rejetto forum

Testing build #126

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13308
    • View Profile
download @ www.dovedove.it/hfs/hfs126.exe

what's new
+ Menu -> Start/Exit -> "Quit without asking to save" 
+ warning for whom enters Speed limit = 0
- "folders filter" wasn't working for virtual folders
- moving columns in the connections panel could screw up things
- error on switching to real/virtual on multiple folders
- monolib error 


Offline MarkV

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Thx4Update!

Why are the build numbers no more shown when updating?
http://worldipv6launch.org - The world is different now.


Offline Comrade Elisey

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 89
  • Cthulhu fhtagn! Cthulhu fhtagn!!!
    • View Profile
    • Dubophone

Offline MarkV

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
For me it showed:

Last stable: HFS 2.2a
Last unstable: HFS 2.2a

But no build numbers...
http://worldipv6launch.org - The world is different now.


Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13308
    • View Profile

Offline MarkV

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 763
    • View Profile
Why?

As you often do a silent update after a release (#124 -> #125), not showing the build numbers is no good. It confuses people ('Offered me to update to v2.2a, but I already have it?'). Just my €0.02.
http://worldipv6launch.org - The world is different now.


Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13308
    • View Profile
i meant, i "reintroduced" the number in the while.

there is a system in the last hfs that should guess when is appropriate to show the build number and when only the version, and maybe it is not working good .