Quote
It is not already any more a problem for me because the solution was already in 224 that I had put on-line,
It is in fact about an error of macro in the template
I'm happy to know that this is not a problem for you either, neither is it for me. But when I report problems, I do it to help rejetto to improve the template with the information, because I think the main version of program and standard template needs to be improved. I don't think that users should relay on 'better' parallel versions.
One thing more: in your solution you put your 'folder archive' in the [special:begin] section. I think this should be reserved for things that affect the whole behaviour of the template, and would place the settinge of the 'folder archive' in the head of the former [files] section, that is now where it's treated the folder header, aside the breadcrumbs thing.
I am saddened to disappoint you so, but you understood well the sense of the use of the section [special:begin] , she is for this type of action there, the solution is possible within the template, you should have read my post last one to TSG; the other solution is to re-modify sources, and I do not believe that rejetto will agree for that.
Somebody bring to light a problem, I bring a solution of repair and in more I almost am thrown(cast)
I don't think that users should relay on 'better' parallel versions.
I at least, there is a thing which I can claim, it is that I do not make that to indicate bugs in the versions, I bring not bad work since I am on the forum, displease those there who do not love to me.