1
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: hfs for torrents
« on: October 30, 2011, 10:34:38 PM »
translation ?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Beta / Re: Testing build #279
« on: October 23, 2011, 12:00:07 PM »
OK. I see the issue got your attention/interest... If I'll have the time - I might check it up. I bet it'll work fluently...
3
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / hfs for torrents
« on: October 20, 2011, 12:30:07 PM »
ah.. k, thanks. Good to see you all still alive and kicking here ... 
PS:
Did anyone try to use HFS with uTorrent ? I mean, for example - for hosting web seeds?
PS:
Did anyone try to use HFS with uTorrent ? I mean, for example - for hosting web seeds?
4
Beta / Re: Testing build #279
« on: October 20, 2011, 06:00:56 AM »
Long time... Why is b279 == 2.5MB and 2.2g = 560KB ? 
5
router & port problems / Re: operating dyndns service when behind a router
« on: July 13, 2007, 04:54:39 AM »
sounds reasonable (if it's really so...) ... thanks.
6
router & port problems / Re: operating dyndns service when behind a router
« on: July 12, 2007, 06:57:19 PM »
I meant how does HFS "knows" what exteranl IP to report to dyndns, in case it changes dynamically ?
7
router & port problems / Re: operating dyndns service when behind a router
« on: July 12, 2007, 05:48:45 PM »
thanks! I was too lasy to look ...
btw, how do you find the external IP ?
btw, how do you find the external IP ?
8
router & port problems / operating dyndns service when behind a router
« on: July 12, 2007, 05:14:48 PM »
is it possible at all, and how ?
(the router supports uPnP )
(the router supports uPnP )
9
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 29, 2007, 05:19:27 AM »
maybe HFS template kus provide a bettrer save daily, saying the expected save size, are just warn about it... if possible - maybe - spit it itself ? ...
10
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 27, 2007, 04:33:17 PM »Quote
second, do you really think i should spend time supporting mega-archives for FAT32 ?
edit: I really don't see why you should use this, unless you have some strange problems like those described before or in case of large size file(s) (over 4G ? ) .as I said - no...
... you could/might like to spend it on "tuning" the current implementation like - archiving "permissions" per user, and/or per folder, support for selecting multiple/single folder-targets for archiving in the template (remote side, like the extra column I mentioned before) etc..
Again - a VERY nice feature !!!
11
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 26, 2007, 08:26:00 PM »
back to the beginning... that 's what I suggested in the first place - have an option to define if and how to split the archives...
12
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 26, 2007, 04:14:55 PM »
rejetto, I think I am not making myself clear ... when the file reaches the "other" side - it is being created as ONE file, and it may be larger the 4G. Would't this be a problem if the remote OS does not supprt it ?
13
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 26, 2007, 03:33:54 PM »
will it help in cases of very large (>4G ) resulted archive file ?
14
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 25, 2007, 05:02:46 PM »
yes...
edit: I really don't see why you should use this, unless you have some strange problems like those described before or in case of large size file(s) (over 4G ? ) .
edit: I really don't see why you should use this, unless you have some strange problems like those described before or in case of large size file(s) (over 4G ? ) .
15
Beta / Re: Testing build #100
« on: May 25, 2007, 04:39:54 PM »
just an idea - an option for multiple-files rar... so you can start download while it's still looking for the rest of the files...