra port seem to manifest at the same time from what I observed but maybe this is some weird software conflict from me browsing (but happens anyway even if I don't so maybe not) while others are on my site.  I stripped down running services from Administrative
Tools and kill anything not needed in Task Manager for speed and security. About 17 to 22 running tasks on average. I always watching for rogue processes and have a good understanding of what they are (the normal or bad ones to watch for.)  Don't know if this new info might help but figured I would let you know.  Thanks again.  Keep up the great work.  :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 21, 2006, 06:53:30 AM
i didn't say anything about your "dead connections".
it is absolutely normal, Windows doesn't release system resources instantly after closing a TCP connection, those are the ones waiting to be released, and are not working.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 21, 2006, 01:08:26 PM
Please refesh my memory.  Can you tell me what "Specific HTML for Download Managers" does and what Specific HTML is expected with that setting enabled?  (Menu -> Other Options).

What is the default setting for this - enabled or disabled.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Azag on February 21, 2006, 03:39:43 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i didn't say anything about your "dead connections".
it is absolutely normal, Windows doesn't release system resources instantly after closing a TCP connection, those are the ones waiting to be released, and are not working.

I understand about the dead connections what I meant referring to ghost connections was those gray horizontal bars in bottom of GUI with the list of active connections and transfers. Even after turning the Server off they are still there and infoabout them can be revealed with right click  (with leave disconnection connections OFF) this shouldn't happen and doesn't make sense to me but it happens that they are still there even after killing my internet connection by turning the network connection off.  Also forgot to mention that after this behavior when I turn HFS off and try to quit, whether or not I am connected to the internet, HFS will not shutdown. It will only shutdown by killing the process in Task Manager or an external process killer.  It is not hung since I can still click buttons in GUI and even turn it on again and run but once I see those gray bars where old connections had been it is then not possible to quit HFS.  This seems weird but I could maybe better show proof with a flash presentation using Demo Builder or something so you see what I mean. See the pictures I uploaded to refer to what I said about "gray bars" in the live connections manager spot (bottom) in the GUI.  I have also uploaded a TCPView report and a CurrPorts report of the connections just when someone had overloaded it a few minutes ago with to many requests to fast and this caused the "bug" to appear or at least this was the capture of my connections a few mere seconds after it happened. They were using a download manager  the used a "byte range" type of downloader that seems to cause this behavior almost always but not sure of the model or maker of download manager since if was not referred to with right click info but was most certainly not a standard browser from my experience and User-Agent info revealed nothing but Mozilla/4.0 but it was not and mouse over says: <unknown>
"Byte range" example:   Range: bytes=128480-1637017
Sorry for confusing explanations.  :#)  :lol:

Here you can check the reports if they might help:

http://vxchaos.cjb.net/Uploads/SERVER%20ERRORS/TCPView%20Report%202-12-06.txt

http://vxchaos.cjb.net/Uploads/SERVER%20ERRORS/CurrPorts%20report%202-12-06.html

I apologize again if I am being a pain in your ass rejetto by bring my problem to you at this point when your probably busy as hell to begin with.
Any input is greatly appreciated though even if you can't find anyone else with this problem.  :?  I intend keep running it whether or not I can fix this sicne this is the best program of it's type I've ever tested and at this time the most secure which in my mind makes it priceless.  :D
People seem to like to penetration test my site sometimes and with HFS I can ususally catch them in the act...then I temp ban them or perma if they are a real problem. ;)  :lol: It is a lot harder to do that in real time with any other server if not impossible.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 24, 2006, 03:32:57 AM
those reports are useless, i fear :(
dead connections in HFS should not be related to unreleased system resources (sockets)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Azag on February 24, 2006, 06:40:50 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
those reports are useless, i fear :(
dead connections in HFS should not be related to unreleased system resources (sockets)

Well thanks for taking a look.  I wish I had more useful info to show but maybe in time.  :#)  I suspect it is the way my older Linksys routerdeals with to many data requests to quick or a misconfiguration in it or somewhere else on my part. There appears to be no real harm, nor memory leak, nor any resource eating problem any more so I am very thankful for that. Perhaps in time with newer versions bug will disappear since as I said thsi problem is very minor compared to how it use to be (no 100% CPU and no large RAM resource is being lost anymore which is a very good thing.)  So if I discover something more insiteful to help clear this up or if the bug just stops or there is a major change I will let you know. I there are any third party tools I could use to do a real time debug dump that would give you better info to look at like some decompiler or debugger (IDA pro or other) or even Borland Delphi itself.  You would of course have to tell me the needed options or parameters to use.  ;)   But either way I realize even to look if a bug was found (not necessarily since it may not be HFS fault at all) that it would take some considerable time to fix if possible.  Point is I am in no rush and if there si anything I can do to help I am more than willing to do whatever I can. Just ask.  Thanks and keep up the good work as always. :D  
One question relating to maverick's last one.  
Does the  "Specific HTML for download managers" option have to be checked in order to allow downloaders to resume their unfinished downloads  or will they resume without it. Also what does this option actually do?  Just wondering how that works. Okay cyaz...  :bye:  :^^:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 24, 2006, 08:03:04 AM
the Specific HTML for download managers option uses a special template when Getright is browsing (or others)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on February 24, 2006, 01:06:46 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
the Specific HTML for download managers option uses a special template when Getright is browsing (or others)
Did a test.  Maybe it is just me, but I didn't see a special template and it is enabled.  Does a download manager browse?  All that was really required for the one's that I have used is to just supply the dowload link to the program and let it do its work.

But, I did notice something that might need fixing.

I don't use Getright but I do use Download Accelerator Plus (DAP).
In Menu -> Limits -> max simultaneous downloads from a single address:
1. Setting - "no limits" -> DAP starts 10 downloads for the same file.  Resume IS supported.
2. Setting - "anything but no limits" ->  DAP starts only 1 download no matter what the limit is set at.  Resume is NOT supported when limits are active.

Downloading with my Opera browser:
1. Setting - "no limits" - works correctly - resume IS supported.
2. Setting - "anything but no limits" - works correctly - resume IS supported.

beta 37
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on February 25, 2006, 09:53:38 AM
Quote from: "ataxy"
i have a problem with beta37 everytime i load my vfs it hangs about a third of the way in its loading of it, task manager says not responding even if i let it go for 30 min
you can send your VFS file privately to my email.
i will have a look at it and try to understand the problem.

Quote from: "Azag"
I suspect it is the way my older Linksys routerdeals with to many data requests to quick or a misconfiguration in it or somewhere else on my part.
i think it is just a bug in HFS
the first problem is to reproduce it

Quote from: "maverick"
Does a download manager browse?
getright, fdm and flashget do

Quote
I don't use Getright but I do use Download Accelerator Plus (DAP).
...Resume is NOT supported when limits are active.
i tested with DAP7
it refuses to download at all
then tested DAP8
sometimes it tells SUPPORTED, sometimes not
it seems to me it is just bugged   >:(
...sad because i intended using DAP as download manager
btw, if i kick connections DAP doesn't automatically retry downloading the file. is there a way to do it?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 01, 2006, 09:46:19 AM
how can i edit the html file ?? ... sice beta 36 i couldnt find the option in "other options"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 01, 2006, 12:44:53 PM
Switch to Expert Mode.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 06, 2006, 04:30:26 PM
beta38 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta38.zip

what's new
+ Menu -> Switch ON/OFF
+ warning on many items
* %diskfree% now considers the minimum disk space set
- errors in progress bars
- setting a drive in "edit resource" led to problems
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 06, 2006, 04:35:46 PM
ok boys... with beta38, what are the lasting problems?
i know the update feature doesn't work for somebody.
i have no idea how much time it will take to fix it, i think i'd better publish the stable with this problem since it is not very important.

it will take some time before documentation is updated. it would be cool if someone will help with it.

see now how segmented downloads are nice to watch, now that a graphical bug has been fixed. :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on March 06, 2006, 05:38:32 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
i know the update feature doesn't work for somebody.

Yep, I still got errors. Maybe Windows is not ready to start the exe?
I would try it myself, but I have only Delphi 4 here, so I sadly can't compile HFS. Anyway, would you please consider trying this as the batch file:
Code: [Select]
start /wait hfs.new.exe -q
move "%s" "%shfs.old.exe"
move /y hfs.new.exe "%2:shfs.exe"
start "%2:shfs.exe"
del %0
Instead of 'DEL '+BATCH_FILE+CRLF, you may use 'DEL %0', just for a better look.

And before the execNew, some small delaying like sleep(100) would be good to give Windows some time to close all files.
Why do you close HFS with a -q call instead of closing itself?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 07, 2006, 01:17:22 AM
Quote from: "Martok"
start /wait hfs.new.exe -q
i think this may fix the problem
Quote
Why do you close HFS with a -q call instead of closing itself?
so that i'm sure that batch is running when HFS is closing
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 07, 2006, 01:46:16 AM
I have noticed a couple of problems with v2.0 beta 38.

1. Menu -> IP Address -- shows an INVALID IP Address (it isn't my address).  I have never seen this problem before this beta 38.


2. Menu -> IP Address -> Dynamic DNS Updater for No-IP -- HFS is not contacting dynupdate.no-ip.com  This feature worked ok in beta 37.  Not working at all for me in beta 38.


maverick
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 07, 2006, 02:21:16 AM
1. it is an IP detected with the "find external", right? probably one of the servers i have in list is inaccurate. using your http analyzer you may find which one, so i can remove it from the list.

2. HFS does the update ONLY IF the external IP has changed since the last update. the value of the last update is kept in the cfg-line last-external-address. you may check if it differs from yours.

...and it works only with the address HFS finds itself, it doesn't matter if you type a custom address or switch to another one.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 07, 2006, 03:52:08 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
1. it is an IP detected with the "find external", right? probably one of the servers i have in list is inaccurate. using your http analyzer you may find which one, so i can remove it from the list.
Yes, just checked and it is the IP detected with the "find external address".  But what it finds isn't correct.  I have only noticed this problem with beta 38.  It looks like you are using myip.se and myip.dk to check ip address.  Both of these "might" be causing the problem.

Quote
2. HFS does the update ONLY IF the external IP has changed since the last update. the value of the last update is kept in the cfg-line last-external-address. you may check if it differs from yours.
The last external address shown in hfs.ini is not my address as I mentioned before.  Just checked and this time I am able to connect to my no-ip account.  I'm not sure why it worked this time.  My HTTP analyzer does not show HFS trying to login to my no-ip account (like beta 37 did)  but there is a HFS connection to dynupdate.no-ip.com/ip.php to check IP address which was correct.  I think the problem I mentioned with the DNS Updater might have something to do with the wrong external IP address HFS was finding.

Quote
...and it works only with the address HFS finds itself, it doesn't matter if you type a custom address or switch to another one.
Yes I know.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 07, 2006, 11:57:31 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Yes, just checked and it is the IP detected with the "find external address".  But what it finds isn't correct.  I have only noticed this problem with beta 38.  It looks like you are using myip.se and myip.dk to check ip address.  Both of these "might" be causing the problem.
to know which of them, just go to the websites www.myip.se and www.myip.dk and see who is replying wrong.

Quote
I think the problem I mentioned with the DNS Updater might have something to do with the wrong external IP address HFS was finding.
yes, it may be
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2006, 02:16:34 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
to know which of them, just go to the websites www.myip.se and www.myip.dk and see who is replying wrong.
That is one of the first things I did yesterday.  As I said before those addresses "might" be causing the problem.  Today, I'm not to sure it is the case.  

All I know for sure right now is that when HFS finds the wrong external address (the last digit of the real IP is missing), and when that invalid IP address shows up in the list of IP addresses in HFS,  I cannot access my no-ip account.  So, I am almost sure there is a relationship between the external address found by HFS and the DNS Updater problem.

Do you not see a wrong external address from time to time in your HFS list of IP addresses?  It is strange because sometimes HFS will find the correct external address and other times it won't (last digit of real IP is missing).  The first time I noticed this problem is in beta 38.  You are aware of the routines used when HFS finds an external address.  I think the problem is there.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 07, 2006, 02:27:55 PM
Sorry, the above post was from me.  Thought I was logged in. :#)  For now, I am going back to beta 37.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 07, 2006, 03:44:14 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
All I know for sure right now is that when HFS finds the wrong external address (the last digit of the real IP is missing),
last missing digit?
this is enough... i fixed the bug :)
now waiting for an email from martok before beta39
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 07, 2006, 04:23:13 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
last missing digit?
Check your PM
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 07, 2006, 05:43:11 PM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "rejetto"
last missing digit?
Check your PM
ok, but already fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 07, 2006, 06:53:33 PM
beta 39 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta39.zip

what's new
+ command line: -i X (load/save hfs.ini in folder X)
* hfs.ini by default saved in the same folder with hfs.exe
* list of services for external address is now updated online at start
- little problem with port box
- find external address didn't work with 15 chars length addresses
- automatic update not always working
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 08, 2006, 04:11:42 AM
in beta 38 you introduced
Quote
* %diskfree% now considers the minimum disk space set
I didn't check if it was working in beta 38 but it doesn't look like it's working in beta 39
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 05:36:54 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
I didn't check if it was working in beta 38 but it doesn't look like it's working in beta 39
fixed in next beta
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 06:40:09 AM
great features this time ;)
planned for 2.1, i decided to have them for 2.0, i think they are important.
after these features HFS goes to final.

see this topic for a guide to the "load comments" feature (http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2978)


beta 40 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta40.zip

what's new
+ load comments from external files
+ File Menu -> "bind/unbind root to real-folder"
+ File Menu -> "switch to real-folder"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 08, 2006, 07:31:15 AM
Quote
in beta 38 you introduced

* %diskfree% now considers the minimum disk space set

I didn't check if it was working in beta 38 but it doesn't look like it's working in beta 39   

fixed in next beta
You have really been busy the last few days. :^^:

beta 40 - %diskfree% - you are adding the minimum disk space to the actual free space.  You should be subtracting the minimum disk space from the actual free space to give you the amount of diskfree that a person is able to upload.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 07:54:00 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
beta 40 - %diskfree% - you are adding the minimum disk space to the actual free space.  You should be subtracting the minimum disk space from the actual free space to give you the amount of diskfree that a person is able to upload.
i just tested: it is subtracting  :?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 08, 2006, 08:00:50 AM
Not working here.  I have 9GB free in my upload partition.  Minimum disk space is 2GB (in megabytes).  %diskfree% reports 11GB - should be 7 GB
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 08, 2006, 08:27:50 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ load comments from external files
Works as advertised. :)

As upload folders are real folders is there a way to give users the option to add their own file comments to the file they uploaded?  (add their comments to a hfs.comments.txt file located in the upload folder)?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 08:34:27 AM
whoops, a 32bit overflow :)
redownload to see it fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 08:35:44 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
As upload folders are real folders is there a way to give users the option to add their own file comments to the file they uploaded?  (add their comments to a hfs.comments.txt file located in the upload folder)?
no need for it, single file comments works also in real-folders
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 08, 2006, 08:51:54 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
no need for it, single file comments works also in real-folders
Yes, but I have to manually create each single file comment file - right or am I missing something?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 08:53:41 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "rejetto"
no need for it, single file comments works also in real-folders
Yes, but I have to manually create each single file comment file - right or am I missing something?
sorry, it was referred to the sentence in parentheses
the other is in to-do
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: thecow5 on March 08, 2006, 03:37:48 PM
Hi all, I am able to add Google and MSN search to my webpage but would like to know if a search option could be added to the HSF server so a person can search files on the server, lets say a person is looking for a song I can place an m3u file in the HSF folder and the search would look in that m3u file for the file name.
thanks, this is a great software  :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 08, 2006, 05:20:45 PM
when you ask for features, see if they are already in the to-do list, or this forum will be filled with answers like "it is already in to-do" ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 10, 2006, 03:23:22 PM
A work around until the to do is complete, you can create a ***.bat file to run from your desktop and drop a list of the music (***.mp3) into a ***.txt file within the music directory.  Get you friends to download the ***.txt file and they can search the file (edit,find) for the song, artist, whatever.  I use this method and the family love it.

Oops forgot to login....

Aarf
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: aarf on March 10, 2006, 08:54:58 PM
Create a new .txt file, rename it whatever .bat and put this in the body

echo off
cls
dir YourRootDirectoryHere:\MusicFolderHere\*.mp3 /s >SameRootHere:\SameMusicFolderHere\MyMusic.txt

Double click your .bat file when complete and check er out.

Hope it helps
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 11, 2006, 01:05:50 PM
beta 41 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta41.zip

what's new
+ Menu -> IP address -> Dynamic DNS updater -> "See last server response..."
* "Abort file addition" more visible
- dns updater problems
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 11, 2006, 06:41:56 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta 41
what's new
+ Menu -> IP address -> Dynamic DNS updater -> "See last server response..."
* "Abort file addition" more visible
Sorry rejetto, but...
1. I don't see "See last server response" in my beta 41
2. "abort file addition" more visible - I still haven't come across it.  Where do I find it?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 11, 2006, 07:23:38 PM
@maverick

"See last server response" does only appear after at least 1 update/try.

@rejetto

I had problems with automatic update (beta40 ---> beta41). It seemed to announce the right (beta41), but downloaded the wrong file (beta40 again). Tried several times, no luck. Updated manually, works now. B)

edit:
Code: [Select]
HFS update info
[last stable]
1.6a
[last untested]
2.0 beta41
[last untested build]
026
[last untested url]
http://www.melauto.it/rejetto/hfs.test.exe
[EOF]

h**p://www.melauto.it/rejetto/hfs.test.exe - maybe the wrong (old) file?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 11, 2006, 07:48:28 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
@maverick

"See last server response" does only appear after at least 1 update/try.
I have loaded and unloaded HFS 4 times.  Cleared my cache.  Accessed my NO-IP account successfully each time.  There must have been at least 1 or possibly more updates and I still don't have the "See last server response"   option in Menu -> IP address -> Dynamic DNS updater.  Maybe that option is buggy.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 11, 2006, 08:10:47 PM
Maybe it is with NO-IP... I tried with DynDNS and the message appeared.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 11, 2006, 10:53:40 PM
Quote from: "MarkV"
Maybe it is with NO-IP... I tried with DynDNS and the message appeared.
I quess that is possible.  rejetto will be able to sort it out. ;)

I don't have a dynDNS or CJB account to test.  I'm not totally sure, but that "last server response" option is probably the same response shown in hfs.ini -> "last-external-address=" .  (A DNS update would take place if that address is different than the current one).
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 11, 2006, 11:27:05 PM
My last server response was notfqdn, which probably means "no update required, IP still unchanged".

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 02:49:56 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
h**p://www.melauto.it/rejetto/hfs.test.exe - maybe the wrong (old) file?
yes, fixed
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 02:54:51 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
I have loaded and unloaded HFS 4 times.  Cleared my cache.  Accessed my NO-IP account successfully each time.  There must have been at least 1 or possibly more updates and I still don't have the "See last server response"   option in Menu -> IP address -> Dynamic DNS updater.  Maybe that option is buggy.
i just tested NO-IP with fake user data.
it "worked", the "see last server response" appeared, and i got this:
Code: [Select]
---------------------------
HFS 2.0 beta41
---------------------------
status=4
---------------------------
OK  
---------------------------
i guess it means i entered wrong password :)

anyway, HFS now logs DNS updates, so you can know when it occours. (other events)

moreover, entering DNS data forces an update. this happen also when external IP doesn't change.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 02:56:30 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
My last server response was notfqdn, which probably means "no update required, IP still unchanged".
from http://www.dyndns.com/developers/specs/return.html
notfqdn
The hostname specified is not a fully-qualified domain name (not in the form hostname.dyndns.org or domain.com).


maybe you can suggest a better message to show in the HFS dialog...?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 12, 2006, 03:15:13 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
maybe you can suggest a better message to show in the HFS dialog...?

Yes - just add a small explantation (or maybe the URL to the page with these descriptions).

Yes I had a typo in my host config, now it's nochg <IP>...
The forced update after entering data may be a problem as DynDNS considers it abusive, if you don't care about the server return message you could block your hostname... :?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 03:43:55 AM
if you enter data correctly, there should be no need to re-do it.
if you enter incorrect data, update is not committed and the policy should be respected.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 12, 2006, 03:59:04 AM
Ok.

With the invalid host data, this is what the log told me:
Code: [Select]
11.03.2006 20:19:13 Dynamic DNS updated: 83.xxx.xxx.xxx - 7 bytes reply
In reality it updated nothing... Maybe the log entries should read more like
Code: [Select]
11.03.2006 20:19:13 Dynamic DNS failed with error code: notfqdn
Successful updates are only good and nochg.


MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 04:03:10 AM
it changes from service to service.
maybe in the future HFS will recognize replies for known services.
for now i just changed the message to a clearer "DNS update requested"
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 12, 2006, 04:25:02 AM
Ok, thank you.

But I think every server, be it DynDNS, NO-IP etc. sends some kind of message back to HFS. You could print that message with the log entry.

Code: [Select]
11.03.2006 20:19:13 DNS update requested: 83.xxx.xxx.xxx - reply: notfqdnWould this be possible?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 04:53:30 AM
nope, some servers sends html (cjb)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 12, 2006, 06:09:42 AM
So how does the "See last server response..." work for cjb then?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 06:16:14 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
So how does the "See last server response..." work for cjb then?
if html is detected, it is saved to a temporary file.html and run (causing the browser to open it)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 12, 2006, 06:22:42 AM
And is it possible to show message in log in case it is not HTML? (HFS can detect HTML, I guess)

I will now stop asking stupid questions and go to bed.  :roll:

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 06:29:39 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
And is it possible to show message in log in case it is not HTML? (HFS can detect HTML, I guess)
the message could be too long.
would you consider a good behaviour to include the message only if shorter than (let's say) 20 chars?
consider HFS may soon recognize such messages for supported services (ver2.1?)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 12, 2006, 08:37:26 AM
rejetto
Quote from: "maverick"
1. I don't see "See last server response" in my beta 41
I waited long enough for my IP address to physically change.  Re-checked HFS and "see last server response" does show up and the full response I get is -> Status=1 which I guess means successful.  I also get a new log entry -> Dynamic DNS updated: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - 8 bytes reply.  So it looks like everything is working correctly for no-ip.

Quote from: "maverick"
2. "abort file addition" more visible - I still haven't come across it. Where do I find it?
how about this?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 12, 2006, 09:21:55 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "maverick"
2. "abort file addition" more visible - I still haven't come across it. Where do I find it?
how about this?
before, it was in the menu
it appears while adding a virtual folder
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 13, 2006, 03:51:31 AM
Quote from: "rejetto"
the message could be too long.
would you consider a good behaviour to include the message only if shorter than (let's say) 20 chars?
consider HFS may soon recognize such messages for supported services (ver2.1?)

For the log on screen, it could be shortened. But if one logs to file, the complete messages would be great. This would aid solving problems by analyzing server messages in log files.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 13, 2006, 03:57:24 AM
Quote from: "MarkV"
For the log on screen, it could be shortened.
if the message is long (html?) shortening is probably meaningless and would fill the log with garbage

Quote
But if one logs to file, the complete messages would be great.
impraticable, the message can be several kb
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 14, 2006, 02:39:26 PM
so, no more problems with dynamic dns....  :?:
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 14, 2006, 02:43:04 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
so, no more problems with dynamic dns....  :?:
No, no problems from me.  Working just fine. (no-ip)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on March 14, 2006, 05:50:18 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
Quote from: "MarkV"
For the log on screen, it could be shortened.
if the message is long (html?) shortening is probably meaningless and would fill the log with garbage

Quote
But if one logs to file, the complete messages would be great.
impraticable, the message can be several kb

I don't think HTML messages should be logged. But e.g. DynDNS messages are rather short... whatever. :P

Maybe a Log what... -> Debug feature to aid debugging?

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 17, 2006, 08:54:29 AM
beta42 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta42.zip

+ understand DNS update replies
* better DNS update logging
- no-ip.com problems
Title: Bug?
Post by: Quanta on March 17, 2006, 12:59:11 PM
G'Day Rejetto,

After I installed beta42 and give the ok to start, It only loads about 10% of my VFS file and than it stops and nothing happends. So I put beta41 back and everyting works fine..

A bug in the new beta??

Thanks for HFS!! Keep up the good work!!

Greetz, Quanta.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 17, 2006, 01:15:40 PM
please quanta, contact me privately (http://www.rejetto.com/me) and give me your VFS file. i will track down the bug and fix it.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Quanta on March 17, 2006, 04:48:51 PM
Okee Rejetto,

You've got mail..:-)

Greetz, Quanta.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: thecow5 on March 17, 2006, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
A work around until the to do is complete, you can create a ***.bat file to run from your desktop and drop a list of the music (***.mp3) into a ***.txt file within the music directory.  Get you friends to download the ***.txt file and they can search the file (edit,find) for the song, artist, whatever.  I use this method and the family love it.

Oops forgot to login....

Aarf

thanks aarf, I also found another way.

I opened Winamp or MediaPlayer and created a playlist with all my music (and one for videos) , and saved it as an .m3u PlayList, I then edited the .m3u playlist with notepad removing location of my files and replacing it with the web address of my server.
([Replace this] \\serverboy\Music$\Xavier\Sag es laut.mp3
with this http://mysyte.no-ip.net/music/Xavier/Sag es laut.mp3)

then saved it as a text file, opened that text file in MS Word and save it as a document file.
now all one has to do is use MS Word to open the file and search for the Song, Artist or Album they want then click on it and it will automaticle download providing they have the proper username and password for my site in there download manager it will start downloading or if not they will be prompted with an appelet to enter a username and password.

thanks for your advise, I will also try it your way to see which I like the best.  :D
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 18, 2006, 04:26:03 AM
Quote from: "Quanta"
Okee Rejetto,
You've got mail..:-)
ok, i tested your VFS, and it didn't get stuck, just took time.
it is huge, 8+MB and 46k+ items.
3.5 minutes to load on my laptop. (next versions will show loading time)
how long did you wait before giving up?
what CPU do you have?

anyway, i bet you are using virtual-folders whereas real-folders would be enough.
why are you using virtual-folders? using real-folders this would shorten loading time to only few seconds!  beta42 should have warned you about this.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Quanta on March 18, 2006, 09:06:54 AM
G'Day Rejetto,

After 40 a 50 seconds it just stop loading the VFS file and nothing happens, If I start Beta42 again It just do the samething again..:-(

With Beta41 everything works perfect..

I now I must switch to real-folders, but there are so many that it take a long time to do so.. But i'm working on it..

My cpu is a AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+ with 2 GB of memory and about 2.5 TB storage.

I'm going to try to start Beta42 again, but I don't think it will work after de severall tries I have done yesterday. If it's going to work, I will let you now.

Thanks for analysing my VFS-file, I hope I got it to work with the new Beta's..

Keep up the good work!

Greetz, Quanta.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Quanta on March 18, 2006, 09:31:01 AM
G'Day Rejetto,

I switchted to real-folders (except some private folders) and everyting is working perfect now with Beta42. The VFS-file is now only 68KB and HFS starts within a couple of seconds..:-)

First I was afraid to switch to real-folders because I thougt that I must switch every virtual-folder by hand. Than I discovered the Switch to Real-folders button in the main menu and it was fixed in a couple of seconds..:-)

Stupid of my that I dident notice this before...

I'm "happy" that the fault was on my side, sorry to take up your time.

Thanks for your support!!

Greetz, Quanta.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 18, 2006, 12:04:04 PM
i spent some time analyizing differences between beta41 and 42 and found no reason why it should read a VFS 42 does not. even the loading code is unchanged.
in next beta you will get a cancel button while loading.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 18, 2006, 06:46:48 PM
be careful with this new version, backup your VFS because the format has changed

beta43 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta43.zip

+ you can abort loading VFS and downloading update
+ show how long VFS loading took
+ new VFS format with compression
+ warn you loading incompatible VFS formats
- upload was not disabled on virtual-folders
- set user/pass: inputing a password with empty username did not raise error
- loading vfs and sending hfs in background led to problems
- "switch to real-folder" was active times it should not
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: maverick on March 18, 2006, 08:18:39 PM
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta 43
With this beta I notice that the log entry for the DNS update request and reply no longer shows up.  Is this now the expected behavior or is it a bug?

Quote from: "rejetto"
+ show how long VFS loading took
I don't see this after the vfs is loaded.  Where do I find it?

Quote from: "rejetto"
+ new VFS format with compression
Yes, the vfs is now compressed.  I haven't physically timed the loading of the compressed vfs but it seems to take a little longer to load than the regular vfs.  Could this be because the vfs has to be uncompressed first before loading takes place?  If this is the reason, why compress to begin with?

Quote from: "rejetto"
+ you can abort loading VFS
Why would someone want to abort loading the vfs?  I'm just curious as to the possible reasons why.

Quote from: "rejetto"
be careful with this new version, backup your VFS because the format has changed
As the VFS format has changed, and as there were previous vfs problems mentioned when adding a file to HFS using the shell feature when HFS wasn't running, will the new file added this way to HFS be added properly to the new vfs format?  (I haven't tried it).

maverick
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 19, 2006, 08:25:06 AM
Quote from: "maverick"
Quote from: "rejetto"
beta 43
With this beta I notice that the log entry for the DNS update request and reply no longer shows up.  Is this now the expected behavior or is it a bug?
the update doesn't work anymore at all 8O
a strange bug, not exactly mine, fixed in next beta

Quote
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ show how long VFS loading took
I don't see this after the vfs is loaded.  Where do I find it?
statusbar

Quote
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ new VFS format with compression
Yes, the vfs is now compressed.  I haven't physically timed the loading of the compressed vfs but it seems to take a little longer to load than the regular vfs.  Could this be because the vfs has to be uncompressed first before loading takes place?  If this is the reason, why compress to begin with?
recently i noticed people managing huge VFS files, over 1MB.
compression ratio is sometimes 10:1, very high, so it makes sense with big files.
i now tested with a 750 items (medium-large) VFS and, all in cache, this is the result:
uncompressed 3.7 secs
compressed 3.8 secs
compression ratio 5:1

it seems to me that compression is worthy.
it may be a good idea to introduce compression only over 100 items, it is quite easy for me to implement.

Quote
Quote from: "rejetto"
+ you can abort loading VFS
Why would someone want to abort loading the vfs?  I'm just curious as to the possible reasons why.
large VFSs take even minutes to load, taking 100% CPU.
in this time you may change your mind.

Quote
Quote from: "rejetto"
be careful with this new version, backup your VFS because the format has changed
As the VFS format has changed, and as there were previous vfs problems mentioned when adding a file to HFS using the shell feature when HFS wasn't running, will the new file added this way to HFS be added properly to the new vfs format?  (I haven't tried it).
it should be fully compatible, the sentence was about possible bugs.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 19, 2006, 08:41:48 AM
beta44 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta44.zip

- dns updater was not working anymore
* compression active only for 200+ items
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 20, 2006, 11:34:39 AM
notice: in beta43 a bug was fixed for "switch to real-folder".
it was active for any virtual-folder.
it makes sense only for virtual-folders who once were real-folders.
this bug is fixed but may reappear loading VFS files created with previous versions.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ataxy on March 21, 2006, 03:53:21 PM
bravo rej much improvement in those version keep up the good work
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 21, 2006, 04:53:29 PM
lately i changed many things, also with no new functionality, just to improve code quality.
from now on, no more changes, just testing to get the final version.
i said.
Title: bug report: chinese character filename
Post by: zuxuelin on March 22, 2006, 06:59:20 AM
when i download a file with chinese character filename and specifically extend filename from HFS Server,
for example: the .rar files,
it can not save as by the chinese character filename.

but the .txt files with chinese character filename can save as by the chinese character filename properly.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: guest on March 22, 2006, 10:58:31 PM
When i open the file,
My firewall pops up with the Port question (allow / deny)

hfs hanging on that and
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Mike on March 23, 2006, 12:13:09 AM
You have to give HFS both internet and server access in your firewall. (allow)
Title: Re: bug report: chinese character filename
Post by: rejetto on March 23, 2006, 02:10:17 PM
Quote from: "zuxuelin"
when i download a file with chinese character filename and specifically extend filename from HFS Server,
for example: the .rar files,
it can not save as by the chinese character filename.
fixed in next beta
i noticed in last Opera version they broke the support for such filenames, i shall tell'em  :(
np with IE and firefox instead
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 23, 2006, 02:33:56 PM
beta 45 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta45.zip

what's new
- disabling "shell context menu" was not working
- "bans" and "persistent connections" had no effect on current connections
- problems with non-ascii filenames
- other minor fixes
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: guest on March 23, 2006, 05:20:00 PM
Quote from: "Mike"
You have to give HFS both internet and server access in your firewall. (allow)
I know that .. but before i could the HFS killed itself :)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: 65031 on March 23, 2006, 05:38:58 PM
支持啊,顶起来

我的网站:http://www.zhidu.com
Title: HFS 2.0 since beta 23
Post by: Ace-B on March 23, 2006, 10:37:44 PM
Beta 23 is working fine.
Next releases (tested with beta 34 & beta 40) don't kick "idle" & "Request" connections ! In settings: Menu > Limits > Connectings Timeout > I put values 180 or 300, but users just stain connected after assigned time. HFS settings is stored in INI file, not in registry.
Now I download beta 45 and try to work with it. When it's getting clear about this problem - I wrote here again ! (sorry 4 bad english).
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 24, 2006, 08:46:38 AM
yes, it is a bug, since it is an important feature, i publish a beta just for this bugfix

beta46 @ www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs2.0beta46.zip

what's new
- "connections inactivity timeout" was not working
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ANTS on March 25, 2006, 11:17:10 AM
Rejetto do you have an estimate on when the final version of 2.0 will be released?
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 25, 2006, 02:42:30 PM
less than a week
i'm working right now for releasing
if no one posts other bugs....
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Anonymous on March 25, 2006, 10:35:27 PM
Oh ok awesome Rejetto. Great work!

By the way I found one small 'sort of bug' im using Beta 46.

I the Menu > IP Address I'm using my LAN IP address (192.168.XXX.XXX) however if I click find external ip address then in Menu > IP Adress it automatically switches so External IP without me clicking it. Is it a bug or is that meant to happen?

That's it. Thanks!
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ANTS on March 25, 2006, 10:36:04 PM
Sorry that was me ^^^.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on March 26, 2006, 04:10:45 PM
Quote from: "Anonymous"
I the Menu > IP Address I'm using my LAN IP address (192.168.XXX.XXX) however if I click find external ip address then in Menu > IP Adress it automatically switches so External IP without me clicking it. Is it a bug or is that meant to happen?
expected behaviour...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: ANTS on March 27, 2006, 05:11:55 AM
Ok then.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: traxxus on March 28, 2006, 03:34:25 PM
2.0 is out, say the Updater...
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Calipso on June 03, 2006, 08:59:05 PM
Give me please latest beta. Thnx.
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Martok on June 03, 2006, 09:14:32 PM
Check "Testing 2.1":

http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3195
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on June 03, 2006, 10:58:53 PM
Quote from: "Calipso"
Give me please latest beta. Thnx.
...said the man who brought up this thread back from the grave. :D

Close it already rejetto.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: Calipso on June 03, 2006, 11:06:57 PM
Quote from: "Martok"
Check "Testing 2.1":

http://www.rejetto.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3195
Thank you.

I have a problems with downloading files with size more than 2147483647 bytes (i.e., the largest positive integer, using 32-bit arithmetic). How to fix it? It is real?

P.S. Sorry for my English. ;)
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: MarkV on June 03, 2006, 11:16:53 PM
For files larger than 2GiB, you have to use a download manager like Getright. This was discussed many times already in this forum. Even modern browsers fail to download such large files.

MarkV
Title: 2.0 coming...
Post by: rejetto on June 04, 2006, 04:27:29 AM
yes, time to close this topic.
open new ones.