rejetto forum

Review for HFS 2.2

rejetto · 5 · 1705
« previous next »
Pages: 1

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13510
    • View Profile
on: July 27, 2007, 08:32:29 AM
Guess what?
A new review for HFS.
The ratings? Couldn't be better! ;D

Offline radd

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Reply #1 on: July 27, 2007, 08:51:28 AM
what so confusing about the restrict access? can we discuss about it? i would love to see if the article writes "the bad : NONE"

Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13510
    • View Profile
Reply #2 on: July 27, 2007, 08:55:49 AM
it's a matter of being equivocal, not wrong or right.
can anyone phrase it better?
i can think of "Access only for".

i'm very glad for that review.

Offline radd

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Reply #3 on: July 27, 2007, 08:59:44 AM
allow access from..
allow access..

Offline maverick

  • Tireless poster
  • ****
    • Posts: 1052
  • Computer Solutions
    • View Profile
Reply #4 on: July 27, 2007, 09:58:10 AM
Good job rejetto and good review.

I don't know why they found the restrict access menu misleading.  To me it is straight forward.  I think if they would have created a few user accounts for their test review, the restrict access menu would have made more sense to them.

Maybe call it "restrict user access to" or "limit user access to".
maverick

Pages: 1