1
Everything else / Re: Message to Rejetto: forum's email is broken
« on: August 05, 2024, 11:19:54 PM »works as expected, bots will be able to have fun again
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
works as expected, bots will be able to have fun again
2
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / MOVED: Webd, similar to HFS, only 90KB
« on: June 29, 2024, 12:17:18 PM »3
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: HFS including SSl tools
« on: January 15, 2024, 09:13:31 PM »
Unless you are on 32-bit Windows, you can replace stunnel included in hfs with the latest 64 bits version available for loading there
https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html
https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html
4
Bug reports / Re: [2.4.0 RC6][*.vfs][Menu->Save file system] almost empty file (less than 300byte)
« on: December 14, 2023, 05:13:47 PM »
HFS versions 2.3 and 2.4 will no longer evolve, the VFS recording format cannot be modified in order to maintain compatibility between these versions
a new HFS 3.0 development has been implemented by rejecto by following this link
https://rejetto.com/forum/index.php?board=46.0
a new HFS 3.0 development has been implemented by rejecto by following this link
https://rejetto.com/forum/index.php?board=46.0
5
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: Regarding the inability to open downloaded files on mobile phones
« on: December 12, 2023, 06:34:27 PM »
your HFS works correctly, access via your external IP is viable, I was able to verify it by using it directly
rather than using the DNS address from your smartphone, carry out the manipulation using the external IP that your HFS can obtain from Menu->Ip address->Find external address
Don't give your IP here, rejetto and I already have it in your profile
rather than using the DNS address from your smartphone, carry out the manipulation using the external IP that your HFS can obtain from Menu->Ip address->Find external address
Don't give your IP here, rejetto and I already have it in your profile
6
Bug reports / Re: [2.4.0 RC6][*.vfs][Menu->Save file system] almost empty file (less than 300byte)
« on: November 04, 2023, 05:13:40 PM »
This is the only method that comes to mind, and I hope that it will solve your problem of loss of VFS 
switch to expert mode (key F5)
select Menu>Save options to file, and activate Menu>Auto-save Options
in Menu>Virtual File System , choice Backup on Save and Autosave every: enter 900 (= every 15mn) or more
Menu>Others options> Edit Event Script... (ALT+F6)
put this content in hfs.events and save it in the hfs.exe folder
this script tests if the size of the vfs is less than a certain value (255 to be reduced if necessary) and in this case restores the backup, every time the server is SWITCHING ON ( not possible only when hfs is launched), allowing a functional VFS to be found
verify in windows registry if not exist those keys else delete them
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\rejetto and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\rejetto
switch to expert mode (key F5)
select Menu>Save options to file, and activate Menu>Auto-save Options
in Menu>Virtual File System , choice Backup on Save and Autosave every: enter 900 (= every 15mn) or more
Menu>Others options> Edit Event Script... (ALT+F6)
put this content in hfs.events and save it in the hfs.exe folder
Code: [Select]
[server start]
{.if|{.{.filesize|hfs.vfs.}<255.}|
{:{.add to log|Empty VFS detected.}
{.if|{.exists|hfs.vfs.bak.}|
{:{.add to log| VFS backup found.}
{.delete|hfs.vfs.}
{.copy|hfs.vfs.bak|hfs.vfs.}
{.add to log| previous VFS restored and loaded.}
:}|{:{.add to log| VFS backup not found.}:}
/if.}:}
|{:{.add to log|VFS seems good.}:}
/if.}this script tests if the size of the vfs is less than a certain value (255 to be reduced if necessary) and in this case restores the backup, every time the server is SWITCHING ON ( not possible only when hfs is launched), allowing a functional VFS to be found
verify in windows registry if not exist those keys else delete them
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\rejetto and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\rejetto
7
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: HFS including SSl tools
« on: March 16, 2023, 10:31:21 PM »
No there will be no new version beyond the one already available in 2.x
a new project supporting https is already available in this topic
https://rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=13506.msg1067143#msg1067143
a new project supporting https is already available in this topic
https://rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=13506.msg1067143#msg1067143
8
Bug reports / Re: False errors on upload
« on: January 26, 2023, 10:15:57 PM »
so it looks like this folder is visible in the VFS, since you changed the access properties there
try to go to the diff template tab and you can place a customization of the upload results there by adding this section
try to go to the diff template tab and you can place a customization of the upload results there by adding this section
Code: [Select]
[+upload-success]
{.add to log|{.filename|%item-resource%.}=uploaded by {.if|{.length|%user%.}|%user%|Anonymous /if.}./add to log.}
9
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: Rejetto HFS file server alternative?
« on: November 15, 2022, 03:44:12 PM »
Why shouldn't you wake a sleeping cat?
Cats who are deprived of these stages of sleep can become lethargic or irritable, it is therefore better to avoid waking them up as much as possible
and I must say that taking care of an awakened Fysack is not easy
Cats who are deprived of these stages of sleep can become lethargic or irritable, it is therefore better to avoid waking them up as much as possible
and I must say that taking care of an awakened Fysack is not easy
10
Programmers corner / Re: Only one thing that wasn't released about HFS...
« on: October 25, 2022, 07:23:04 PM »
the procedure to reproduce in php seems to be the following
php receives a request from hfs in this format
if hfs is indeed accessible from the web with this url then it sends as response to php the text 'HFS OK'
from then on the php returns a text by the first channel with '1' as the correct functioning response, otherwise an empty string in the event of an error
*************************************
technically it is possible to simulate this exchange using two hfs sessions and forcing a redirection from hfstest.rejetto.com to a local ip in the windows 'hosts' file by adding this line
127.0.0.1 hfstest.rejetto.com
the server must appear as the php must be launched to listen to it on port 80 and active on 'Any Address'
in the root put as diff template
[]
1
launch another session of hfs listening on any port other than 80, then launch the "self test", the response obtained will be positively successful
you can also perform this experiment by replacing the localhost address with the local ip (192.168.1.xxx)
If we also use the 'self test' of the hfs of port 80 as a self test, the response will also be positive with 127.0.0.1 , but no response with 192.168.1.xxx
php receives a request from hfs in this format
Code: [Select]
http://hfstest.rejetto.com/?port={external_port}&host={external_ip|dns_name}&natted={no|yes}this should generate a new request using a second channel from php to hfs on the url of the formCode: [Select]
http://%host%:%port%/testif hfs is indeed accessible from the web with this url then it sends as response to php the text 'HFS OK'
from then on the php returns a text by the first channel with '1' as the correct functioning response, otherwise an empty string in the event of an error
*************************************
technically it is possible to simulate this exchange using two hfs sessions and forcing a redirection from hfstest.rejetto.com to a local ip in the windows 'hosts' file by adding this line
127.0.0.1 hfstest.rejetto.com
the server must appear as the php must be launched to listen to it on port 80 and active on 'Any Address'
in the root put as diff template
[]
1
launch another session of hfs listening on any port other than 80, then launch the "self test", the response obtained will be positively successful
you can also perform this experiment by replacing the localhost address with the local ip (192.168.1.xxx)
If we also use the 'self test' of the hfs of port 80 as a self test, the response will also be positive with 127.0.0.1 , but no response with 192.168.1.xxx
11
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: Why file system cleared?
« on: October 05, 2022, 07:06:04 AM »
the track seems unreliable, the system attributes are not sufficient to prevent a program other than hfs from accessing the VFS file.
I don't see any other solution as it stands than managing a copy of the vfs outside of hfs.
an important thing is to always activate "backup on save" in "Menu > Virtual File System" in order to keep a valid copy
I don't see any other solution as it stands than managing a copy of the vfs outside of hfs.
an important thing is to always activate "backup on save" in "Menu > Virtual File System" in order to keep a valid copy
12
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: Why file system cleared?
« on: September 28, 2022, 07:19:57 PM »
for once it would have been necessary to note the date of creation of the empty vfs file, to determine if it was a new file created as part of a data backup or if there was loss of the complete file with recreation of a new but virgin,
this date could also have been compared with the log of windows application and system events and allowed to have an idea of the cause of this phenomenon.
To tell the truth, this seems to be a fairly exceptional phenomenon over time, if it were more often recurrent, we could consider an in-depth study to try to reproduce it. At this stage it is wiser to make backups at regular intervals
the subject remains open to follow-up in the event of a shorter recurrence
by HFS scripts it is certainly possible to test the size of the current vfs and in the event of an incident to restore the last backup without the administrator having to intervene too late while issuing an alert to this one in the form of an email or other means of communication available from the server
we can test the existence of a hidden virtual file in the vfs as a reference point, and if this one disappears this means that the vfs had a problem, hfs can then react accordingly
this date could also have been compared with the log of windows application and system events and allowed to have an idea of the cause of this phenomenon.
To tell the truth, this seems to be a fairly exceptional phenomenon over time, if it were more often recurrent, we could consider an in-depth study to try to reproduce it. At this stage it is wiser to make backups at regular intervals
the subject remains open to follow-up in the event of a shorter recurrence
by HFS scripts it is certainly possible to test the size of the current vfs and in the event of an incident to restore the last backup without the administrator having to intervene too late while issuing an alert to this one in the form of an email or other means of communication available from the server
we can test the existence of a hidden virtual file in the vfs as a reference point, and if this one disappears this means that the vfs had a problem, hfs can then react accordingly
13
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: read permision with download file on subfolder
« on: July 31, 2022, 03:59:53 PM »
A forgotten event appeared while extending the legacy tests
we start from a real folder added to the VFS (we make sure that it does not inherit the upload itself), we assign it the upload rights by checking anyone,
we then add a new virtual folder as a child, we can confirm that the upload is not possible for this child.
To this virtual child if we also add a real folder: named UPLOAD HFS
it then appears a dialog box asking us whether or not we want to authorize the inheritance upload for this 'grandchild' for all, in this case anyone will be checked for this folder otherwise he will still benefit from the rights of upload successive parents.
After verification, it is implemented that any folder name containing the word upload brings up the question
we start from a real folder added to the VFS (we make sure that it does not inherit the upload itself), we assign it the upload rights by checking anyone,
we then add a new virtual folder as a child, we can confirm that the upload is not possible for this child.
To this virtual child if we also add a real folder: named UPLOAD HFS
it then appears a dialog box asking us whether or not we want to authorize the inheritance upload for this 'grandchild' for all, in this case anyone will be checked for this folder otherwise he will still benefit from the rights of upload successive parents.
After verification, it is implemented that any folder name containing the word upload brings up the question
14
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: read permision with download file on subfolder
« on: July 30, 2022, 06:21:32 PM »
virtual folders do not have permission to perform uploads, only real folders mounted in the VFS have this possibility
if the subfolder is a physical child on the hard disk of the uploaded folder, it will have the same rights as its parent, on the other hand if the two directories are neither parent of one nor parent of the other, it is possible to mount the 2nd as a child of the first in the VFS as actual directories (red folder icons) and individually assign the necessary permissions but it does seem like the inheritance persists, a solution to invalidate it is to put a filter mask for the upload of the sub-directory in the files mask tab, put \*.* in the upload field ( which means none matching the mask *.*)
this will not prevent the user from being able to send a file, but hfs will refuse to save it
the solution that can be adopted is to create an account named for example "noupload" protected by a password not found with special characters
we configure the parent to authorize the upload to any authorized person, then for the subfolder we only authorize the upload for the "noupload" account, this deactivates parental inheritance and the upload button will not appear, for remote maintenance needs, we can also authorize the upload for the account that manages the server in addition to the right to delete the subfolder
I remind you that the child must not be a direct subdirectory of the parent on the disk, although theoretically it could work indirectly
I see that it is the exact suggestion from rejetto above
if the subfolder is a physical child on the hard disk of the uploaded folder, it will have the same rights as its parent, on the other hand if the two directories are neither parent of one nor parent of the other, it is possible to mount the 2nd as a child of the first in the VFS as actual directories (red folder icons) and individually assign the necessary permissions but it does seem like the inheritance persists, a solution to invalidate it is to put a filter mask for the upload of the sub-directory in the files mask tab, put \*.* in the upload field ( which means none matching the mask *.*)
this will not prevent the user from being able to send a file, but hfs will refuse to save it
the solution that can be adopted is to create an account named for example "noupload" protected by a password not found with special characters
we configure the parent to authorize the upload to any authorized person, then for the subfolder we only authorize the upload for the "noupload" account, this deactivates parental inheritance and the upload button will not appear, for remote maintenance needs, we can also authorize the upload for the account that manages the server in addition to the right to delete the subfolder
I remind you that the child must not be a direct subdirectory of the parent on the disk, although theoretically it could work indirectly
I see that it is the exact suggestion from rejetto above
15
Everything else / Re: Let things calm down
« on: April 29, 2022, 08:12:00 PM »
The problem is that when the address of a target is known to a hacker, there is little chance that it will not be tested. From Rom_1983's point of view, nothing accuses you, but given the suspicion that you are under surveillance, it suggests that these attacks are indirectly linked to your Python scripts.The problem is that when the address of a target is known to a hacker, there is little chance that it will not be tested. From Rom_1983's point of view, nothing accuses you, but given the suspicion that you are under surveillance, it suggests that these attacks can be indirectly linked to your Python scripts.
It should also be remembered that all messages with their content containing links to personal sites are visible to any visitor who is not logged in, so do not be surprised to be potentially the victim of unwanted visits.
If we hear most often about big brother and its eavesdropping through the NSA, we should not forget that other major countries are not behind in this area either and are increasingly trying to manipulate the opinion, it is therefore logical to remain suspicious of them as long as it is not possible to verify the information by means of sources not subject to the directives of these governments
It should also be remembered that all messages with their content containing links to personal sites are visible to any visitor who is not logged in, so do not be surprised to be potentially the victim of unwanted visits.
If we hear most often about big brother and its eavesdropping through the NSA, we should not forget that other major countries are not behind in this area either and are increasingly trying to manipulate the opinion, it is therefore logical to remain suspicious of them as long as it is not possible to verify the information by means of sources not subject to the directives of these governments