Author Topic: Testing build #269  (Read 17393 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12945
    • View Profile
Testing build #269
« on: September 06, 2010, 06:32:21 PM »
download @ www.dovedove.it/hfs/hfs269.exe

what's new
+ Menu > Updates > "Delay update to serve last requests"
+ accounts options now more accessible
* forced dns update every 24 days
- event [server start] was not working
- {.from table|#ini.} broken in build #254
- search was not working with non-ansi characters [link]

Offline SilentPliz

  • Operator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
  • ....... chut ! shh!
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2010, 06:39:57 PM »
Hi rejetto!

268 is an unlucky number? :D

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12945
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2010, 07:03:26 PM »
yes, 2,6,8
6/2=3
2+8=10
10+3=13

268 was used for an "internal" release :)

Offline MarkV

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 746
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2010, 11:14:17 PM »
Update automatically is still broken. I've done the version-march backwards and determined the start of the problem. Build #264 still works beautifully, but builds #265 and onwards have this bug. I looked at the changelog for #265, and there were several update-related changes. I fear one of them causes this problem.
http://worldipv6launch.org - The world is different now.

Offline SilentPliz

  • Operator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
  • ....... chut ! shh!
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2010, 01:04:59 AM »
yes, 2,6,8
6/2=3
2+8=10
10+3=13

lol! It's also logical that the numerology :D
For the 666 I'm burning a candle and I repent me of all my sins.

« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 01:11:41 AM by SilentPliz »

Offline SilentPliz

  • Operator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
  • ....... chut ! shh!
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2010, 03:52:01 AM »
Nice the drag n' drop on Accounts and the change for "hints of long accounts name".  8)

I suggest that you add this "event" for an better ergonomy:

procedure ToptionsFrm.accountsBoxDblClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
renaccountBtnClick(renaccountBtn);
end;


« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 05:31:40 PM by SilentPliz »

Offline SilentPliz

  • Operator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
  • ....... chut ! shh!
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2010, 04:24:41 AM »
Update automatically is still broken.

Confirmed!  ;)

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12945
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2010, 09:33:07 AM »
i didn't test it yet, but did you consider that upgrading to #269 you actually tested #268's upgrade procedure ?

Offline MarkV

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 746
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2010, 02:37:26 PM »
I know, but how should I test #269's?
http://worldipv6launch.org - The world is different now.

Offline crazyboris

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 140
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2010, 03:02:46 PM »
2.6.9

6+9-2=13   ;)

Offline SilentPliz

  • Operator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
  • ....... chut ! shh!
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2010, 03:29:38 PM »
Bug with:

Menu > Other options > User Accounts... Account list

To reproduce it:

- Create some Accounts
- Select one account in the list
- Click on the "rename" button

The last account of the list is selected (ready to be renamed).

With the procedure given above, I can do without the rename button until the correction of this bug. :)
« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 03:36:11 PM by SilentPliz »

Offline SilentPliz

  • Operator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1223
  • ....... chut ! shh!
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2010, 03:51:22 PM »
i didn't test it yet, but did you consider that upgrading to #269 you actually tested #268's upgrade procedure ?

I made an false build #270... I putted it on-line with a hfs.updateinfo.txt:

Code: [Select]
HFS update info

[last stable]
2.2f FR - Build #155
[last stable build]
155
[last stable url]
http://silentpliz.perso.sfr.fr/hfs/hfs2.2fFR_155.exe

[last untested]
2.3 bĂȘta - Build #270 FR
[last untested build]
270 FR
[last untested url]
http://silentpliz.perso.sfr.fr/hfs/hfs270_FR.exe

[EOF]

The automatic update does not work ... manual intervention is required (via the Update now button).

« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 04:54:23 PM by SilentPliz »

Offline Tha Jsta

  • Occasional poster
  • *
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
    • Back 2 Da OG/Don't Bite Tha Phunk/One Eight Seven
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2010, 07:55:21 PM »
Update automatically is still broken. I've done the version-march backwards and determined the start of the problem. Build #264 still works beautifully, but builds #265 and onwards have this bug. I looked at the changelog for #265, and there were several update-related changes. I fear one of them causes this problem.

@ Rejetto. Yes! I was just going to tell you about this. Build 268 [the one I tested for you] had this problem, but I thought you may have known and that is why I said nothing. I really hope build 269 does not have this problem, but if it does you may want to release a build 270 because this is one of the server's best features. I do not use many softwares with this feature being automatic, and that is one of the reasons why I like this so much.
CLICK HERE to visit the dopest West Coast Hip-Hop blog online.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12945
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2010, 05:34:57 PM »
The last account of the list is selected (ready to be renamed).

no success at reproducing your bug.
after your procedure, the same account that was renamed is selected here.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *
  • Posts: 12945
    • View Profile
Re: Testing build #269
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2010, 05:37:13 PM »
I suggest that you add this "event" for an better ergonomy:

it's not the standard behaviour, but i don't actually see a better use for the double click there...