46
HFS ~ HTTP File Server / Re: video problems
« on: February 28, 2009, 12:10:25 AM »
I got the same results with wmp that you saw with the dvx feedback.... except for the player used.. the results are all exactly the same
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quoteps: attention mars, trop de télé rend UMP !
Tu me fais marrer:
cela m'étonnerait beaucoup que de regarder des dessins animés, ça fasse pencher mes opinions vers tel ou tel parti politique, pour ton info c'était ma première visite hier soir sur le site de courbet.Tu sais, y'a pas que la politique dans la vie , mais je maintiens que ton système c'est comme une arnaque, il faut payez pour avoir le droit de voir! tu promets presque un voyage sur la lune alors que ce que tu offres au final c'est une simple photo (et encore un peu floue),soit donc de la poudre aux yeux. Ce que certains font en peer to peer et gratuitement, toi tu le fais en le faisant payer: aurais tu peur que l'UMP te fasse la chasse aux sorcières sur internet? Tu sembles être un passionné de musique et gloire à toi de vouloir faire partager tes passions avec d'autres, mais de là à en tirer un bénéfice pour quelque chose dont tu n'es pas l'auteur (et peut etre sans l'accord des auteurs), tu m'excuseras mais ça frise l'arnaque tout simplement.
...........
Mais je te rassure, ce n'est pas moi qui irai te dénoncer, mais si tu te fais pincer tu ne pourras pas te défendre en prétextant que tu n'étais pas au courant
Quoteas long as the "video" files are under restricted access... folders or individual files.... the player still shows the error saying either the file doesn't exist or that the server is blocking access.. and I have used 5 different players.
5 players? i thought you was using a flash player. aren't you?
{I tested with flash, divx web, WMP and a couple of others that handle streaming protocols.. the results were the same for all of them}Quotewhich brings me back to a previous suggestion on the command menu... when creating/adding a restricted folder that contains video files... there should be a prompt asking if the folder contains video files.. which when checked would automatically set the flags needed;
{is this a restricted resource? Yes/No} if no .. it just creates/adds the folder
what you are doing and suggesting for hfs is something totally bad.
anonymous mean "no password". you are actually giving free access to the files, not protecting.
{ok.. I use tog 3.0 with the login template and I tried to do a direct login to the folder and the individual file with the ANONYMOUS flag set for he source folder.... it still asked to me to login because I was attempting to access a restricted resource... so I am covered LOL}
i understand "anonymous" there can be misleading. it's just a feature that was asked long time ago and found no better way till now.
{I had made a previous comment about how cerebusFTP has a way of limiting the anonymous access only to the account with the access in question... this configuration seems to be working the same way}Quoteok after more testing... it's no longer hanging when the ANYONE flag is set instead on the resource itself..
do you understand by yourself that "anyone" means as well that you are not protecting the files?
{see above} the login script in the tog template is protecting the files from direct access.}
[you should post some log lines about the video player requests.]
will work onthat as soon as I ahve a chnace todo it without interupts
the one thing that has been consistent tho is that I cant place access restriction on a folder with video files without also checking the ANONYMOUS box.. if I leave it unchecked.. I cant stream/preview the vids from the website.. I keep getting a file not found error.. if I dont restrict access it works fine.... if its under a main folder.. it works ok if just the main folder has the anon flag set .. I dont have to apply it to the folder the vids are already in.
i guess your streaming player has problems with permissions.Quotealso very persistent.. if I check a folder for anonymous only ..without restricted access..... the folder goes invisible in the list... when I go back and check an account name.. the folder shows back up....somehow I dont think thats supposed to happen that way
it's likely you enabled option "list protected items only for allowed users"
Rejetto: remember several builds back when I said I noticed an oddity in how the folder/files PROPERTIES page was acting weird.... well I have a whole new computer system, and totally different hardware.. and the same problem is back.... the 1st and 2nd tabs seems to BLUR into one another and I have to click on the 3rd properties tab to correct the visual problem.. its intermittent.. it doesnt always happen.. about 1 in 3 tries..
i think a screen shot is better...