Author Topic: Testing build #104  (Read 5889 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12953
    • View Profile
Testing build #104
« on: June 18, 2007, 11:59:23 PM »
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs104.exe

what's new
+ smarter bandwidth division (between connections)
+ specific warning messages on some limits
- problems with the "always on top"
- "no download" broken in #103
- no "not found" page was given for unexistant URLs
- problem with "confirm exit" and windows shutdown
- download got corrupted if resumed after 2GB 

Offline Garphy

  • Occasional poster
  • *
  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2007, 05:35:26 AM »
still corrupts vfs while cancel loading on startup...

Offline Wasserfloh

  • Occasional poster
  • *
  • Posts: 81
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2007, 06:42:07 PM »
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs104.exe
Why is Build 104 three times as large as the previous?

Offline MarkV

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 746
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2007, 07:48:39 PM »
www.rejetto.com/temp/hfs104.exe
Why is Build 104 three times as large as the previous?

build #103 is compressed with UPX, build #104 is not.
http://worldipv6launch.org - The world is different now.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12953
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2007, 07:18:39 AM »
UPX compression is not compatible with the debug symbols.
every stable/official relase is compressed, test versions may not be.

User

  • Guest
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2007, 06:13:25 PM »
Please pack all beta's in archive (if this not problem for you) , it's saving traffic and money for testers :)

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12953
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2007, 12:27:55 AM »
would anyone actually save time/money if the beta is 0.5 instead of 1.5MB ?

Offline maverick

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 1052
  • Computer Solutions
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2007, 04:38:39 AM »
would anyone actually save time/money if the beta is 0.5 instead of 1.5MB ?

The only ones that "may" save time/money would be those using a 56k or lower dialup modem connection.  I doubt there would be many that would use such a connection running a server like HFS.

Are you again including debug code within HFS like you used to?  If so, that would explain the file size difference.

maverick

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12953
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2007, 07:15:56 AM »
sure, i said it above

Offline Garphy

  • Occasional poster
  • *
  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2007, 02:40:00 PM »
bug report:
~nodefault unavailable in 104...

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12953
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #104
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2007, 04:03:31 PM »
fixed from next build