rejetto forum
Software => HFS ~ HTTP File Server => Beta => Topic started by: rejetto on January 23, 2009, 03:13:43 PM
-
i didn't miss your post, it's just taking a lot of time to reply you all.
i have a long queue since i was away for a month!
but i may eventually lose a post or two :P so if it won't be answered in a while, you can try to repropose it.
download @ www.dovedove.it/hfs/hfs220.exe
what's new
- security fix: groups were allowed to login http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6550.msg1039964#msg1039964
- setting same name for 2 accounts was not prevented http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6550.msg1039964#msg1039964
- there was a problem that prevented usage of telnet www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=6517
- some problems with diff tpl www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=6508
- {.set item.} was not accepting @special usernames http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6097.msg1039938#msg1039938
- permissions were not correctly inherited and displayed in hints www.rejetto.com/forum/?topic=6504
- ugly bug of the default template on uploads http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6484.msg1039325#msg1039325
- blank spaces prevented {.set item.} to recognize accounts http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6484.msg1039628#msg1039628
- problems after closing "manage accounts" in file properties
-
GOOD BUG
go to options + accounts + add account
don't change the name , you can't validate except by using ESC key
Have a nice night rejetto :D build 221 ;D
Rejetto, I suggest you to load the french build 220 (except done the language) you can find some good idea ;)
-
Your latest test buld (220) sets all kinds of alarms off in my virus checker that blocks the download.
Please check your development system for infections.
-
We should not go so fast. :)
It would be nice to say more about your antivirus... and alerts displayed.
Where have you downloaded your version of HFS?
The false positive arrive often.
In this case it is best to notify the publisher of your antivirus.
Your antivirus may issue an alert because HFS is a server, and it tries to connect to the net ... nothing to do with a virus.
Otherwise, the "220" is safe (tested at the moment with avira anti-virus, kaspersky online... no warnings ).
The "development system" ::) is the shelter of all suspicion.
And I'm sure rejetto is very vigilant about this.
-
Your latest test buld (220) sets all kinds of alarms off in my virus checker that blocks the download. Please check your development system for infections.
yes, we know some antiviruses display alerts by saying in a very cryptic way that HFS is a server (something too geeky for the common user according to security companies).
What they don't know is that they make people think that it's a virus instead of a server. Or they do know, but being scaremongers is part of their business.
Anyway, when in doubt, you can try www.virustotal.com for online scanning.
-
Rejetto, I suggest you to load the french build 220 (except done the language) you can find some good idea ;)
i'm sure there are good ideas there. To load it is a snap, but to find those ideas takes more time. i hardly find the time to write some code, it's better if you save me some time by suggesting me what to do, and when words are not enough, point me out to the same thing as you have already done in the french build. ;)
-
so far no bugs noticed on my end... and I have a brand new system upgrade.. with yet another custom hardware configuration..
I can tell you however that comodo internet security says build #220 is safe.... in fact they have a file submission tool and I submitted hfs.exe for analysis... the software now recognizes even updated copies... and the way this works.. if there is the slightest "dangerous" change.. it will lock my system down.
and other than telling me that a "server" program (hfs.exe) wants to connect.. or to update the firewall rule... CIS doesn't set off any alarms with HFS
-
Works well here, cant find anymore bugs personally. Also I'm now using ESET Smart Security using Policy Based Filtering and an exception for HFS, and it works perfectly, never detects as a virus and I get a nifty notification when I update HFS builds saying that my hfs.exe has been modified should I allow it to run.
I like the new properties menu (its new to me), but how come 'Flag as new' is in the context but not in the Flags tab in the properties window? And I assume the 'Set user/pass' is just there for quick access as well?
Also I have to notify you of these, first of all the option 'Switch to virtual-folder' I think it would be better worded as 'Change to virtual-folder and Change to real-folder' And for some reason when I'm in a hurry I confuse 'Edit resource...' with 'Properties...' I haven't decided on a solution for this... maybe a re-wording or.. have Properties... in bold with the added separation of another divider if needed. Also 'Properties...' is generally at the bottom of the context in most interface situations, I would look for it down there before at the top (right-click a folder in windows etc). Aaand when you receive the pop-up for a real folder being converted to a virtual folder, the English is not that clear... I cannot get the pop-up to appear again to re-read it :P something about 'putted too many files'.. anyway im going to bed, eyes are blurry I cant read my own writing.
-
my antivirus program show too that the HFS.EXE is a troian
vvv.virustotal.zom/analisis/082f2a8ad9f45eebe7669481d61c6daf
-
NOD32 AV says clean. :)
-
############# ERROR ON: 23/01/2009 23:30:19
C:\nukie\HFS\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 00404606 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000001
HFS 2.3 beta (220)
----------------------------------------------------------------
System : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+, 1533 MHz MMX
Display : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
HFS-Service.exe: Build: 0 22/01/2009 15:48:48
hfs.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:26:56
hfs.old.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:25:26
hfs2Service.exe:1.0.0 Build: 0 04/11/2006 0:01:42
### END LOG
############# ERROR ON: 24/01/2009 12:41:05
C:\nukie\HFS\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 00404606 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000001
HFS 2.3 beta (220)
----------------------------------------------------------------
System : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+, 1533 MHz MMX
Display : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
HFS-Service.exe: Build: 0 22/01/2009 15:48:48
hfs.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:26:56
hfs.old.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:25:26
hfs2Service.exe:1.0.0 Build: 0 04/11/2006 0:01:42
### END LOG
############# ERROR ON: 24/01/2009 16:55:28
C:\nukie\HFS\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 00404606 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000001
HFS 2.3 beta (220)
----------------------------------------------------------------
System : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+, 1533 MHz MMX
Display : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
HFS-Service.exe: Build: 0 22/01/2009 15:48:48
hfs.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:26:56
hfs.old.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:25:26
hfs2Service.exe:1.0.0 Build: 0 04/11/2006 0:01:42
### END LOG
############# ERROR ON: 24/01/2009 16:55:54
C:\nukie\HFS\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 00404606 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000001
HFS 2.3 beta (220)
----------------------------------------------------------------
System : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+, 1533 MHz MMX
Display : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
HFS-Service.exe: Build: 0 22/01/2009 15:48:48
hfs.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:26:56
hfs.old.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:25:26
hfs2Service.exe:1.0.0 Build: 0 04/11/2006 0:01:42
### END LOG
Anyone knows where those came from? Rejetto? :D In case anyone wondering if there's any third part program that might be causing this, I was using KIS 2009. Shouldn't be from that though.
-
NOD32 AV says clean. :)
ESET Smart Security = ESET NOD32 Anti-Virus + Firewall :D
I haven't got that exception nukie, maybe something to do with HFS-Service.exe?
-
Perhaps, *sigh*
Only tried using it for a while now, one of the simplest way to make HFS a system service. Will check further :)
-
Build new up from ~218 freez every ~3hours.
Just application freez and make 50% of CPU usage.
-
############# ERROR ON: 23/01/2009 23:30:19
C:\nukie\HFS\hfs.exe
Access violation at address 00404606 in module 'hfs.exe'. Read of address 00000001
HFS 2.3 beta (220)
----------------------------------------------------------------
System : Windows XP Professional, Version: 5.1, Build: A28, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+, 1533 MHz MMX
Display : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions
HFS-Service.exe: Build: 0 22/01/2009 15:48:48
hfs.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:26:56
hfs.old.exe: Build: 0 23/01/2009 23:25:26
hfs2Service.exe:1.0.0 Build: 0 04/11/2006 0:01:42
### END LOG
<snip>!!!!
Anyone knows where those came from? Rejetto? :D In case anyone wondering if there's any third part program that might be causing this, I was using KIS 2009. Shouldn't be from that though.
I can answer this easily..... the problem has to do with that series of AMD CPU. the same errors manifested "at least once" for me on my old CPU which is a 1700+... I have since installed an AMD X2 64 (Phenom) and there have been no more errors of that type.... at least not for me.
[btw... HI TSG!!!! nice to see you are still among us ;D]
-
GOOD BUG
go to options + accounts + add account
don't change the name , you can't validate except by using ESC key
Have a nice night rejetto :D build 221 ;D
It looks like it tries to force you to change the user name: bug or feature? ;)
-
My two euro cents:
what's new
- security fix: groups were allowed to login http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6550.msg1039964#msg1039964
Checked: now it is working fine
- setting same name for 2 accounts was not prevented http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6550.msg1039964#msg1039964
Checked: now it is working fine
-
go to options + accounts + add account
don't change the name , you can't validate except by using ESC key
Have a nice night rejetto :D build 221 ;D
;D thank you for reporting. fixed in next build.
-
I like the new properties menu (its new to me), but how come 'Flag as new' is in the context but not in the Flags tab in the properties window?
because despite the name, it is not a flag you can set and remove, it just change the "addition" timestamp of the file, so it will be then "flagged" inside the template. there's no undo.
And I assume the 'Set user/pass' is just there for quick access as well?
that's just laziness :D
when i'll move it to the properties i'll have to re-do the dialog as a tab.
Also I have to notify you of these, first of all the option 'Switch to virtual-folder' I think it would be better worded as 'Change to virtual-folder and Change to real-folder'
ok
And for some reason when I'm in a hurry I confuse 'Edit resource...' with 'Properties...' I haven't decided on a solution for this... maybe a re-wording or.. have Properties... in bold with the added separation of another divider if needed.
ok for the divider.
bold has a standard meaning in windows, it's the default action, so i'd better not use it for properties.
Also 'Properties...' is generally at the bottom of the context in most interface situations, I would look for it down there before at the top (right-click a folder in windows etc).
right, but i'm unsure about this change
Aaand when you receive the pop-up for a real folder being converted to a virtual folder, the English is not that clear... I cannot get the pop-up to appear again to re-read it :P something about 'putted too many files'..
You are putting many files. Try using real folders instead of virtual folders. Read documentation or ask on the forum for help.
the reason of the "putting" is that it's inherited from the "add folder" action.
-
my antivirus program show too that the HFS.EXE is a troian
www.virustotal.zom/analisis/082f2a8ad9f45eebe7669481d61c6daf
i don't see the word "trojan" anywhere. Don't stop at the "red color", and read what's written. ;)
-
It looks like it tries to force you to change the user name: bug or feature?
I work in parallel of rejetto with my personal compilations of hfs since the build 143 :) , its evolutions always followed the same thread of reflection, and any new evolution on behalf of rejetto was always preceded by a poll with the persons who use hfs. Not having noticed again topic on this subject, it was easy to deduct that from it it was about a bug, not very nasty moreover where from its naming GOOD BUG. ;)
Quote from: mars on 24 January 2009, 01:19:00
go to options + accounts + add account
don't change the name , you can't validate except by using ESC key
Have a nice night rejetto build 221
thank you for reporting. fixed in next build.
The boss gave his verdict onto the question :D :D
-
AlexPebody requests moved to
http://www.rejetto.com/forum/index.php?topic=6585.0
-
My two euro cents:
thanks luca, confirmations are welcome.
-
Build new up from ~218 freez every ~3hours.
Just application freez and make 50% of CPU usage.
please, could you download build #217 and see if the problem perists?
it would be a very useful information.
50% is because you have a dual core CPU, it's as the 100%.
-
It looks like it tries to force you to change the user name: bug or feature?
I work in parallel of rejetto with my personal compilations of hfs since the build 143 :) ,
4 eyes are better than 2, over bugs. thank your mars.
anyway i think luca was half-joking ;)
-
Perhaps, *sigh*
Only tried using it for a while now, one of the simplest way to make HFS a system service. Will check further :)
welcome nukie :)
yes, please try using hfs not as a service, just to see if that's the problem.
sadly this build didn't include debug information for the reports, and it was not useful.
It's because i have no ADSL these days, i'm on GPRS. :( So if you'll get same error on next build, report it again because it may eventually be more useful.
-
Hi. I upgraded from build 219 to 220 and now when I bring up HFS in my browser the latest RAWR template I'm using is all messed up. I had to drop back down to 219 (or just use the default template). However, my main issue was that while using HFS 219, I started downloading several files at the same time by right clicking and selecting "Save link as...". Two of the files saved completely, but were corrupt when I tried to open them. The third file stopped in the middle of downloading and would not resume. The server (which I'm away from) is now dead. I can't even get it to display the HFS home page and will need to reset it when I get back to where it's located.
1). Can HFS handle downloading multiple files at one time?
2). Could the cause be using the RAWR template rather than the default one?
3). Is there a proper way to download via HFS rather than "Save link as..."?
Thank you,
FGump
-
Blah... Blah...
I can answer this easily..... the problem has to do with that series of AMD CPU. the same errors manifested "at least once" for me on my old CPU which is a 1700+... I have since installed an AMD X2 64 (Phenom) and there have been no more errors of that type.... at least not for me.
[btw... HI TSG!!!! nice to see you are still among us ;D]
I have no problems with my AMD Athlon 3500+ (Venice) 2200 MHz... That's what my HFS runs on anyway..
Yes I am back, until I get a job :D. Finished University, finished moving (until 4 weeks time), just looking for work while updating things. RAWR-Player is alot better now, fullscreen functionality on double click, icon and context, support for every known media available to the netstream component of as2... aspect ratio's are now preserved, the templates will default to a Widescreen (16:9) with PillarBox for compatible video files. To keep the aspect, the video files must have the appropriate Metadata embedded... stolen YouTube videos do not carry this in the Metadata but can be quickly converted to contain it using Super (c). I havent found any other filetypes that do not carry the correct Metadata other than stolen YouTube FLV files.
I am currently working on showing buffer information or notification, I can get something working that shows it, however there is a bug and I cant use the recommended way for some reason.
I 'might' add an internal playlist option for people that want to have a playlist of songs or videos on their website. But it is not essential for what we use the player for currently, so I may use this almost completed build, possible '1.0.0' in the templates. It might also wait until I build RAWR-Player-2 which will be written in ActionScript3.
But anyway, back on topic, I am not sure, but I am getting strange speeds from hfs when streaming videos testing the RAWR-Player. They are not fully downloading like they used to, instead they are capped at about 1000-2000KB\s (this is viewing a HD MP4 with the player lol, an extreme case) I am not sure if its Flash Player only downloading what it needs, or the Browser (its a daily trunk of Firefox), or a bug.
-
When you login and you are asked for your password, if you click cancel, a page opens saying that you are not authorized… is there a way to skip this page and to come back to the previous page?
It's not that critical, just "nice to have" ;D
-
When you login and you are asked for your password, if you click cancel, a page opens saying that you are not authorized… is there a way to skip this page and to come back to the previous page?
It's not that critical, just "nice to have" ;D
I have noticed this, my router also does this. I'm not sure if its possible, if you put a redirect on that part of the template, every time someone clicks an item they are unauthorised for they will be redirected to the homepage, how annoying :P
-
When you login and you are asked for your password, if you click cancel, a page opens saying that you are not authorized… is there a way to skip this page and to come back to the previous page?
It's not that critical, just "nice to have" ;D
I have noticed this, my router also does this. I'm not sure if its possible, if you put a redirect on that part of the template, every time someone clicks an item they are unauthorised for they will be redirected to the homepage, how annoying :P
is not possible to catch the "pressed cancel button" event and redirect to the homepage only in that case? ??? Probably not editing the template, but in the HFS code maybe yes ::)
-
Or they do know, but being scaremongers is part of their business.
Im a warmonger hehe
the software now recognizes even updated copies...
Wow thats cool 8), go Comodo! My ESS shows me that a program that connects to the internet have been changed, i like it, i love alerts
My two euro cents:
lol
I work in parallel of rejetto
You should work diagonal :-* so we could speed up evolution ;)
[ no ADSL these days, i'm on GPRS.
:D that is so great, we could not do that 5 years ago, or could we ::) ::) ::) ??? ;) ;D
-
Hi ^^...Rejetto your HFS is great...I've got probelms with this release...I don't know when it appens, but this build freezes, then i have to close it from the task manager...Why? ???
-
lol, that wasnt me ::) Just kidding :P, it was
-
I have a problem with every version of HFS, 2.2 and 2.3.
I tested uploads to 5 people, 2 of them get very slow and jumpy speeds. The other 3 can dowload with stable max. speed as one would expect.
I would love to see this fixed, as I love HFS and don't know any other fileserver that doesn't need installing or any services running ect.
Any instructions, so i can help?
bye, Suzi
-
rejetto before this release i was using 214 and got no max cpu usage, but this one seems to do so every few hours. Anyway i just wanted to report this.
-
Hi. I upgraded from build 219 to 220 and now when I bring up HFS in my browser the latest RAWR template I'm using is all messed up. I had to drop back down to 219 (or just use the default template).
strange. there are lots of rawr users out there, i didn't see any problem like this reported.
TSG ?
However, my main issue was that while using HFS 219, I started downloading several files at the same time by right clicking and selecting "Save link as...". Two of the files saved completely, but were corrupt when I tried to open them.
if you have some limits set, saving may face those limits, and what will your browser download will just be the warning message.
in such case, those files should be very small.
The third file stopped in the middle of downloading and would not resume.
HFS supports resuming. Maybe the program you are using to download does not.
The server (which I'm away from) is now dead. I can't even get it to display the HFS home page and will need to reset it when I get back to where it's located.
if the server is dead, that may be a good reason for the resuming to not work :)
1). Can HFS handle downloading multiple files at one time?
2). Could the cause be using the RAWR template rather than the default one?
3). Is there a proper way to download via HFS rather than "Save link as..."?
1. yes, absolutely
2. as above, it's known to be correctly working
3. yes, just click on the file, it's the default behavior. If you don't get the download dialog, then HFS may be configured this way for that kind of file you are testing. The option is "open directly in browser".
-
When you login and you are asked for your password, if you click cancel, a page opens saying that you are not authorized… is there a way to skip this page and to come back to the previous page?
not with current system.
your cancel is just a request without necessary password. such request should not be replied with the homepage.
-
[ no ADSL these days, i'm on GPRS.
:D that is so great, we could not do that 5 years ago, or could we ::) ::) ::) ??? ;) ;D
yes, i was already doing it ;)
just today i got my adsl back!
-
I tested uploads to 5 people, 2 of them get very slow and jumpy speeds. The other 3 can dowload with stable max. speed as one would expect.
from what you say it is likely that is has nothing to do with your side (hfs) but it's up their network.
-
rejetto before this release i was using 214 and got no max cpu usage, but this one seems to do so every few hours. Anyway i just wanted to report this.
1. after few hours it takes max cpu for awhile or forever?
2. what if you revert to 214? does the problem disappear?
-
I tested uploads to 5 people, 2 of them get very slow and jumpy speeds. The other 3 can dowload with stable max. speed as one would expect.
from what you say it is likely that is has nothing to do with your side (hfs) but it's up their network.
Hm, but these people have no problems downloading from anywhere else, this seems to occur only in HFS.
-
weird case.
what i would do:
ensure from the logs that they are actually not reaching HFS.
if they do, then find more on what's preventing the request from being fulfilled.
if they don't, install another similar software (or even an ftp server) to see if the problem persists.
-
This build works perfectly fine with RAWR-Template, ToG and Terayon. How else would I be testing the latest RAWR-Player build with it :D
On a side note, the streaming with RAWR-Player thing I posted earlier doesn't seem to be a bug, its more of a feature of the latest Flash Player, I think it only uses as much bandwidth as is required to stream the video. You can force it to speed up if the connection is faster, by trying to seek further into the timeline, but it will then throttle it down again. This is also nice as it will reduce the load on peoples servers, with the RAWR-Player only taking what it needs. There was a time when this would have to be manually programmed in actionscript, but its nice to know I don't have to bother anymore ;D. So it doesn't appear to be a bug :).
-
It's actually a bit random but i've caught it at least 2 times since i changed to 220 (about a week ago?), anyway in 214 never seem'd to get max cpu that's why i sticked with it at that time. Reversing it would take some time to check if it doesn't do it anymore since it only happens every so often.
-
it's important because we don't know if your problem has to do with the new version or something else!