Login
Register
Menu
Home
Help
Search
rejetto forum
PROBLEMS? QUESTIONS? CLICK HERE!
rejetto forum
»
Software
»
HFS ~ HTTP File Server
»
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
jbckylie
·
4 ·
2735
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jbckylie
Occasional poster
Posts:
3
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
on:
August 14, 2006, 12:26:23 PM
Hello,
i just made a test between 2 pc with gigabit card and it is not the top .
I have a very bad flow.
transfert with windows : 250 Mo - > 11s (=20Mo/s)
( in 100Mbits , the maximum is 9 Mo/s: it is normal )
With HFS, i have more than 1 minute.
I have the same delay with ftp.
Is there a limitation in HFS or FTP ?
Is someone can try again .
Thanks you.
rejetto
Administrator
Tireless poster
Posts:
13510
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
Reply #1 on:
August 15, 2006, 02:11:35 PM
yes, as far as i know, windows file sharing (SMB) is faster than any other.
don't know why.
i know of people using HFS in LAN, just because SMB sometimes refuses to work.
anyway, if you know of a significantly faster program, let me know.
kitkit516
Occasional poster
Posts:
6
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
Reply #2 on:
August 15, 2006, 04:36:08 PM
Hello
Sorry for my poor english.
I'm using 100M broadband network .
if i use the HFS software to share the file with other 100M broadband user
max speed around 4xxx KB/s (4x Mbps)
But ...
if i use the Apache http server
max speed can reach around 11xxx KB/s (9x Mbps)
Anonymous
Guest
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
Reply #3 on:
August 15, 2006, 10:07:21 PM
Yes I also notice that HFS runs slower than some others. Don't know why. Must be the code.
Print
Pages:
1
rejetto forum
»
Software
»
HFS ~ HTTP File Server
»
hfs and gigabit .....not the top
Search
Username
Password
Always stay logged in
Forgot your password?