rejetto forum

Testing build #212

rejetto · 32 · 18042

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline leosmendes

  • Occasional poster
  • *
    • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Access violation at address 0056188D in module 'hfs.exe'. Write of address 00000000
HFS 2.3 beta (212)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stack list, generated 8/11/2008 17:59:31
[0056188D]{hfs.exe     } main.TmainFrm.Doerror1Click (Line 10892, "main.pas" + 2) + $4
[00465A31]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenuItem.Click (Line 1878, "Menus.pas" + 14) + $C
[0046724D]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TMenu.DispatchCommand (Line 2603, "Menus.pas" + 5) + $5
[0046863C]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.WndProc (Line 3393, "Menus.pas" + 4) + $12
[004E270A]{hfs.exe     } ComCtrls.TToolBar.WndProc (Line 19404, "ComCtrls.pas" + 80) + $6
[00468579]{hfs.exe     } Menus.TPopupList.MainWndProc (Line 3374, "Menus.pas" + 2) + $8
[0042ABE8]{hfs.exe     } Classes.StdWndProc (Line 11572, "classes.pas" + 8) + $0
[0046C45C]{hfs.exe     } Controls.FindControl (Line 2103, "Controls.pas" + 6) + $C
[00494DFE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.ProcessMessage (Line 7670, "Forms.pas" + 23) + $4
[00494E43]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.HandleMessage (Line 7689, "Forms.pas" + 1) + $6
[004950DE]{hfs.exe     } Forms.TApplication.Run (Line 7773, "Forms.pas" + 16) + $3
[00569903]{hfs.exe     } hfs.hfs (Line 97, "" + 21) + $2
----------------------------------------------------------------
System   : Windows Server 2003 Enterprise, Version: 5.2, Build: ECE, "Service Pack 2"
Processor: AMD, AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+, 2790 MHz MMX
Display  : 1024x768 pixels, 32 bpp
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Product Versions

hfs.exe: Build: 0 8/11/2008 08:52:28

im now testing  beta 213 , thanks


Offline rejetto

  • Administrator
  • Tireless poster
  • *****
    • Posts: 13510
    • View Profile
You clicked a button called "Do error".
So, you got an error.
What else would you expect? ;)

I will remove this command in next version, because not needed anymore.